Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Sex and Relationships

Why Relationship Sex Is Boring

By Esther Perel, Huffington Post. Posted October 22, 2008.


The very things that nurture love -- comfort, stability, safety -- can extinguish sexual desire.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

While the diversity in the couples I work with is infinite, one complaint rings true across all cultures: couples who describe themselves as loving, trusting and caring complain that their sex lives have become dull and devoid of eroticism.

Why is it that great sex so often fades for couples who claim to love each other as much as ever? Can we want what we already have? Why does good intimacy not guarantee great sex? Why is the forbidden erotic? Why does the transition to parenthood deliver such an erotic blow? And when we love what do we feel and when we desire how is it different?

These are some of the questions that occupied me when I set out to the nature of erotic desire in long-term relationships for my book Mating In Captivity: Reconciling the Erotic and the Domestic. I wanted to look at the obstacles and anxieties we experience when our quest for secure love clashes with our pursuit of passion.

After traveling to 20 countries in the last two years (the book has been translated into 25 languages), I kept wondering whatever happened to the generation that experienced the sexual revolution, or its beneficiaries, who have contraception in their hands, who can count on premarital sex as a given. They view sexual satisfaction as central to relational happiness, they can do what they want, and they have no desire to do it, or at least not at home.

It is commonly viewed that sexual problems are the result of relationship problems -- namely, lack of communication. Find out about the state of the union first; see how it manifests in the bedroom second. The premise is that if sexual problems are the consequence of the relationship, fix the relationship and the sex will follow.

In my experience, I'd helped many couples improve their relationship -- they felt closer, laughed together, they communicated more. But this did nothing for the bedroom. Emotional fulfillment does not necessarily translate to sexual excitement.

Sex is not a metaphor for a relationship, it's a parallel narrative. It speaks its own language. Love and desire are two different languages. We would like to think that they flow from each other. While love and desire relate, they also conflict. Love thrives in an atmosphere of reciprocity, protection , and congruence. Desire is more selfish. In fact, at times, the very elements that nurture love: comfort, stability, safety, for example, can extinguish desire.

Love seeks closeness, but desire needs space to thrive. Here's a question to illustrate my point.

"Tell me about a moment when you find yourself particularly drawn to your partner." All over the world, the answers resonate with a remarkable similarity.

When I seem him play sports ... When she's unaware I'm watching her ... When he is talking with friends ... When she's confidently speaking with a colleague ... When she's standing on the other side of a crowded room, and she smiles just for me ... When he's playing with the kids ... When he makes me laugh, when she surprises me ... When I watch him do something he is passionate about.

Whatever the answer, it is never without an element of distance. The separateness is accentuated and difference is magnified. We look across this distance and what we see is different than the view up close. We create a bridge of things unknown by making a perceptual shift, and it is on this bridge, in the space between each other, that we can meet and play with the erotic.

My work with couples is to illicit strivings, longing, and novelty -- to make interesting what is sufficiently available.

So how do we begin to better ourselves in the language of sex? First of all, stop thinking you're trying to improve "sex" -- it's a limiting definition, too enmeshed in mechanics, necessity and numbers. Think about improving your relationship with eroticism; if that's too big a leap, think play.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: sex, relationships, sexuality, desire

Esther Perel is a licensed marriage and family therapist who has spent half her life treating patients and the other half coaching, consulting and training for organizations and lay and professional audiences.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Illicit?
Posted by: ShaeSays on Oct 22, 2008 1:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Freudian slip?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Many Dollars, from the Sale of Books, is "Going to Feed a Hungry Person ....
Posted by: One American Lady on Oct 23, 2008 4:13 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Provide Housing, for the Homeless, Provide Medicine for a Sick Child, Provide Medical for a Dying Person??? "
How Many People's Lives, Were "Used as Examples, for this Book, to be Published, & THE PEOPLE... DIDN'T *REAP BENEFITS*.... & it's like the Oil Barons... someone got a Pocket Full of Money... & others, die.
One American Lady
Veterans Advocate

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Imagine This:
Posted by: One American Lady on Oct 23, 2008 4:18 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you, are LIVING WITHOUT:

*Enough Food

*a Roof over Your Head

*Lack of Resources to Pay a Heating / Air bill

*Without Health & Medical Insurance

*Without a Way to Wash Your Clothing, except by scrubbing them in a sink.

*Without Sufficient Medication, for the Infection that has taken over your body

*Without Good Health

IS THIS SUPPOSED TO LEAVE A PERSON, WITH A "FEELING FOR ... BEING INTIMATE".

MOST PEOPLE, DO NOT CHOOSE, TO *FEEL SEXUAL, WHEN THEIR WORLD IS FALLING DOWN AROUND THEM*.

Did you also, find this *in your travels, while you Made a Lot of Money, & Others, LIVE WITHOUT* ???
One American Lady
Veterans Advocate

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Monogamy Is Monotony
Posted by: Libertine on Oct 23, 2008 10:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the author pretty much hit the nail on the head.

I've found that once I get to know a partner completely and that there are no more surprises left, nothing new to learn about this woman, then boredom sets in and desire flies out the window and the sex becomes routine and mechanical. And all the sex books and new positions and new settings in the world don't change the fact that I'm having sex with the same old partner.

It's quite similar to what would happen if you decided to eat your favorite meal 3 meals a day, 365 days a year. What was once your favorite meal, quickly becomes "the same ol' thing", no longer anything special.

After a brief failed marriage in the 80s, I decided that marriage and monogamy were no longer for me, as it wouldn't be fair to me or to any woman I might marry. Since that time, my relationship/sex life is to have several "friends with benefits" relationships going concurrently, with the occasional one night stand thrown in for added variety. I live alone, maintaining my own space.

There's no domestic dailiness to kill the desire, living apart keeps us from knowing every small detail about one another, and having several relationships at once keeps excessive familiarity away longer. And when any one of these relationships runs its natural course(they typically run from one to five years), I tend to remain friends with them.

I only had the one child from the failed marriage and had no desire for more, so my life didn't upset the lives of children, as I've kept my relationship life separated from my role as a parent.

I can't advise anyone else how to conduct their lives, but I can say it works for me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sex is just sex. Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Sex is just sex. Posted by: Libertine
» Knee Jerk Response Posted by: Libertine
Monogamy goes against human nature
Posted by: nfamous on Oct 24, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Relationship sex is boring after it gets old. Humans are always looking for new experiences because they make us feel alive. They burn new gray matter in our brains. Doing the same thing over and over is an agonizing mental prison. It doesn't mean that you don't love your wife or girlfriend but it does mean you don't enjoy sex with her anymore. There are only so many new things you can try with the same person. Men, and women too, are re-invigorated with sex with someone new. It varies your mundane routine like driving to work a different way. Humans are ruled by our brains. Why would we not want to do what makes us feel good? The opposite behavior is suicidal. I view illegal drugs in very much the same light. They make us feel good but when we get too much of them they are no longer as effective.

Love has nothing to do with sex, regardless of how women interpret their fluctuating hormonal emotions. Men should be free to be married and have sex at the same time as long as they practice safe sex. I bet that the divorce rate would plummet if humans would just admit the truth about ourselves and jettison these silly religious traditions. I'm not saying that families are not useful to society. I'm only saying that we need to redefine them to what works in modern society. Obviously what we have no doesn't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Needed My Space (But Didn't Know It)
Posted by: popeurbanxxiii on Oct 24, 2008 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My wife took out her own apartment to be closer to her work. We own a house and it's just not a great time to be selling it, so I'm living in it.

We had fallen into most of the marriage traps Dr. Perkel writes of in her book. The passions had cooled, and the sex was infrequent and mostly boring. We had even discussed making the split permanent. We agreed we were free to see other people.

The thing that made me desirable again to my wife was her seeing that I was desirable to other women. The summer before this last one was quite a summer for me. I was dating two women and still seeing my wife, mostly on weekends. My sexual desire came roaring back -- big time. I could even put away the little blue pills. The hunger and desire returned to my wife. The biggest turn-on for me is to see that desire in her eyes.

I've dropped the other two women, but I have no particular desire to have my wife move back in. We have kept up the intensity by maintaining the space. We've gotten a lot more sexually exploratory. We discuss openly what we desire, what we like, and what is "not so much".

