Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

Influential Pastor Preaches Anti-Semitism to His Flock

By Casey Sanchez, SPLC Intelligence Report. Posted August 11, 2008.


Identifying an evil race he calls the "Kenites" as the killers of Christ, televangelist Arnold Murray denies he is an anti-Semite. Others disagree.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Branson, Mo. -- It's a long way to go to church, especially for a congregation used to watching its pastor on television. But the flock of Shepherd's Chapel is like no other. Twice a year, almost 4,000 of its members will fly or drive from points across the country to this Ozarks tourist destination, best known for the neon kitsch and wholesome family entertainment of the Highway 76 Country Music Boulevard, to see Pastor Arnold Murray, host of the long-running TV Bible study program, "Shepherd's Chapel."

The strapping, 6-foot-4-inch octogenarian, known as "The Sarge" to his followers, has gained an audience that numbers in the millions. "Shepherd's Chapel" has been on the air for at least three decades and is broadcast in nearly every major and mid-size U.S. city.

At Passover this April 5 (Murray calculates the date for Passover according to his own interpretation of the Jewish calendar), the 81-year-old Arkansas pastor is all smiles as the packed audience in the Grand Palace country music hall rises to give him a long standing ovation before he's even said a word. His son Dennis introduces him as a man who is "taking names and kicking dragons." One woman can't contain herself. "We love you, Pastor Murray," she yells out. Murray jokes that he should get her number before pushing back his sleeves and opening his King James Bible. "Let's get to work," he commands. And they do. The audience is so rapt that throughout the 45-minute sermon the only sound they make is the onionskin rustle of thousands of Bible pages turning. But there are some things they're not being taught.

One of them is the fact that Murray's 1958 minister's license was signed by the late white supremacists Roy Gillaspie and Kenneth Goff, two early ideologues of Christian Identity, a racist theology that's been popular among Klansmen, neo-Nazis and other white nationalists for several decades. Most Identity adherents believe the Bible is the history of the white race, who are seen as the real "chosen people."

Gillaspie was the pastor of the Church of Jesus Christ, a seminal Christian Identity operation -- headquartered at Gillaspie's Bellflower, Calif., church -- with a handful of congregations in California and Arkansas, one of which was led by Murray. (Murray's Church of Jesus Christ in Gravette, Ark., was the precursor to his Shepherd's Chapel, in the same location.) The Intelligence Report has obtained Church of Jesus Christ newsletters dated 1978 that are signed by Murray.

Goff, for his part, was the founder of the Colorado-based Soldiers of the Cross Training Institute, a school that trained Christian Identity leaders including Dan Gayman, a well-known anti-Semitic leader during the 1980s. In 1958, Goff's pamphlet, "Reds Promote Racial War," claimed the Bible supported racial segregation. A 1969 Soldiers of the Cross newsletter penned by Goff describes black civil rights protesters as seeking "to submerge our culture and religious heritage under a flood of cannibalism, voodooism and beastly jungle sex orgies."

Arnold Murray is still connected to something called Soldiers of the Cross. According to Arkansas public records, a corporation by that name is doing business as Shepherd's Chapel in Arkansas, and Murray is registered as the corporation's agent. Murray's home, his church property where the TV studio and satellites are located, and several parcels of land in Gravette, Ark., are all listed as the property of Soldiers of the Cross.

Despite these ties to the roots of the Christian Identity movement, Murray today publicly disavows racism, and his followers include a tiny minority of non-whites. Even so, Murray preaches often about a race of evil people, descended from Cain, borne out of "the Serpent Seed" of Eve's sexual union with Satan in the Garden of Eden. He calls them the "Kenites" and identifies them in his 1979 Shepherd's Bible as people "who slipped in among the Jewish people in Jerusalem and claim to be God's chosen people, when in fact they are of Lucifer." He also mentions that "in 1967 Jerusalem fell to the Kenites during the 6 day war"; the Israelis, in fact, won the Six-Day War. In one sermon, Dennis Murray speaks of "the Kenites, who are responsible for the slaying of Christ." (In most Judeo-Christian traditions, the Kenites are a nomadic clan of Midianites and a tribe into which Moses married.)

The Serpent Seed is a belief ripped straight from the pages of "seedline" or "two-seed" Christian Identity theology, the hard-line version of the theology that holds that Eve was impregnated by Satan and gave birth to his son, Cain, described as the first Jew. That is, Jews are seen as biologically descended from Satan, and are allegedly hard at work preparing the earth for his rule. Identity adherents also argue that whites, not Jews, are the real Hebrews of the Bible, and that non-whites are sub-human "beasts of the field" created without souls.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: anti-semitism, the sarge, pastor murray

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Even after reading this the usual suspects will remain in denial claiming it's zionist propaganda
Posted by: yellow on Aug 11, 2008 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But, of course, anti-semitism is real and has been for centuries. And of course it is utterly unrelated to Israel, nor could even Israel's abolition end anti-semitism. This mother of all hatreds will remain until its root causes are eliminated which are the same root causes of all prejudices. It is the suffering caused by inequality and endemic crisis of our class system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ALL Religion Is Either A Hate Crime...
Posted by: ranchero42 on Aug 12, 2008 12:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or child abuse, or BOTH. Your invisible friend may love you, but get anywhere near the chataqua tent and SOMEBODY gonna tell you what god needs from you, today, tomorrow, for the rest of your increasingly sad existence. Why wait until you're dead before you find out they're lying, get the hell away from preachers and organized religion. If you still feel compelled to worship, do it as the NT says, close the door behind you and do it quietly. Are we gonna need to have any more discussions about this, young person? I'm looking at YOU.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's see he' against jews
Posted by: donl51 on Aug 12, 2008 1:00 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but not against Israell is that how that works?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I say! Posted by: donl51
» RE: Let's see he' against jews Posted by: Opinionator
» If He's A Revelationary... Posted by: ranchero42
Kenites?
Posted by: war_on_tara on Aug 12, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about the Barbieites?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Barbie-ISTs, it's Barbie-ISTs Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: Kenites? Posted by: Lauren
This one has bothered me since before I was confirmed as a Lutheran at age 13
Posted by: Phred42 on Aug 12, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It wasn't the Jews that Killed Jesus.....It was the Italians

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Christian anti-semitism can be traced to Paul
Posted by: vasumurti on Aug 12, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Christians think they are no longer under Mosaic Law, because Paul referred to his background as a former Pharisee and previous adherence to Mosaic Law as "so much garbage."

Nothing in the synoptic gospels suggests a break with Judaism. Jesus was called "Rabbi," meaning "Master" or "Teacher," 42 times in the gospels. Jesus' ministry was a rabbinic one. He went to the synagogue (Matthew 12:9), taught in the synagogues (Matthew 4:23, 13:54; Mark 1:39), expressed concern for Jairus, "one of the rulers of the synagogue" (Mark 5:36) and it "was his custom" to go to the synagogue (Luke 4:16).

Jesus himself said, "Do not suppose I have come to abolish the Law and the prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill...till heaven and earth pass away, not one jot or tittle pass from the Law till all is fulfilled. Whoever, therefore, breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven...unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven." (Matthew 5:17-20)

Jesus also upheld the Torah in Luke 16:17: "And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for the smallest portion of the Law to become invalid."

Nor do these words refer merely to the Ten Commandments. Jesus meant the entire Torah: 613 commandments. When a man asked Jesus what he must do to inherit eternal life, Jesus replied, "You know the commandments." He quoted not just the Ten Commandments, but a commandment from Leviticus 19:13 as well: "Do not defraud." (Mark 10:17-22)

Jesus' disciples were once accused by the scribes and Pharisees of violating rabbinical tradition (Matthew 15:1-2; Mark 7:5), but not biblical law. Jesus never says anywhere in the entire New Testament that the Law is abolished; this was Paul's theology.

Sometimes Christians cite Matthew 7:12, where Jesus says "Do unto others..." and this "covers" the Law and the prophets. But Jesus was merely repeating in the positive what Rabbi Hillel taught a generation earlier. No one took Hillel's words to mean the Law had been abolished--why should we assume this of Jesus?

If Jesus really did come to abolish the Law and the prophets, Simon (Peter) would not have resisted a divine command to kill and eat both "clean" and "unclean" animals (Acts 10), nor would there have been a debate in the early church as to what extent the gentiles were to observe Mosaic Law (Acts 15). When Paul visited the church at Jerusalem, James and the elders told him all its members were "zealous for the Law," and they were worried because they heard rumors Paul was preaching against Mosaic Law (Acts 21). None of these events would have happened had Jesus really come to abolish the Law and the prophets.

Paul says if anyone has confidence in the Law, "I am ahead of him."

Would that mean Paul places himself ahead of Jesus, who said he did not come to abolish the Law and the prophets? Would that mean Paul places himself ahead of Jesus, who said whoever sets aside even the least of the Law's demands shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 5:17-19)?

Would that mean Paul places himself ahead of Jesus, who taught that following the commandments of God is the only way to eternal life (Mark 10:17-22)? Would that mean Paul places himself ahead of Jesus who said that it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for the smallest portion of the Law to become invalid (Luke 16:17)?

