COMMENTS: 4
Scalia Used False Information in Gitmo Dissent
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.
According to a new report by Seton Hall Law Center for Policy and Research, "The statistic was endorsed by a Senate Minority Report issued June 26, 2007, which cites a media outlet, CNN. CNN, in turn, named the DoD as its source. The '30' number, however, was corrected in a DoD press release issued in July 2007, and a DoD document submitted to the House Foreign Relations Committee on May 20, 2008 abandons the claim entirely."
The largest possible number of detainees who could have "returned to the fight" is 12; however, the Department of Defense has no system for tracking the whereabouts of released detainees. The only one who has undisputedly taken up arms against the United States or its allies, "ISN 220," was released by political officers of the DoD against the recommendations of military officers.
Scalia bolstered his hysterical claim that the Boumediene decision "will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed" with stale information that was proven to be false one year ago. Professor Mark Denbeaux, director of the Seton Hall Center, said, Scalia "was relying uncritically on information that originated with a party in the case before him."
The Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 decision that the Guantánamo detainees were entitled to file petitions for writ of habeas corpus to challenge their detention. More than 200 men who have been held for up to six years and have never been charged with a crime, will now have their day in court. Many were snatched from their homes, picked up off the street or in airports, or sold to the U.S. military by warlords for bounty.
Scalia, who sits on the highest court in the land, has acted as a loyal foot soldier for the executive branch of government.
This article first appeared at
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sslyon on Jun 25, 2008 7:42 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: larryfhilton on Jun 25, 2008 9:47 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have the worst President in history, and in Scalia, the worst Supreme Court Justice (rather symetrical, isn't it?) but we cannot continue to say, "La de dah--the country will survive them," because it will only survive when men and women of good will stand up to them and say, "ENOUGH".
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bobtr900 on Jun 26, 2008 12:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both of the entities that spawned him seem destined to corrupt America via their hate for it and our way of life. Will we survive their agenda for us, truly, I do not know.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 28, 2008 4:03 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pretty sure that some judges come under continual peer review nationally... but who assesses and reviews SCOTUS, this is most powerful body anywhere! [power over life and death]
and I thought...
Justice in the US was implemented to protect its citizens from the blatant neglect and vulgarities from its own, but these days this is only available to those that can afford it!
Lets just call this new improved justice system...
JUSTICE 2.0 new and improved [for those that can afford it]
can't you see?... something is seriously wrong here!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sslyon on Jun 25, 2008 7:42 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: larryfhilton on Jun 25, 2008 9:47 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have the worst President in history, and in Scalia, the worst Supreme Court Justice (rather symetrical, isn't it?) but we cannot continue to say, "La de dah--the country will survive them," because it will only survive when men and women of good will stand up to them and say, "ENOUGH".
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bobtr900 on Jun 26, 2008 12:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both of the entities that spawned him seem destined to corrupt America via their hate for it and our way of life. Will we survive their agenda for us, truly, I do not know.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 28, 2008 4:03 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pretty sure that some judges come under continual peer review nationally... but who assesses and reviews SCOTUS, this is most powerful body anywhere! [power over life and death]
and I thought...
Justice in the US was implemented to protect its citizens from the blatant neglect and vulgarities from its own, but these days this is only available to those that can afford it!
Lets just call this new improved justice system...
JUSTICE 2.0 new and improved [for those that can afford it]
can't you see?... something is seriously wrong here!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped
ACORN Smear Collaborator Claims Persecution to Raise Money for Her Legal Troubles
Bad Policies Are Really What's Driving California's Huge Prison Costs