Dr. Perkel says that for desire to burn, there has to be a bit of separation. I give that notion a hearty "Huzzah!" Too much closeness can take the air out of the room and smother the fire.

The experience has shown me that I really do love my wife and I can still lust after her like some horn-dog teenager after all these years (We've been together now for almost twenty years). I feel twenty years younger. I feel vital and alive. A good sex life adds so much to your feeling of well being. The past two years has been (unexpectedly) one of the high points of my life.

I set out with one set of expectations and was very pleasantly surprised when those expectations never manifested. What I got was much better than what I expected. I am exclusive again with my wife and I don't expect that to be changing.

What works for me is not a prescription for everybody. Communication and intimacy are important, but I can truthfully testify, it is absolutely no guarantee of a satisfying sex life. They do indeed exist in their own separate, but somewhat overlapping realms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

open marriage
Posted by: CJC on Oct 25, 2008 12:09 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WE have an open marriage, that is we occasionally have sex with other people together or apart. There is nothing boring about it especially when everyone is open and honest about what is going on. There are no affairs or cheating on any side of it. It is not for everyone, but it sure beats eating the same meal 3 times a day or lying to a significant other. Sure there are risks, but what in life doesn't? As for the morals factor, we define what is moral, so please don't give me the God, Jesus talk. WE don't buy it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Legalize pologamy
Posted by: Landbaron on Oct 26, 2008 12:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It works in other countries when 2 or 3 brothers might marry one woman or visversa. Could have a lot of advantages. No real jealousy since the offspring's would be related. Now that gays are allowed to marry, it might not be that far off. But the conservatives can't mind their own business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a load of immoral claptrap
Posted by: Andrew_S on Oct 27, 2008 3:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the author basically say's she humped her way around 20 countries, to realize she has something that is a good time getter. A minority regard sex as laizez fair intelligent choice, most regard it as a compliment to personal security. In addition to an investment in a human future. Lord help us if the personal beliefs of this person have any merit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not here
Posted by: sanity on Oct 27, 2008 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regardless of the merits of the ideas in this article, it is pieces like this that prevent Alternet from being a better website.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Men want a sexy figure
Posted by: antonius116 on Oct 27, 2008 2:22 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many married men I know have become dissappointed in their wives because they no longer have a sexy figure. What's a man supposed to do about that? Should he become the antithesis of a feminist and divorce her because he's no longer satisfied by her sexual figure? Many would find that low and selfish. Many women think the "love" in their relationship should satisfy the man during sex, when it doesn't. Their wives are comfortable with them too. Their husbands satisfy them sexually because they still value their physique and work to keep it, meanwhile these men are frustrated because their wives don't. If they go look elsewhere for sex, is that selfish? Is it selfish to want to go and have sex with a more physically beautiful woman?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Men want a sexy figure Posted by: sureshot45
» RE: Men want a sexy figure Posted by: antonius116
» RE: Men want a sexy figure Posted by: sureshot45
No conservative talking points aloud
Posted by: xtine on Oct 29, 2008 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems that the only 'evidence' the author has for her theory (other than anecdotal client tales) is that when asked what makes people feel drawn to their partner, it is some kind of distance. But I think those answers could be interpreted in many different ways. You will naturally feel more drawn if you are not already there. I believe that love and sex are deeply intertwined, and that we can choose who we love and how.

The studies I have read show that married people report being happier with their sex lives than singles do by a significant majority. If marriage were really that terrible, people wouldn't do it and gays wouldn't want to do it, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Monogamy is a Form of Incest
Posted by: DrSBMason on Nov 13, 2008 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Evolutionary Psychology 101:

Because of our large brains, humans must be born before they are completely formed. For this reason, Mother Nature arranged for sexual attraction to last a couple of years or - in other words - until the child is easily managed by a single parent and a reasonably cooperative society. The male is then free to spread his seed while the female is once again ready to search out a healthy male. Continue living together and sexual attraction dies because the couple comes to approximate brother and sister...and Mother nature hates incest. It's really a very simple system that evolved in answer to the problem of a big head and a small pelvis. Problems arise when a priest/politician class creates lists of selfserving sins/laws as a means of maintaining their power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement