Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

Flight Rage Incident Reveals the Dark Side of Osteen's 'Prosperity Gospel'

By Barbara Ehrenreich, Barbaraehrenreich.com. Posted August 13, 2008.


The wife of get-rich-now pastor Joel Osteen faces a civil trial that embodies the sense of entitlement of those who preach the gospel of prosperity.
Advertisement

For heartsick former supporters of John Edwards, this week offers an edifying tabloid alternative: the civil trial of Victoria Osteen, wife of megachurch minister and televangelist Joel Osteen, for assaulting a flight attendant. The issue was what is sometimes described as a "spill" and sometimes as a "stain" on the armrest of Mrs. Osteen's first-class seat, which the flight attendant refused to clean up with sufficient alacrity because she was busy assisting others aboard. Although there is no evidence that the spill consisted of tuberculosis-ridden phlegm or avian flu-rich bird poop, Osteen was mightily pissed, allegedly pushing and punching the flight attendant and making such a ruckus that the Osteen family had to be removed from the flight.

I would be more sympathetic to the flight attendant, Sharon Brown, if she weren't demanding 10 percent of Osteen's fortune to compensate for injuries including a "loss of faith" and hemorrhoids somehow incurred from a frontal assault. But it isn't easy being a flight attendant in this era of layoffs, pay cuts and packed planes -- certainly not compared to being a millionaire on her way to Vail. Whatever dubious substance Victoria Osteen faced on that first-class armrest, she should have been able to derive some serenity from the fact that the church she co-pastors draws 40,000 worshippers a week and that her husband has been dubbed "America's Most Influential Christian."

Just another celebrity meltdown set off by insufficiently servile servers? Recall Russell Crowe's 2005 assault with a telephone on a SoHo hotel clerk, or Naomi Campbell's attacks with similar weapons -- a cell phone and a Blackberry -- on members of her own staff. But there's a curious antecedent here that Christians would do well to ponder: In 1997, another megachurch pastor and leading televangelist, Robert Schuller, was prosecuted for an eerily similar first-class tantrum.

Schuller, like the Osteens, is a proponent of positive thinking -- the doctrine that God intends for you to be rich, healthy and generally "great" right here in this life. While politicos have focused on the Christian Right, there's been far less attention to the fast-growing brand of Christianity Light, also represented by televangelists Joyce Meyer, Benny Hinn and Creflo Dollar. Positive thinking is the theology of the modern megachurch, and it avoids all mention of sin -- including the "sins" of abortion and homosexuality -- lest such "negative" topics turn off any potential converts or "seekers." Its promise is that you can have anything you want simply by "visualizing" it or, as Osteen puts it, "believing for it" -- a doctrine derided by some Christian critics as "name it and claim it."

Schuller faced a different biohazard on his first-class flight in '97: cheese. When the flight attendant gave him a fruit-and-cheese plate for dessert, Schuller insisted that the cheese be removed. The flight attendant refused, explaining, reasonably enough, that all the fruit had been plated with cheese and could be contaminated, from a cheese-allergy sufferer's point of view. But the pastor was simply on a low-fat diet and did not want to see the cheese on his plate, so he got out of his seat and accosted the flight attendant, shaking him violently by the shoulders. Schuller ended up paying a $1,100 fine and undergoing six months of police supervision.

In the theology of Christian positive thinking, "everything happens for a reason." The Osteens may conclude that the divine intention was to prod them into emulating Joyce Meyer and Creflo Dollar by investing in a private jet. But there's another possible message from on high: that this brand of Christianity fosters a distinctly un-Christian narcissism.

Consider the ways the Lord works in the life of the Osteens, as recounted in Joel Osteen's book Your Best Life Now, which has sold 4 million copies and is graced by a back cover photo of the smiling couple. Acting through Victoria, who kept "speaking words of faith and victory" on the subject, Joel was led to build the family "an elegant home." On other occasions, God intervened to save Joel from a speeding ticket and to get him not only a good parking spot but "the premier spot in that parking lot." Why God did not swoop down with a sponge and clean up the offending stain on the armrest remains a mystery, because Osteen's deity is less the Master of the Universe than an obliging factotum.

Plenty of Christians have already made the point that the positive thinking of Christianity Light is demeaning to God, and I leave them to pursue this critique. More importantly, from a secular point of view, it's dismissive of other humans, and not only flight attendants. If a person is speeding, shouldn't he get a ticket to deter him from endangering others? And if Osteen gets the premier parking spot, what about all the other people consigned to the remote fringes of the lot? Christianity, at best, is about a sacrificial love for others, not about getting to the head of the line.

If the Osteens' brand of religion is what flight attendant Sharon Brown lost faith in as a result of being manhandled by on that plane to Vail, then the suit should be dropped, because Victoria Osteen has already done her enough of a favor.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: joel osteen, prosperity gospel

Barbara Ehrenreich is the author of 13 books, including the New York Times best-seller Nickel and Dimed. A frequent contributor to the New York Times, Harpers and the Progressive, she is a contributing writer to Time magazine. She lives in Florida.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It sickens me
Posted by: odie-wan on Aug 13, 2008 12:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This brand of "religion" sickens me. I have little faith in organised religion as it is and stories like this make me even more determined to stay away from these charlatans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It sickens me Posted by: rhinojos
» What really sickens me Posted by: LionHeart
» RE: What really sickens me... Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: What really sickens me Posted by: mainspark
» RE: What really sickens me Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: What really sickens me Posted by: LionHeart
» Holy Lawsuit, Batman! Posted by: edgar1
» The only religion here Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming
» RE: It sickens me Posted by: annekarina
» RE: It sickens me Posted by: mpreb658@earthlink.net
Not surprised.
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 13, 2008 2:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During my younger adult years (I'm 73), I attended a Methodist church with my wife and three kids. Now, 40 years later, I'm a God-fearing agnostic.

I think that's much closer to what Jesus would like in human beings than the greed-driven, hypocritical bullshit espoused by Joel Osteen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oxymoron Posted by: edgar1
» RE: Oxymoron, yourself! Posted by: Nightstallion
» RE: Oxymoron Posted by: drsivana99
» phrase of the week Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming
Maybe God is a socialist.
Posted by: andabottleof_rum on Aug 13, 2008 2:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Religion can be politicized in any way. In fact while the Osteens and others like them find ways to twist Christianity, borne of 2000-years-old texts, into a pro-capitalist dogma, it is equally possible, if not more likely, that a reading of the New Testament would inform a politics closer to socialism or pacifism than to capitalism. There's stuff about loving your enemy, turning your cheek and offering another target when attacked, rich men can't go to heaven, the last shall be first and the first shall be last, worry not for tomorrow and live day by day.

The attitude behind such ideas does not seem to resemble the materialistic, aggressive, success-driven, forward-looking values espoused by capitalism.

"The meek shall inherit the earth." From a capitalist perspective, meek people are losers; Social Darwinism selects against them in the competition for wealth, prestige, and influence.

Then again, establishment Christianity has never seriously put these biblical ideas into practice, as they are antithetical to social hierarchy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Maybe God is a socialist. Posted by: downstreamer
the selfish gospel
Posted by: zippoflash on Aug 13, 2008 3:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These people, by saying things happen for a reason and that god rewards their prosperity just goes to reinforce a personal and political selfishness that deems the poor and the unlucky as deserving of their fate. Nasty Social-Darwinism disguised as Christianity. No wonder the flight attendant was attacked. She didn't recognize her 'place' in their scheme of things.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They are not "Christians"
Posted by: terradea42 on Aug 13, 2008 4:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please. Let's call these political hypocrites what they are: "Paulitions" or "Christianists." I'm sure there are some people who preach, practice and portray the Jesus Christ of the Bible, and they should not be lumped in with the chaff described in this article.

Seriously, why do people continue to give trash like Osteen and his wife money???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They are not "Christians" Posted by: Steve Adair
» RE: They are not "Christians" Posted by: QuestionAuthority
» RE: They are not "Christians" Posted by: rhinojos
maineman
Posted by: maineman on Aug 13, 2008 4:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look no further than their massive home in houston in its most prestigious neighborhood to turn your stomach. How people buy in to these principles is beyond logic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Business As Usual Posted by: edgar1
» ...beyond logic Posted by: Steve Adair
» RE: ...beyond logic Posted by: Dboy
» RE: ...beyond logic Posted by: Steve Adair
The Olsteens preach an extreme version of what lots of churches preach
Posted by: Jasonix on Aug 13, 2008 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The televangelists preach that if you give 10% of your gross income to them, God will make you rich in return. That sounds extreme, but I've heard plenty of Baptist and Pentecostal pastors make slightly toned-down promises of the same ilk - if you "tithe," then God will preserve your middle class status.

The churches are institutions built on the easy-motoring, post-World War 2 American prosperity just like everything else. Despite the Elmer Gantry stereotypes of rural rubes, the typical evangelical Christian is a baby boomer mom just past her "soccer-mom" years - the church is a social club that provides services as varied as hiking clubs and cooking circles. Now that Americans aren't the most prosperous people in the world anymore with tons of disposable income, the churches are losing money, and the leadership is faced with the challenge of keeping their institutions afloat in the ensuing economic carnage.

They could, of course, decide to actually follow the New Testament, scale down their buildings and feel-good social events for Baby Boomers, and make communities dedicated to mutual support of each other. They could be the nucleus of a new emerging post-prosperity America, where life is local and survival depends on people banding together and tackling the tough challenges of post-modern life directly by re-instituting local agriculture, retrofitting their houses for sustainable living, sharing resources, etc.

But nah. Hey, the pastors want a slice of the American dream, too - and don't want to be bothered by the fact that the American Dream is nothing but a dream now. So pony up your 10% - your pastor needs that vacation to Disney World, and your church needs that Powerpoint slide projector.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

is there anyone who still believes...
Posted by: aislinnluv on Aug 13, 2008 5:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that "churches" should be tax-exempt? maybe i should start my own religion and apply for tax-exempt status? i have some strongly-held beliefs that i might be able to pass off as "dogma". and i could easily assert that anyone who doesn't concur with my own thinking is doomed. that's usually enough, isn't it? oh, wait.... i have to develop an obnoxious personality first. sorry. back to the drawing board.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» these ministries.... Posted by: jmndodge
» RE: is there anyone who... Posted by: ranchero42
It Is About Positive Thinking
Posted by: pinnacle on Aug 13, 2008 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You people are so full of it that your eyes are turning brown! Robert Schuller wrote a book entitled 'If It's Going To Be, It's Up To Me'. What could be more true? The fact is that those who believe in themselves and overcome their fears of failure and rejection are the ones who succeed ---- no matter how one measures success. Another of Schuller's books revealed how he was able to get the financial backing to build the his church in southern California. He didn't have the money and he didn't know a single contributor who could provide all the money required. What did he do? He got off his behind and went to work! If you want what the other guy has, the bible tells you it is a sin to steal it. It isn't sin to have it, you just have to work to get it. That doesn't mean working for someone else. Exercise your own brain and go for it. Maybe that's what Joel is doing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It Is About Positive Thinking Posted by: mandiwrite
» not a match Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: It Is About Positive Thinking Posted by: Live Gently
» RE: It Is About Positive Thinking Posted by: mpreb658@earthlink.net
» RE: It Is About... Posted by: ranchero42
Otto .
Posted by: otto on Aug 13, 2008 5:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right on! I'm much more at home with people like Mother Therese (not unlike Ghandi), Jean Vanier and his "living with the handicapped" way of life in L'Arche communities, Dorothy Day, Jim Wallace and Sojournors in Washington, John Howard Griffin, the Berrigans, etc. They, like Jesus, seem to identify more with the poor and marginalized.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Otto . Posted by: edgar1
If you want to know what's important to God...
Posted by: Romans1 on Aug 13, 2008 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read Luke 18: 9-14

"He also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous and regarded others with contempt: “Two men went up to the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee, standing by himself, was praying thus, ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other people: thieves, rogues, adulterers, or even like this tax
collector. I fast twice a week; I give a tenth of all my income.’ But the tax collector,
standing far off, would not even look up to heaven, but was beating his breast and saying,
‘God, be merciful to me, a sinner!’ I tell you, this man went down to his home justified rather than the other; for all who exalt themselves will be humbled, but all who humble themselves will be exalted.”

So look, it's not about whether you give to the poor. The Pharisee did that and Jesus rejected him. Obviously, it's not about thinking positively about yourself. The Pharisee did that too.

It's about whether you have come to the understanding that you are a sinner in need of God's mercy. That is all. Christ died and rose from the grave to take the penalty for your sins (and mine, especially mine, I need Him worse than you do).

Come to God on your face and beg Him to save you. He will do just that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Judging Posted by: truthlover
» RE: Judging Posted by: Romans1
» spot on... Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: spot on... Posted by: Romans1
» RE: spot on... Posted by: helenwheels
» Outrageous! WE are Lord? Posted by: truthlover
» God is dead Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: God is dead Posted by: annekarina
"Blessed are the poor in spirit"
Posted by: Romans1 on Aug 13, 2008 6:16 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jesus meant those who recognize their own sinfulness and helplessness regardlss of class or wealth.

Some who came to Jesus were poor and marginalized and some were affluent. Some who rejected Jesus were poor and marginalized and some were affluent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks, Barbara
Posted by: jmmartin on Aug 13, 2008 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What an excellent piece! You hit the nail on the head. A minor cavil might be expresses vis-a-vis your doubting the stewardess's plea for ten percent of Victoria Osteen's net worth. In Texas, you have to plead punitive damages if you expect to ask a jury to give them to you, but I suspect an ulterior motive on her part (or the part of her attorneys): they want to do a Grassley job on the Osteens. Simply exposing their status as super rich capitalists can only embarrass them and, who knows, perhaps subject them to the kind of scrutiny the Iowa senator has brought to other mega-churches.

Moreover, the Osteen message is not Christianity. It is just the opposite. Jebus is supposed to have said, "A rich man will no sooner enter the Kingdom than a camel shall pass through the eye of a needle." Substitute a Mercedes Benz for the camel, and you've got the Osteens. Although an atheist, I hope there really is a hell -- for I am certain Joel and Victoria will be burning in it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» just a note... Posted by: aislinnluv
Crimea River
Posted by: Crimea River on Aug 13, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have the utmost respect for Barbara Ehrenreich’s work – “Nickel and Dimed” was required reading for some of my students last semester. And though I enjoy self-righteous snark as much as the next Alternet subscriber, she does the Prosperity Gospel’s collective obscenities no justice by recycling this tired angle and lumping Joel Osteen in with his criminal counterparts. Consider me one of HIS “heartsick supporters,” rather than a vacuous tabloid slag. The Edwards Affair actually has plenty of tabloid spectacle to it, considering it was The Enquirer itself that broke the story. (And try watching his “Father of the Year” speech with a straight face now…)

Victoria’s airline hissy was probably just that, and the Osteens got off the flight and paid a $3,000 fine for her questionable behavior, and perhaps will be on the hook for a bit more to the plaintiff, whose reported background and motives don’t pass the smell test. I certainly feel immensely more human knowing that even Robert Schuller can have a REALLY bad day…But there’s no factual connection between Victoria’s alleged poor judgment and her husband’s ministry. This bandwagon approach is lazy journalism, and the posters here who are jumping on it and going further by trashing all Christians and Biblical theology are stunning in their ignorance and intolerance.

While Joel might side-step Biblical taboos such as homosexuality and abortion in his preaching, I find it refreshing that he’s not willing to condemn anyone, and his decision to avoid those contradictions is in the hopes of bringing people closer to the teachings of Jesus – rather the point of the gospel, wouldn’t you say? Fire-and-brimstone is one approach, but thank god it’s not the only one, and sin as a theological turn-off is not the point. Joel’s preaching focuses on love, compassion and redemption and, far from the allegations of his critics, he quotes scripture extensively, discusses sin, and promotes the Bible. I know, because I’ve been a fence-straddling agnostic who accidentally discovered him on TV and now watches him regularly, embraces his style of preaching, and has started reading the Bible (though not as regularly do I understand it – it’s quite a hefty piece of literature).

Joel’s books, on the other hand, are naïve and sweetly simple – certainly nothing new under the sun. But they’re bestsellers for a reason – they appeal to people’s positive yearnings, with a “God helps those who help themselves” bootstrap message, and what’s wrong with that? And so what if he makes some money off them, even millions? Any reason he should live in a van down by the river after he’s been on the New York Times Bestsellers list twice?

If Victoria needs to get real and get her grace and humility on, so be it, but don’t let’s all find another excuse to take a self-satisfied shite on Christians, the Bible and sound bites of Christian theology without doing some homework or by treating this very unfortunate incident as some logical extension of “SSDD.” Not all TV pastors are out to fleece their flocks, and their parishioners aren’t all empty-headed narcissists – just like atheists, agnostics and alternative media mavens aren’t all dope-smoking, over-educated assholes. Check out The Wittenburg Door.com and other such sites to fuel your constructive outrage for the real shameless charlatans (Benny Hinn, et al) who need to have their broadcast licenses yanked and their finances given a rubber-gloved probe by the feds, for starters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Crimea River Posted by: owlsliveintrees
struck by lightning
Posted by: zooeyhall on Aug 13, 2008 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really wish some of these creeps would get struck by lightning the next time they are out on the golf course. A real message from god---right?

I have had some of these types in my family--they think because they are closer to god that any good fortune they have is due to that fact.

And there is a dark side to all of this. If god rewards you with wealth and prosperity for your faith, then what about those who don't have either wealth or prosperity? The dark implication is that you are somehow evil or not deserving of god's largesse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

she's LUCKY - or SIMPLY RICH.
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Aug 13, 2008 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when I was returning from the bathroom on ONE trans-continental 'cattle class' AirFrance flight, we experienced turbulence.

as I hesitated to enter my seat because the geriatric gentleman in the aisle seat... the bitchy attendant snapped, "GET INTO YOUR SEAT & stop 'wandering the cabin'!"

wandering the cabin?! huh?? I only went left & around because the aisle between the bathroom & my seat was blocked by the attendants taking up the finished trays... My partner & I were bewildered.

I pointed out that his table was still down & he had an empty food tray on it & I COULD NOT GET INTO THE SEAT.

at that point, she demanded I "GET INTO MY SEAT, NOW!" I asked if she could *take* the tray so I could.

She snapped that I should "DO AS I WAS TOLD"

I pointed out that it wasn't my fault she was a bad waitress in a lousy service & that if SHE wanted to climb over a geriatric to get into the seat she could. & waived my right hand vaguely... she told me I was THREATENING HER & asked if I wanted Security to deal with me.

At this point I PICKED UP THE TRAY so I could get into the seat & tripped over he geriatric arthritic gentleman.

2 hours later, I was shaken awake by a stranger in uniform who demanded if I was the person indicated by my seat placement.

I asked 'who wants to know? & who the hell are you?'

"none of your business, answer the question"

"who the hell are you to ask me anything?"

"I'm the Purser, don't make me get Security"

at this point, my partner awoke & drowsily confirmed who I was.

I asked, "& where is this information going?"

"Interpol, we document people like you".

HUH?!? We fully expected to be escorted off the aircraft.

When we landed, the attendant opened the overhead cargo & a large package dropped on the head of the geriatric gentleman.

NOTE TO THOSE TRAVELLING BY AIR FRANCE -who never answered any of my complaint letters:
"I GUESS I SHOULD SPRING FOR FIRST-CLASS TICKETS."

┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
┄┄
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
┄┄
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: she's LUCKY - or SIMPLY RICH. Posted by: helenwheels
You don't know who to root for...
Posted by: markaxinn on Aug 13, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The pushy, sanctimonious wife of the mega-preacher vs. the greedy, bossy, flight attendant who's more into control than service.

Pity both sides cannot lose the case.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone
Posted by: taxidriver on Aug 13, 2008 7:20 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, I sort of respect the Osteens for going to trial. It would've been far easier to reach an out-of-court settlement than to risk a public trial and the slings and arrows cast by judgmental journalists. Yes, it sounds like Victoria "lost it" and got pushy. Who hasn't had a bad day? But does this one moment somehow paint her with a scarlet letter? (Should she be forced from now until eternity to wear an A for assaulter?)

I don't really go for the Osteens' Christianity-lite, and maybe they're too eager to enjoy the fruits of their success. But I'm not quite ready to pitch them into the fires of hell--and they're a considerable improvement over the Bakers, the Swaggarts, and other exploitative and hypocritical televangelists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Toothy Salvation Posted by: edgar1
» RE: I agree Posted by: taxidriver
Christianity is the dogma for controling the crowd
Posted by: sharloch on Aug 13, 2008 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Christianity is the dogma for controlling the mob. Everything else about it is just a way to justify its existence. Spirituality can live in any religion, morality can exist without religion, evil is a natural complement of goodness (and we all possess it, the preachers and the popes not excluded). So what else is new?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What would Jesus think.......
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 13, 2008 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This new brand of "Christianity" is just another ponzi scheme. While enriching their own coffers, they keep the "good sheep" in line with promises of good if only they would continue to pray, so that when things don't go well for the the sheep of course it's their own fault (they obviously don't have enough faith, prayer, etc. ), in the meantime these "pastors" have their hands in the pockets of the good sheep!

