Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

Anatomy of a Frame-up: The Shocking Case of Troy Davis

By Marlene Martin, International Socialist Review. Posted September 19, 2008.


Troy Davis faces execution on September 23rd. Will Georgia knowingly kill an innocent man?
Advertisement

Since this article was written, the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles denied Troy Davis clemency, giving the green light for his execution. Go here to help stop the execution.

AUGUST 18, 2008, marked a horrible milestone for Troy Davis. Nineteen years before, Savannah, Georgia, police officer Mark Allen McPhail was shot and killed -- a crime for which Troy would be accused, convicted and sent to death row.

McPhail was shot and killed in the early morning hours in a Burger King parking lot. In short order, twenty-five fellow officers were assigned to the case and began to scour the neighborhood for the perpetrator. The media sensationalized the case of a 27-year-old white father of two shot in the line of duty. One officer told a reporter, "There is a desire among the police to have the suspect locked away before McPhail is buried."

A few days later, police had their man in custody -- 20-year-old Troy Davis. Two years later, Troy, who is African American, was convicted and sentenced to death in a trial that lasted ten days.

The case against Troy is more than flimsy -- it appears to be totally fabricated.

The key to his conviction was testimony from nine witnesses, seven of whom have now come forward to recant. Among the two who haven't taken back their testimony is Sylvester Coles, initially a suspect himself until he went to the police saying that Troy Davis was the killer. The other witness remembers only the color of the shooter's clothes, and that he was left-handed. Troy is right-handed.

Several witnesses told police that Coles had a .38-caliber gun in his possession the night of the shooting. But once the police had arrested Troy, it was too hard for them to turn back when they learned this information. As attorney Jason Ewart told The South magazine,

At some point, there was an "Oh No" moment, when the police discovered that the person who may have fingered Davis had a caliber gun that had killed Officer McPhail the night of the shooting, [something] that was withheld from them [by Coles]. At that point, it was too late: Davis was the suspect. To go back and investigate someone else would have been politically tough to do…. [T]here was no investigating any other suspect. There was no [police] questioning; there was no searching for the murder weapon: there was no searching anyone else's house. His picture was the only one they showed in a photographic lineup.

Troy admits he was at the scene the night that McPhail was killed. But he says that he stepped in to help a homeless man who was being pistol-whipped by Coles. The girlfriend of the homeless man ran to get the police. When McPhail got to the scene, he was shot twice and died shortly thereafter.

No physical evidence, like his fingerprints on the murder weapon or gunpowder residue on his hands, ever connected Troy to the crime, and he never confessed. The only thing that convicted Troy was the testimony of witnesses, many of whom say police pressured them to identify Troy as the murderer.

One of the witnesses, Monty Holmes, stated in his affidavit, "In August of 1989, the police came to talk to me about the officer who was killed. … I told them I didn't know anything about who shot the officer, but they kept questioning me. I was real young at that time, and here they were questioning me about the murder of a police officer, like I was in trouble or something. I was scared. … It seemed like they wouldn't stop questioning me until I told them what they wanted to hear. So I did."

Another witness, Jeffrey Sapp, stated, "The police came and talked to me and put a lot of pressure on me to say, 'Troy said this' or 'Troy said that.' I got tired of them harassing me, and they made it clear that the only way they would leave me alone is if I told them what they wanted to hear. I told them that Troy told me he did it, but it wasn't true. Troy never said that or anything like it."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: death penalty, georgia, capital punishment, troy davis, antiterrorism and effecti

Marlene Martin is the national director of the Campaign to End the Death Penalty.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Contact the Georgia State Board of Paroles and Pardons
Posted by: fanny666 on Sep 19, 2008 1:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As always, a polite tone works best.

Clemency_Information@pap.state.ga.us

Also you can write letters through Amnesty International's Troy Davis page

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Troy Davis dies...
Posted by: Nigelthebriton on Sep 19, 2008 1:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...on the gurney, the whole case for capital punishment will have died with him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Justice" is Corrupt
Posted by: johnjmccarthy on Sep 22, 2008 4:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"We have heard all the evidence in this case. If the government thought this person to be innocent, they would never have accused him and brought him before us. And we have our duty!"

This statement is from the ranking officer of a top secret general court-martial conducted on January 29-30, 1968 in Vietnam.

The majority of the jury of seven were raised in the South. The Military Judge opened the trial by saying the following to the Jury, "We have all been on courts before" indicating that the jurors were continuously ordered to serve as members of juries by the convening authority, the person responsible for setting the wheels in motion, because these same jurors always rendered verdicts of "guilt" The same Military Judge admonished the Jury after the close of the trial by saying, "Do you realize what you have done in this sentencing?"

The Jury replied, "You said the maximum penalty for a conviction in this case is death and the minimum is life. We chose life."

The sentence also DID NOT include reduction in rank, Captain, forfeiture of pay and allowences nor dismissal from the service. This remains a precedence in the history of so called 'military justice' (Bring the guilty bastard in).

The defendant in the above case serves to expound on what travesties remain in the American Judicial System. And for those who say this is not related to military justice, I would point out that the Record of Trial and all Allied paper work is headlined by, "United States vs Captain John J. McCarthy. Most resources of the USG had a hand in this matter.

http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com/id1.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Despicable Injustice, Georgia Judges As Perpetrators..
Posted by: gazooks on Sep 22, 2008 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... of murder in callous disregard of the intent of law, protecting the innocent and fostering respect for the rights of others.

So many instances of this type of official violence against the poor, victimizing humans for the sake of prosecutorial expedience, happen daily in every region of our country.

The underwriting of the privileges of blind vengeance, sought by a sickeningly hypocritical and exclusive cop culture is a principle task on the agendas of many politically ambitious prosecutors and judges.

Their interests lie entirely outside those of considerations of justice and inflict it's cause with damage and disrespect far worse than that of any actual criminal.

This arrogant abuse of lethal power is indistinguishable from that of the most craven, mindlessly self interested and twisted act of sociopathic violence by those whom they sit in judgment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crooked Cops
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Sep 22, 2008 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Make no doubt about it, One thing cops are good at is fabricating evidence. Its what they do best.

Jiff
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

im confused
Posted by: sureshot45 on Sep 22, 2008 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i am against capital punishment and i certainly do not believe that this man should die. however title and intro sentence are somewhat misleading. 'innocent' is thrown around quite loosely. this man was there that night when the officer was shot, did not report the shooting, never came forward. (i could have facts wrong, but that is how i understand the case) wasn't he waiting in the car for his friend who actually committed the crime? he should not die, but he is hardly innocent. accessory to murder i believe is the technical term. and it does not matter if the murder was not premeditated, davis never came forward or called for help at the time of shooting. i think by labeling him 'innocent' the argument for him to get off is weakened.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: im confused Posted by: gazooks
» RE: im confused Posted by: greenknight
Time to Stand up to the Police
Posted by: edgar_michel on Sep 22, 2008 11:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't that what all Americans are affriad of? If a police officer accuses a person of committing a crime, isn't like they are already guilty? We fear the police and it is that fear that is crippling the nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Justice or Just us?
Posted by: Bearzerker on Sep 26, 2008 8:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we have here is a broken legal system that works for pay,
and not for anything else... that resembles justice.


remember the golden rule... those that have the gold make the rules!
or in this case if this man had just 1/2 the capital that the state had in order to find and then convict him, then maybe he would have had a fair trial.

My bone of contention is just this, Public Defenders need proper funding!...
That's it in a nutshell, and would be a good starting point at finding Justice in the just us U.S.!... mixing politics and justice at any level isn't just bad public policy its bad political policy as well!

I think the blindfolded lady holding the scales of justice
...isn't just blindfolded...
she truly is a deaf dumb and blind kid from Georgia!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]