Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

"A Kinder, Gentler Torture": My Client at Guantánamo

By H. Candace Gorman, In These Times. Posted June 2, 2008.


The American people either don't care about torture -- or else they don't want to hear about it.
Advertisement

While staying at his in-law's village in Afghanistan in December 2001, Abdul Hamid Al-Ghizzawi, my client at Guantánamo, knew little of Bush and Cheney.

Later, when vigilante thugs turned him over to the Northern Alliance for an American bounty, Al-Ghizzawi knew nothing of Donald Rumsfeld, Alberto Gonzales, Jay Bybee, John Yoo or Matthew Waxman -- the man who would become Al-Ghizzawi's personal war criminal and who is now a professor at Columbia Law School.

So, it was understandable that when Al-Ghizzawi heard American troops were coming, he tried to get himself turned over to them. As Al-Ghizzawi later told me, he thought he would be safe with the Americans "and have rights" and be treated "with respect." Al-Ghizzawi convinced the Americans to take him when they learned he spoke English. That was all the troops knew about him. Ignorance of who he was or why he was there, however, proved no impediment to torture.

In the early years, "the Americans treated me very brutally and disrespectfully, worse than the Northern Alliance … and the Northern Alliance was very bad," Al-Ghizzawi recounted to me. "But now the torture is much different. Now the torture is my life every day in this prison, alone without my family, dying, with no rights and no charges."

His American jailers spared Al-Ghizzawi the very worst of the worst in the long list of torture techniques now in use. He was not murdered or waterboarded. He did not have a razor blade taken to his penis, nor was he hung from the ceiling by his arms. One might describe Al-Ghizzawi's torture as a kinder, gentler torture.

In American custody, Al-Ghizzawi was only beaten with chains; bound to chairs in excruciating positions for endless hours; threatened with death and with rape; stripped and subjected to body-cavity searches by non-medical personnel while men -- and women -- laughed and took pictures.

Among many other brutalities and indignities, Al-Ghizzawi was also posed naked with other prisoners; terrorized with dogs; forced to kneel on stones in the searing heat; left to stand or crouch for extended periods; deprived of sleep; subjected to extreme cold without clothes or covering; denied medical attention; and kept in isolation for years.

Again, as I said: a kinder, gentler torture.

Now, of course, Al-Ghizzawi knows all about Bush and his enabling minions. He knows that lawyers invented legal theories to justify the inhumane and indefensible treatment he received. He knows the role that lawyers such as Bybee, Yoo and Matthew Waxman played.

At the end of 2004, Waxman, then assistant secretary of defense for detainee affairs, who is currently trying to reinvent himself as one of the good guys, learned that Al-Ghizzawi and others were found not to be "enemy combatants" (EC) or threats to the United States by the military's own combatant status review tribunals (CSRTs). Waxman set into motion a "do-over" CSRT, to make sure that Al-Ghizzawi's suffering continue, lest Waxman and the Bush administration suffer the embarrassment of being exposed for holding numerous innocent men for years for no reason.

Note this declassified portion of an e-mail chain between Waxman and others:

"Inconsistencies will not cast a favorable light on the CSRT process or the work done by [Office for the Administrative Review of the Detention of Enemy Combatants]. This does not justify making a change in and or (sic) itself but is a filter by which to look … . By properly classifying them as EC, then there is an opportunity to (1) further exploit them here in [G]TMO and (2) when they are transferred to a third country, it will be controlled transfer in status."

Every time I visit, Al-Ghizzawi asks me, "What happened to America?" I try to explain the unexplainable. I tell him that the American government now believes that torture is permissible; that we can hold people forever without charge; keep people in isolation for years; bar communications with family members; force-feed those who want to die and refuse to provide medical treatment for those who want to live. I explain that the American people, whose nation once stood as a beacon of human rights, neither care about this nor want to hear about it.

I also assure him that I am collecting the names of those responsible.

Attorney Seth Farber contributed to this article.

To read the original version of this article, go here.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: torture, donald rumsfeld, alberto gonzales, waterboarding, abdul hamid al-ghizzawi, guantánamo, john yoo, matthew waxman, jay bybee

H. Candace Gorman is a civil rights attorney in Chicago.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sick Monsters
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jun 2, 2008 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author says:
"The American people either don't care about torture -- or else they don't want to hear about it."

Third possibility -- the American people ENJOY all this "get tough" evil being done in our names. It makes you proud, doesn't it? Torture some brown-skinned foreigners -- sounds like fun to many Americans.
You people (of whom I am one) are SICK MONSTERS!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sick Monsters Posted by: Love Me, I'm a Liberal
» RE: Sick Monsters Posted by: luzmejor
Obvious
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jun 2, 2008 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I posted the following as a comment to another article. But I posted it relatively late, so I don't think it was noticed by many. -- And, yeah, I am angry.


I am usually against the insane "zero-tolerance" approach that is often taken in our public schools today. But I will say, I am not zero-tolerance on zero-tolerance itself.

For I think that this country should have ABSOLUTELY NO TOLERANCE WHAT SO EVER to torture, PERIOD! -
No torture EVER under ANY circumstances.

Anyone who even politically supports torture, let alone engages in it personally, is a hideous sadistic fascist and EVIL monster, plain and simple.
There is no arguing with this. It is OBVIOUS.
DUH!

Oh, why have we fallen so far as a country?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blowback
Posted by: Crazy H on Jun 2, 2008 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The biggest, strongest, nation on the planet has changed the rules.

You can bet your bottom dollar that more of our own people will be tortured as a result. How can we complain? We showed the world that it was okay.

A recent poll said that something like 70% of Americans favor torturing "terrorists." How naive they are, safe in the knowledge that they're not terrorists.

PETA has been declared a terrorist organization, not for mass murder, or even for inducing fear in the common man - but for costing a corporation money.

Step One: Legalize torture for terrorists
Step Two: Expand the definition of terrorist
Step Three: Torture anyone you damn well please.

I would, however, like to see Rush Limpbone's face as he gets waterboarded for refusing to name his drug supplier...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

COLLAPSE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Posted by: gsosbee on Jun 2, 2008 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Responsibility For The Collapse Of The Constitutional Government Of
The United States of America





The present task is to identify agencies and *individuals of the USA government who are responsible for the collapse of the constitutional democracy and the simultaneous formation of the current totalitarian state here. As may be expected the criminals and the terrorists of the two premier homicidal groups (i.e.: the fbi/cia) are also the spearheads of the nation's global intel operations, both overt and covert.** Other intel groups take orders (either directly or indirectly ) from the fbi and the cia.

Due to the corruption, incompetence and outright felonious mindset of the members of the fbi/cia, all of the other intel arms of the USA government are unable to protect the country from the mounting threats by persons and countries who seek to stop this nation's assault on Humanity. The reason for the national intel failure, therefore , can be directly attributable to the fbi/cia and their foolish congressional and presidential Handlers. As a result of this website and (www.sosbeevfbi.com) I have learned that the following intel groups study my material sometime in an apparent effort to comprehend why the fbi would attempt to frame (or neutralize) one of their own:

fbi ( this group of thugs ostensibly operates under doj, but in reality the fbi is the boss);
cia- this group is a nation unto itself, operating completely independently of the US governmnet;;

homeland security (responsible for many threats and assaults on my person)has an intel office manned by special agents and others who analyze data;
dea has an intel office for national security matters, but dea is largely controlled by fbi/cia; dea also pretends to function under the authority of doj;

the dept of defense is top dog in military intel, but they too take orders (or to put it mildly, "requests" from the fbi/cia)-within this dod group are army, air force, navy, marines (their respective intel offices);also under the dod banner are the dia, nsa, nro (national recon office), and the national geospacial intel office (Note that this office has extensively analysed my sites and for this reason I came to learn of their existence as a highly specialized tech office coordinating data both from earth and space);

The US Department of State has its own office of intel which regularly reviews my material to determine whether I may be a candidate for a federal arrest warrant;The US depts of energy and treasury also each visit my sites in connection with their appraisals of finances, etc., in connection with my material and visits thereto.

The various intel groups have their own subgroups which also carry out mission oriented objectives globally. For purposes of this report the reader should understand that the United States of America is run by the intel services and that these agencies are so completely corrupt in their operations and influence that no one can touch them.

*The names of fbi and cia agents, operatives, thugs, assassins, etc., is a work in progress; see my sites, newspaper reports, and perform other inquiries to identify the government rat bastards who look to imprison, torture, kill anyone who stands in their path.

**[Some of the above material is borrowed from the book, "Intelligence and National Security, A Reference Handbook" by J. Ransom Clark, Praeger Security International, Weatport Connecticut,2007.]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A note to Kevin Rudd
Posted by: Smiff on Jun 4, 2008 6:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bravo Kevin for bringing (most) of the Aussie troops out of Iraq. (Why not all of them?)

Bravo for publicly criticising John Howard's sycophantic decision to take us into an unsanctioned war of aggression in the first place.

But there is much more to be done.

Does Australia as a nation have the courage to speak out against atrocities such as those mentioned in this article?

No intelligent person with an ounce of compassion can accept that this behaviour is civilised.

Must we continue to look away from the crimes against humanity that our 'allies' commit?

As a nation, will our foreign policy continue to fall in line with the Dubya/Cheney white hats vs black hats view of the world?

Would we mindlessly follow them into a war with Iran?

Even if we don't blindly follow as your predecessor did, do we have the courage as a nation, do you have the courage as a leader, to speak out?

Surely as a nation...as part of the wider humanity...we are all better than that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nuremberg revisted?...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 4, 2008 9:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... but who is really on trial here?
this comment is snipped from;
Gitmo in Disarray, But Pentagon Moves Full Speed Ahead with Military Commissions


This is just going to be a warm up to the real thing thats going to be
revisiting this administration BIG TIME time next year in the Hague!

Its so sad that the real monsters responsible for 9-11 were denied habeas corpus rights and
treated as enemy combatants from the get go and not as the criminals that they actually are,
just like Timothy McVeigh!

Treating the 9-11 monsters the same as they treated us just made us... THEM...
and now they [the real monsters] have the sympathy and US, we're the victimizers?
Just how and when did that happen?...
and who is responsible for this?

Only Bush43 could pull that disaster out from his Stetson!
This leader of the Fee-world was a one man disaster from the moment he took office...
a Psycho schematic Retard... idiot... and/or moron!

and he was elected to office not once... BUT TWICE!

which makes the entire US electorate retards/idiots/morons times two!

and if you refuse to allow the prosecution of this War Criminal, plus his accomplishers
you will have no real friends anywhere, anymore!

so... chew on that fat and contemplate the real meaning of these Tribunals this election cycle!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TIME TO START REMEMBERING
Posted by: billgee on Jun 5, 2008 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We're not the wonderful, freedom loving, virtue spreading country we pretended to be.
Founded by Freethinkers, Masons and Runaway slaves maybe its time for us to remember who we want to be.

America the Beautiful

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]