Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

Canada Apologizes to its Native People. Will We?

By Sarah van Gelder, YES! Magazine. Posted June 16, 2008.


Both Canada and the U.S. have a history of abusing the original inhabitants of their lands. Will both admit to it?
Advertisement

Canada said sorry (last) Wednesday. Four months earlier, it was Australia. Now it's our turn.

All three countries have a history of mistreatment of the original peoples of their respective lands. All three forcibly separated children from their families, communities, and cultures. And ironically, these same three countries were among the four (including New Zealand) who voted against the recently adopted UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Wednesday, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper did what was long overdue. The Conservative leader in a speech in the House of Commons apologized for Canada's policy of forcing First Nations children into residential schools. He acknowledged the suffering of individual children who were often abused, inadequately housed and fed, prevented from speaking their language and learning their culture. And he recognized that the harm has had far-reaching ripple effects. You can watch the Canadian Prime Minister's apology here.

"We now recognize that it was wrong to separate children from rich and vibrant cultures and traditions, that it created a void in many lives and communities, and we apologize for having done this. We now recognize that, in separating children from their families, we undermined the ability of many to adequately parent their own children and sowed the seeds for generations to follow, and we apologize for having done this. We now recognize that, far too often, these institutions gave rise to abuse or neglect. …"

And, addressing the First Nations' leaders who listened to his statement on the floor of the House of Commons, he added:

"You have been working on recovering from this experience for a long time and in a very real sense, we are now joining you on this journey. The government of Canada sincerely apologizes and asks the forgiveness of the aboriginal peoples of this country for failing them so profoundly."

The day was marked by ceremonies in 30 locations across Canada, where First Nations people gathered to remember and to commemorate the apology.

Canada's apology follows a similar one by Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd to the Aboriginal peoples in February of this year. Like in Canada, young Aboriginals were taken from their families, often by force, and sent to schools and homes where they were often abused, exploited, and prevented from speaking their language or practicing their way of life.

The United States has a similar legacy, but has yet to apologize. One state has stepped up and issued a somewhat different sort of apology, though. In a non-binding resolution, the Colorado Legislature apologized in late April for the intentional deaths, "cruelty, and inhumanity" inflicted on Native peoples. According to an article in Indian Country Today, the resolution specifically mentions the forced removal of the Cherokee Nation in 1838 and the Sand Creek Massacre of 1864, when as many as 200 Native people -- mostly elderly men, women and children -- were killed by members of the Colorado militia.

That's one state that's acted, 49 to go, plus the federal government. There's some good news from Washington, D.C., though. Kansas Senator Sam Brownback, a Republican, and Michigan Democrat Dale Kildee, head of the House's Native American Caucus, are pressing for congressional action, and they could succeed.

An apology to Native peoples is an important first step, but it should be accompanied by a commitment to discontinue the old practices of taking Native land and taking away Native peoples' political rights. And there are a lot of old wrongs that we can still make right.

While we're at it, the United States also owes an apology to the descendants of the slaves whose uncompensated labor built so much of the wealth of this country.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: native americans, canada, un, stephen harper, first nations, un declaration on the rig

Sarah van Gelder is Executive Editor of YES! Magazine where you can read her blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Focus on the future
Posted by: ahmlco on Jun 16, 2008 1:38 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What good is an apology for those events today when the people affected have been dead and buried for nearly two hundred years? Is Bush or the House saying, "I'm sorry" going to change anything?

And would your even believe their sincerity if they did?

We as a species spend way too much time focusing on ancient history, and on rights and wrongs both real and imagined. Instead, we need to turn around and look to the future, and to what we can do to make things better for all involved.

One has only to look at Bosnia or at the Israelis and Palestinians to see what happens when you spend too much time focusing blame on what happened in the past...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Apologize for what?
Posted by: rickiey on Jun 16, 2008 9:16 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I certainly won't.

I haven't done anything wrong, and owe no one an apology.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Apologize for what? Posted by: John Orford
LOL
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Jun 17, 2008 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah right. As long as Dictator Bush is at the helm, it'll never happen. He could care less about the American Sheeple and what they might think. Global Domination is all that is on his feeble little mind.

JT
Online Privacy when it Counts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Useless apology
Posted by: Jamesberry on Jun 17, 2008 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Harper applogised only for the residential schools program. Left out was the original crime of theft of native lands. Chinese canadians had already gotten their apology for the old head tax. They also got money. Japanese-Canadian got their apology years ago.

It's worth noting that among the first acts of Harper's government was to cancel the Kelowna Accords a program to aid reservations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NonHater
Posted by: YouReapProsperity on Jun 17, 2008 5:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether you agree or disagree about the apology is not the issue. The issue is a public recognition of the aboriginal people’s inherent right to be included in the Canadian dialogue, something the Americans still grapple with. In America, it is not only the US governments intent to deny native prosperity and sovereignty, but citizens, communities and every jurisdiction from local to states that remain in denial about indigenous claims to be the first Americans. Economically and culturally, natives are denied protection and assertion of rights. Lands are still taken away and abused for “profit” and natives have no collective legal representation. Law enforcement still charges in with guns blazing if a tribes dissent decisions. Natives are still murdered with no investigation or insight because courts do not see beyond racial lines.

Some problems can be come from our own people who have bought into the “good Indian-bad Indian” mentality. Natives are much of their own worst enemies since money and privilege given to natives has created “Good Old Indian Boy” factions but, there has to be a collective effort from all sides to even recognize this problem exists. Americans do not even know their own history, how could they recognize an aboriginal history? Anthropology, especially the media and information itself, is bought and sold like baloney and bread. This is the result of a capitalist society, yet when natives open a casino or a tribal business, Americans become communists and want to distribute that wealth and prosperity to the local and state governments. American Indians are the most loyal servicemen to the US Armed Forces and even the gaming industry tribes contribute to the states’ purses, but these gestures still do not make Americans appreciative or respectful towards the native plight. They remain indifferent and would rather see a statue, painting, film, coin, car, or name a building after natives than to extend a handshake to a living being.

The apology says a lot more of the Canadians than the indigenous peoples themselves. This will undoubtedly show the world that there are good white people after all. As for the reparations, at least Canadians offer something Americans cannot even fathom behind the wall of ignorance and hatred and that is, recognition. God Bless Canada and may she live long in the hearts of men and the world, for she has shown her strength and she has begun that journey of goodwill! Something America may never acquire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There was an apology by the US
Posted by: Ahni on Jun 17, 2008 6:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, there was/is an apology by the US. See http://www.nativeres.org/

As to the previous comment about how such apologies are unnecessary because "it's in the past.."

Well, I agree with you that they're useless, little more than token gestures (or perhaps, public relations schemes)

However, Residential Schools in Canada did not happen 300 years ago. They went on from 1840 to 1970. All I have to do is walk down the street to meet a dozen residential school victims.

Generally speaking, the fact is, for indigenous People the genocide (as defined by the genocide convention )never stopped. It's still happening as you read these words. The history is living.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There was an apology by the US Posted by: YouReapProsperity