Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

Sex and Religion: Not Just a History of Repression

By Arthur Versluis, American Sexuality Magazine. Posted October 3, 2008.


From antiquity on, there were people in the West who held that spirituality and sexuality were not necessarily mortal enemies.
Advertisement

Few people know of the long-standing traditions of sexual mysticism in the West. These traditions, unlike Hindu and Buddhist forms of Tantra, which were often distorted, commodified, and trivialized upon transmission to the modern West, have remained largely untouched. This is because they were entirely unknown.

But the vast range of possibilities for hidden, erotic mysticism demand a closer look. They reveal a rich, profound range of perspectives, allowing us to see new dimensions of human sexuality. Consequently, history becomes more multidimensional. It is also possible that, as we uncover these secret erotic traditions of the West, they will in turn feed into new movements and generate new ways of understanding. Each era draws upon the past in its own way, and perhaps it is time for us -- at least those who are interested and who feel some calling to do so -- to reconsider the Western currents of erotic mysticism.

Though Western sexual mysticism has a long and fascinating history, it is only now being rediscovered. From antiquity on, there have been people who have held that spirituality and sexuality are not necessarily mortal enemies. Whatever we may think of these diverse figures (including adherents of the ancient Mystery religions, some of the ancient Gnostics and alchemists, and all the way up to present day authors such as Alan Watts), the fact is that they have important things to teach us about the hidden links between sexuality, spirituality, and nature.

Of course, we should begin by outlining what we mean by "sexual mysticism" in the first place. After all, the very term "mysticism" is an ambiguous one, for some even synonymous with "wooly-minded." In actuality, however, "mystic" derives from the Greek word "mustein," meaning "silent" or "closed-lips," and shares its origins with the word "mystery." Meanwhile, the words "mysticism" and "mystery" can both be traced back to the ancient Greek Mystery traditions of antiquity, which, as we shall see, certainly had sexual dimensions.

Taking a look back into Greek and Roman antiquity (approximately 800 B.C. - A.D. 600), we see that the Mystery traditions -- be they Bacchic, Dionysiac, Eleusinian, or Orphic -- were closely bound up with the cosmic cycles, and in particular with the cycles of agricultural and human fertility. In fact, the earlier forms of the Mystery traditions, including those occurring throughout the Hellenistic period (323-146 B.C.), were specific to the domain of women. Women celebrated the mysteries of fertility and sexuality. Only later were men allowed to be priests and participate in many of the traditions. What we are looking at, then, corresponds to something quite different from the modern stereotype of femininity as demure, coquettish, or passive. Today, the women described in the ancient Mystery traditions would come across as frenzied, wild, and dangerous. But it is this authentic wildness, expressing a dimension of nature itself, which we moderns often fail to recognize.

It is important to note that these drunken, wild parties of Dionysiac ritual were held outdoors, and often at night. But while these rites, as previously mentioned, were often associated with fertility, this was not their only dimension. The Mysteries entailed a direct connection with the transcendent forces of the cosmos, which although expressed in the natural world, have their origins in pagan divinity. This was where gods and humans mingled and ordinary rules of society didn't apply. There was a wildness, a fierceness to the Mystery traditions; a dissolution of civilization is integral to understanding both its power and dangers.

Turning to the appearance of Christianity within this declining pagan world, we see something quite different and, in many respects, new. And while there were Stoic and other ascetic or semi-ascetic traditions present within Greco-Roman antiquity, there remains an undeniable and profound shift between the orgiastic traditions of antiquity and the extreme asceticism of Christianity.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: religion, sexuality, west, mysticism

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
the spirit versus the flesh
Posted by: vasumurti on Oct 4, 2008 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All bona fide religions teach sexual restraint: to be concerned with things of the spirit rather than the flesh.

A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami writes in The Path of Perfection:

"Yoga does not mean going to some class, paying some money, engaging in gymnastics, and then returning home to drink, smoke, and engage in sex. Such yoga is practiced by societies of the cheaters and the cheated...If one tells you that you can indulge in sex as much as you like and at the same time become a yogi, he is cheating you. If some so-called guru tells you to give him money in exchange for some mantra and that you can go on and engage in all kinds of nonsense, he is just cheating you. Because we want something sublime and yet want it cheaply, we put ourselves in a position to be cheated...if we want perfection in yoga, we have to pay for it by abstaining from sex. Perfection in yoga is not something childish, and Bhagavad-gita instructs us that if we try to make yoga into something childish, we will be cheated. There are many cheaters awaiting us, waiting to take our money, giving us nothing, and then leaving."

In the New Testament, the apostle Paul taught that "it is good for a man not to touch a woman," i.e., it is best to be celibate, but because of prevailing immoralities, marriage is acceptable. Divorce is permissible in the case of an unbeliever demanding separation. (I Corinthians 7)

Paul repeatedly attacked sexual immorality:

"This is God's will--your sanctification, that you keep yourselves from sexual immorality, that each of you learn how to take his own wife in purity and honor, not in lustful passion like the gentiles who have no knowledge of God." (I Thessalonians 4:3-5)

Paul told his followers not to associate with sexually immoral people (I Corinthians 5:9-12, 6:15,18). He condemned homosexuality (Romans 1:24-27) and incest (I Corinthians 5:1).

"Make no mistake," warned Paul, "no fornicator or idolater, none who are guilty either of adultery or of homosexual perversion, no thieves or grabbers or drunkards or slanderers or swindlers, will possess the kingdom of God." (I Corinthians 6:9-10 [NEB])

Paul condemned wickedness, immorality, depravity, greed, envy, murder, quarreling, deceit, malignity, gossip, slander, insolence, pride (Romans 1:29-30), drunkenness, carousing, debauchery, jealousy (Romans 13:13), sensuality, magic arts, animosities, bad temper, selfishness, dissensions, envy (Galatians 5:19-21; greediness (Ephesians 4:19; Colossians 3:5), foul speech, anger, clamor, abusive language, malice (Ephesians 4:29-32), dishonesty (Colossians 3:13), materialism (I Timothy 6:6-11), conceit, avarice, boasting and treachery. (II Timothy 3:2-4)

Paul told the gentiles to train themselves for godliness, to practice self-control and lead upright, godly lives (Galatians 5:23; I Timothy 4:7; II Timothy 1:7; Titus 2:11-12). He instructed them to ALWAYS pray constantly. (I Thessalonians 5:17)

Paul praised love, joy, peace, kindness, generosity, fidelity and gentleness (Galatians 5:22-23). He told his followers to conduct themselves with humility and gentleness (Ephesians 4:2), to speak to one another in psalms and hymns; to sing heartily and make music to the Lord. (Ephesians 5:19; Colossians 3:16)

Paul wrote further that women should cover their heads while worshiping, and that long hair on males is dishonorable. (I Corinthians 11:5-14) According to Paul, Christian women are to dress modestly and prudently, and are not to be adorned with braided hair, gold or pearls or expensive clothes. (I Timothy 2:9)

My problem really isn't with Christians unable to follow Paul, but with the hypocrisy of saying "I believe" and ignoring the rest of what their religion dictates. Why not just be secular, like everyone else?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the spirit versus the flesh Posted by: maevewoman
» RE: the spirit versus the flesh Posted by: Brian Charles
Terrytom, commodified what the hell is that?
Posted by: terryton on Oct 5, 2008 7:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting article, appears scholarly yet as I began I found a word I did not recognize. So I looked it up, that word, commodified, there is no such word. My word spell checker didn’t like it and the online dictionary or encyclopedia wouldn’t recognize it. This set up a bias in my mind, one of suspicion and lack of respect. The article seemed now to ramble and lacked focus to me.
Personally I distrust most religion, to the point of intolerance the exception being Buddhism and the Dalai Lama. I consider myself a most spiritual person. And along the way I enjoy sex and I’m quite uninhibited. I was not moved to seek the book. I wonder what the author meant when that nonexistent word “commodified” was written and why was the spell checker not used. I love words and welcome learning new ones. Am I nit picking?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]