Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

W's Worst Judges

By Stephanie Mencimer, Mother Jones. Posted September 17, 2008.


Forget Roberts or Alito for a minute; in eight years, Bush installed more than 300 federal judges. Here are a few to keep a close eye on.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Over the past eight years, Bush has installed 310 federal judges -- two of them to the highest court in the land -- whose influence will be felt for many years. Here are some to keep an eye on, along with their more notable rulings before and after elevation.

1. WILLIAM H. PRYOR JR., 11th Circuit
Precedent: As Alabama's attorney general, he defended the state's practice of handcuffing prison inmates to hitching posts.
Case closed: Voted to uphold an Anita Bryant-era Florida law prohibiting gays and lesbians from adopting children -- even when they've served as their foster parents.

2. PRISCILLA OWEN, 5th Circuit
Precedent: Considered so conservative that Alberto Gonzales, her onetime colleague on the Texas Supreme Court, called one of her dissents (in an abortion case) "an unconscionable act of judicial activism."
Case closed: Reversed a $3.5 million malpractice verdict, saying the plaintiff should have spoken up sooner about her congestive heart failure, which was caused by a drug she was given during pregnancy. In his dissent, Reagan appointee Patrick Higginbotham accused Owen of imposing "tort reform by decree, not ballot."

3. JAY BYBEE, 9th Circuit
Precedent: As a top lawyer in the Bush Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, he issued an infamous memo finding that interrogation techniques are torture only if they are "equivalent in intensity to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death."
Case closed: Voted to strike down a jury award for a San Diego police sergeant forced to quit after he was deployed to Iraq with the Navy Reserve.

4. JANICE ROGERS BROWN, D.C. Circuit
Precedent: Deemed "not qualified" to sit on California's Supreme Court by a state bar association panel. (She was appointed anyway.)
Case closed: Argued that a woman coerced into having sex with her boss was not a harassment victim unless she had been punished, demoted or fired as a result.

5. D. BROOKS SMITH, 3rd Circuit
Precedent: Promised the Senate in 1988, when he was appointed to a federal trial court, that he would resign from an exclusive, men-only hunting club.
Case closed: He did not resign -- until he learned there was a vacancy on the 3rd Circuit.

6. WILLIAM RILEY, 8th Circuit
Precedent: Appointed directly from private practice, where he largely handled insurance defense cases.
Case closed: Earned a rep as Wal-Mart's favorite judge, siding in favor of the company in three discrimination lawsuits. Wrote the majority opinion in a case ruling that the Americans with Disabilities Act did not apply to a diabetic pharmacist fired by Wal-Mart because he needed to take a regular uninterrupted lunch break in order to inject insulin and eat a special diet.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: supreme court, george w. bush, judicial system, jay bybee, federal courts, william h. pryor, priscilla owen, janice rogers brown, d. brooks smith, william riley

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Only Republicans could have appointed these judges
Posted by: badkitty on Sep 17, 2008 9:57 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For all those who claim there is no difference between Democratic and Republican presidents, take a look at these judicial appointments, especially Janice Rogers Brown. She's probably having a heart attack right now over the AIG bailout, although she is a strong supporter of very large corporations. Some Democrats supported these nominees, especially in the name of "bipartisanship", but no Democratic president would have ever nominated them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» NPR/PBS redux Posted by: motamanx
Making way for the NWO
Posted by: Andrew_S on Sep 18, 2008 1:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly it was stupid of the people to give up their representation and rights to the judiciary, so else what should it expect. Sadly few realize that the creation of walking Gods who are immune from mortal law, also creates the same thinking. Look forward to some pretty interesting political developments in the very near future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Judges and Ideology
Posted by: bobtr900 on Sep 20, 2008 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've known about the first four judges for years. There are other aspects of their judicial records that make them activist judges, for the Republican mindset. But of course the Reepubs never think of themselves as judicial activists(legislating from the bench via judicial decisions) that is a pejorative they heap on us lefties.