Paul may have regarded the Law as "so much garbage," but it should be obvious JESUS DIDN'T THINK THE LAW WAS "GARBAGE"!

Christians believe in Paul, not Jesus. Bertrand Russell called Paul the "inventor" of Christianity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the Jews didn't kill Jesus
Posted by: vasumurti on Aug 12, 2008 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the Romans were responsible for the crucifixion.

Christian theologian Dr. Upton Clary Ewing writes:

"The wrongful blaming of the Jews for the death of Jesus has been one of the most effective roadblocks ever placed in the highway leading to the brotherhood of man. It is not only shameful, but completely illogical, for one to continue to hold that the Jews were responsible for the death of Jesus. As all the evidences of comparative beliefs seem to verify, Jesus and the Pharisees were more in agreement on religious issues than they were in disagreement.

"As for Jesus' declaring Himself to be the Messiah, the Jewish hierarchy would have been more amused than hostile at the audacity of anyone from Galilee making such a claim. The Jews, with very few exceptions, were far from being averse to the principles of Jesus. Even those who were annoyed by His jibes and His admonitions would not have felt justified in taking severe measures against Him. There were great multitudes of Jews who, although they dared not protest to the Romans, wept deeply as they followed Jesus to His crucifixion. Even the gospel of Luke openly admits the sincere affection the Jews had for Jesus. 'And there followed Him a great company of people and of women who also bewailed and lamented Him.' (Luke 23:27)

"The trial and execution of Jesus was strictly a Roman responsibility. It was prompted by and carried out in accord with strict Roman ordinances which extended little leniency to a Jew. The Jews under Roman authority were tolerated only when they conformed to all the articles of strict obedience. To be involved in the slightest misdemeanor, even among themselves, could mean the lash or other harsh, humiliating punishment.

"During the Roman occupation of Judea, it was the custom of the time to mete out severe punishment for a Jew for an offense that would hardly warrant the arrest of a Roman citizen. One does not need other historical evidence to confirm this; verification is found where Paul is charged with disturbing the peace: 'Is it lawful for you to scourge a man that is a Roman?' (Acts 22:24-29)

"The crucifixion of Jesus is explicable on one ground only: that He was sentenced to death and executed by Roman authority as a sower of sedition against Roman rule. A sentence by the Sanhedrin was imagined, and condemnation pronounced on the grounds that Jesus laid claim to be the Son of God. Jesus, as all four evangelists are compelled to admit, was condemned to death by Pilate on political grounds as 'King of the Jews,' that is, as a Messianic agitator who laid claim to some kind of royalty in Israel, which automatically made Him subversive of the imperial government. Historically, the case of Jesus is intelligible only if we admit from the outset that He was sentenced to death by Pilate alone, acting as a representative of Roman authority.

"Crucifixion was strictly a Roman means of execution. Death by stoning was the method used by the Jews, and this was ordered by the Sanhedrin only upon conviction of blasphemy; i.e., for cursing or denying the existence of God, which Jesus did not do. Up to the time of Jesus the Sanhedrin had not imposed a death sentence in over 200 years. In fact even if they had desired to do so they could not, for capital punishment was administered solely by Roman authority for crimes against imperial law...they nailed a sign on the cross to show their contempt for the Messianic claims of Jesus: 'Behold Him the king of the Jews.' These words which appear in all four gospels spell out examples of Roman vituperation, not Jewish judgement."

The NT says Pilate unwillingly sentenced Jesus to death, but Josephus says Pontius Pilate was so brutal he was recalled to Rome because of too many executions! Luke 13:1-5 reveals the real Pilate: "...the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The right game
Posted by: sirios on Aug 12, 2008 8:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fascinating how the author and the commentators seem to be claiming that their history books and their interpretation of these texts are the undisputable truth on the subject. without actual physical prescense one simply does NOT know. this holds true for ANY subject that you wish to be right on. Everything is heresay without direct experience. This is a biggie, and will be challanged by all those determined to maintain their life story which for the most part is based on what they have read , or been told by others. If we are told something from someone , it is verbalized from one level of conciousness and heard and interpreted from another level of awarness. This immediately puts the accuracy of the knowledge in question. Now, add 2000 years to the situation and, Wow, what a mess!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The right game Posted by: Lauren
The right game
Posted by: sirios on Aug 12, 2008 8:38 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fascinating how the author and the commentators seem to be claiming that their history books and their interpretation of these texts are the undisputable truth on the subject. without actual physical prescense one simply does NOT know. this holds true for ANY subject that you wish to be right on. Everything is heresay without direct experience. This is a biggie, and will be challanged by all those determined to maintain their life story which for the most part is based on what they have read , or been told by others. If we are told something from someone , it is verbalized from one level of conciousness and heard and interpreted from another level of awarness. This immediately puts the accuracy of the knowledge in question. Now, add 2000 years to the situation and, Wow, what a mess!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Archie1954
Posted by: Archie1954 on Aug 12, 2008 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any Christian worth his salt will know that he and we killed Jesus. The Jews were God's chosen people, the ones He decided would carry out His plan on earth and they did. But it was humanity as a whole that killed Jesus. The Jews and Romans were simply the means. I can't believe that any Christian would allow himself to believe the filth that this Christian imposter is feeding to them. It really is outrageous!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Archie1954 Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Archie1954 Posted by: BrianOfNairobi
God killed Jesus
Posted by: joyo on Aug 12, 2008 9:10 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Great God, One and only Holy Creator of the universe and all the matter, forces and ideas within it, killed His son Jesus. And we should be terrified, terrified, that He did. Because He is awaiting your response.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: God killed Jesus Posted by: ranchero42
» RE: God killed Jesus Posted by: Lauren
» RE: God killed Jesus Posted by: BrianOfNairobi
» Where is the benevolence? . . . Posted by: dustdevil
» Ghosties Posted by: edgar1
Does the War on Religion ever end?
Posted by: Godfather89 on Aug 12, 2008 9:38 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I dont think so, all the time... Religion is meant for personal development and has more to do with psychology than social implications or scientific discoveries.

In fact one religious person from the past even said that if the claims posed by religion seem to extravagant that it has to do with the self than it does have to do with the percectible world. Because of this, creationism is utter BS even to a religious person, so that means that even a religious person should favor science over externalized religious claims (e.g. God created the world 6000 years ago).

Nonetheless, Religion is meant for the mature and grown up to use to improve themselves and make the world a better place through your own personal development.

If it is used for anything outside of that, such as politics, economics, domestic and foreign policies, hate crimes, than it is nothing more than children doing what they do because of some bogeyman running around called "god." It makes me wonder if the know God or if they want to even know God.

Besides Christ calls us to not be worldly well aren't "politics, economics, domestic and foreign policies, hate crimes" and things of that sort, worldly? By the words of Christ these "pastors and evangelicals" are blind leading the blind and do not represent the word of Christ.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Does the War on Religion ever end? Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» RE: Does the War on... Posted by: ranchero42
» RE: Does the War on... Posted by: Godfather89
And, who says only Islam has it's fanatics!?!?!?!
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 12, 2008 11:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a shame that no one wants to admit the truth! Islam is not the only religion that has it's share of fanatics! And why is it that the sheep that go to these places have not read the book for themselves! (This is a good place for teaching literacy)

First, Jesus lived his life as a Hebrew, he was raised as a Hebrew, and the original followers were Hebrew. It wasn't until he converted Paul that the problem came in. While it was the Romans that did kill Jesus, it was because the Hebrews would not speak out for his rightousness.

As for religion Christianity was used to justify the Crusades, slavery, Manifest Destiny, why the Native Nations in this country needed to be "civilized", why the European Jews needed to return to Israel, and part of the justification for why George W. is in office!

I am all for a belief in the Ultimate by whatever name you wish to use. What I'm against are the sheep that refuse to use just a tad bit of common sense. What I'm against are ignorant people that only use certain quotes to justify what they are for or against! If you want serious dialog about the Book then by all means read and interpret for yourself, put into action your faith in your life - before you come into mine!!!

Can someone explain why is it that although the Old and New Testament are in the same book, why is it that "Christians" only feel the need to read the last part, does not the (OLD) first part of the Book apply to them - or is the (NEW) part the only part they need! Jesus didn't come to replace the Old Book, he came (if he came) to breathe life into it for everyone else!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jesus never existed and is a Roman deception...
Posted by: SevenStarHand on Aug 12, 2008 12:38 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He is based on lies told about me (and others) and the deceptive recasting of stolen texts and misrepresented ancient wisdom symbology. On the other hand, the Teacher of Righteousness of the Dead Sea Scrolls, who was Jacob the Just, aka Saint James, most definitely did exist. He was a staunch and capable opponent of Rome and the deceptive Temple Priesthood, who are still Roman lapdogs to this day.

I was the Teacher of Righteousness, as well as many other well-known "biblical" prophet-sages throughout many lifetimes. [Amen]Moses did indeed exist and I still exist. I was the author of most of the original symbolic narratives on which the canons of the Three faiths of Abraham were based. Hence, they are derivatives of earlier texts and concepts, not the originals, and I have produced comprehensive proof of this over the last several years. These were not tribal narratives, but a long-term effort to send encoded wisdom into the future to a time when humanity could finally break the yoke of money, religion, and politics. I have proven the truth and comprehensively exposed Rome's lies in and about the so-called "New Testament."

The time for the removal of ignorance has arrived !!!

Peace and Wisdom...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People shape religion and religion shapes people.
Posted by: BlueGorilla on Aug 13, 2008 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course the active support of racism, by the church has been an integral part of its history.This makes it a product of wider society,as well as a key force in perpetuating a great evil.
From St Pauls call of "come out and be seperated",to the millenia of anti-semitism coming from Roman Catholicism,and the long time embracing of slavery by all established churches,it seems that for Jews and blacks the benign hand of a loving god,was strangely absent.
The change in church thinking re slavery,lagged behind the economic changes in the world,(though in fairness there are noteable exceptions,ie some Memonnites Quakers in America,and outstanding moral religious figures elsewhere),and caught up slowly,and in some US evangelical cases,they never caught up at all.
Man creates god,in his own image,not vice versa.Slavery,hatred of Jews,obsessive homophobia,even rampant capitalism ,paedophilia,genocide,pacifism kindness and socialism can be supported by scripture.The kindness,egalitarianism and forgiveness preached by Jesus is ignored by conservative christians,liberal christians disgard Jesus's hellfire and damnation preaching.
Some preachers,would most likely be far right congressmen if not for religion.The biblical interpretation reflects the milieu from which it springs.

Sadly this cynicism also reinforces existing prejudice,as rabble rousers vent spleen on any minority it so chooses..and spouteth whatever that which doeth pleaseth the Redneckites.."yep that their preacher,he gawn and said,that those slippery Jews,all gone an done some bad things Cleetus".

The nonesense of a convenient,and hate fuelled religious pick and mix,serves to keep the ignorant,willfully ignorant.Victims of divide and rule tactics,as they locate the wrong enemy..again and again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is why Xtians should be banned from using Jewish sacred writings
Posted by: DaBear on Aug 14, 2008 11:55 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Murray and the other fundie nutballs are just one more proof in a long line of evidence that should bar Xtians from using someone else's books. They get is all messed up, they don't know the language or the cultural milieu in which to interpret them. The result is whackjobs on crack spewing all manner of horseshit with devastating consequences for the people from whom the source material was stolen. Europe was better off under the Celts, dammit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I think you're right. Posted by: yellow
Talk about Biblical illiteracy
Posted by: Katabole on Aug 24, 2008 11:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a member of the Shepherd's Chapel for the last 17 years I find it disheartening and insulting that anyone would claim that Shepherd's Chapel is anti-Semetic. This anti-Semetic claim is due in large part to the complete Biblical illiteracy of the majority of the world's Christians.
Do you who claim to be Christians find it insulting and unbelievable that Satan is the father of Cain? Or did your church teach you the lie that Adam is the father of Cain? No worries. A short study on the root of the Hebrew word for "tree" used in the Genesis account of creation should easily alleviate any misunderstanding. Of course this is a foreign language to those who didn't study the Bible from the origianl languages and make assumptions based on human tradition.

Cain sure is Satan's son. Jesus tells a parable about him and his descendants in the New Testament in Matt 13, the parable of the tares of the field or the weeds. He explains the parable and then explains it literally and when He explains it literally he claims that the tares or weeds are the LITERAL CHILDREN of the devil. He even goes as far as to call these Kenites, a Hebrew word meaning descendants of Cain, exactly who they are in John chapter 8 when He says they are the children of the devil.

It truly amazes me that the only thing more legendary than the illiteracy of so-called Christians is their ignorance.

I think both those who claim to be Christians and are not members of the Chapel and those who are not Chrsitians could do themselves a world of good, if they actually rightfully divided the Bible as the Bible asks the reader of it to do.

People should listen to what the Bible teaches about the churches and not what the churches supposedly say about the Bible.

There is an evil seed planted in the world as Jesus says. It began at Cain (the first murderer) and his descendants still live today, and many of them claim to be Jews when they are not.

Of course, many people don't know there are two words for the word "Jew" utilized in the Greek New Testament. One meaning denotes the descendants of the tribe of Judah,; the true Jews. The other meaning denotes the people who live in the land of Judea. The Kenites are not of the tribe of Judah meaning that they were never true Jews, but presently most live in the land of Judea in modern day Israel

Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 should explain this along with Jeremiah ch 24 when God explains to Jeremiah about the bad or evil figs.

Next time you so-called Christians post, make sure you know what your talking about which even in your limited understanding, is far more than any atheist knows about truth or life.

Christianity is a reality. Not a religion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]