Religion once again the opiate of the masses! I wonder what Jesus would think of these "pimps in the pulpit"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What would Jesus think....... Posted by: drsivana99
Would Jesus condone gambling?
Posted by: vasumurti on Aug 13, 2008 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although gambling is not explicitly forbidden in the Bible, it does prey upon the individual’s desire for worldly riches. This desire for immediate wealth and self-aggrandizement is contrary to the spirit of New Testament teaching.

Jesus taught the multitudes to seek the eternal treasures in heaven rather than pursue temporary, earthly gain. He insisted upon the self-sacrifice and renunciation of earthly possessions and family ties and duties. (Matthew 6:19-21, 6:24-34, 8:21-22, 10:34-39, 19:20-21,29; Luke 9:57-62, 12:51-53, 14:25-26,33; James 5:1-3)

Jesus had no interest in worldly disputes over money and property. (Luke 12:13-14) He taught that life is meant for more than the accumulation of material goods. He condemned those who lay up treasures for themselves, but are not rich towards God. (Luke 12:15-21) In his parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man, Jesus expressed concern for materialistic persons (Luke 16:19-31).

Jesus taught that it is hard for those attached to earthly riches to enter the kingdom of God. (Matthew 19:16-24; Mark 10:17-23; Luke 18:18-25) His apostles lead lives of voluntary poverty; sharing their possessions with one another. Those among the brethren who did not do so were condemned. (Acts 2:44, 5:1-11)

"He who loves his life will lose it," taught Jesus, "and he who hates his life in this world will keep it for eternal life...For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul?" (Matthew 16:26; Mark 8:36; Luke 9:25; John 12:25)

In Paul’s words, "Piety with contentment is great gain indeed; for we brought nothing into the world and, obviously, we can carry nothing out. When we have food and clothing, we shall be content with these. Those who are eager to be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into numerous thoughtless and hurtful cravings that plunge people into destruction and ruin. "For the love of money is the root of all evil. In striving for it, some have wandered away from the faith...But you, O man of God, shun these things and go after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, gentleness." (I Timothy 6:6-11)

Gambling preys upon the people of lower income. The National Commission of Gambling estimated in 1983 that there were over a million compulsive gamblers nationwide. The Commission predicted that as gambling gradually becomes legal across the country, this figure will eventually reach three million.

The first treatment center for compulsive gamblers was built outside Baltimore, Maryland, in 1982. Compulsive gamblers often run into enormous financial difficulties—borrowing or even stealing from others, including their own families.

Heavy debt becomes a hard fact of life for compulsive gamblers. They sleep poorly, and become indifferent towards eating and affection. Tense and irritable, they often drink, and may even consider suicide.

Since the advent of legalized gambling, per capita crime in the Atlantic City area has tripled. A police check of records at different casinos there wound over one million dollars loaned to 25 underworld figures.

One survey of police enforcement of gambling laws found that 80 percent of the police believe profits from illegal gambling are used to finance other illegal activities, such as loan-sharking. In half of the cities surveyed, local independent criminal organizations were said to control gambling operations.

Conservative Protestants have traditionally taken a stand against gambling. The Puritans of Massachusetts enacted America’s first law against gambling in 1638. In 1682, the Quakers in Pennsylvania passed their own law against gambling and "such like enticing, vain, and evil sports and games." During the period from 1830 to 1860, lotteries were banned across America. By 1908, nearly every state in the nation had banned horse racing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» not directly, but... Posted by: vasumurti
» RE: Would Jesus condone gambling? Posted by: drsivana99
Magical thinking: it's not just for witches & wizards anymore!
Posted by: crazyquilt on Aug 13, 2008 7:45 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hear a lot of outrage over how Mme Osteen acted, although that type of self-important behavior seems almost a byword of American culture. Of course, the problem isn't the behavior -- after all, there seems to be no stigma against characterizing the flight attendant as a gold-digging woman with delusions of real authority. The problem is the hypocrisy; she hardly "turned the other cheek."

Of course, it's easy to demonize Christians. After all, they're the dominant religious group in the US, as most of them will be happy to remind you. But, in this narcissistic game of "name it and claim it," they're no different than witches.

Witches?

Witches.

What's magic, other than a glorified version of name it & claim it? Sure, witches ask different spiritual factotums (factota?) but the sense of entitlement and the belief that "there are no coincidences" is identical. Ask any Pagan artist, musician, craftsperson, or event organizer: Pagans are great at saying how things should be done, criticizing them when they aren't done right, and doing rituals to make sure everything turns out as desired -- but when it comes to real work or monetary outlay? Forg