COMMENTS: 124
Why Karl Rove Should Go to Jail
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.
After my ruling that Mr. Rove's claims of immunity are not legally valid, Congressman Conyers and I gave him one last chance to comply with the law. He ignored us. As he let yet another deadline slip by this week, Mr. Rove's disregard for Congress has become intolerable. Mr. Rove needs to understand that he is not above the law and should obey a subpoena just like any other American is required to do.
Mr. Rove should not be able to hide behind the president to avoid the American public. Americans are fed up with this administration flaunting the law. They expect Congress to hold people accountable and that is exactly what we intend to do. Letting Mr. Rove get away with this would set a dangerous precedent. I have recommended that we hold Mr. Rove in contempt of Congress. If we need to revive the inherent contempt procedure which gives Congress the authority to arrest those who defy Congressional subpoenas, then so be it.
The courts have made clear that no one, not even the president, is immune from compulsory process. Any person who scoffs at the law and who has committed an offense that is punishable by jail time should be put in jail. This includes Karl Rove.
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Turiye on Jul 17, 2008 5:50 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Omnipotent Executive Privelege Bulls$$t....
Posted by: Scotslass
» Let's start the hangings!! -- drag em from the castle
Posted by: govfoe
» RE: Let's start the hangings!! -- drag em from the castle
Posted by: Prairie Waif
» RE: Let's start the hangings!! -- drag em from the castle
Posted by: Cybershaman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Crazy H on Jul 17, 2008 6:12 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So arrest him, already, Representative!
Posted by: vision
» RE: So arrest him, already, Representative!
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: So arrest him, already, Representative!
Posted by: zerachiel
» RE: So arrest him, already, Representative!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» I guess Conyers and the rest of the Dems EMJOY looking impotent...
Posted by: ~Fiona~
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rickiey on Jul 17, 2008 6:34 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"My Ruling" indeed. Here's a hint: Under the constitution, Congress has LEGISLATIVE powers, not judicial.
1. If you want to take on the executive branch, there are two legal ways to do it, and only two:
1. The creation of laws that restrict the actions of the executive branch.
2. Impeachment.
Either do it right, or do it not at all.
The branches are supposed to SHARE power, which does not include the executive branch being subservient to the legislative.
Congressional "oversight" is unconstitutional (not to mention ineffective).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: Seeker4Ever
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: Seeker4Ever
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: ADNK
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: john mont
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: rickiey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pauldd on Jul 17, 2008 7:19 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Congressman, I have respected and admired your opinions on the Judiciary Committee during the criminal reign of this administration. What I fail to understand why you refuse to take your obligation to the Constitution seriously and use your powers to take action instead of just promoting your opinions through editorials.
Both houses of Congress have the power of Inherent Contempt which can be invoked and then order the Sergeant-At-Arms take Mr. Rove into custody. I could be wrong on the legal procedural details but YOU clearly have the power to do this. But instead you write editorials in Huffington Post.
Why, Mr. Conyers, Why? It seems to much of America that you have stood by while this rogue regime has run roughshod over the constitution and the likes of you, Mr. Waxman and Mr. Leahy have talked a good game but failed to act on your Constitutionally mandated responsibilities.
The path is clear to EVERYONE who stands for truth, justice and the rule of law. There is no question to "confront" there are only actions to be taken. Take them or go home, you're of no help to us if you keep talking but fail to act.
Now, Ms. Sanchez, Chairwoman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee, you have also posted a letter calling for justice (more specifically, jail time for Karl).
So you gave Mr. Rove "one last chance to comply with the law [and] he ignored [you]."
The only thing Karl Rove is hiding behind is YOUR and Mr. Conyers' timidity and your failure to invoke Inherent Contempt to force Mr. Rove to comply with a congressional subpoena. If any common person failed to comply with a subpoena, they would be sitting in the hooskow waiting to answer for their failure to appear. But Karl is flipping the American public the bird and you're whining in the Huffington Post about how he should be in jail instead of doing your Constitutionally mandated job of upholding the law.
If "The courts have made clear that no one, not even the president, is immune from compulsory process", then WHY aren't you invoking Inherent Contempt, instead of just talking about, and having the Sergeant-at-Arms remand Mr. Rove into custody until he complies with the subpoena?
The current brand of "Republican" disgusts me but I know that if Rove was a Democrat there is no doubt that the Republicans would have him in custody right now. So quit whining and do something!
This country can't afford criminals in the executive branch but we also can't afford cowards in the legislative branch. So step it up, the future of our country depends on it!
Kindest Regards,
J. Q. Public
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Dear Ms. Sanchez
Posted by: sheena2u
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jasonabresinos on Jul 17, 2008 8:03 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: foreverhope on Jul 17, 2008 8:16 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is something we can do NOW and it IS important! PLEASE CALL AND PASS THIS ON:
1-202-224-3121
You can also let Rep. Conyers know you appreciate the work he is doing to bring justice and possible indictments against Rove and others in the BUSH regime, same number.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chagrilama on Jul 18, 2008 6:05 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems that the teeth of Congress have all fallen out, and many of the representatives talk well, talk tough, but the actions you take as a group is a disgrace to this nation and a snub to the people who elected you all and are paying your salaries and benefits.
I am personally ashamed that you even wrote the post at this time. It would be much more instructive and useful to the People if you wrote it AFTER you moved to arrest Mr Rove - even if you cannot get enough votes to do it because your colleagues in Congress are spineless. By posting BEFORE, you demonstrate that you, too, are spineless - and you do it publicly. What a shame.
So please, Congresswoman Sanchez: You have an obligation to ACT in the interest of the people who elected you! Your obligation is just as strong as Mr Rove's obligation. Why is he more "obligated" than you are?
Sorry to "rain of your parade", as it were, in this forum. You make a good case and many people are sickened and disheartened by the Administration's fouting of their moral, ethical, and legal obligations to the people of this country. But frankly, you get ZERO sympathy here - since you are part of the problem that helps foster this kind of behaviour.
Chagri Lama
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ladyluck43701@yahoo.com on Jul 18, 2008 9:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» then it may be too late
Posted by: quakergirl
» RE: then it may be too late
Posted by: Lauren
» Blackwater
Posted by: Tombo
» RE: Blackwater
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Pardoning is presidents option
Posted by: zerachiel
Comments are closed-
Posted by: srsmn on Jul 18, 2008 12:00 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The whole world is watching this - it's embarassing.
srs_mn
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Just do it
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Just do it
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Just do it
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Just do it
Posted by: helenwheels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JimRooooo on Jul 18, 2008 2:24 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless you would allow his style of politics to become institutionalized, it is absolutely necessary that he be held to accounts, thoroughly investigated and then indicted should the evidence show grounds to do so.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I agree with the others here. It's time to cowboy up
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: robertkamper on Jul 18, 2008 7:53 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
July 17, 2008
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why is this criminal writing op ed columns in the Wall Street Journal?
Posted by: edgar_michel
» RE: Why is this criminal writing op ed columns in the Wall Street Journal?
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: criminal writing op ed columns in the Wall Street Journal?
Posted by: editnetwork
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DR. LARRY MITCHELL on Jul 19, 2008 12:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DR. LARRY MITCHELL on Jul 19, 2008 12:33 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ON SECOND THOUGHT...
Posted by: lenioui
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chuckjs on Jul 19, 2008 3:22 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While you are at it do something about the pathetic leadership in your party. If you want to hold these Republican people responsible for what they have done a good first step would be to get rid of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. They are the single biggest obstacle stopping the criminal prosecution on any current Republican politician. It is YOUR party and you are an insider, unlike most of the rest of us, now do something about it!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Would you like some cheese to go with that!
Posted by: pcushniesr
» Re: Would you like some cheese to go with that!
Posted by: sheena2u
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fearn on Jul 19, 2008 4:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Imagine: Pelosi thinks Bush is doing a bad job...
Posted by: Badger2
» RE: From the outside
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pcushniesr on Jul 19, 2008 4:24 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: riley on Jul 19, 2008 4:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Question. . .
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Question. . .
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kc10ken on Jul 19, 2008 4:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the fuck is wrong with you? You have the power, the authority and the mechanics to go out, arrest that fat bastard and drag his ass in front of the committee.
We elected you dems to bring justice and sanity to Washington and all you do is sit there and whine about how Rove and the rest of the GOP criminals in Washington defy your orders.
YOU'RE IN CHARGE...DO YOUR FUCKING JOB ALREADY!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Covert operatives camo'ed in Blue! COMPLICITY!!!
Posted by: Purple Girl
» RE: Covert operatives camo'ed in Blue! COMPLICITY!!!
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Covert operatives camo'ed in Blue! COMPLICITY!!!
Posted by: sheena2u
» RE: Covert operatives camo'ed in Blue! COMPLICITY!!!
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Covert operatives camo'ed in Blue! COMPLICITY!!!
Posted by: Mr. G
Comments are closed-
Posted by: warrior woman on Jul 19, 2008 4:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: shill on Jul 19, 2008 4:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulDKennedy on Jul 19, 2008 5:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Badger2 on Jul 19, 2008 6:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jul 19, 2008 6:35 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arrest the entirety of all three branches and We will sort out the innocent from guilty in anightly 'American Idol' style procession of Trials. We have some awesome 'parting Gifts' for the Losers! Oh and we Will keep the suspension of Habus Corpus for them and refuse any appeals. DICK get your swim trunks on -You're going Waterboarding!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Dude! You Should Delete This Post
Posted by: BAKslider
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sheena2u on Jul 19, 2008 7:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Thomas Paine said in Common Sense, "In America the law is king. For as in absolute govenments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other."
He continues, that otherwise "Nothing is criminal; there is no such thing as treason; wherefore, every one thinks himself at liberty to act as he pleases" And finally he warns, "If something is not done in time, it will be too late to do anything."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: You have no choice
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: You have no choice
Posted by: oldumbo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lduvall on Jul 19, 2008 8:09 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The lack of democratic leadership in either the house or senate, and the failure to have any nerve to try and hold bush, cheney, rove, etc., accountable in any way - is there ANY REASON for rove or anyone else to care what the all powerful enabling committees and their members think?