Not content to wreck our economy(keep us poor and we'll be obedient) and our military, the Repubs are hell bent on destroying our legal system. Their hard at work trying to attack our form of government (Scalia and his call to end democracy) and what is the little peoples safety net (Welfare, Social Security) and our upward mobility path (Public Education) there is still left. And all of this is being done for ever greater PROFITS.

Given a chance they will destroy the world just to force Armageddon(the Pope, during his Germany tour) and the Rapture(Hagee, GWB etc).

What God Himself has not yet done, they will do. They will end the world; just because it is not to their liking. If they don't like the USA or the world they should end their own miserable lives, not everyone else's life or world.

They are killers for ideology, either business ideology or religious ideology/theology. Whats the difference? They have merged the two so they are the same, business and religion.

Why do we tolerate these maniacs?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Judges and Ideology Posted by: weathered
No problems with these two
Posted by: rickiey on Sep 20, 2008 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Alabama's attorney general, he defended the state's practice of handcuffing prison inmates to hitching posts.

Gotta be honest: I've no problem with this one.

exclusive, men-only hunting club.

Why should he leave the club? No problem with this one. Have you ever gone to Curves? THen shut the hell up, hypocrite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No problems with these two Posted by: thinks4herself2008
» RE: No problems with these two Posted by: mainspark
» Curves Posted by: truthlover
» RE: Curves Posted by: wolfgangmo
» RE: Curves Posted by: rickiey
» RE: No problems with these two Posted by: TheNamelessCity
Shouldn't be surprised....
Posted by: ptoddchesser on Sep 22, 2008 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
about this from the present administration. They call it "judicial activism" when a progressive judge makes a ruling but it's "constructionism" when a conservative judge makes a ruling. It's all code and it's all meant to destroy the constructs that so many, all the way back to the founders, have worked so hard to create. All this in the name of the almighty dollar. I hope GWB's grandchildren end up hating his guts and the "legacy" he will leave them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Judge not....
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 22, 2008 8:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And to think....When Bush mercifully leaves the White House on January 20, 2009, although his physical presence will be gone, we'll be living with the hideous little thug's legacy for decades.

As I've said on this site (and my own) more times than I can count, fifty years from today, the president on the United States, whomever he or she may be - who in all liklihood hasn't even been born yet - will still, on a daily basis, be dealing with the damage taht this half-witted frat bot did to our beloved country so many decades before.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
Bush=Truman? Have Another Sip!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One way to keep a President McCain from appointing more rightwing judges.
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Sep 22, 2008 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ask Senator Obama to use the following slogan during his campaign:

John McCain -- OLD ideas, OLD solutions

If you think the slogan has legs, please contact the Democratic National Committee with this link -- Contact DNC -- then copy & paste the bold text below into the Question box. NOTE: the link works slowly.

To help Senator Obama win in November, please use the following slogan in his TV ads: "John McCain -- OLD ideas, OLD solutions"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keep In Mind
Posted by: QQOblivion on Sep 22, 2008 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keep in mind that John McCain has said he admires judges like Roberts, Alito, Scalia, and Thomas, and that he plans to appoint judges to the courts much like Bush has appointed.

Now tell me you are going to vote for Nader.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not all Republican Judges are arch-conservatives
Posted by: markaxinn on Sep 24, 2008 3:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Earl Warren, author of Brown v. Board of Education, was an Eisenhower appointee. Harry Blackmun, author of Roe v. Wade, was appointed by Nixon. Stevens, perhaps the most liberal current member of the Supreme Court, was appointed by Ford. O'Connor, first woman on the Court, was appointed by Reagan. David Souter was appointed by Bush Sr.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

terrytom I saw it coming
Posted by: terryton on Sep 25, 2008 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What would one expect from the most corrupt administration in over one hundred years.
I saw this coming at once and knew of the value of loading the courts.
To quote my lawyer friend, "it is better to know the judge than to know the law."
I love how so many of these judges decisions are said to be judicial activism so often claimed as the work of liberals by the right-wingers.
They are such hypocrites and liars.
The fact that so many dumocrates let these atrocities go forth only proves to me they are in on the Fascist Conversion of America.
The concentration camps are prepared and Blackwater and the military stand ready to deal with all real patriots.
We are in deep trouble.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement