Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

A Northern Family's Role in the Slave Trade

By Jessica Mosby, The Wip. Posted June 10, 2008.


Northerners are usually portrayed as benevolent abolitionists. But one woman tells a different story of slavery in the "deep north."
Advertisement

American slave trading is a human rights atrocity forever associated with the Confederacy of the Southern United States. Northerners are stereotypically portrayed as benevolent abolitionists fighting the South's slave labor plantations. But history is rarely that cut and dried.

Katrina Browne is the producer, director, and writer of "Traces of the Trade: A Story from the Deep North," which premiers on PBS as part of the Point of View film series on June 24. She grew up very proud of ancestry: Her New England-based DeWolf family is filled with generations of prominent and successful people. The fact that they originally made their fortune as slave traders was only ever mentioned in family lore as a footnote. As Browne says, "I never thought to ask how we got so established."

While attending the Pacific School of Religion in Berkeley, Calif., Browne received a DeWolf family history booklet written by her grandmother that referenced her family's slave-trading past. Browne was appalled. Then she realized that this was not news to her; rather, she had known most of her life that the DeWolfs were slave traders, but she had never fully acknowledged the horrendous truth about her family's past. After deciding that she had to do something to come to terms with her ancestry, Browne contacted 200 DeWolf descendants asking them to join her on a journey around the Triangle Trade route that made three generations of DeWolfs the most prominent slave-trading family in the United States. One hundred forty people never responded to her letter; nine relatives signed up.

"Traces of the Trade: A Story from the Deep North," which has screened at a number of film festivals, including Sundance, documents the 2001 journey Browne and her relatives took to trace her ancestors' route from Rhode Island to Ghana to Cuba and back again. The result is a powerful 86-minute film that starts an important and often uncomfortable dialogue about race.

Browne asked her relatives to travel with her because she felt that it was "more than I could take on by myself." The group dynamic also stimulated very intense discussions about race and accountability; different family members felt very differently about guilt and responsibility. The DeWolfs brought more than 10,000 Africans to the United States and Cuba, and more than 500,000 descendants of those slaves are alive today.

Do the DeWolf descendants bear some responsibility for their ancestors' actions?

The journey begins in Bristol, R.I., the ancestral home of the DeWolfs. At the height of their enterprise, the DeWolfs' business supported the entire town of Bristol -- local shipyards built the ships used to transport slaves and goods; the distilleries made rum from sugar grown on the DeWolfs' Cuban plantations; Bristol warehouses stored their rum and sugar; and many New Englanders owned slaves that the DeWolfs bought and sold. Their former mansion, Linden Place, is now a museum, and St. Michael's Episcopal Church has enormous stained glass windows bearing the family's name. While trading thousands of slaves, the DeWolfs called themselves Christians.

The truth about their lineage didn't really seem to resonate with the DeWolf descendants while in Bristol; the Northeastern town is far too idyllic to really bring home the ghastly reality of slavery. But the real contrast of how slave traders lived in comparison to the slaves they bought and sold was too dramatic to ignore in Ghana. For generations, the DeWolfs traded rum and other goods for slaves on the African coast. While visiting the dark, cramped cells where slaves were held before being traded, Browne and her relatives were physically sickened by the inhumane conditions.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: slavery, katrina browne, traces of the trade: a st

Jessica Mosby is a writer and critic living in San Francisco, Calif.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Slavery vs. wages
Posted by: Jasonix on Jun 10, 2008 4:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Societies use slaves when they have low population densities relative to the amount of land. When it's easy for a worker to leave and set up shop somewhere else, societies set up legal mechanisms to force the worker to labor for society's institutions rather than their own benefit. This is not an ideal situation - slaves are apt to revolt, and the owners must pay for the slaves' food and upkeep. (The exception is when slavery is used as a part of a strategy of ethnic cleansing, and the goal is to work the slave to death.)

When society has higher populations, it prefers to use wages - you get some money for your work, and the employer doesn't need to worry about your upkeep. Ideally, from the employer's perspective, he'll be able to pay you less than what it'd take to house and feed you. There should be a large number of people kept unemployed so that you'll be motivated to work to keep your job.