Get some guts, take some action, before bush pardons everyone.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why should Karl Rove Go to Jail??
Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: Why should Karl Rove Go to Jail??
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ranchero42 on Jul 19, 2008 8:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WhuThe?!? on Jul 19, 2008 8:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 113121 on Jul 19, 2008 8:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: helenwheels on Jul 19, 2008 9:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jonathan Turley, a Constitutional expert, explained it quite well on Countdown more than once.
I am pretty sure though that most of the Dems have been blackmailed or threatened in some ways. Illegal wiretapping made sure the shrub & it's madministration got the goods on everyone, I'm sure.
What a cesspool our gov't is.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lamac66 on Jul 19, 2008 9:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I give republicans/conservatives that, they will be nasty when they have to be.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Toothless Tiger in Indian Country
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: onevoter on Jul 19, 2008 10:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is like the parent who tells their child to stop doing something or they are going to (fill in punishment here), then they never follow through. So, the child learns that their threats of punishment mean nothing and they continue the behavior that should have been punished.
Words mean little without action to back them up. WALK THE TALK OR SHUT THE F*&K UP !!
The day I first heard of this, I tried to write to Congresswoman Sanchez...it is nearly impossible to send an e-mail unless you live in her district.
Pelosi, Reid, Conyers, Sanchez....how many more Dems have no spine and are therefore accomplices to the criminal acts of this administration? Looks like they need to let Kucinich be Speaker.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Might as well vote NADER like many others.
Posted by: jwverez
» RE: Might as well vote NADER like many others.
Posted by: Prairie Waif
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nomomorons on Jul 19, 2008 11:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Members of TAR should revolt! TAR leadership should be forced to resign. Rove should go to jail.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TJColatrella on Jul 19, 2008 11:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Federalist Society has infiltrated and infested our Justice Dept. and our Federal Court system...including what was once our Supreme Court..and is now in reality the Federalist Society Court..!
Their agenda is to unify with the Executive Branch and make Congress impotent and since the Legislative Branch is the people's branch thus create their Unitary Dictatorship where a very small slecet few rule over the masses and thus as Alexander Hamilton warned in Federalist 78 destroy our democracy...
Until all of these abuses are traced as they properly can be from David Addington and John Yoo and the Torture memos, and FISA and Declaring Americans "enemy combatants" to suspending Habeas Corpus, to disregarding Congress and the nearly 800 Signing Statements all trace back to the Federalist Society...the scandals in our Justice Dept., Siegelman's false prosecution and Federal Attorney's firings...it's all the damn Federalist Society..
The Federalist Society is destroying our system of government from the inside just like some cancer...
Hell the Federalist Society, Scalia most of all, one of their biggest recruiters and a Tory Traitor to our Constitution of note installed Bush and caused all this misery, death and mayhem and corruption we are living with and will suffer from for decades..
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Schroeder on Jul 19, 2008 12:19 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaPoorChimp on Jul 19, 2008 12:22 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And here's another sad fact: most of you here have likely voted the Democratic-Liberal line(often represented by the same candidate) in the past; some have voted the Republican-Conservative line (also quite often represented by the same candidate). That's what you've done for years, if not your entire voting lives. And guess what? That's what you'll do yet again in November, and for all elections to come. And the Demopublicans and the Republicrats know that all too well. So neither the candidates themselves nor their backers (would "handlers" be a better word?) have much incentive to make any major changes.
So what I propose---in full knowledge that the snowball has a better chance in hell than that enough of us would act on this---is that, with precious few exceptions (Paul? Kucinich?), we make it our policy as the electorate to vote the incumbents out in every election, every time. Federal, state, local, whatever. We do this until they get it through their self-important heads that we're paying atention, we're damn mad, and we're not going to take it anymore.
Not only that, but we should, as often as is feasible, vote IN minor party candidates or independents: Greens, Libertarians, whatever. It hardly matters. Just let the Dems and the Repubs know the free ride is over.
Besides, the minor party types haven't had the opportunity to cozy up to the vested & monied interests yet, and so may actually have the agendas of their constituents at heart, at least for a while. (until the next election?)
I think one cause for optimism about this tactic is that, when it comes to preserving themselves and their cushy jobs, the professional office-holders can be remarkably quick learners, so perhaps we wouldn't have to do that very many times before seeing positive changes.
Again, I have NO expectation that enough of us would act to bring about this felicitous state of affairs, but who knows? Maybe we'll get the Putney Swope (q.v.) effect.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gc94112 on Jul 19, 2008 12:51 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EagleX on Jul 19, 2008 3:03 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: smendler on Jul 19, 2008 3:05 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: WANTED: KARL "TURD BLOSSOM" ROVE (PDF poster)
Posted by: smendler
» broken link
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EagleX on Jul 19, 2008 3:12 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is obvious that Sanchez is attempting to circumvent the Constitution by going after the precedent of executive privilege to cover her dubious actions while in office.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Justice Department needs to look at Sanchez...too many red flags
Posted by: jvaljon1
» RE: Justice Department needs to look at Sanchez...too many red flags
Posted by: peacefullaim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EagleX on Jul 19, 2008 3:29 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There must be complete transparency from the Sanchez girls to determine who is funding their attempt at undermining the Constitution and the separation of powers.
