Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

Naomi Klein: China's Hi-Tech Surveillance State Is Ready for Export

By Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez, Democracy Now!. Posted August 18, 2008.


With 300,000 security cameras in Beijing alone, China is at the forefront of the surveillance boom -- and U.S. corporations are reaping the profits.
Advertisement

Juan Gonzalez: China deported five international activists [last week] for unfurling a "Free Tibet" banner over the top of an Olympic Games billboard. It's the latest incident in what has become an almost daily crackdown on both domestic and international protesters who have had to contend with a brand new surveillance system that China set up ahead of the games. This includes 300,000 security cameras and an estimated 100,000 security officers on duty in Beijing.

But it's not just Beijing that's gotten a security upgrade. There are now over 600 "safe" cities in China that have received new surveillance gear. The equipment and integrated security systems will remain long after the Olympics, to be used, many fear, on China's own population. The domestic surveillance market in China is expected to reach $33 billion next year. And some of the biggest beneficiaries of this boom are U.S. hedge funds and corporations, such as Cisco, General Electric and Google.

Amy Goodman: Award-winning journalist and bestselling author Naomi Klein calls this "McCommunism." Her latest article published in the Huffington Post is called "The Olympics: Unveiling Police State 2.0." Naomi Klein is author of The Shock Doctrine. She joins us on the phone from Canada.

We're also joined in our firehouse studio by investigative journalist and author Christian Parenti, who's also just back from China. His latest piece for The Nation magazine is called "Class Struggle in the New China".

We welcome you both to Democracy Now! Naomi Klein, let's begin with you. Lay out what you also called in Rolling Stone the "all-seeing eye."

Naomi Klein: Well, there's an incredible operation going on in China to use the latest, what's now called homeland security technology -- networked surveillance cameras, biometric identification cards, facial recognition software -- networking all of these cameras and running the software through it as a way to control an increasingly rebellious population. There's an incredible statistic from 2005 that there were 87,000 mass incidents, which means protests and riots, across the country.

So it is already being used as a way to control the population and also to keep an eye on what in China is called the floating population, the migrant population, who are displaced by mega projects, who travel to cities like Beijing and Guangzhou and Shenzhen looking for work. This is a mobile population that is right now 130 million people. And this technology is used to keep track of those people, because in a sort of Maoist time in China, you had -- where people stayed in their communities, you had networks of control and surveillance that were really about people snitching on their neighbors. When people are moving across long distances, the technology is replacing that. So "Police State 2.0" is really about upgrading the surveillance system, with the help, as you said earlier, of U.S. companies like Cisco, General Electric, who have been providing these technologies.

Juan Gonzalez: Your article talks about -- calls it the "Golden Shield," as the Chinese refer to it, and you focus especially on the city of Shenzhen, in terms of the enormous reach of this. I was struck that you mentioned, for instance, that every internet cafe in China has surveillance cameras that are hooked up to local police stations so that they can keep an eye on who is using the internet cafes?

Naomi Klein: Yeah, and the internet cafes are -- you know, they're really like internet bowling alleys. They're huge. An average-size internet cafe has 600 terminals. And there are dozens of cameras in the -- not just obviously the cameras on the computers, but surveillance cameras. And this is a huge market. You mentioned that it's worth $33 billion a year now. It's actually -- that's even increased since I wrote that article. The latest estimate is that it's going to be worth $43 billion, and -- a year within two years.

And the reason why this is such a fast-growing market is that it's not just that the internet cafes are installing these cameras; it's that it's a law now in China that they are required to install the cameras. So are at religious sites, so are entertainment sites, karaoke bars, restaurants. So, the government passes a law and says you must install these surveillance cameras, the companies comply, and then you have another set of companies who are connected to the party and also, as you said, to American companies. Many of them are listed on the NASDAQ, the New York Stock Exchange. And they are benefiting directly from this created market, this mandated market. You must install security cameras, so no wonder this is such a fast-growing market.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: china, human rights, surveillance, olympics, naomi klein, tibet, christian parenti

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
GE gets a woody
Posted by: weathered on Aug 18, 2008 2:50 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But they're small time, Ms. Klein.

If you'd look at the profile of the 'insecurity' industry look too at Israel, talk about exploiting! They'll take a taxi driver and dress them up as a security consultant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's an idea.
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 18, 2008 2:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every time you see a security camera, give it the finger.

The obscene gesture won't change things, but at least you'll feel better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» red light cameras Posted by: veggiegrrrl
The UK was the first to do this
Posted by: Bobsays on Aug 18, 2008 4:45 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To anyone who is British, none of this is new or a surprise. The socialist New Labour government has overseen the setting up of a massive surveillance society. In fact, Stephen Lewis (Naomi's father-in-law) waxed lyrically about the fantastic policies of British PM Gordon Brown in a recent issue of Adbusters. Brown has been the architect of this surveillance society. I guess in Naomi's world, it's okay to survey if it is progressive. And please stop calling anything you don't like 'Mc-something'. That's just Mcrhetoric.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dboy you Define Me...Not!! Posted by: BigElectricCat
» RE: Dboy you Define Me...Not!! Posted by: BigElectricCat
Is this nervous levity
Posted by: Blacktiger on Aug 18, 2008 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or are you actually making light of this very serious situation? At present I still feel OK, I don't mind the camera in the bank or the ones on the street that are watching for speeding/racing cars, stuff like that. I am also aware if I cause some trouble I could be identifide and headed for a cot and three squares a day. Personally I would be better off, though not homeless, I sure ain't a millionaire! So children, if you can't say something intelligent,please don't ridicule serious persons, and serious subjects. Please begin to respect the freedoms you have left such as they are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Is this nervous levity Posted by: richholland
McFascism
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Aug 18, 2008 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it was communism it would at least ostensibly be "for the people". Obviously that is not the case. It is only a very select few who will benefit from a 21st century technological control grid. Need an organ? Got $1 million? Ok then we can do business. We'll send out our goons to go get a new lung for you right now... oh look there's a perfect donor match standing on that streetcorner in Brooklyn.

That's all this is about... its just going to be complete corruption through and through. Organ harvesting, drug running, crushing dissent, that is what it's all about. I dont know what it is that makes people so damn blind to this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: McFascism Posted by: krzyn8
» RE: McFascism Posted by: Iconoclast421
The new religion
Posted by: loneswaneast on Aug 18, 2008 7:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Religion used to be relied upon to control the masses, but is unreliable in the long run and tricky because it causes its own race of power thugs.
Corporate government just needs to add tasers and other high tech crowd control weapons to these surveillance methods and it beats God every time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The new religion Posted by: Dboy
» RE: The new religion Posted by: loneswaneast
Revolution Now!
Posted by: Godfather89 on Aug 18, 2008 8:02 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wake up people while the government is building the next veil! We need a progressive movement (Campaign for Liberty) to fight for Civil liberties and Privacy, if the people don't care or don't make a sound than the Congress wouldn't even bother to think twice about this situation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: evolution Now! Posted by: krzyn8
» RE: evolution Now! Posted by: Godfather89
» usterroristnation Posted by: usterroristnation
Denver or Beijing?
Posted by: fanny666 on Aug 18, 2008 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Denver or Beijing?

Can you tell the difference between the high-tech surveillance state in China and the high-tech surveillance state that's being prepared for the protesters in Denver?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's Unite
Posted by: dockboy on Aug 18, 2008 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Workers of the world unite. Let's call for a public boycott of all Cisco, GE, and Google products. Just quit using them. That'll show them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

China-Liberal Utopia
Posted by: Romans1 on Aug 18, 2008 6:58 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Liberals should love China. Here we have an equal opportunity oppressor. All religion is outlawed (an expressed goal at Alternet)except for the state approved church, Christianity, Islam, you name it. Everyone makes the same salary. Everybody is equal and the state owns everything. Best of all, the state controls the population (another favorite Alternet subject) with lots of abortions (another favorite Alternet subject). Libverals should love China because it is the product of the Liberal agenda carried to its logical conclusion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Get a clue Posted by: fanny666
» RE: Get a clue Posted by: Romans1
» RE: Get a clue Posted by: BigElectricCat
» RE: China-Liberal Utopia Posted by: Dboy
» RE: China-Liberal Utopia Posted by: Romans1
Notice that the cororations involved are right here.
Posted by: nightgaunt on Aug 19, 2008 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Suffice it to say that their test run is in China for applications here and in other countries. Believe it! How would anyone like the idea that it is a snitch society, where nearly everyone is a spy and can report you for personal slights to get revenge?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

REMEMBER THE RIGHT FEARS DEMOCRACY. 24-7 SURVELANCE IS
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Aug 24, 2008 9:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the first step in their tyranny. Tyranny is not limited to either the left or the right. The continuum from left to right is probably a circle meeting on the far side as tyranny. This they both have in common. Being a radical centrist, seen in this light, may be sane.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]