Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Sex and Relationships

Why Prostitution Should Be Decriminalized

By Rita Nakashima Brock, On The Issues Magazine. Posted October 3, 2008.


The decriminalization of prostitution is one feminist strategy for helping women lead better lives.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In the mid-1990s, Asian feminists concerned about the sexual exploitation of children and women and the growing epidemic of HIV/AIDS urged Susan Thistlethwaite and me to write a book about the sex industry. We traveled to six Asian countries and to major cities in the U.S., interviewing sex workers, anti-prostitution activists, government officials, medical personnel, social workers, brothel owners, members of the military, religious leaders and even a few customers to write Casting Stones: Prostitution and Liberation in Asia and the United States.

We did not expect to advocate for decriminalization, but that is where our research led us.

Moral Judgments Interfere

Many find sex work morally repugnant, but similar assessments could be made of other forms of work, such as the nuclear arms industry. Moral arguments that frame prostitution as sexual immorality see it from the perspective of its customers, and this focus on sex tends to make the subject religiously radioactive. (Editor's Note: See "Casting Stones: The Theology of Prostitution" by Brock in the Summer 1997 On The Issues Magazine.)

Judgment is cast, not on the customers seeking sex, who are often respectable family men and community leaders, but on those who provide services to them. Sex workers, on the other hand, see what they do as business, and most seek to collect their fees with as little sexual performance as is necessary. They separate their work from their own private relationships, as many workers do. Seeing prostitution as sexual immorality, rather than as business, maintains the gaze of the privileged with power and marginalizes the most vulnerable and visible in the system.

Decriminalization Recognizes Consenting Adults

Decriminalization is no panacea for fixing the worst aspects of sex work, but it is a step in the right direction. In contrast to legalization, a system we call "the state as pimp," decriminalization prevents the state from prosecuting adults for consensual, nonviolent sexual activity, whether or not money is exchanged.

Laws already prohibit nonconsensual violent sex, as well as slavery, human trafficking, sex with a minor, rape, assault, extortion and robbery. Criminalization makes prosecuting major crimes against sex workers more difficult and the work more dangerous.

New Zealand, a country that has long had women at top levels of government leadership, passed the Prostitution Reform Act of 2003, or the PRA, which decriminalized sex work. Controversial at the time -- the PRA passed by one vote -- opponents have failed at repeal efforts.

A thorough 2008 study of the short-term impact of the PRA concluded:

(T)he sex industry has not increased in size, and many of the social evils predicted by some who opposed the decriminalisation of the sex industry have not been experienced. On the whole, the PRA has been effective in achieving its purpose, and the Committee is confident that the vast majority of people involved in the sex industry are better off under the PRA than they were previously.
The study identified areas that still needed work, such as the impact on neighborhoods of street solicitation and coercion of sex workers to take customers against their will.

Rejecting Benevolent Paternalism

In reaching our conclusions, Sue and I followed a basic feminist liberation principle: those most vulnerable and negatively impacted by an exploitive system must be respected and listened to carefully as experts with knowledge gained from experience. Benevolent paternalism, as well meaning as it may be, is still a way for those in power to deny it to those they seek to help and to impose their view of the world on others.

Sex workers should be in leadership in any movement intended to make their lives better. Their agency over their own lives must be enhanced, even when we disagree with their choices. We followed this principle in writing Casting Stones, and it led us to conclude that decriminalization is one feminist strategy for helping women lead better lives.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: feminism, prostitution, decriminalization

Rev. Rita Nakashima Brock, Ph.D., is Senior Editor in Religion at The New Press and co-author of Casting Stones: Prostitution and Liberation in Asia and the United States, which won the Associated Catholic Press Gender Studies Award in 1996. She is a board member of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice and a former director of the Radcliffe Fellowship Program at Harvard University.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Prostitution should be legal
Posted by: vasumurti on Oct 4, 2008 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prostitution should be legal. Someone once commented that using attractive women in advertising--magazines, billboards, etc. (what to speak of women stripping, working in topless bars or merely posing nude!) is a subtle form of prostitution--women using their bodies for income.

