Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

How Cell Phones Have Fueled a Frenzy of "Honor" Killings in Iraq

By Patrick Cockburn, Independent UK. Posted May 21, 2008.


The position of women in Iraqi society has deteriorated dramatically since the start of the occupation -- and the daily results are deadly.
Advertisement

A dark pool of dried blood and a fallen red scarf mark the place where Ronak, who had fled to a woman's shelter in the Kurdish city of Sulaymaniyah when she was accused of adultery by her husband, was shot three times by a man hiding on the roof of a nearby building.

Ronak was wounded by bullets in the neck, side and leg and only survived after a four-hour operation. She was the latest victim of a huge increase across Iraq in the number of "honor" killings of women for alleged immorality by their own families.

Many are burnt to death by having petrol or paraffin poured over them and set ablaze. Others are shot or strangled. The United Nations estimates that at least 255 women died in honor-related killings in Kurdistan, home to one fifth of Iraqis, in the first six months of 2007 alone.

The murder of women who are deemed to have disobeyed traditional codes of morality is even more common in the rest of Iraq where government authority has broken down since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein in 2003.

A surprising reason explaining the massive increase in the number of honor killings is the availability of cheap mobile phones able to take pictures. Men photograph themselves making love to their girlfriends and pass the pictures to their friends. This often turns out to be a lethal act of bravado in a society where premarital or extra-marital sex justifies killing.

The first known case of sex recorded on a mobile leading to murder was in 2004. Film of a boy making love with a 17-year-old girl circulated in the Kurdish capital, Arbil. Two days later she was killed by her family and a week later he was murdered by his.

Since then there has been a sharp increase in the number of women suffering violence –- it is almost always the women rather than the men who suffer retribution – as a result of some aspect of their love life being pictured on mobile phones.

In 2007, at least 350 women, double the figure for the previous year, suffered violence as a result of mobile phone "evidence", according to Amanj Khalil of the Institute for War and Peace Reporting, citing figures compiled by women's organizations and the police directorate in Sulaymaniyah.

The true figure is probably much higher. Bodies are buried in the mountains. Violence is concealed. Whole extended families and clans feel a genuine sense of shame because of some supposed act of immorality.

Often retribution is carefully planned. In the case of Ronak, whose real name has to be concealed, her would-be killer carefully chose his firing point in an empty office building beside the shelter and may have waited for her for a long time. Ronak, who has three children, came from the ramshackle town of Chamchamal on the road between Sulaymaniyah and Kirkuk. Accused of adultery by her husband and fearing an honor killing, she fled her house and took refuge first with the police who passed her on in March this year to the Asuda shelter in Sulaymaniyah, one of six shelters in Kurdistan for women who are victims of violence or threatened with honour killing.

She must have thought herself safe. Along with four other women, she was living on the first floor which can only be reached by a narrow staircase closed off by a locked inner door. The police gave a measure of protection. But members of her husband's family may have pursued her from Chamchamal. "When we went to court [with Ronak, who was seeking a divorce] we thought we were being followed," says Khanum Raheem Lateef, the manager of Asuda.

The windows in the shelter are mostly masked by curtains, but the one in the kitchen area leading to the bathroom had been taken down. At 11pm last Sunday Ronak went to the bathroom and as she came back into the kitchen a gunman lying on a roof 20ft away shot her three times.

The position of women in Iraqi society has deteriorated dramatically since the start of the occupation. Despite the horrific number of honor killings, their status may be improving only in Kurdistan, where the government is secular, in contrast to Baghdad where the religious parties hold power. The Kurdish police and courts are also more sympathetic than elsewhere in Iraq to women whose lives have been threatened. There are no shelters for women in Baghdad or Basra.

Vulnerability to violence is not the only area in which the equal status of women in Iraq has been eroded. A woman can only get a new passport if she is accompanied by a male relative. One woman, whose father was too ill to attend the passport office, had to take her 14-year-old brother with her to vouch for her before officials would give her a new passport.

Many women escape from miserable marriages, often arranged by their families, not by flight but by suicide. In 2007, some 600 women and girls in Kurdistan killed themselves, mostly by burning themselves, or by drowning or shooting themselves, according to the Health Ministry of the Kurdistan Regional Government.

"Women may feel there is genuinely no hope for them to escape subjection," says Sherizaan Minwalla, a lawyer with the Heartland Alliance in Sulaymaniyah, who represents many victims of domestic violence. "Suicide may seem a rational choice and even a form of protest."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: cell phones

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Lesser of two evils..
Posted by: carbon-based on May 21, 2008 8:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Saddam or Islam.... we should stay out of what we do not understand.. bottom line is they will live how they want and we should not judge..

leave and let live - we have our own problems to deal with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great point Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» RE: Lesser of two evils.. Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Lesser of two evils.. Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Lesser of two evils.. Posted by: koolwoman
» RE: Lesser of two evils.. Posted by: carbon-based
» Live and let murder? Posted by: janvdb
» RE: Live and let murder? Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Live and let murder? Posted by: morticia
» RE: Live and let murder? Posted by: carbon-based
Well, the U.S. plan is proceeding according to plan.
Posted by: non-person on May 21, 2008 11:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look at Saudi Arabia.

That's what they want to turn Iraq into.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7222869.stm

Maybe Mr. Cockburn should also visit Saudi Arabia and report on their cultural issues as well

"Honor Killings have been commonplace in places such as Egypt & Pakistan. Some have suggested that this can be related to the “Infamous" Honor Killing that took place in 1977 in Saudi Arabia (Honor Killing, 2005). Princess Mishaal Bint Fahad Al Saud was a Saudi Arabian, who fell in love with a young Lebanese student. The princess attempted to fake her own drowning, in hopes to run off with her lover. The couple were caught shortly after in the Airport, and publicly executed for adultery upon the orders of her grandfather, Prince Mohammad Bin Abdul Aziz, who was an older brother to the then King of Saudi Arabia. A controversial version of the story that the killing took place in a parking lot in Jeddah, in an act of tribal vengeance, by the King’s elder brother, the princes was nineteen years old at the time (Death of a Princess, 2005). This sheds light on the epidemic of Honor killings, since the majority of the Muslims look up to, and abide by the standards of the Saudi Royal Family, for Saudi Arabia is the birthplace of Islam, and for whom the equivalent is the Vatican City State, in relation to the Christian faith."

Although, those Saudi prisons are awfully unpleasant, by all indications, so maybe reporting on that from S.A. is not such a good idea.

I would also recommend this one:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ article/0,9171,1101040726-665048,00.html

"When U.S. forces overthrew Saddam Hussein 15 months ago, the Bush Administration proclaimed that women's rights would be a centerpiece of its project to make Iraq a democratic model for the rest of the Arab world. But for many Iraqi women, the tyranny of Saddam's regime has been replaced by chronic violence and growing religious conservatism that have stifled their hopes for wider freedoms — and, for many, put their lives in even greater peril. For women like Shaima, the most terrifying development has been the rash of honor killings committed by Iraqi men against sisters, wives, daughters or mothers whom they suspect of straying from traditional rules of chastity and fidelity. Although such killings are hard to quantify and occurred during Saddam's regime as well, Iraqi professionals believe that women are now being murdered by their kin at an unprecedented rate. On the basis of case reports provided by police, court officials and doctors at Baghdad's forensics institute, the number of victims of honor killings in Iraq since the U.S. invasion in March 2003 may total in the hundreds. (By comparison, in neighboring Jordan, where women's-rights advocates have succeeded in bringing attention to the issue, activists report an average of 20 honor killings a year.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jareilly
Posted by: jareilly on May 21, 2008 3:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can I just say it without being slimed by soft-focus cultural relativism and "live and let live" blather? This s**t is deeply pathological and twisted. This is institutionalized murder culturally sanitized as redeemed honor. The idea that hurt male pride can only be redeemed by murder of one's own family member is pure barbarism. It's the worst sort of savage, illiterate blood rite; a remnant of a brutal, isolated and violent subculture of warring desert scavengers and thieves, cynically elevated to the status of "religious and cultural tradition". A social (dis)order passed along for purposes of imposing a long-dead, pre-scientific and absolutist worldview on each successive generation. Not unlike the lynching of black folks in the US.

There is nothing inconsistent about opposing this horror while opposing the horror of the US occupation at the same time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: jareilly Posted by: shd1230
» RE: jareilly Posted by: osd
Barbarians
Posted by: gellero1 on May 21, 2008 6:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This barbarism is ingrained in their culture, and can be traced to their religion........the Koran........which condones and justifies murder. Sorry if that's not politically correct, but we don't seem to see fatwas by their Immams against this barbarity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So? Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» The answer is no..... Posted by: gellero1
» RE: So? Posted by: planet doomed
» RE: So? Posted by: Chloe2005
» Ashamed???? LOL Posted by: gellero1
Last comment on this site
Posted by: Phenix on May 22, 2008 11:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad Alternet has posted an article by Patrick Cockburn who is the best western reporter in Iraq. I laughed when someone suggested he study Saudi Arabia. Cockburn is not an elegant writer but he explains the situation is plain language. Women in Iraq are in great danger because of the break down of secular rule in Iraq. I was unaware that Iraqis had cam phones that are probably better than mine :). I wonder why possesses a man to take photos of a woman knowing that she could very well die.

In a world gone mad I thought it was appropriate that the first men who taped his partner was also killed. This punishment should be extended to all men who cause the death of a woman through taping her. Of course I'd prefer that no one dies but at least this way its fair.

If you are interested about Iraq and want to read an honest no nonsense account of its failings then read his new book.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your premise is crap
Posted by: robbie.seal on May 22, 2008 2:33 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Honor killings are nothing new, and have not increased in Iraq since we got there. They are just reported now. Saddam didn't care if Shia killed Shia unless he could get something out of it. These women are murdered for the same reason there are honor killings in other Muslim countries and the same reason women are raped in central Africa. Its because they live in a society that sees them as property and not people. They have no rights. Stop trying to blame Bush for everything. The war is screwed up, but Bush did not invent honor killings. The cell phone does not cause honor killings. The men that rule their societies invented honor killings long ago. Until these women have rights, they will be murdered for adultry, suspected adultry, for the crime of being raped etc, etc...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Your premise is crap Posted by: bobtr900
cultural imperialism or atheism
Posted by: dawoud_almajid on May 23, 2008 5:12 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not even for a minute has anyone considered that what they are doing is correct. all of the value judgements that have been expressed in the supposed horror of these " honor killings" which is a misnomer at best, and an attempt to dehumanise islamic culture at worst, have been made from a post enlightenment western point of view, which is totally devoid of god or morality, where relativism is the code word for do what you feel, maybe if the rules against adultery were enforced in our societies, we wouldn't have so many single parent households and such a mass migration toward homosexual lifestyles??????????? but i digress, maybe they think that we are savages too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Ghost of Falwell? Posted by: Grinty
Cultural Imperialism
Posted by: gellero1 on May 24, 2008 12:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yep.....we Westerners have made some Imperialist value judgements, and foisted them on the world.............

No Slavery

No cutting off hands and feet for stealing

No 'honor' killing.

If the other cultures of the world don't like it, too bad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]