Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

New Poll: Parents Overwhelmingly Support Age-Appropriate Sex Ed

By Scott Swenson, RH Reality Check. Posted October 5, 2008.


Political leaders are nervous about supporting comprehensive sex education in schools. But it may be a bigger political liability not to.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

A new poll of parents' attitudes toward age-appropriate comprehensive sex education underscores why there has been an overwhelming rejection of attacks Sen. John McCain made against Sen. Barack Obama for supporting common sense legislation to protect youth in Illinois. Teen pregnancy has also been thrust into the campaign with Sarah Palin's unwed 17-year-old pregnant daughter, so parents all over the country have been thinking and talking more about important issues involving sex education.

The new poll of parents in Washington, DC, the city with the highest rates of HIV and rising rates of STDs, shows an overwhelming 93 percent of parents support teaching age-appropriate comprehensive sex ed that includes information about abstinence and prevention methods like contraception in public and charter schools. By contrast, abstinence-only-until-marriage programs favored by the Bush Administration and supported by far-right ideologues, do not equip children at any age with facts about contraception or other medical facts. By law, they can only promote abstinence-only-until-marriage. The federal government spends $1.5 billion tax dollars on abstinence-only programs even though multiple independent studies have proven they do not work.

Adam Tenner, executive director of Metro TeenAIDS, who sponsored the poll along with the DC Healthy Youth Coalition, said, "there are deep myths about who supports and who does not support sex education that begins with abstinence but includes contraception, disease prevention skills and information on what kind of regular care people need once they are sexually active. This poll certainly shatters many of those myths."

Metro TeenAIDS and the DC Healthy Youth Coalition sponsored the study to make certain parents voices were heard as DC schools prepare to implement new health education curricula mandated by the State Board of Education for healthy learning. Questions were asked of a representative sample of 652 parents in Washington, DC. The survey was conducted by Zogby International, who has also done survey work for the National Abstinence Education Association, special interest lobbyists comprised of organizations that profit from abstinence-only-until-marriage programs and lobby against comprehensive sex education. The abstinence-only-until-marriage lobby, working with obstructionist social conservatives in Congress, prevented cuts to their failed programs even after Democrats regained a majority in 2006.

Tenner said, "elected political leaders, conservative or not, are nervous about supporting comprehensive sex education in schools."

One of the biggest myths about age-appropriate comprehensive sex ed is that it promotes promiscuity, when in actuality programs have proven to delay sexual debut, and equip youth with a healthy sense of respect for their bodies, their emotions and their partners. Most importantly, comprehensive sex ed equips youth with medical facts so that if and when they become sexually active, they can protect themselves.

"At the end of the day, what we all agree on is that we want young people to remain abstinent for as long as possible and that when they choose to have sex that they have the knowledge and information and self-worth to protect themselves from HIV, other sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy. And HIV does not exist in a vacuum. Poverty, poor schools, dangerous neighborhoods all play their part," Tenner said.

The survey defined "age-appropriate" by saying, "For the following questions, when we mention 'age appropriate', we mean education that is suitable for the age and maturity of each student at each grade level." In most school districts this means providing a sense of "good touch/bad touch" in the younger years to protect children from predators, then adding other medically factual lessons about human sexuality as students mature.

The poll indicates that 81 percent of African-American parents who attend church once a week or more, and 85 percent of those who identify as Evangelical Christians, support age-appropriate comprehensive sex education. Studies done in Catholic schools of age-appropriate K-12 sex ed demonstrate its effectiveness.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: teens, sexuality, public opinion, parents, sex ed

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Tell Children The Truth
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 5, 2008 12:14 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When parents are messed up with alcohol or other drugs, or when the father is jealous of his son, or the mother is jealous of her daughter, or when both parents are too ignorant, how can the children grow up learning how to be good lovers and responsible parents? They can't, because church dogma indicates sex is evil and most public schools are intimidated by church influence. The result is the children of Western nations are often poorly informed, inept, confused and liable to fall into neurotic or psychotic behavior. Thus, age-sensitive sex education in the public schools is long overdue, but hopefully not too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tell Children The Truth Posted by: Lilykins
Ah, sweet reason
Posted by: BlueTigress on Oct 6, 2008 12:22 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No matter how "hip" or "cool" parents want to be, there is still a profound discomfort with talking about their kids about sex.

Just make sure the instructors are trained to deal with the kids who are trying to rattle them - unlike what I had.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Then let them
Posted by: rickiey on Oct 7, 2008 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Parents Overwhelmingly Support Age-Appropriate Sex Ed

You are darn straight they do. And I am one of them. Thats why I've made sure that my kids have received age-appropriate sex ed. How did I make sure?

I gave it to them.

Have you READ the non abstinence only curriculum?

It sucks.

Sex ed is another thing that the government is unqualified to do, and shouldn't be involved in. Parents are the only ones that can do it, and do it right.

It is neither the role, nor the responsibility of government to take over parenting responsibilities "in case of bad parents". (For all of you who are going to say "some religious freaks simply won't do it).

And yes, it is an uncomfortable discussion. So? Parents do many, many, many things that are "uncomfortable".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Then let them Posted by: Lilykins
» RE: Then let them Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Then let them Posted by: Lilykins
Honestly
Posted by: distancebiker23 on Oct 16, 2008 10:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I went to a school that had forty-two pregnancies a year. We had the safe-sex education class, but it hardly improved the schools numbers in STDs of sexually active teenagers. I know it works in other schools, but we have to keep in mind that it won't work if the kid is going home to a place where quite the opposite takes place. Many of the girls who were sexually active there told me they thought it had been ok because their parents had said it was ok and that's just how it was in the family. I guess what I'm trying to say is, don't expect to get results with some people, but offer them the information. Abstinence-only doesn't work when half the kids in the room are sexually active and at least one is pregnant. It just won't work.
Not really intending to take a jab at Palin, but I find it bewildering that she can preach abstinence-only when it obviously didn't work for her daughter. To saegway a bit, if McCain wins, which I pray to a non-higher being that doesn't happen and am using my vote for the first time to do so, Palin will outlaw abortion. And mark my words, people will keep getting pregnant, and countless women will die because of poor or dirty abortions in the black market. And her abstinence program will only augment that market. We need to keep kids educated, give women choice, and let things develop from there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]