Of course, if the fringe Left continues to undermine the Constitution with endless investigations -- why shouldn't Republicans reciprocate?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Republicans get away with murder.
Posted by: BlueGorilla
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wakoh on Jul 19, 2008 4:36 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ev. Wakoh Shannon Hickey, Ph.D.
Posted by: Ahimsa
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueGorilla on Jul 19, 2008 4:41 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This adminastration has been a hi-jack from the beginning,as Naomi klein pointed out recently,the Bush Gang (plc)have used every catastrophe as an opportunity to extend a hard right wing,neo-con programme,at home and overseas.In their zealousness,they have ignored protocol,and perceived themselves as creating whatever history,rules and reality they wanted to.That has meant an occasional bending of the the rules,and a more frequent ignoring of the rules.
This attack on democracy and rights ,has been aided by a media which has spread a false patriotism,as the Bush line becomes truth ,not argument,not perspective,but iron truth.
This bull was for the post 9/11 years swallowed by huge swathes of the mainstream population,whose best brains have less political awareness than even the least educated Venuzualan worker.
Cometh the hour,cometh the Democrats..sadly not.The dems cowed response has been pathetic,and adds weight to Chomsky's view that any difference between the major parties is an illusion,and they are working in cahoots to sustain the manufactured consensus of the ruling elite.
The democrats support for the Iraq-attack,pathetic shielding of Bush re impeachment,and the toothless,half assed way in which Karl rove has been pursued,speaks volumes for the lack of real opposition in the USA.
For the moment,the USA has the rulers it deserves.There are signs of a growing awareness however.The back No in November campaign is offering a real opportunity to tell the politicians ,that they are offering nothing.It also has the makings of a real democratic grassroots movement.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rondoda1 on Jul 19, 2008 5:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Ronald Doda Jr.
Posted by: rondoda1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: adamskiinasia on Jul 19, 2008 5:49 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: get-out-of-jail-free card
Posted by: jvaljon1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ahimsa on Jul 19, 2008 6:54 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For whatever is left of this country's soul
Throw him in jail, in real jail.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hugeal on Jul 19, 2008 9:28 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE TIME TO ACT IS NOW! WE ARE WATCHING YOU AND WILL TAKE NOTE OF YOUR ACTIONS!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Miki on Jul 20, 2008 2:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not in your district. In fact, I am an American living in South Africa because I am unable to legally marry in the USA (California, respectfully notwithstanding.)
I am a little dismayed at the disrespect that has been heaped upon you for writing this article. I do understand the level of anger and frustration expressed, but I think that what some of our Alternet readers fail to appreciate that theirs isn't the only front in this economic and class civil war currently being waged within the US. As the last civil war was fought under the guise of slavery but was really about economics, this civil war is about systematically enslaving us all to serve the economic masters.
The very thing that the Judiciary Committee is investigating is the abuses of power against Siegelman (D) who was investigated relentlessly for years...showing how determined the dirt diggers in the current administration are. A little research into your history and that of your sister reveals that Rovian tactics from the DoJ aren't limited to governors.
I have always maintained that it probably is not me, today anyway, that Bush and co-conspirators want to wiretap without a warrant, after all does big brother want to listen to me talking to my sister about chicken recipes or complaining about the economy? No, he wants to get the dirt on anyone who threatens his power and that puts you and your sister on the front lines in that battle. I am but a tiny threat to the powers that be, and I could be handled with minimal effort, they don't need to tap my phone/email to do it.
It is easy for me to call on you to have courage and integrity, to demand it from public servants but I cannot. Fight your battles and I will fight mine. May we be victorious in our quests. You may well find support from the very people who criticized you the loudest.
Good luck to you, Representative. We have a long battle ahead trying to return America to its ideals and to correct its legacy of atrocities.
~Miki
A Hawaiian in Africa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Amen!
Posted by: Hans B
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aussie321 on Jul 20, 2008 12:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: editnetwork on Jul 20, 2008 3:50 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not 'Flaunting' But . . .
Posted by: sicntired
» RE: Not 'Flaunting' But . . . Ouch!
Posted by: editnetwork
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sicntired on Jul 20, 2008 5:20 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PrinceRobert on Jul 20, 2008 7:32 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is well past time for us to cease to tolerate the cowardly incompetence of the Congress and particularly the Do Nothing Democrats. The Republican party is a criminal enterprise but I am possibly even more disgusted by the Hotair Blowhard "leadership" of the Democrats in office. So, while I agree with the disgust and anger expressed by 99% of the commentors, I say that there is more than ample justification for WE THE PEOPLE to take charge, to throw the do-nothings out on the street, re-establish a government that will not tolerate criminal activity and summarily jail and prosecute those who are so obviously commiting or complicit in crimes such as mass murder and obstruction of justice.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: editnetwork on Jul 20, 2008 7:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jeffersonian Republican on Jul 21, 2008 12:14 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only real actions with regard to Rove and impeachment, inter alia, will demonstrate the sincerety of the passions of the many words spoken and written of thus far.
In short, just "do it" or withdraw.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Turiye on Jul 17, 2008 5:50 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Omnipotent Executive Privelege Bulls$$t....
Posted by: Scotslass
» Let's start the hangings!! -- drag em from the castle
Posted by: govfoe
» RE: Let's start the hangings!! -- drag em from the castle
Posted by: Prairie Waif
» RE: Let's start the hangings!! -- drag em from the castle
Posted by: Cybershaman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Crazy H on Jul 17, 2008 6:12 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So arrest him, already, Representative!
Posted by: vision
» RE: So arrest him, already, Representative!
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: So arrest him, already, Representative!
Posted by: zerachiel
» RE: So arrest him, already, Representative!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» I guess Conyers and the rest of the Dems EMJOY looking impotent...
Posted by: ~Fiona~
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rickiey on Jul 17, 2008 6:34 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"My Ruling" indeed. Here's a hint: Under the constitution, Congress has LEGISLATIVE powers, not judicial.
1. If you want to take on the executive branch, there are two legal ways to do it, and only two:
1. The creation of laws that restrict the actions of the executive branch.
2. Impeachment.
Either do it right, or do it not at all.
The branches are supposed to SHARE power, which does not include the executive branch being subservient to the legislative.
Congressional "oversight" is unconstitutional (not to mention ineffective).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: Seeker4Ever
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: Seeker4Ever
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: ADNK
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: john mont
» RE: A clear case of abuse of authority.
Posted by: rickiey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pauldd on Jul 17, 2008 7:19 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Congressman, I have respected and admired your opinions on the Judiciary Committee during the criminal reign of this administration. What I fail to understand why you refuse to take your obligation to the Constitution seriously and use your powers to take action instead of just promoting your opinions through editorials.
Both houses of Congress have the power of Inherent Contempt which can be invoked and then order the Sergeant-At-Arms take Mr. Rove into custody. I could be wrong on the legal procedural details but YOU clearly have the power to do this. But instead you write editorials in Huffington Post.
Why, Mr. Conyers, Why? It seems to much of America that you have stood by while this rogue regime has run roughshod over the constitution and the likes of you, Mr. Waxman and Mr. Leahy have talked a good game but failed to act on your Constitutionally mandated responsibilities.
The path is clear to EVERYONE who stands for truth, justice and the rule of law. There is no question to "confront" there are only actions to be taken. Take them or go home, you're of no help to us if you keep talking but fail to act.
Now, Ms. Sanchez, Chairwoman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee, you have also posted a letter calling for justice (more specifically, jail time for Karl).
So you gave Mr. Rove "one last chance to comply with the law [and] he ignored [you]."
The only thing Karl Rove is hiding behind is YOUR and Mr. Conyers' timidity and your failure to invoke Inherent Contempt to force Mr. Rove to comply with a congressional subpoena. If any common person failed to comply with a subpoena, they would be sitting in the hooskow waiting to answer for their failure to appear. But Karl is flipping the American public the bird and you're whining in the Huffington Post about how he should be in jail instead of doing your Constitutionally mandated job of upholding the law.
If "The courts have made clear that no one, not even the president, is immune from compulsory process", then WHY aren't you invoking Inherent Contempt, instead of just talking about, and having the Sergeant-at-Arms remand Mr. Rove into custody until he complies with the subpoena?
The current brand of "Republican" disgusts me but I know that if Rove was a Democrat there is no doubt that the Republicans would have him in custody right now. So quit whining and do something!
This country can't afford criminals in the executive branch but we also can't afford cowards in the legislative branch. So step it up, the future of our country depends on it!
Kindest Regards,
J. Q. Public
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Dear Ms. Sanchez
Posted by: sheena2u
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jasonabresinos on Jul 17, 2008 8:03 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: foreverhope on Jul 17, 2008 8:16 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is something we can do NOW and it IS important! PLEASE CALL AND PASS THIS ON:
1-202-224-3121
You can also let Rep. Conyers know you appreciate the work he is doing to bring justice and possible indictments against Rove and others in the BUSH regime, same number.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chagrilama on Jul 18, 2008 6:05 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems that the teeth of Congress have all fallen out, and many of the representatives talk well, talk tough, but the actions you take as a group is a disgrace to this nation and a snub to the people who elected you all and are paying your salaries and benefits.
I am personally ashamed that you even wrote the post at this time. It would be much more instructive and useful to the People if you wrote it AFTER you moved to arrest Mr Rove - even if you cannot get enough votes to do it because your colleagues in Congress are spineless. By posting BEFORE, you demonstrate that you, too, are spineless - and you do it publicly. What a shame.
So please, Congresswoman Sanchez: You have an obligation to ACT in the interest of the people who elected you! Your obligation is just as strong as Mr Rove's obligation. Why is he more "obligated" than you are?
Sorry to "rain of your parade", as it were, in this forum. You make a good case and many people are sickened and disheartened by the Administration's fouting of their moral, ethical, and legal obligations to the people of this country. But frankly, you get ZERO sympathy here - since you are part of the problem that helps foster this kind of behaviour.
Chagri Lama
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ladyluck43701@yahoo.com on Jul 18, 2008 9:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» then it may be too late
Posted by: quakergirl
» RE: then it may be too late
Posted by: Lauren
» Blackwater
Posted by: Tombo
» RE: Blackwater
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Pardoning is presidents option
Posted by: zerachiel
Comments are closed-
Posted by: srsmn on Jul 18, 2008 12:00 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The whole world is watching this - it's embarassing.
srs_mn
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Just do it
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Just do it
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Just do it
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Just do it
Posted by: helenwheels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JimRooooo on Jul 18, 2008 2:24 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless you would allow his style of politics to become institutionalized, it is absolutely necessary that he be held to accounts, thoroughly investigated and then indicted should the evidence show grounds to do so.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I agree with the others here. It's time to cowboy up
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: robertkamper on Jul 18, 2008 7:53 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
July 17, 2008
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why is this criminal writing op ed columns in the Wall Street Journal?
Posted by: edgar_michel
» RE: Why is this criminal writing op ed columns in the Wall Street Journal?
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: criminal writing op ed columns in the Wall Street Journal?
Posted by: editnetwork
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DR. LARRY MITCHELL on Jul 19, 2008 12:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DR. LARRY MITCHELL on Jul 19, 2008 12:33 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ON SECOND THOUGHT...
Posted by: lenioui
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chuckjs on Jul 19, 2008 3:22 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While you are at it do something about the pathetic leadership in your party. If you want to hold these Republican people responsible for what they have done a good first step would be to get rid of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. They are the single biggest obstacle stopping the criminal prosecution on any current Republican politician. It is YOUR party and you are an insider, unlike most of the rest of us, now do something about it!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Would you like some cheese to go with that!
Posted by: pcushniesr
» Re: Would you like some cheese to go with that!
Posted by: sheena2u
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fearn on Jul 19, 2008 4:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Imagine: Pelosi thinks Bush is doing a bad job...
Posted by: Badger2
» RE: From the outside
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pcushniesr on Jul 19, 2008 4:24 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: riley on Jul 19, 2008 4:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Question. . .
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Question. . .
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kc10ken on Jul 19, 2008 4:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the fuck is wrong with you? You have the power, the authority and the mechanics to go out, arrest that fat bastard and drag his ass in front of the committee.
We elected you dems to bring justice and sanity to Washington and all you do is sit there and whine about how Rove and the rest of the GOP criminals in Washington defy your orders.
YOU'RE IN CHARGE...DO YOUR FUCKING JOB ALREADY!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Covert operatives camo'ed in Blue! COMPLICITY!!!
Posted by: Purple Girl
» RE: Covert operatives camo'ed in Blue! COMPLICITY!!!
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Covert operatives camo'ed in Blue! COMPLICITY!!!
Posted by: sheena2u
» RE: Covert operatives camo'ed in Blue! COMPLICITY!!!
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Covert operatives camo'ed in Blue! COMPLICITY!!!
Posted by: Mr. G
Comments are closed-
Posted by: warrior woman on Jul 19, 2008 4:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: shill on Jul 19, 2008 4:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulDKennedy on Jul 19, 2008 5:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Badger2 on Jul 19, 2008 6:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jul 19, 2008 6:35 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arrest the entirety of all three branches and We will sort out the innocent from guilty in anightly 'American Idol' style procession of Trials. We have some awesome 'parting Gifts' for the Losers! Oh and we Will keep the suspension of Habus Corpus for them and refuse any appeals. DICK get your swim trunks on -You're going Waterboarding!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Dude! You Should Delete This Post
Posted by: BAKslider
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sheena2u on Jul 19, 2008 7:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Thomas Paine said in Common Sense, "In America the law is king. For as in absolute govenments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other."
He continues, that otherwise "Nothing is criminal; there is no such thing as treason; wherefore, every one thinks himself at liberty to act as he pleases" And finally he warns, "If something is not done in time, it will be too late to do anything."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: You have no choice
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: You have no choice
Posted by: oldumbo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lduvall on Jul 19, 2008 8:09 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The lack of democratic leadership in either the house or senate, and the failure to have any nerve to try and hold bush, cheney, rove, etc., accountable in any way - is there ANY REASON for rove or anyone else to care what the all powerful enabling committees and their members think?
Get some guts, take some action, before bush pardons everyone.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why should Karl Rove Go to Jail??
Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: Why should Karl Rove Go to Jail??
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ranchero42 on Jul 19, 2008 8:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WhuThe?!? on Jul 19, 2008 8:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 113121 on Jul 19, 2008 8:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: helenwheels on Jul 19, 2008 9:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jonathan Turley, a Constitutional expert, explained it quite well on Countdown more than once.
I am pretty sure though that most of the Dems have been blackmailed or threatened in some ways. Illegal wiretapping made sure the shrub & it's madministration got the goods on everyone, I'm sure.
What a cesspool our gov't is.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lamac66 on Jul 19, 2008 9:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I give republicans/conservatives that, they will be nasty when they have to be.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Toothless Tiger in Indian Country
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: onevoter on Jul 19, 2008 10:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is like the parent who tells their child to stop doing something or they are going to (fill in punishment here), then they never follow through. So, the child learns that their threats of punishment mean nothing and they continue the behavior that should have been punished.
Words mean little without action to back them up. WALK THE TALK OR SHUT THE F*&K UP !!
The day I first heard of this, I tried to write to Congresswoman Sanchez...it is nearly impossible to send an e-mail unless you live in her district.
Pelosi, Reid, Conyers, Sanchez....how many more Dems have no spine and are therefore accomplices to the criminal acts of this administration? Looks like they need to let Kucinich be Speaker.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Might as well vote NADER like many others.
Posted by: jwverez
» RE: Might as well vote NADER like many others.
Posted by: Prairie Waif
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nomomorons on Jul 19, 2008 11:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Members of TAR should revolt! TAR leadership should be forced to resign. Rove should go to jail.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TJColatrella on Jul 19, 2008 11:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Federalist Society has infiltrated and infested our Justice Dept. and our Federal Court system...including what was once our Supreme Court..and is now in reality the Federalist Society Court..!
Their agenda is to unify with the Executive Branch and make Congress impotent and since the Legislative Branch is the people's branch thus create their Unitary Dictatorship where a very small slecet few rule over the masses and thus as Alexander Hamilton warned in Federalist 78 destroy our democracy...
Until all of these abuses are traced as they properly can be from David Addington and John Yoo and the Torture memos, and FISA and Declaring Americans "enemy combatants" to suspending Habeas Corpus, to disregarding Congress and the nearly 800 Signing Statements all trace back to the Federalist Society...the scandals in our Justice Dept., Siegelman's false prosecution and Federal Attorney's firings...it's all the damn Federalist Society..
The Federalist Society is destroying our system of government from the inside just like some cancer...
Hell the Federalist Society, Scalia most of all, one of their biggest recruiters and a Tory Traitor to our Constitution of note installed Bush and caused all this misery, death and mayhem and corruption we are living with and will suffer from for decades..
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Schroeder on Jul 19, 2008 12:19 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaPoorChimp on Jul 19, 2008 12:22 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And here's another sad fact: most of you here have likely voted the Democratic-Liberal line(often represented by the same candidate) in the past; some have voted the Republican-Conservative line (also quite often represented by the same candidate). That's what you've done for years, if not your entire voting lives. And guess what? That's what you'll do yet again in November, and for all elections to come. And the Demopublicans and the Republicrats know that all too well. So neither the candidates themselves nor their backers (would "handlers" be a better word?) have much incentive to make any major changes.
So what I propose---in full knowledge that the snowball has a better chance in hell than that enough of us would act on this---is that, with precious few exceptions (Paul? Kucinich?), we make it our policy as the electorate to vote the incumbents out in every election, every time. Federal, state, local, whatever. We do this until they get it through their self-important heads that we're paying atention, we're damn mad, and we're not going to take it anymore.
Not only that, but we should, as often as is feasible, vote IN minor party candidates or independents: Greens, Libertarians, whatever. It hardly matters. Just let the Dems and the Repubs know the free ride is over.
Besides, the minor party types haven't had the opportunity to cozy up to the vested & monied interests yet, and so may actually have the agendas of their constituents at heart, at least for a while. (until the next election?)
I think one cause for optimism about this tactic is that, when it comes to preserving themselves and their cushy jobs, the professional office-holders can be remarkably quick learners, so perhaps we wouldn't have to do that very many times before seeing positive changes.
Again, I have NO expectation that enough of us would act to bring about this felicitous state of affairs, but who knows? Maybe we'll get the Putney Swope (q.v.) effect.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gc94112 on Jul 19, 2008 12:51 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EagleX on Jul 19, 2008 3:03 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: smendler on Jul 19, 2008 3:05 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: WANTED: KARL "TURD BLOSSOM" ROVE (PDF poster)
Posted by: smendler
» broken link
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EagleX on Jul 19, 2008 3:12 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is obvious that Sanchez is attempting to circumvent the Constitution by going after the precedent of executive privilege to cover her dubious actions while in office.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Justice Department needs to look at Sanchez...too many red flags
Posted by: jvaljon1
» RE: Justice Department needs to look at Sanchez...too many red flags
Posted by: peacefullaim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EagleX on Jul 19, 2008 3:29 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There must be complete transparency from the Sanchez girls to determine who is funding their attempt at undermining the Constitution and the separation of powers.
Of course, if the fringe Left continues to undermine the Constitution with endless investigations -- why shouldn't Republicans reciprocate?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Republicans get away with murder.
Posted by: BlueGorilla
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wakoh on Jul 19, 2008 4:36 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ev. Wakoh Shannon Hickey, Ph.D.
Posted by: Ahimsa
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueGorilla on Jul 19, 2008 4:41 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This adminastration has been a hi-jack from the beginning,as Naomi klein pointed out recently,the Bush Gang (plc)have used every catastrophe as an opportunity to extend a hard right wing,neo-con programme,at home and overseas.In their zealousness,they have ignored protocol,and perceived themselves as creating whatever history,rules and reality they wanted to.That has meant an occasional bending of the the rules,and a more frequent ignoring of the rules.
This attack on democracy and rights ,has been aided by a media which has spread a false patriotism,as the Bush line becomes truth ,not argument,not perspective,but iron truth.
This bull was for the post 9/11 years swallowed by huge swathes of the mainstream population,whose best brains have less political awareness than even the least educated Venuzualan worker.
Cometh the hour,cometh the Democrats..sadly not.The dems cowed response has been pathetic,and adds weight to Chomsky's view that any difference between the major parties is an illusion,and they are working in cahoots to sustain the manufactured consensus of the ruling elite.
The democrats support for the Iraq-attack,pathetic shielding of Bush re impeachment,and the toothless,half assed way in which Karl rove has been pursued,speaks volumes for the lack of real opposition in the USA.
For the moment,the USA has the rulers it deserves.There are signs of a growing awareness however.The back No in November campaign is offering a real opportunity to tell the politicians ,that they are offering nothing.It also has the makings of a real democratic grassroots movement.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rondoda1 on Jul 19, 2008 5:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Ronald Doda Jr.
Posted by: rondoda1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: adamskiinasia on Jul 19, 2008 5:49 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: get-out-of-jail-free card
Posted by: jvaljon1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ahimsa on Jul 19, 2008 6:54 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For whatever is left of this country's soul
Throw him in jail, in real jail.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hugeal on Jul 19, 2008 9:28 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE TIME TO ACT IS NOW! WE ARE WATCHING YOU AND WILL TAKE NOTE OF YOUR ACTIONS!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Miki on Jul 20, 2008 2:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not in your district. In fact, I am an American living in South Africa because I am unable to legally marry in the USA (California, respectfully notwithstanding.)
I am a little dismayed at the disrespect that has been heaped upon you for writing this article. I do understand the level of anger and frustration expressed, but I think that what some of our Alternet readers fail to appreciate that theirs isn't the only front in this economic and class civil war currently being waged within the US. As the last civil war was fought under the guise of slavery but was really about economics, this civil war is about systematically enslaving us all to serve the economic masters.
The very thing that the Judiciary Committee is investigating is the abuses of power against Siegelman (D) who was investigated relentlessly for years...showing how determined the dirt diggers in the current administration are. A little research into your history and that of your sister reveals that Rovian tactics from the DoJ aren't limited to governors.
I have always maintained that it probably is not me, today anyway, that Bush and co-conspirators want to wiretap without a warrant, after all does big brother want to listen to me talking to my sister about chicken recipes or complaining about the economy? No, he wants to get the dirt on anyone who threatens his power and that puts you and your sister on the front lines in that battle. I am but a tiny threat to the powers that be, and I could be handled with minimal effort, they don't need to tap my phone/email to do it.
It is easy for me to call on you to have courage and integrity, to demand it from public servants but I cannot. Fight your battles and I will fight mine. May we be victorious in our quests. You may well find support from the very people who criticized you the loudest.
Good luck to you, Representative. We have a long battle ahead trying to return America to its ideals and to correct its legacy of atrocities.
~Miki
A Hawaiian in Africa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Amen!
Posted by: Hans B
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aussie321 on Jul 20, 2008 12:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: editnetwork on Jul 20, 2008 3:50 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not 'Flaunting' But . . .
Posted by: sicntired
» RE: Not 'Flaunting' But . . . Ouch!
Posted by: editnetwork
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sicntired on Jul 20, 2008 5:20 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PrinceRobert on Jul 20, 2008 7:32 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is well past time for us to cease to tolerate the cowardly incompetence of the Congress and particularly the Do Nothing Democrats. The Republican party is a criminal enterprise but I am possibly even more disgusted by the Hotair Blowhard "leadership" of the Democrats in office. So, while I agree with the disgust and anger expressed by 99% of the commentors, I say that there is more than ample justification for WE THE PEOPLE to take charge, to throw the do-nothings out on the street, re-establish a government that will not tolerate criminal activity and summarily jail and prosecute those who are so obviously commiting or complicit in crimes such as mass murder and obstruction of justice.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: editnetwork on Jul 20, 2008 7:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jeffersonian Republican on Jul 21, 2008 12:14 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only real actions with regard to Rove and impeachment, inter alia, will demonstrate the sincerety of the passions of the many words spoken and written of thus far.
In short, just "do it" or withdraw.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped
ACORN Smear Collaborator Claims Persecution to Raise Money for Her Legal Troubles
Bad Policies Are Really What's Driving California's Huge Prison Costs




