Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

The Intolerant States of America -- Why My Middle Name Is Now 'Hussein'

By Kyle Hussein de Beausset, AlterNet. Posted July 1, 2008.


Intolerance isn't just popular among the ignorant. It is within every one of us.
Advertisement

"I think Obama would be a disaster, and there's a lot of reasons," said [Leroy] Pollard, explaining the rumors he had heard about the candidate from friends he goes camping with. "I understand he's from Africa, and that the first thing he's going to do if he gets into office is bring his family over here, illegally. He's got that racist [pastor] who practically raised him, and then there's the Muslim thing. He's just not presidential material, if you ask me." Eli Saslow

-- Washington Post (30 June 2008)

Welcome to the Intolerant States of America. Liberal elitists will read the words of Leroy Pollard, a resident of Flag City, U.S.A., and feign disgust. This arrogance betrays the truth that we are all part of Leroy Pollard, and Leroy Pollard is part of us. The first person I ran into who believed the myths about Barack Obama was not a resident of a small town like Flag City, U.S.A., but a wealthy investment banker, and the parent of a Harvard graduate.

You see, the residents of the Intolerant States of America would have you believe that intolerance is now a thing of the past, popular only among the ignorant. In this limited worldview, the original sins of the Intolerant States of America were washed away just 40 years ago by the heroes of the civil rights era.

Great victories were won then, and they were felt the world over. But to believe these victories have vanquished intolerance is to do the heroes of our past a great injustice.

It might be that it is no longer acceptable to say the "n-word" in the public sphere, but intolerance has found new ways to inject it's poison into society. In the quote above, Leroy Pollard does not once mention the fact that Obama identifies as a black male. Instead, Pollard's intolerance is directed towards residents of the majority world ("he's from Africa"), towards unauthorized migrants ("bring his family over here, illegally"), and towards Muslims ("then there's the Muslim thing"). Anti-racist advocates might argue that these phrases are just substitutes for racism, but it runs deeper than that, in my opinion. Pollard's words don't just amount to racism, they amount to nativism and religious intolerance, as well.

Intolerance did not die along with the now sanitized image of the Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr., as the residents of the United States of America would have you believe. It just mutated as it has done since time immemorial. Intolerance is not relegated to the small and backward towns of the United States of America, it is within every one of us. Like demons, lurking in our subconscious, awaiting resurrection, intolerance is summoned from the lesser halves of all of our souls.

These demons win when we see them as a thing of the past. These demons win when we see them only in the minds of others, far away from ourselves. These demons win when we fail to see them as a confluence of sentiments, where fear of Muslims, can turn to fear of migrants, can turn to fear of brown people, can turn to fear of the majority world. Daily we must religiously search our souls for these demons and work hard to find ways to stand against them.

I don't know what makes me more sad, the fact that Leroy Pollard considers African people, unauthorized migrants, and Muslims as less than worthy humans, or the fact that Barack Obama considers these rumors so damaging to his electability, that he works constantly to distance himself from these categories.

What I do know, is that there is always hope. Even in the darkest of nights there is light and all we have to do is move towards it. There is one set of Obama supporters who, rather than distance themselves, have chosen to embrace the aspect of Barack Obama's identity that is inspires so much hate. Recently, the New York Times reported a new phenomenon:

Emily Nordling has never met a Muslim, at least not to her knowledge. But this spring, Ms. Nordling, a 19-year-old student from Fort Thomas, Ky., gave herself a new middle name on Facebook.com, mimicking her boyfriend and shocking her father.

"Emily Hussein Nordling," her entry now reads.

Nordling has never met a Muslim, but still she has adopted Obama's Muslim name as her own in an act of defiance against the intolerance that has sprung up as a result of Obama's candidacy. I am still undecided about who I'm going to vote for, but Nordling's act has so inspired me that I'm going to follow her lead for at least the remainder of the election season.

From now on, please refer to me as Kyle Hussein de Beausset.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: america, racism

Kyle de Beausset is the founder of Citizen Orange.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Peace
Posted by: carbon-based on Jul 2, 2008 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Intolerant States of America? Well, it does seem there is quite a bit of that going around lately. Blacks hate whites, whites hate blacks, blacks hate hispanics etc..etc... funny hispanics hate no one! There just happy to work..maybe we can all take a lesson from them.

Truth is America is probably one of the more tolerant countries around. Look at what is going on in Africa, mid east, France with their Muslim population..China - America, for it's problems is still one of the better places in that regards - was the "60's hippy movement really all just a fad?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Peace Posted by: chi-town-gal
» RE: Peace Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Peace Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: Peace Posted by: talkville
» RE: Peace Posted by: Moira61
» RE: Peace Posted by: realist
» RE: Hispanics hate no one? Yeah right! Posted by: magiquarian1969
» Hispanics hate no one??? Posted by: writer7
» MS-13 Gang Posted by: Dboy
Am I worried?
Posted by: reinaldok on Jul 2, 2008 1:29 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You bet I am. These absurd intolerant statements are certainly not isolated spoutings. In the last few months my travels have taken me to a neighborhood bar in Orlando,
a condo reunion in Central Florida, a family get together in Sarasota, a pub in Chicago, a university event in Philadelphia, a golf club in California, a tour group in Iceland, etc etc etc. In every place I heard the same utterly ridiculous garbage. The one piece of intolerance I seemed to always hear was: "I wouldn't vote for a N-----". If you don't believe that this is typical in the good ole US of A, then you also believe faithfully in the tooth fairy. I agree that these spouters do not belong to some wild eyed minority. They could be your family, your pastor, your co-worker, your next door neighbor, your teacher, you doctor on and on!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Am I worried? Posted by: vade_dyset
Another view of...
Posted by: L.A.Lynn on Jul 2, 2008 2:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the Eli Saslow piece in the WaPo, (which this article draws major points) on Huffington Post by Paul Hogarth.

linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another view of... Posted by: hagwind
Before Israel,
Posted by: weathered on Jul 2, 2008 2:47 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Islam was of little concern to America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Before Israel, Posted by: Brittanicus
» RE: Before Israel, Posted by: realist
» RE: Israel is the wrong scapegoat Posted by: Ydotheyhateus
In search of ...
Posted by: talkville on Jul 3, 2008 3:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Help Wanted: Looking for the True, the Pure, the Real American. If anyone has seen him or her, please contact all available media outlets as soon as possible. Note: self-nomination will not be admitted as evidence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: In search of ... Posted by: mick3
» RE: In search of ... Posted by: outlook
THANKS- I CIRCULATED THIS IDEA WIDELY
Posted by: drricklippin on Jul 3, 2008 4:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a excellent idea for "ADOPT YOUR TEMPORARY MIDDLE NAME AS HUSSEIN CAMPAIGN"

I have personally joined and asked others to do the same.

Be Well,

Dr. Rick Hussein Lippin
Southampton,Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And don't forget intolerance toward women who don't "behave"
Posted by: janvdb on Jul 3, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, it's just as bad as intolerance toward blacks. Just as bigotted. And more prevalent.

Women who don't "behave" include women who exercise good control over their reproductive lives using modern medical technology, women who exercise good control over their finances and aren't broke or dependent and don't have kids they can't support, women who don't need men, women who have their lives under control.

That's what constitutes "not behaving" for a woman and there's a LOT of intolerance for that sort of a woman in this country.

Women who DO "behave" don't need intolerance -- they have already allowed the patriarchy to destroy them with unplanned, unsupported pregnancies, stupid "woman's" jobs, and years out of the work force, which destroys their finances and leaves them begging and dependent. That's "behaving" for women.

So, it's women who have their s---t together who attract the hatred, intolerance and bigotry by people who drag out all the ancient weapons against women -- whore, slut, bad mother, barren, cold, bitch -- just like it was the women who had property who were largely accused of witchcraft in medieval times.

We mustn't forget intolerance against women.

Jan VanDenBerg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Intolerant vacuity
Posted by: John Annis on Jul 3, 2008 6:15 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So we all harbour intolerance within us, do we? The only intolerance of mine of which I'm aware is for this kind of breast-beating nonsense.

Let's all call ourselves Hussein. Gawd what a load of crap. That will really help the world to get along. I'm going to add Dawg Schlomo to my name and see how many new chums I get.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» RE: Obama Posted by: willd4change
What's in a name?
Posted by: realist on Jul 3, 2008 6:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the Republican Party's staunchest supporters is Adolph Coors IV. Does the name Adolph make Republicans suspect him of being a Nazi?

The House Minority Leader's name is John. John was the name of one of the apostles. Should we suspect the Minority Leader of being a Palestinian Jew?

Should we stop teaching "algebra," since that was a tool originally developed and named by the Moslem world? Or should we just rename it "freedom math?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What's in a name? Posted by: Balanchine
» RE: What's in a name? Posted by: Balanchine
» RE: What's in a name? Posted by: babs
» RE: What's in a name? Posted by: chiefwanadubie
erascism
Posted by: willd4change on Jul 3, 2008 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for the great artical. We build a wall to keep the hispanic population out when they should be standing there with work visas begging them to come in. The fat ass americans would rather sit at home drawing welfare than actually do some work. Maybe if they had gotten an education (that is also free) so they are to stupid to work construction or anything that pays well. Yet americans want to hurry and close the border. We should open our country to the millions of displaced Iraqi's (that aren't terrorists of course) from our worthless presidents war, oh and dont forget the afgans it seems that has taken a back burner for lack of oil. How about all the foreign people that were here pre-9/11, don't hey count? So let's see we still hate blacks, but now the media tells us to hate muslims, they are terrorists, the hispanics because they want to work here and support their family, what about the canadians they jump border all day every day lol. build a dam fence they can't drive for crap. Racism is taught, don't judge less you be judged. I hate ignorance, and that is what most americans are, ignorant. Sad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's the economy, STUPID
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Jul 3, 2008 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans will vote for what they think of as their own economic self-interest. The likelyhood that they'll vote for a Republican as the economy slips into financial hot water is slim. They may be ignorant, but they can always cook up a rationalization for voting Democratic.

I'll bet a lot of folks will imagine that Obama is actually white, and that the media makes him look darker than he is as a "conspiracy". Hey, they actually believe far sillier things!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The intolerant states of America
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jul 3, 2008 10:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since the British invasion of "1964" America has become the "Divided States" The hippie revolution, put a wedge between parents and children!!! The sexual revolution divided men and women!!! Straights, from Gays!!! RELIGION AGAINST RELIGION!!! RELIGION AGAINST SINNERS!!! YOUNG AGAINST OLD!!! OLD AGAINST YOUNG!!! THE GOVERNMENT AGAINST THE PEOPLE!! AMERICA IS DESTROYING IT'S SELF FROM WITHIN, with division, intolerance, special privilege, and the disenfranchised!!! WAKE UP!!! EITHER WE'RE ALL AMERICANS, OR THEY'RE NONE AT ALL!!! IF WE'RE DIVIDED WE'RE CONQUERED!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Somebody tell me the author didn't just extrapolate what Random Person Number 417...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jul 3, 2008 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...said to a Washingtong Post reporter about Obama to the entire U.S. population.

There are 300M people in the U.S. If you focus solely on the kooks, why are you so surprised that's all you see of "America" is kooky?

Tunnel vision much?

Without perspective, we are left to focus on our cave paintings. Get out. Find some fresh air. Develop a credible argument, and understand that people aren't monolithic, in defiance of the author's blatant stereotyping.

As far as the author's thesis is concerned, it's instructive to point out that he can only speak for himself when he makes these sorts of noises:

Intolerance isn't just popular among the ignorant. It is within every one of us.

Does that make the author intolerant? Perhaps, but most likely only willfully, selectively, and systematically misinformed. People defy attempts to be shoe-horned into the personal collectivist fantasies of others, at each and every turn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
A non sequiter Really Bearish. What about the topic?
Posted by: nightgaunt on Jul 3, 2008 12:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From what I can determine, so far, prejudice of any kind is learned. So we need to do a better job on educating a more open minded population don't you think?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Is simple english a problem? Posted by: ReallyBearish
How far would a black candidate get in Europe?
Posted by: JoshuaR on Jul 3, 2008 1:46 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really think alternet can get a little hysterical sometimes.

All countries are equally racist. America is not unique. I actually find America to be more tolerant than most.

Try to get Japan, China, South Korea, or any of those countries to accept multiculturalism.

The underlining message of this article, though not explicitely stated is: ACCEPT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION OR YOU ARE A HATEFUL WRETCH.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

i won't even give this author the pleasure of reading their article
Posted by: davesilvan on Jul 3, 2008 9:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
grand, sweeping allegations that 'everyone is intolerant' is a lie I cannot tolerate. You may think everyone is intolerant, and you have a right to say it under our first amendment, but I'll be damned if i'm going to read your racist article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

in fact, i'll do you one better
Posted by: davesilvan on Jul 3, 2008 9:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I won't even read any of your articles from here on, 'kyle,' if that IS your real name.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"I am still undecided about who I'm going to vote for,..."
Posted by: Digital Gentleman on Jul 4, 2008 12:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What???????? I can not believe the author wrote that. It is precisely this type of idiocy from "progressives/liberals/leftists" that got us Bush in 2000. The reality is, a vote for ANYONE other than Obama is in practice a vote for McCain!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Out of the Racist Closet
Posted by: beautifulady2003 on Jul 4, 2008 5:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The emergence of Barack Obama as a serious candidate for president has brought out a lot of long-dormant racist feeling in Americans that maybe they forgot they had, or didn't realize was in them. The Republican party is playing on this phenomenon and will exploit it to push for a McCain win in November.

Remember the old "I have nothing against Negroes, I just wouldn't want my daughter to marry one" kind of thing also applies to the idea of having a black person (or even partially black) in the White House (oh, sorry for the pun).

The Muslim thing, of course, plays on the fears implanted by the neocons against Muslims, of course all Muslims are secret terrorists, myself included! Even Obama himself is so afraid of us that he keeps his Muslim supporters off camera and won't visit a mosque while on the campaign trail. Not to mention how vociferously he repudiates his Muslim predecessors.

By the way, I have a friend named Hussein, and my fiance's name is Osama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Exercise that right to think before
Posted by: GPFrank on Jul 4, 2008 9:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like the idea of adopting the name Hussein and the general thrust of the article. I wish to clarify a point of termenolgy; difference.
If the writer said we all have prejudice I would agree. For instance I have prejudice against fat men, don't ask me why> But I would never act on that prejudice which is intolerance. Prejudice is a feeling but intolerance is behavior. Saying something you wouldn'd do like letting your daughter marry xxxx is behavior when nobody asked your daughter to marry xxxxx.
Now the article is about America and talks about American issues; from that aspect arguing there is intolerance on all continents is beside the point; is no argument for what is at hand; the claim of American exceptionalism which is at the root of that ignorance. There is also a right that goes along with free speech; the right to shut up, especially when one knows everyone has had three drinks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our Intolerance
Posted by: Dianka on Jul 5, 2008 8:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Think you aren't just as intolerant? OK, try this: What do you think about the poor around the world? Next, how about America's poor?
Poor elsewhere: Hard working, oppressed, suffering as a result of socio-economic
prejudices (blocked from opportunities, etc.)

US poor: morally/intellectually inferior, trash, responsible for their own situation and would not be poor if they would just work hard and play by all the rules; no suffering;
America's poor aren't really poor at all

What can we say about a people that uses billions of tax dollars to "ease the burdens" of the rich, but find it intolerable to provide sub-poverty level aid to the poor?

In America today, class divides people into winners and losers far more than any other factor. We provide protections to animals that we deny to the poor. Even our progressive community, keenly aware of social injustices
impacting other marginalized groups worldwide cannot see what is happening in the US, where the poor increasingly see their fundamental legal and human rights written off.

Societies select only the powerless as scapegoats. What never changes is that those who participate in the marginalization (or demonization) of any group of people don't recognize the hate/prejudiced within themselves. And that's because they believe their own intolerance is justified.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Our Intolerance Posted by: SoCalSally