Tibet managed to make a fusion of these two systems - serfs were bound to work for assigned masters, but they had to support themselves. This was justified by Tibetan religion. I believe that we might see something similar in America in the future - if you get in a situation where you can't pay your bills, you go to prison or a detention center. You'll be saddled with debt, and you'll be imprisoned if you fail to keep running like a hamster on a wheel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Slavery vs. wages Posted by: dudelette
It continues today....
Posted by: Bozwell on Jun 10, 2008 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today, we too have "slave labor" via the illegal immigrant, primarily hispanics but others as well who are emplopyed by those KNOWING they can pay less, have less than 'good" working conditions or benefits in order to increase the employers profit lines and we have a government that turns a blindeye from enforcing rules and regulations that would actually PROTECT this "wroking clas" and by turning the blind eye to employers, they allow it to continue and we ordinaries are told it is for OUR benefit or we would need ourselves to pay more for goods and services....quite a conundrum, we say one thing, but do and encourage elsewise as if that leaves us without responsibility or guilt in the matterings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» We "Globalized" our SLAVE TRADE Posted by: Prairie Waif
» I am *EMBARRASSED* I replied Posted by: Prairie Waif
» You perfectly describe a socialist society Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist
Too Many Americans Treat Slavery Like An Entitlement Program
Posted by: desidid on Jun 10, 2008 5:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans like the portrait of slavery that Hollywood has propelled with movies such as, Gone With The Wind. They act like forcing people to give up their history, culture, family, religion, language, and freedom wasn't that bad because in return they received housing, clothing, and food. In other words they treat slavery as an entitlement program. From this history they view welfare as a gimme, when in fact freeing slaves without any money, land, or material wealth from their labor was a welfare program for those who participated in the trade. Many Blacks chose to stay and work the land because, they really had no other choice. As sharecroppers they were still enslaved to a system where they worked but, saw very little profit, if any. This history is glossed over whenever we talk about race in this country and especially when speaking to the issue of reparations. Slavery didn't end in 1865 it simply morphed into something else. It took another 99 years for the Civil Rights Act and Affirmative Action to try to correct the damage of hundreds of years of laws and practices that denied Blacks our rightful place in American society. Within 10 years of Affirmative Action being introduced many Whites feared that Blacks would actually fulfill our destiny to stand shoulder to shoulder with other Americans so they decried it as reverse discrimination. This democracy started with a lie, (All men are created equal) and continues to delude itself into thinking it is a just nation. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Another book Posted by: supercrisp
» RE: Another book Posted by: desidid
well, DUH!
Posted by: Vik on Jun 10, 2008 5:56 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not news. Those slave ships sailed from New England ports, and they were owned by Northerners. How many of those grand mansions in New England were built from profits from the slave trade? And the most racist people I have ever met have been New Englanders--and this was no doubt true back then, also--

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» hey - is this Chris Mathews? Posted by: war_on_tara
» RE: well, DUH! Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: well, DUH! Posted by: anonymous black writer
» RE: well, DUH! Posted by: Shehova
» RE: well, DUH! Posted by: mtnprivy
Worth seeing
Posted by: chutry on Jun 10, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's my reaction to the film after I saw a review copy a few weeks ago. I think a lot of people know this history, but there are so many others who don't that I think the story is well worth revisiting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Race = Myth
Posted by: animatedstardust on Jun 10, 2008 7:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's incredibly annoying for the media to STILL use the term "race" to define differences in ethnic groups. There's no such thing as different human races, but only one race: The Human Race.

Hello! We're ALL related and DNA research (i.e. National Geographic's Genographic Project) proves this a fact today.

It's time for Mosby and the rest of the media to recognize and respect this important fact and stop attempting to keep us seperate. We're ALL related! There is only ONE race. The Human Race.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I do not understand the guilt trip of certain Americans
Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist on Jun 10, 2008 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Am I as a Caucasian Swede responsible for the slave trade? Do I owe anything to African Americans? Should African Americans have special privileges and have special compensations?

In my mind the US has made tremendous reparation programs. Lyndon Baines Johnson and his massive Great Society program reallocated enormous sums of money from white middle class Americans to mainly African Americans. It still does today.

The US has the affirmative action legislation. If you are an African American you get scholarships and grants from any university basically for free i.e higher education is virtually without cost as long a you have the grades.

So what more do the American society "owe" African American, free housing, a lifetime guaranteed income, a free car etc. ?

This social experiment in repaying for 100 years of slavery has had little or no effect. It has basically been a waste of money. The only ones benefiting are African Americans that already had the ability to get ahead, they got free education, did not have to have student loans and got preferential treatment in the workplace. What of the rest? the inner cities of the US? Are they better of because of this sense of Entitlement, that America owes them?

My personal belief is that it is nothing more damaging than to generous entitlements, in Sweden we can see this very clearly. We now have a very large portion of our population that now are living on Entitlement, it is now so many that the portion of the population that actually work can no longer support those that do not work, there are no more taxes to be had.

The US has problems with its minorities but so do we, Sweden minorities are mainly people from the Middle East most of them extremely religious conservative Muslims. The problems are the same, so it cannot be the issue of slavery alone. Aother similarity is the large Entitlement programs. But is there a causality? That is what many studies in Sweden now is trying to find out, does large Entitlement programs activate the non working portion of the minority group or pacify them, keep them on entitlement permanently?

I think that the guilt trip has to end, in the US it must be clear that there is only one people. Not black, white, Chinese, Mexican, gay or straight, female or male. We are all living in America. Nobody has any special privileges or rights! Everybody is equal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So America owes you? Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist
» RE: So America owes you? Posted by: desidid
» RE: So America owes you? Posted by: yellow
» RE: So America owes you? Posted by: desidid
» RE: So America owes you? Posted by: yellow
» RE: So America owes you? Posted by: desidid
» Driving whilst black Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist
» Cops have a hard job to do Posted by: JibreelRiley
» I got your clone Posted by: JibreelRiley
» RE: I got your clone Posted by: desidid
» RE: Thank You from a Young Black Conservative Posted by: anonymous black writer
» Hypocrisy Posted by: michael1972
I never met
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Jun 10, 2008 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
my great great grandparent and/or other relatives of that period.
Mainly it was because they were in Europe at the time of slavery.

Since I never met them, can one of those of superior intelligence and without an agenda LEGITIMATELY explain to me why I should feel any guilt about what someone did with whom I have never had contact?

I thought not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I never met Posted by: Denver Dem
» RE: I never met Posted by: anonymous black writer
» RE: I never met Posted by: Knot_Rich
» You thought wrong Posted by: jam-today
» RE: You thought wrong Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: I never met Posted by: ellarwee
» Europe Posted by: michael1972
The North has a long history of slavery and racism
Posted by: harpy on Jun 10, 2008 10:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many people tend to think that slavery was a "South" only thing, and nothing could be further from the truth. Slavery existed in every state until the North began to lead toward industrial economy instead of agricultural. The Northerners then sold their slaves to Southern farmers for the most part.

Most people don't realize that the first slave revolts were in New York City as early as 1741 http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part1/1p285.html , and after that was quelled, several slaves were burned at the stake, in addition to other punishments. The slavery and the racism have never been confined to the South, and the worst riots concerning the Civil Rights Act occurred in Boston, Detroit, Los Angeles, and other cities not Southern.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poverty IS slavery
Posted by: wolfgangmo75 on Jun 10, 2008 11:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Poverty is the new corporate slavery.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

truly racism is alive and well
Posted by: WesternNY on Jun 10, 2008 11:49 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, in response to the Swede who believes that all blacks are receiving a free ride, that person obviously has not spent much time in the US.

I am not sure why that person thinks that Johnson's Great Society was one large entitlement program for blacks. The description given of blacks' claims on American society are certainly exaggerated. Besides, I don't understand why this is bothersome, especially for someone from a country where anyone with the right grades can go to college.

Johnson's Great Society involved mainly the creation of Medicare, Medicaid and food stamps. These are programs available to all who qualify: they are not race based.

Johnson's contribution to the unfortunate demise of the Democratic party was the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1964. The effect of these laws was the destruction of Jim Crow laws in the South and any race descrimination anywhere in this country. One part of the conservative argument against regulation is code for bemoaning the federal outlawing of racial discrimination; the other part is code for bemoaning the government's interference with the greedy impulses of the corporate interests.

And while I feel no particular personal guilt about what occurred with regard to black Americans, I do believe that it is only fair to provide a level playing field. The fact that Obama is now a candidate indicates how great the need for Johnson's civil rights laws was: Obama was born only within a few years of Johnson signing those acts.


For immigrants to this country, it takes approximately three generations to fit in (this is my background, and my son is the third generation). Clearly, blacks were finally given a fair shake beginning only in 1963, the true end of slavery in the US. Obama is the proof of that pudding.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Is your skin color the only determining factor? Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist
» RE: I beg to differ (See: NO and Hurricane Katrina) Posted by: anonymous black writer
White Like Me
Posted by: desidid on Jun 10, 2008 3:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tim Wise

Pt. 2

Pt. 3

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WTF Why Do 97% of these Posters think that if you are brown or black you get a free ride????????????
Posted by: Turiye on Jun 10, 2008 8:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Man, I felt like it was Deja Vu all over again. This shit African Americans don't need to take out student Loans, they get favoritism in hiring, shit like that. This is absurd! I have no idea where the hell alot of you are from but I guran-fucking-tee you are not from the NE. This is accomplishing nothing, you all are going back and forth without civil discourse. My 1st husband is Cuban(Afro-centric), my 2nd for 25 years is Turkish. I always would hear this shit when we started our business, "oh he's an "immigrant" so you don't have to pay taxes for 7 years right?", I said , "I do not know whom your accountant or advisor is but I pay much in taxes.", this is such bullshit.
Man,.No I refuse this is all about a bunch of white men that think some how they were fucked. Screw this. I already know the ending..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Most people *forget* that the UnderGround Railroad...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jun 11, 2008 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...was to **British North America** / Canada, not the Northern States.

Sad but true, because to admit otherwise would grant some measure of respect to Canada in American history classrooms. Can't have that!

...given that Americans write American textbooks, this fact has been conveniently forgotten.

The other convenient omission?
...is that the US Civil War was *emotionally & publicly motivated* by slavery (which was ostensibly ended within the British Empire, yet still existed 'out of sight, out of mind')...

but the US Northern bankers, industrialists, war profiteers & investors?
...wanted the Southern economy & land: the anti-slavery dispute was the popular & justifiable motivator for public support for an economic aggression.

The charming part?

...is that slavery still exists as an integral part of the 'norm' or American Way. Why? pay attention to what you buy & from where it came. Its simply more *profitable* to keep the slaves where they are now & move the product, not the people.

"To be a trade unionist (in Columbia) is to carry a tombstone on your back": Mark Thomas "on Coca-Cola" documentary

the 'cultural norm' popularized by American media is based on foreign slavery or near-slave conditions...

...don't even *ask* how cellphone batteries are made, or about the living standards in the US 'protectorate' of Saipan...

┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
┄┄
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
┄┄
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blacks getting in on the Profits
Posted by: BCcovers on Jun 11, 2008 9:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, so the north and America in general profitted fromt the slave trade. I think most people already know that. In fact it would surprise most to learn that the emancipation proclamation only freed confederate slaves, as Lincoln did not want to anger the northern slave states fighting with the Union. Slavery didn't end in the north until after the war.

Even more surprising to most is the wealth and power amassed by many tribal chiefs/slave traders on the west coast of Africa. The slave traders (black) recieved manufactured goods from Europe they could not otherwise recieve. Remember, it was a slave trade; not slave theft. Meaning that both trading parties exacted benefits; both the Western Africans (who still hold and trade slaves today!) and the white Europeans.

Furthermore one would be surprised at the many black slaveholders in the south prior to and during the civil war. Yes, that's right. Blacks owned plantations and slaves right here in America. The 1830 census listed over 3000 black slaveholders! New Orleans had many of these black slaveholders several of which had very large, prosperous plantations. Just google black slaveholders and you will be confronted with a wealth of information.

So while, yes, racism of the populations of America was rampant. Painting slavery and consequently reparations in a purely racial, white versus black manner does history a disservice. How can one ask the white man to make repairations for a practice that benefitted many blacks both here and abroad and is still engrained in many western african cultures to this very day?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]