SEX & RELATIONSHIPS  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 10

New Poll: Parents Overwhelmingly Support Age-Appropriate Sex Ed

Political leaders are nervous about supporting comprehensive sex education in schools. But it may be a bigger political liability not to.
October 5, 2008  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Sex & Relationships headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
A new poll of parents' attitudes toward age-appropriate comprehensive sex education underscores why there has been an overwhelming rejection of attacks Sen. John McCain made against Sen. Barack Obama for supporting common sense legislation to protect youth in Illinois. Teen pregnancy has also been thrust into the campaign with Sarah Palin's unwed 17-year-old pregnant daughter, so parents all over the country have been thinking and talking more about important issues involving sex education.

The new poll of parents in Washington, DC, the city with the highest rates of HIV and rising rates of STDs, shows an overwhelming 93 percent of parents support teaching age-appropriate comprehensive sex ed that includes information about abstinence and prevention methods like contraception in public and charter schools. By contrast, abstinence-only-until-marriage programs favored by the Bush Administration and supported by far-right ideologues, do not equip children at any age with facts about contraception or other medical facts. By law, they can only promote abstinence-only-until-marriage. The federal government spends $1.5 billion tax dollars on abstinence-only programs even though multiple independent studies have proven they do not work.

Adam Tenner, executive director of Metro TeenAIDS, who sponsored the poll along with the DC Healthy Youth Coalition, said, "there are deep myths about who supports and who does not support sex education that begins with abstinence but includes contraception, disease prevention skills and information on what kind of regular care people need once they are sexually active. This poll certainly shatters many of those myths."

Metro TeenAIDS and the DC Healthy Youth Coalition sponsored the study to make certain parents voices were heard as DC schools prepare to implement new health education curricula mandated by the State Board of Education for healthy learning. Questions were asked of a representative sample of 652 parents in Washington, DC. The survey was conducted by Zogby International, who has also done survey work for the National Abstinence Education Association, special interest lobbyists comprised of organizations that profit from abstinence-only-until-marriage programs and lobby against comprehensive sex education. The abstinence-only-until-marriage lobby, working with obstructionist social conservatives in Congress, prevented cuts to their failed programs even after Democrats regained a majority in 2006.

Tenner said, "elected political leaders, conservative or not, are nervous about supporting comprehensive sex education in schools."

One of the biggest myths about age-appropriate comprehensive sex ed is that it promotes promiscuity, when in actuality programs have proven to delay sexual debut, and equip youth with a healthy sense of respect for their bodies, their emotions and their partners. Most importantly, comprehensive sex ed equips youth with medical facts so that if and when they become sexually active, they can protect themselves.

"At the end of the day, what we all agree on is that we want young people to remain abstinent for as long as possible and that when they choose to have sex that they have the knowledge and information and self-worth to protect themselves from HIV, other sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy. And HIV does not exist in a vacuum. Poverty, poor schools, dangerous neighborhoods all play their part," Tenner said.

The survey defined "age-appropriate" by saying, "For the following questions, when we mention 'age appropriate', we mean education that is suitable for the age and maturity of each student at each grade level." In most school districts this means providing a sense of "good touch/bad touch" in the younger years to protect children from predators, then adding other medically factual lessons about human sexuality as students mature.

The poll indicates that 81 percent of African-American parents who attend church once a week or more, and 85 percent of those who identify as Evangelical Christians, support age-appropriate comprehensive sex education. Studies done in Catholic schools of age-appropriate K-12 sex ed demonstrate its effectiveness.

Tenner noted that the faith community is playing an important role in DC and increasing their understanding of how to deal with issues of sexuality. "Many churches, mosques and synagogues have had AIDS ministries for many years in order to support their congregants who were sick with HIV/AIDS. At Metro TeenAIDS we have recently seen an increase in the number of local churches who are also interested in how to integrate prevention messages into their work with youth. When we ask young people in classes, 'how many of you know someone in your family or your family's friends that has died or is living with HIV/AIDS,' generally 50-60% of hands go up."

The findings as reported by Metro TeenAIDS and the DC Healthy Youth Coalition (PDF)


Finding 1: Regardless of race, the majority of DC parents are concerned with the growing prevalence of HIV and STDs in the District, and believe that preventing unintended pregnancies and HIV begins with comprehensive sex education.


  • Parents polled were nearly unanimous (98%) in their concern about the rates of HIV and STDs in Washington, DC.
  • Almost all (93%) of the parents polled think that preventing unintended pregnancies and HIV begins with comprehensive sex education that includes information on refraining from sex.


Finding 2: Parents believe that DC schools are responsible for teaching their children age-appropriate HIV preventions and sex education, and that the role of parents is to provide their children with moral and ethical guidance.


  • The large majority of parents polled (83%) believe that DC schools are responsible for teaching their children age-appropriate HIV prevention and sex education.
  • Parents polled see a clear difference between their role and the role of the school in terms of teaching students about sex. Nine out of ten parents (90%) said that, while they are responsible for providing their children with moral and ethical guidance, schools are responsible for teaching the children age-appropriate HIV prevention and sex education. Parents also expressed belief that schools are more effective in providing the biological and scientific aspects of sex education.


Finding 3: Regardless of their race or level of religious practice, DC parents strongly believe that comprehensive sex education that emphasizes abstinence but also teaches about contraception needs to be taught in schools. Parents also want to be informed about what their children are learning in school.


  • The large majority (83%) of all parents strongly agree that DC schools should ensure that every young person receives all the information he or she needs to make responsible health-related decisions.
  • Similarly, 85% of parents believe that HIV education is important and that it needs to be included in all grades (K-12). There were no statistically significant difference in response between African American and other parents.
  • Among African American parents who attend their place of worship once a week or more, 81% believe that age-appropriate HIV prevention and sex education is important. For African American parents who identified as "evangelical" Christians, 85% believe that age-appropriate sex education is important in their child's K-12 education.
  • 98% of parents agreed that the schools should have clear guidelines for sex and HIV prevention education, and that those guidelines should be available to parents.
  • Parents also indicated that they would like more resources to help them talk to their children about sex. Three out of four parents (75%) report interest in receiving training on how to better communicate with their kids about sex and HIV/AIDS.


Finding 4: Nearly all parents agree that youth should receive HIV prevention and sex education before they begin having sex, with the majority of parents indicating that this education should begin in 6th grade or earlier.


  • Almost all parents (96.5%) believe that sex education should occur before youth are sexually active. Local data from the 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Survey shows that 30.6% of students in middle school stated that they have already had sex and 10,0% said they first had sex before the age of 11.
  • A majority of parents polled (77%) believe that schools should first begin to teach HIV prevention and sex education in 6th grade or earlier.
  • Overwhelmingly, 83% of African American parents polled agree that age-appropriate information about condoms and birth control should be given once lessons on puberty have started.



Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Sex & Relationships headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: teens, sexuality, public opinion, parents, sex ed


Comments are closed-

Tell Children The Truth
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 5, 2008 12:14 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When parents are messed up with alcohol or other drugs, or when the father is jealous of his son, or the mother is jealous of her daughter, or when both parents are too ignorant, how can the children grow up learning how to be good lovers and responsible parents? They can't, because church dogma indicates sex is evil and most public schools are intimidated by church influence. The result is the children of Western nations are often poorly informed, inept, confused and liable to fall into neurotic or psychotic behavior. Thus, age-sensitive sex education in the public schools is long overdue, but hopefully not too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tell Children The Truth Posted by: Lilykins

Comments are closed-

Ah, sweet reason
Posted by: BlueTigress on Oct 6, 2008 12:22 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No matter how "hip" or "cool" parents want to be, there is still a profound discomfort with talking about their kids about sex.

Just make sure the instructors are trained to deal with the kids who are trying to rattle them - unlike what I had.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Then let them
Posted by: rickiey on Oct 7, 2008 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Parents Overwhelmingly Support Age-Appropriate Sex Ed

You are darn straight they do. And I am one of them. Thats why I've made sure that my kids have received age-appropriate sex ed. How did I make sure?

I gave it to them.

Have you READ the non abstinence only curriculum?

It sucks.

Sex ed is another thing that the government is unqualified to do, and shouldn't be involved in. Parents are the only ones that can do it, and do it right.

It is neither the role, nor the responsibility of government to take over parenting responsibilities "in case of bad parents". (For all of you who are going to say "some religious freaks simply won't do it).

And yes, it is an uncomfortable discussion. So? Parents do many, many, many things that are "uncomfortable".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Then let them Posted by: Lilykins
» RE: Then let them Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Then let them Posted by: Lilykins

Comments are closed-

Honestly
Posted by: distancebiker23 on Oct 16, 2008 10:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I went to a school that had forty-two pregnancies a year. We had the safe-sex education class, but it hardly improved the schools numbers in STDs of sexually active teenagers. I know it works in other schools, but we have to keep in mind that it won't work if the kid is going home to a place where quite the opposite takes place. Many of the girls who were sexually active there told me they thought it had been ok because their parents had said it was ok and that's just how it was in the family. I guess what I'm trying to say is, don't expect to get results with some people, but offer them the information. Abstinence-only doesn't work when half the kids in the room are sexually active and at least one is pregnant. It just won't work.
Not really intending to take a jab at Palin, but I find it bewildering that she can preach abstinence-only when it obviously didn't work for her daughter. To saegway a bit, if McCain wins, which I pray to a non-higher being that doesn't happen and am using my vote for the first time to do so, Palin will outlaw abortion. And mark my words, people will keep getting pregnant, and countless women will die because of poor or dirty abortions in the black market. And her abstinence program will only augment that market. We need to keep kids educated, give women choice, and let things develop from there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Tell Children The Truth
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 5, 2008 12:14 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When parents are messed up with alcohol or other drugs, or when the father is jealous of his son, or the mother is jealous of her daughter, or when both parents are too ignorant, how can the children grow up learning how to be good lovers and responsible parents? They can't, because church dogma indicates sex is evil and most public schools are intimidated by church influence. The result is the children of Western nations are often poorly informed, inept, confused and liable to fall into neurotic or psychotic behavior. Thus, age-sensitive sex education in the public schools is long overdue, but hopefully not too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tell Children The Truth Posted by: Lilykins

Comments are closed-

Ah, sweet reason
Posted by: BlueTigress on Oct 6, 2008 12:22 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No matter how "hip" or "cool" parents want to be, there is still a profound discomfort with talking about their kids about sex.

Just make sure the instructors are trained to deal with the kids who are trying to rattle them - unlike what I had.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Then let them
Posted by: rickiey on Oct 7, 2008 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Parents Overwhelmingly Support Age-Appropriate Sex Ed

You are darn straight they do. And I am one of them. Thats why I've made sure that my kids have received age-appropriate sex ed. How did I make sure?

I gave it to them.

Have you READ the non abstinence only curriculum?

It sucks.

Sex ed is another thing that the government is unqualified to do, and shouldn't be involved in. Parents are the only ones that can do it, and do it right.

It is neither the role, nor the responsibility of government to take over parenting responsibilities "in case of bad parents". (For all of you who are going to say "some religious freaks simply won't do it).

And yes, it is an uncomfortable discussion. So? Parents do many, many, many things that are "uncomfortable".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Then let them Posted by: Lilykins
» RE: Then let them Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Then let them Posted by: Lilykins

Comments are closed-

Honestly
Posted by: distancebiker23 on Oct 16, 2008 10:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I went to a school that had forty-two pregnancies a year. We had the safe-sex education class, but it hardly improved the schools numbers in STDs of sexually active teenagers. I know it works in other schools, but we have to keep in mind that it won't work if the kid is going home to a place where quite the opposite takes place. Many of the girls who were sexually active there told me they thought it had been ok because their parents had said it was ok and that's just how it was in the family. I guess what I'm trying to say is, don't expect to get results with some people, but offer them the information. Abstinence-only doesn't work when half the kids in the room are sexually active and at least one is pregnant. It just won't work.
Not really intending to take a jab at Palin, but I find it bewildering that she can preach abstinence-only when it obviously didn't work for her daughter. To saegway a bit, if McCain wins, which I pray to a non-higher being that doesn't happen and am using my vote for the first time to do so, Palin will outlaw abortion. And mark my words, people will keep getting pregnant, and countless women will die because of poor or dirty abortions in the black market. And her abstinence program will only augment that market. We need to keep kids educated, give women choice, and let things develop from there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS