Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

The Translator's Perspective: an Inside Account of the Biggest ICE Raid in History

By Erik Camayd-Freixas, New America Media. Posted July 14, 2008.


An interpreter struggles with his conscience after a massive immigration raid in Iowa.
Advertisement

On Monday, May 12, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., in an operation involving some 900 agents, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) executed a raid of Agriprocessors, Inc., the nation's largest kosher slaughterhouse and meatpacking plant located in the town of Postville, Iowa. The raid -- officials boasted -- was "the largest single-site operation of its kind in American history." At that same hour, 26 federally certified interpreters from all over the country were en route to the small neighboring city of Waterloo, Iowa, having no idea what their mission was.

The investigation had started more than a year earlier. Raid preparations had begun in December. The Clerk's Office of the U.S. District Court had contracted the interpreters a month ahead, but was not at liberty to tell us the whole truth, lest the impending raid be compromised. The operation was led by ICE, which belongs to the executive branch, whereas the U.S. District Court, belonging to the judicial branch, had to formulate its own official reason for participating. Accordingly, the Court had to move for two weeks to a remote location as part of a "Continuity of Operation Exercise" in case they were ever disrupted by an emergency, which in Iowa is likely to be a tornado or flood. That is what we were told, but, frankly, I was not prepared for a disaster of such a different kind, one that was entirely man-made.

I arrived late that Monday night and missed the 8 p.m. interpreters' briefing. I was instructed by phone to meet at 7 a.m. in the hotel lobby and carpool to the National Cattle Congress (NCC) where we would begin our work. We arrived at the heavily guarded compound, went through security, and gathered inside the retro "Electric Park Ballroom" where a makeshift court had been set up. The Clerk of Court, who coordinated the interpreters, said, "Have you seen the news? There was an immigration raid yesterday at 10 a.m. They have some 400 detainees here. We'll be working late conducting initial appearances for the next few days."

He then gave us a cursory tour of the compound. The NCC is a 60-acre cattle fairground that had been transformed into a sort of concentration camp or detention center. Fenced in behind the ballroom/courtroom were 23 trailers from federal authorities, including two set up as sentencing courts; various Homeland Security buses and an "incident response" truck; scores of ICE agents and U.S. Marshals; and in the background two large buildings: a pavilion where agents and prosecutors had established a command center; and a gymnasium filled with tight rows of cots where some 300 male detainees were kept, the women being housed in county jails. Later the NCC board complained to the local newspaper that they had been "misled" by the government when they leased the grounds purportedly for Homeland Security training.

Echoing what I think was the general feeling, one of my fellow interpreters would later exclaim, "When I saw what it was really about, my heart sank."

Then began the saddest procession I have ever witnessed, which the public would never see, because cameras were not allowed past the perimeter of the compound (only a few journalists came to court the following days, notepads in hand). Driven single-file in groups of 10, shackled at the wrists, waist and ankles, chains dragging as they shuffled through, the slaughterhouse workers were brought in for arraignment. They sat and listened through headsets to the interpreted initial appearance, before marching out again to be bused to different county jails, only to make room for the next row of 10.

They appeared to be uniformly no more than five feet tall, mostly illiterate Guatemalan peasants with Mayan last names (Tajtaj, Xicay, Sajché, Sologüí). Some were in tears; others had faces of worry, fear, and embarrassment. They all spoke Spanish, a few rather laboriously. It dawned on me that, aside from their nationality, which was imposed on their people in the 19th century, they too were Native Americans, in shackles.

They stood out in stark racial contrast with the rest of us as they started their slow penguin march across the makeshift court. "Sad spectacle," I heard a colleague say, reading my mind. They had all waived their right to be indicted by a grand jury and accepted instead an "information" or simple charging document by the U.S. Attorney, hoping to be quickly deported since they had families to support back home. But it was not to be. They were criminally charged with "aggravated identity theft" and "Social Security fraud" - charges they did not understand. And, frankly, neither did I. Everyone wondered how it would all play out.

We got off to a slow start that first day, because ICE's barcode booking system malfunctioned, and the documents had to be manually sorted and processed with the help of the U.S. Attorney's Office. Consequently, less than a third of the detainees were ready for arraignment that Tuesday. There were more than enough interpreters at that point, so we rotated in shifts of three interpreters per hearing. Court adjourned shortly after 4 p.m. However, the prosecution worked overnight, planning on a 7 a.m. to midnight court marathon the next day.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: immigration, human rights, homeland security, ice, postville, agriprocessors

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What we have become
Posted by: pikaomega on Jul 14, 2008 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 2006, I was hired by a company in St. Louis that had recently been swept as part of an immigration raid. The documentation that I was to provide was "stringent" prima face, but there remained workers who I knew to be illegal.

Some may strike at this as evidence of criminality, but to them I would ask: if you were given a choice between the law and your children, which would you choose? If you have ever driven too fast, or without a seat belt, then you are a criminal. We all break the law at one point or another, for reasons that pale in comparison to those that drive waves of workers across our borders.

The ICE raids highlight many flaws in our system. The argument that "Americans won't do these jobs" is a fallacy. Americans will not do the jobs filled by migrant workers because of the exploitative pay and conditions that await within. Yet, the facilitators are left unchecked, and the poor souls that keep them afloat are made to be chattel, a clear example of the dark-skinned "other" that necessitates our dependence on a well-funded nanny state.

If you wish to ease illegal immigration, then consider why people are willing to abandon all that they know and love, embark on a 40 day exodus, sleep in doorways, work in miserable conditions for a pittance-all while being cast in a demonic light by those whose food they pick, sheets they wash, etc.

It saddens me, at my very core, to think that we are still unable to see how our policies-both foreign and domestic-impact the lives of those not like us. These immigrants are the American story, the good and the bad. The plank in our eye grows more septic with each strike of the clock, and no amount of verbose posturing or cleverly engineered "justice" can absolve us of our willingness to remit our highest, most virtuous ideals.

This nation teeters on the brink. We are degrading from the inside. An honest look at ourselves is in order, as the cancer that has metastasized outside our walls threatens those of us within. We hand less to those that will come than we were given. We risk the desperation that drives immigrants into this nation. Alarmist? I hope so. But life has a bitter wit, and we don't seem to be getting the joke.

Our humanity is priceless, and once lost may be so forever. Please remember that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What we have become Posted by: Old Skeptic
» RE: What we have become Posted by: Libsrule
» RE: What we have become Posted by: Libsrule
» RE: What we have become (Amen!) Posted by: Old Skeptic
RE: Illegal is illegal except for Republicans
Posted by: Crazy H on Jul 14, 2008 4:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Izzat so? Hiring illegal aliens is illegal, conspiring to defraud social security is illegal. As are some of the other reported violations:

* Undocumented workers from Guatemala and Mexico were paid as little as $5 per hour - below minimum wage.
* A supervisor made a side business of selling the workers used vehicles, sometimes threatening them with loss of their job if they didn't purchase one.
* A supervisor duct-taped the eyes of an employee, who was then hit with a meat hook. The employee declined to report the incident for fear of being fired.
* Females were told that sexual favors were the barter for a promotion or shift change.

How many of Agriprocessors' executives and officers got lead out in chains that day, do you suppose? According to the Salt Lake Tribune - only two low-level supervisors got busted. Are you going to tell me that the execs didn't know that they were paying below minimum wage? That they had no clue why their employees couldn't speak English? That they never noticed Jose Xilia's social security statement and FICA deductions came back with Fred Baker's name on them?

How many of Agriprocessors' executives and officers vote for Republicans, do you suppose?

Sure, let's enforce the laws. It'd be a nice change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ever considered putting a bullet through the tiny, fetid ball of fat that you call a brain ?
Posted by: kwalla on Jul 15, 2008 2:40 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll be happy to give you the money for the bullet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

agreed!
Posted by: zooeyhall on Jul 15, 2008 6:15 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The law is the law. And there are good reasons to have immigration control. Mexico's immigration laws are MUCH tougher and ruthlessly enforced then this country's.

We already have a generous and established method for immigration to this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» RE: A summary Posted by: edith
» RE: Or they'll just die ... Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Why are they illegal Posted by: solrev
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» RE: American Brutality Posted by: edith
» Lay off the Jews, already Posted by: willymack
Fast Track A Screenplay
Posted by: Skelly on Jul 15, 2008 4:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This needs to be written immediately, as a companion piece to "Fast Food Nation". As an aside, anyone who has ever wondered how a government focused on squashing dissent could possibly criminalize a large group of citizens quickly and efficiently, this article lays out the blueprint. Our government has simply done the dress rehearsal on defenseless and confused people to work out the bugs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fast Track A Screenplay Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Fast Track A Screenplay Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Fast Track A Screenplay Posted by: john mont
» RE: Fast Track A Screenplay Posted by: BCcovers
I mean they could immigrate to Abu Dabai where all the jobs are
Posted by: edith on Jul 15, 2008 5:59 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
funny thing. outside of the EU, where citizens of member nations can travel and work within any Union nation, very few if any nations allow unrestricted immigration or offer work to non-citizen workers without stingent regulations.

since many Alternet posters over the years blame America for everything evil including the inconvenience illegal immigrants suffer when arrested, I suggest a humane solution.

Let us adopt the immigration policy and citizenship requirements of say, Mexico. Being a "non-white" nation, and comprised of folks who suffered white privilege imperialism under the evil Spanish Empire, surely anything Mexicans regard as fair must be better than the lower than cockroach American law enforcement officials and the legislators who enacted the immigration laws. (Why do Mexican border officials beat, kill and rape Central Americans who try to cross into Mexico? Because white Americans must, they just must, doctor photos of this non-existent inhumanity, that's why!)

Given the lax enforcement of US immigration laws, i really don't know why pro-illegal immigration groups like La Raza are upset. Their constituents get a far better deal than they would get in any other country.

What other nation besides the US would be stupid enough for example to offer free education to the challenged children of illegal aliens at a cost of billions because of a 5-4 Supreme Court decision in 1982?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» hit the nail on the head! Posted by: zooeyhall
» No, we really are suckers Posted by: Old Skeptic
Unfortunately, you broke a law
Posted by: adocann1 on Jul 15, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...I appreciate the fact that you are very hard working people who have come here to do no harm. And I thank you for coming to this country to work hard. Unfortunately, you broke a law in the process, and now I have the obligation to give you this sentence..."

They broke the law. The employers should be criminally charged. In fact, they should have rounded up the children,housed them with their parents and deported the lot of them ASAP! More of this and maybe an American can get a job! I shed no tears for them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Grounds for deportation? Posted by: Old Skeptic
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
WellAware
Posted by: wellaware lec on Jul 15, 2008 7:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A thousand thank yous to the author of this article. This compiling of information took a great deal of his time, to our benefit, regardless how we feel about this issue.
Anyone whose conscience is not at least tweaked significantly by all that is revealed here, well, I'm not quite clear why you read Alternet...but am glad you do. Hopefully you read this article carefully instead of skimming, prior to registering your comments.
Indeed, our dastardly, murderous U.S. behaviors in other countries is both hidden and shameful. I appreciate learning more about the realities that drive many to try and stay alive through working in this country and sending money back to their families.
wonder how many of us would do the same if we simply couldn't manage in this country...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Next Monday, I cross the border with a Mexican deportee
Posted by: ptown on Jul 15, 2008 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Next Monday, I cross the border with a Mexican deportee if the judge decides to deport him. He is 18. He has lived in California since he was five. His entire family is undocumented and living in California- since 1994. He started kindergarten in the USA. He had 3 non violent juvenile drug crimes (pot) and was arrested at 18 for another drug possession. He was raised in the ghetto...a gang infested violent hell hole where shootings are frequent. Perhaps the judge will allow him to go back to California but unlikely. He will have to start a new life in Mexico with family he has never met. If anyone should have leniency, it's kids who grew up here. They didn't choose to illegally cross the border. Now, I'm not boo-hooing and asking for sympathy for him. But we do need to work out something fair for kids who lived in the US most of their lives without papers. One hundred years from now, at the rate of demographics, the USA will be a Spanish-speaking nation of Mexican Americans. We need to be rational. What happens now with our Mexican and Central American neighbors will, no doubt, effect the livability of your white great grandchildren and great-great-grandchildren ... (I'm white but kid-free and not leaving behind anyone to suffer on this planet). We need a plan that is reasonable. Investing in the "brown" nations and rebuilding their economies seems highly unlikely considering our own country is in the toilet. Massive international "small families" campaigns?
Incentives for small families? Compulsory bilingual education in the USA? In Mexico? In Central America? No clue what the solution is but the harsher we are, the worse it will be for your children's children...
Do we want a civil/cultural war in this nation?
When we criticize the Israelis for their treatment of the Palestinians, are we, as USA nativists (myself included at times, I am totally frustrated with dealing with an illiterate unassimilated underclass and criminal gangbangers, etc...) no better than the Israelis? Is Mexico and south our version of Gaza?
I am NOT for open borders, in fact, I think open borders will destroy the USA but we have to face reality. The solution has to be a win/win for everyone...for all Americans and humans south of the border are indeed Americans, duh!
I will report back from Mexico after my friend's deportation hearing. Everyone say HOORAY- another criminal alien bites the dust and goes "home" (but Mexico is not his home). Instead of hating (and fearing), let's face reality. The America we know is coming to an end within the next few decades.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» i'm 46... Posted by: ptown
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» Germans and German in the US Posted by: JakobFabian01
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» RE: There IS a better way . . . Posted by: Old Skeptic
Grow a spine, America!
Posted by: Old Skeptic on Jul 15, 2008 9:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am beyond disgusted with our elected officials who have more sympathy for illegal aliens than for the American people! Illegal aliens do take American jobs, and not just in agriculture. In fact, I have read that only some 3% of illegals are involved in agriculture. The rest take jobs that Americans were doing, in janitorial work, construction work, road construction and paving, etc., but can no longer compete with the hordes of cheap labor available to work for pennies on the dollar!

Because of the growth in the "Latino" electorate, politicians are pandering to them and pretending that illegal aliens are not criminals, even when they steal the identities of Americans. Nonsense! Most of these people know that what they are doing is illegal, and couldn't care less how much trouble they cause the people whose IDs they steal.

We need a moratorium on all immigration, especially from non-English-speaking countries, until we can teach English to and assimilate the ones here already. We need to evaluate would-be immigrants based on what they can contribute to our society, and not on which of their family members have managed to get here ahead of them. No more "family reunions" at the taxpayers' expense!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The statue of "liberty" lies.
Posted by: Ignatz deFyre on Jul 15, 2008 9:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"


I see some people have forgotten that we are all immigrants , children and grandchildren of immigrants to America. Before you wise-ass from the comfort of your Lazy Boy with a cold beer in one hand a warm tit in the other while watching perpetual amateur hour idol, think of your great-great grandma on the Mayflower.

Maybe it's you who deserve to be deported.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The statue of "liberty" lies. Posted by: ChairmanMetal
» RE: The statue of "liberty" lies. Posted by: ChairmanMetal
Feeding the Prison-for-Profit Industry
Posted by: mgloraine on Jul 15, 2008 10:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author has provided us a very revealing glimpse into the DHS/ICE machinations. What's not discussed is the reason for the mandatory jail time, rather than simple deportation.

An earlier article by Joshua Holland here at AlterNet pointed out that the privatization of the "prison industry" has become a driving force behind BushCo's love of mandatory jail time. All of the usual suspects (Halliburton, KBR, et al.) stand to rake in billions of tax dollars for housing detained illegals. If they just went back to Guatemala, there'd be no big payday for those "loyal Bushies" who build and run concentration camps.

So once again, through all the pseudo-legalistic mumbo-jumbo of the DHS/ICE cabal, the true motivation is only thinly veiled: stealing money from the federal budget to enrich the friends and political sponsors of Dick Cheney and George W. Bush. Another shameful chapter in the decline of the United States from a Great Nation to a third-rate corporate-fascist dictatorship - a Decidership.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Barbarians we are becoming
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jul 15, 2008 11:09 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact is that most "Americans" whose fore-parents came from elsewhere like to forget that they are immigrants too.

Unless your name is either preceded or followed by a gerund you are an immigrant; your parents just made it before the laws were in-acted.

The fact is that most "Americans" don't realize those supposed "cheap trade deals NAFTA, CAFTA, ect." really only protect the owners of the factories/businesses that get moved into these countries. The average worker in those countries is being paid maybe 40 cents a day. Yes 40 cents a day.

I dare any American to try and live on 40 cents a day (in America) with your spouse and family, I'd really like to get some answers here.

While Americans are trying to compete with off-shoring companies - we have the nerve to wonder why those south of the border are coming over here. When was the last time that an "American" picked a crop (strawberries, grapes, tomatoes, etc), or was willing to work for less than minimum wage to feed their family.

The sheer arrogance of it all is out-matched by the ignorance of the people that rant as though they met the Mayflower at the shore!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Barbarians we are becoming Posted by: Libsrule
» RE: Barbarians we are becoming Posted by: Old Skeptic
Immigration Raids Disguised As War
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Jul 15, 2008 11:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now we know why immigrants are targeted: fear and the subsequent "war" on "terror".
Fear because after 9/11, in order to justify the Department of Homeland Security, an "enemy" had to be created, just like Al-Qaeda; the illegal immigrant. As the testimony in this article explains, those people arrested in Postville were treated as criminals whose sole crime was to work. How many Americans would choose to work at a slaughterhouse? You, the recent college grad; could you take this job and look at animal parts all day? To clean up the blood and come home smelling like death? Better off working at a mall or an air-conditioned office.
So we witnessed how these raids (collateral damage) break up families. They had to agree to the charges against them of suffer a worse fate. The result is devastating. a return to Guatemala is, as the author said, a death sentence. That much is true: while in college I knew a young woman who lived in Guatemala at the time Rigoberta Menchu wrote her book about the accounts of death squads roaming the countryside and killing people (and not to mention the rapes, torture, etc.) for not working up to someone's standards. She said she knew people who simply vanished and that was it. They were found dead a few days later shot or stabbed.
It's war. War against people who literally have no rights and have little understanding of the multi-layered American judicial system. As Pink Floyd said in "Dogs," "You got to be able to pick up the easy meat with your eyes closed." And that's what these ICE people do, go where they can get the highest number of "kills,"
Do we honestly believe that those rounded up in Iowa would knowingly steal someone's identity? They're NOT that sophisicated, folks.
We can imagine that Guatemala doesn't have a Social Security Administration system comparable to ours and how could they steal someone's identity while risking their own? If so, they'll know they'll get caught when they cashed their check. (Were these workers paid in cash?)
Wars are fought not only in the battlefield. Everywhere ICE goes now will have a bommerang effect. It will cause heartache for the workers and cause economic woes for a city or town if they're deported or languish in jail.
So, if this is "war" we will not win, no matter what Obama or McCain says. But we owe a debt to our "illegals."
Without them, we're only a part of the fraction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ICE IS NOT THE PROBLEM! ILLEGAL IMAGRATION ISTHE PROBLEM!
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Jul 15, 2008 12:02 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems simple. Is simple and only simple people would not understand this simple concept. Want to dismantale ICE? Stop invading this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great article; great comments
Posted by: willymack on Jul 15, 2008 12:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we didn't know the origin of the "illegal" immigrant problem, we should know now. Unless the corporate stranglehold on us and our political system is broken, no resolution to this and many other problems will be forthcoming. The ones who SHOULD'VE been rounded up, handcuffed, and carted off to jail are those business owners who also own our elected officials. This is what it's come to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democracy?
Posted by: BCcovers on Jul 15, 2008 12:30 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All polls show that the vast majority of Americans (70+%) are in favor of securing our borders and stemming the flow of illegals. So why are we continuely fed propaganda piece after propaganda piece on alternet in favor of illegal immigration.

Alternet...Are you for democracy or wish to see us under the guidance of "philosopher kings" telling all of us idiots what we should do with our country?

Look no further than the comments your propaganda pieces recieve to see that even amongst progressives, your idea is in the minority. We a democratic society (ideally), why not support this ideal by supporting an issue that the overwhelming majority of Americans are in favor of. THE PEOPLE demand action, the question is, why aren't you alternet, the progressive voice of THE PEOPLE supporting this....

Very fishy indeed....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Democracy? Posted by: Cybershaman
Public Service, National Shame
Posted by: JakobFabian01 on Jul 15, 2008 2:40 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a great public service this article was! And how well written. No account of the arbitrary, cold-hearted thuggery of the DHS and the ICE could have been plainer.

As a volunteer teacher of English as a Second Language, I am horrified by the grim duties that the author was forced to accept. May this article and others like it turn us all against this Kafkaesque nightmare of bureaucratic heartlessness and shut it down, so that workers may work and families may live together without fear.

This perversion of legal due process has to stop! When we deny human rights to any person, we not only shame ourselves, but we weaken our own rights. Human rights are not a zero-sum game. Like freedom itself, human rights can be protected only if they are shared. They are our gift to each other. If we deny these freedoms to others, then they will soon also be denied to us.

For a long time, the Federal bureaucracy has been too slow to process the applications of people who want to immigrate legally. This slowness, in the views of those know-nothings who defend it, is supposed to deter immigrants fro