Tracy Clark-Flory writes in Salon.com:

"At $25-$30 per hour, prostitutes make approximately four times what they likely would outside of the sex industry. Of course, that doesn't take into consideration on-the-job risks like contracting an STD (condoms were used in only a quarter of dealings) or being assaulted; researchers estimate that sex workers are assaulted an average of once a month. There's also the threat of being arrested, but according to the Economist, 'Prostitutes are more likely to have sex with a police officer than to be arrested by one.'"

Problems such as contracting STDs, being assaulted, pimp violence, etc. would not exist if prostitution were legal. Prostitution was legal in ancient India for the same reason the Prohibition of alcohol failed in the United States.

Commenting on Srimad Bhagavatam 1.11.19, A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami writes:

"By tricks of chance, one may be obliged to adopt a profession which is not very adorable in society...even in those days, about five thousand years ago, there were prostitutes in a city like Dwarka...This means that prostitutes are necessary citizens for the proper upkeep of society. The government opens wine shops, but this does not mean that the government encourages the drinking of wine. The idea is that there is a class of men who will drink at any cost, and it has been experienced that prohibition in great cities encouraged illicit smuggling of wine.

"Similarly, men who are not satisfied at home require such concessions...It is better that prostitutes be available in the marketplace so that the sanctity of society can be maintained."

Even some conservatives concede that prostitution can be victimless. In a 1995 column entitled "Prostitution as a Privacy Right," Robert Craig Paul, a syndicated columnist for the Washington Times, wrote:

"If a woman's right to control the use of her reproductive organs permits her to enter into a cash transaction with an abortionist, then how can this fundamental right of privacy not apply to other transactions involving her use of her body?

"...abortion has been against the law and restricted with greater intensity for more of our history than prostitution, reflecting social norms that abortion, viewed as infanticide, is more immoral than prostitution...

"In contrast (to abortion), prostitution is entirely an act between consenting parties that does not affect the bodily integrity, identity and destiny of a third party (the unborn)...

"It is legal nonsense that privacy conveys the right to abort, but not the right to ingest drugs or engage in sodomy...

"It will be interesting to watch the court sort out on the basis of Roe v. Wade why it is legal for a woman to contract for abortion but not prostitution."

Again, prostitution should be legal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prostitution should not be legalized or decriminalized!!
Posted by: Landbaron on Oct 4, 2008 11:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want to see pimps and johns beat these women and take all their money, seeing them robbed and beaten and afraid to go to the police, in constant fear of "street cleaners" -a la Gary Ridgeway- and all the rest of us "moral majority" that keep it from being legalized or decriminalized.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is a better solution
Posted by: Cruella on Oct 4, 2008 6:19 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's called the Swedish Model.

It seems pretty obvious to me that paying money for sex is an abuse of the whole notion of consent. I mean once you've paid for "one unit" of sex - what exactly does that entail? How much pain, displeasure and discomfort are you allowed to continue through for the fee offered?

And we know practically that the sex industry is rife with abuse, trafficking, rape and murder and that a majority of women in the industry are there under one form of duress or another.

At the same time obviously criminalising the women involved has little effect - largely because as I've mentioned most are there under duress. However the other side of the equation - demand - is much more elastic. So you criminalise visiting prostitutes and thus kill off demand for trafficked and abused women.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:Is it a solution? Posted by: ZPaul
How do you argue the "spreading diseases" part?
Posted by: Landbaron on Oct 4, 2008 8:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's what a cop said to a john while being arrested. We don't need more stress on our health care system but the government could sure use the tax revenue now...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not the world's oldest profession for nothing
Posted by: ZPaul on Oct 5, 2008 10:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think it is realistic to think you can eliminate prostitution with prohibition. Nobody wants their daughter to become a prostitute, of course. But I don't think prohibition is going to eliminate it.
I don't think there is a "perfect answer" to this problem. If you punish the prostitutes, that's not right, of course. But I daresay that punishing the customers of the prostitutes is something which the (perfectly legal)prostitutes of Sweden do NOT want, because it is clearly a way of reducing their volume of business, hence reducing their income, which I'm sure they see as another way of prohibiting their activity. The Swedish formula, in my view, is NOT the solution; I don't know if there is a "perfect solution". To say: "It's legal for a person to offer and accept sex for money, but it's illegal for a person to buy it" doesn't seem to be quite right to me.

As I say, we are talking about the world's oldest profession. Practically speaking, if this profession were within the realm of legality, (thus taking it outside the absolute control of the Mafias) it could be controlled better in terms of abuse and health conditions. Between prostitutes having to work for abusive Mafias, as opposed to working protected by the law and with their source of income protected too, in addition to better control of health conditions, I see the latter as preferable, as it may give some prostitutes, the ones who work for the Mafias, hope to get out of the trap some of these Mafias have them in.

I don't really see prohibition as a real solution of any kind. I think it may well It make us feel more righteous to say that, but I think there will continue to be prostitution as there has been since time immemorial.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not the world's oldest profession for nothing
Posted by: ZPaul on Oct 5, 2008 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think it is realistic to think you can eliminate prostitution with prohibition. Nobody wants their daughter to become a prostitute, of course. But I don't think prohibition is going to eliminate it.
I don't think there is a "perfect answer" to this problem. If you punish the prostitutes, that's not right, of course. But I daresay that punishing the customers of the prostitutes is something which the (perfectly legal)prostitutes of Sweden do NOT want, because it is clearly a way of reducing their volume of business, hence reducing their income, which I'm sure they see as another way of prohibiting their activity. The Swedish formula, in my view, is NOT the solution; I don't know if there is a "perfect solution". To say: "It's legal for a person to offer sex in exchange for money, but it's illegal for a person to buy it" doesn't seem to be quite right to me.

As I say, we are talking about the world's oldest profession. Practically speaking, if this profession were within the realm of legality, (thus taking it outside the absolute control of the Mafias) it could be controlled better in terms of abuse and health conditions. Between prostitutes having to work for abusive Mafias, as opposed to working protected by the law and with their source of income protected too, in addition to better control of health conditions, I see the latter as preferable, as it may give some prostitutes, the ones who work for the Mafias, hope to get out of the trap some of these Mafias have them in.

I don't really see prohibition as a real solution of any kind. I think it may well It make us feel more righteous to say that, but I think there will continue to be prostitution as there has been since time immemorial.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No it's not. Posted by: susnow
Street cleaners never get the death penalty....
Posted by: Landbaron on Oct 5, 2008 11:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but if you rape and kill just one woman from a respectable family you'll probably get the death penalty. So as long as we outlaw this trade, these woman will be sub-human creatures. So much for the brotherhood or sisterhood of mankind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What rather surprises me about this thread....
Posted by: ZPaul on Oct 5, 2008 4:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What rather surprises me about this thread is that, as important as this subject is, there has been so little response to it. It's a subject that merits serious study, IMO. Study of the realities of prostitution. A prostitute is a person who, like the rest of us, has to make a living somehow. As I stated above, I believe it is not realistic to expect to change the lot of prostitutes through prohibition, either of prostitute practicing this profession or of their customers soliciting and using their services. The reality is that prostitution exists, and it will continue to exist. At least those practicing it should be able to make a decent living. They need some kind of economic stability or hope of it in order to even think about doing anything else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prostitution is a hotel, Marriage a mortgage.
Posted by: o on Oct 6, 2008 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
seems to me that the only difference is the time limit. at least in traditional matrimony. Love, honor, obey?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Author behind the times
Posted by: Andrew_S on Oct 6, 2008 12:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The business of prositution is as old as time itself. Making mass commerce of it is no new concept. Perhaps the author instead of attempting to regurgitate jeuvenile thinking and realities, should take a greyhound bus trip to Nevada. Then study what is effective policy and law already. What does the author demand, that corpus inflagranti become the mainstream and federal law, well too late. The deed is done by proxy and consent. Females in law are state chattel and legal imbeciles. The very law to change and enforce this is also the patriarchy that espouses the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Author is right on time. Posted by: susnow
» RE: Author is right on time. Posted by: Andrew_S
It's easier to accept prostitution...
Posted by: davmills on Oct 8, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... if you can accept the fact that what adults do in private is entirely their business. And most prostitution occurs consensually and on the q.t. Thus, it should be decriminalized.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Concensually !
Posted by: Andrew_S on Oct 9, 2008 1:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a foolish statement, most prostitution is not concentual, it is economic or coerced. The fact that our esteemed female gender appropriates the sexuality issue as theirs alone, is again a crock of egyptian nipple juice. Females have an additional asset above males that makes the business of barter easier is a fact of life. I doubt either your sincerity in the statement, but do vouch for your indoctrination.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Concensually ! Posted by: davmills
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement