Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Sex and Relationships

Sarah Palin on Sex Ed

By Emily Douglas, RH Reality Check. Posted October 24, 2008.


The Alaska Governor seemingly reverses her stance on sex education.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In 2006, when asked whether she would support funding for "abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs," Sarah Palin wrote, "the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support."

In 2008, at the tail end of a vice-presidential campaign and now the mother of a pregnant 18-year-old: Palin tells People magazine, "[W]e have not been ones to say that students, should not know what preventive measures are all about ... When have I ever said that there should be no sex education taught in our homes or even in our schools?"

When asked by interviewer Sandra Sobieraj Westfall, "Abstinence or contraception?" Palin responds, "Well, both."

Palin even says, "I've been taken aback by some criticism that mainstream media has thrown my way saying, Oh, what a hypocrite she is and she's now learned her lesson because she's been against sex education in the schools. And I'm like, when? Where?"

Well, Sarah Palin, tell it to the Republican Party -- and tell your running mate, too.

John McCain has said "I think I support the President's policy" on sex ed.

The President's policy has been to shovel over $1 billion federal dollars at abstinence-only programs. The Republican Party, meanwhile, recently "renew[ed] our call for replacing family planning programs for teens with increased funding for abstinence education." They also, in case you thought there was an ambiguity, stated that they "oppose school-based clinics that provide referrals, counseling, and relative services for abortion and contraception."

And maybe Palin's religious right base should get a heads up, too -- after all, commenting on Bristol Palin's pregnancy, President of the National Abstinence Clearinghouse Leslee Unruh said, "Abstinence works. It works every single time ... Blaming sex education for the failures of people who make a mistake is not fair."

Here's the relevant portion of the People interview:



SW: Has this changed how you talk about sex with your other children?

SP: I've always been a proponent of making sure kids understand -- even in schools -- they'd better take preventative measures so that they don't find themselves in these less than ideal circumstances. Perhaps Bristol could be a good example to other young women that life happens and preventative measures are, first and foremost, the option that should be considered --

SW: Do you mean abstinence or contraception?

SP: Well, both. Ideally abstinence. But we have not been ones to say that students, should not know what preventive measures are all about. I've been taken aback by some criticism that mainstream media has thrown my way saying, Oh, what a hypocrite she is and she's now learned her lesson because she's been against sex education in the schools. And I'm like, when? Where? When have I ever said that there should be no sex education taught in our homes or even in our schools?

Palin also credits a "flexible schedule" for her ability to balance demanding public service jobs and a growing family. But Palin's running mate opposes expansion of the Family Medical Leave Act, which enables workers to take sick leave to care for family members, and doesn't think FMLA leave should be paid leave.


SW: As a new Grandma, it's going to be hard if you're in Washington and the new baby is going to be so far away --

SP: We've always had very flexible schedules --

TP: Very flexible schedules --

SP: -- and probably quite unconventional, but it's always worked and our family and our faith and those things that we so believe in comes first and we've always made this all work.

For the magazine spread, visit Mediabistro. The complete interview is here.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: abstinence, sex ed, sarah palin

Emily Douglas is the Assistant Editor at RH Reality Check.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Abstinence
Posted by: astudent on Oct 25, 2008 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Abstinence works. It works every single time ..."

Ah, yes. It worked wonderfully for the Virgin Mary, as I recall... Check me on this, didn't she abstain and still end up pregnant? Perhaps these Bible-thumpers should get out their Bibles and actually read them?!

As for Ms. Palin's idea that her pregnant daughter could serve as an example (cautionary tale?) to other young women, that just disgusts me. Doesn't that poor young woman have enough to worry about with the impending birth of her child and impending shotgun wedding? Why should she have to be a pawn for her despicable mother's political ambition? Of course, Ms. Palin's seeming "reversal" on comprehensive sex-ed might be because her daughter is an up-close-and-personal example of how well abstinence-only works!

Finally, if people think teaching abstinence-only sex-ed is the way to go, they obviously haven't looked at how "successful" it is. They also have no comprehension of the idea that forbidden fruit is the sweetest. They seem to indulge in willful ignorance, which proves better than anything else could just how stupid they are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Abstinence Posted by: Lilly
i think Astudent is right about sarah palin
Posted by: cherylsass123 on Oct 27, 2008 9:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
true, all one has got to do is take one look at her daughter, bristol, and well, anybody with half a brain would know that abstinence does NOT work . and about the "virgin" mary and how it never worked for her in the bible. there is a book that is guaranteed to ruin anybody's evangelical, " born again" christianity by robert w funk called ' honest to jesus' in it, he other bible scholars like elaine pagels, took a look back into who the historical jesus[ the man and jewish prophet, not that " god" figure as man many call " christ"] and far as the so called " virgin mary" goes, well? back then, long before modern, post 1970's medical in-vitro fertilization methods had been discovered and lesbian women could actually have a "virgin birth" ; this was IMPOSSIBLE!
rather, it is believed that yes, jesus of nazareth actually did have a father! it just was NOT joseph, mary's husband. among many theories by robert w. funk and elaine pagels; the most common historical one was that mary had sex with other men; possibly as a prostitute in order to earn money to put food on the family's table. many women did this back then, and well; they still do today especially in many of those poorer asian countries like vietnam. [ as well as here in urban/other places bound by american poverty]
as for both the " virgin birth" concept, as well as the " dying and rising to heaven god"; funk mentioned that this was a very common story back in the historical jesus' days! it was often used to describe important people in that ancient society, socrates,plato, aristotle; all were " born of a virgin mother" and " rose to heaven" when they died. same with the moslem's prophet, mohammed about 400 years later! [ www.honesttojesus.com may be the link, or just search Honest to Jesus]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement