Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

Meet Gus Puryear: Bush's Latest Villainous Nominee for a Lifetime Judgeship

By Silja J.A. Talvi, AlterNet. Posted May 5, 2008.


The unsolved murder of Estelle Richardson in her prison cell haunts the nation's top private prison litigator as he vies for a judgeship.
Advertisement

Editor's Note: In 2004, Estelle Richardson's lifeless and battered body was found on the floor of a Corrections Corp. of America prison cell. Four years later, that unsolved homicide has come back to haunt Republican stalwart "Gus" Puryear, the nation's top private prison litigator and Bush nominee for U.S. District Court. This is Part I of an AlterNet exclusive, two-part investigative feature by Silja J.A. Talvi.

Part 1: Mr. Puryear, meet Ms. Richardson

It's hard to say what Estelle Ann Richardson would have thought if she would have had the chance to meet the man who authorized a hefty settlement check for her children.

Maybe she would have noticed that he moved in the world like someone who was used to things going his way, that he had a lot of money, or that he looked a lot younger and more relaxed than most of his corporate peers. It's hard to say, because she never had the chance to be introduced to the harmless-enough looking man possessed of a rather ostentatious name: Gustavus Adolphus Puryear IV.

The 39-year-old lawyer, awaiting a lifetime appointment as a judge in U.S. District Court, prefers to be called "Gus."

By all accounts, Gus is a charismatic, outgoing guy who likes to spend time with his family. He volunteers as a deacon in the Presbyterian Church and serves as a board member of the Exchange Club of Nashville, Tenn., where one of his responsibilities is to organize the annual Antiques and Garden Show. From a corporate standpoint, Puryear has excelled in his job as general counsel for Corrections Corp. of America (CCA), the nation's largest and most influential private prison company. Under his direction, CCA's in-house attorneys work with a stable of contracted law firms to handle corporate legal matters of all kinds, not the least of which are the hundreds of claims and lawsuits filed against the company at any given time. A smart, enthusiastic GOP stalwart, Puryear is the kind of guy the party wants around. It doesn't hurt that he's also very, very rich: Between his bank account, assets and unexercised CCA shares, he's worth about $13 million, give or take a few thousand.

On the other hand, Richardson, a low-income, African American mother of two, moved through a world quite removed from that of the upper-echelon neighborhoods, schools and workplaces that afford Puryear his comfort zone. It's unlikely that the two would have ever met under even the most random of circumstances. The exclusive, members-only Belle Meade Country Club to which Puryear belongs, for instance, wouldn't have been the kind of place Richardson would have set foot in, particularly considering that African Americans weren't even allowed to join until 1994. (To this day, the only black member lives out of state. To boot, none of the women who have been admitted to the club, called "lady members," hold voting privileges.)

Belle Meade country clubbers probably raised a glass to toast Puryear when President Bush nominated him to sit on the federal bench in the Middle District of Tennessee. Yet, instead of breezing through what should have been an easy, perfunctory hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee this past February, Puryear was confronted with a series of uncomfortable questions about his legal and professional qualifications for the bench.

Nothing about Puryear's hobnobbing, rapid ascent to the status of a GOP darling suggested the emergence of an ad-hoc, grassroots movement to derail his nomination, much less the methodical persistence of a former CCA prisoner-turned-jailhouse lawyer hell bent on exposing the judicial candidate's affiliations, biases, and lack of courtroom experience. What Richardson's story has to do with all of this isn't obvious on the face of it, but the connection between the two has bubbled to the surface amidst a strange series of post-nomination twists and turns that no one, including Puryear, could have seen coming.

A mysterious homicide

On July 5, 2004, Richardson's lifeless, 34-year-old body was found slumped on the floor of an isolation cell in a Corrections Corp. of America (CCA)-operated detention facility in Nashville. An autopsy revealed that she died as a result of massive blunt force injuries to the head, resulting in a cracked skull. Richardson also had four broken ribs and serious internal organ injuries. Dr. Bruce Levy, Tennessee's chief medical examiner, ruled that Richardson's death was a homicide. His autopsy revealed a set of injuries that were consistent with a "deceleration injury," meaning that her head and body slammed simultaneously toward a hard surface, such as a wall or a floor.

In an interview with the Tennessean in September 2004, Dr. Levy emphasized that Richardson's injuries could not have been the result of a fall or suicide. Richardson, as he pointed out, was in a highly restricted segregation unit, which allowed no freedom of movement outside of her small, one-woman cell, much less contact with other prisoners. "It's a restricted area," he said. "There's a limit to what you can do. If she had fallen from a high window or if she had been hit by a car, I would expect to see these types of injuries."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: gus puryear, cca, estelle richardson

Silja J.A. Talvi is an investigative journalist and the author of Women Behind Bars: The Crisis of Women in the U.S. Prison System (Seal Press: 2007). Her work has already appeared in many book anthologies, including It's So You (Seal Press, 2007), Prison Nation (Routledge: 2005), Prison Profiteers (The New Press: 2008), and Body Outlaws (Seal Press: 2004). She is a senior editor at In These Times.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Want to know more about the Puryear nomination?
Posted by: againstpuryear on May 5, 2008 1:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent article! For much more about Puryear's judicial nomination, including all of the issues, a full list of media coverage and how you can get involved, visit: www.againstpuryear.org.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Excellent website! Posted by: brunowe
Job ONE well done! DESTROY America.
Posted by: williameon on May 5, 2008 4:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pack The Courts!
Pack the Schools!
Pack the Government!
Pack the Media!
Pack the Ballot Boxes!
Pack your job off to China!
Pack the Militia off to Die in a Death March.
Pack the Army full of Criminals and Torturers
Pack the Attorney Generals Office full of Liars.
Pack the Atmosphere full of Co2.
Pack Nuclear Waste into shells and fire them at Civilians
Pack Death and Destruction everywhere!
Pack the Environment with Toxic Pollution.
Pack Stores with Chinese JUNK
Pack Terminator Genes into the Food Supply.
Pack the Environment full of Genetic Mutations
Pack Clones into Laboratories
Pack libraries with Books of lies.
Pack TV with Crooks, Shysters, Quacks, Dicks, Bobbin Head Dolls, Queens, Steers and Schlock Meisters.
Pack Zioland with WMD
Pack The Pulpit with Gestapo
Pack the Bankers full of Money
Pack all the Gold from Fort Knox.
Pack the Black House with Pirates.
Pack the Resident to a Zoo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Guilty of Reckelss endangerment -At least
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 5, 2008 4:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This Privitization of every aspect of our national Systems is criminal.
Not just Prison systems, but the Military,health care, education, National Banking, OSHA regulations & Oversight....It is endless. And if it is not entirely handed over to for Profit oranizations the 'gov't' has been hiring the Personnel of these Corps as the heads of Our national Agencies, and/or Allowed to write Legistlation.
We not only need to adhere to the Fundementaly requirement of Separation of Chruch and State, but also Demand and Assure there is Separation of Corps and State!these pracitces are not only counter productive, and not Cost effective- they are a Conflict of National interest. If the 'Public Servants ' will not begin the 'divestment' from these corrupt Profiteering Corp contracts then they should begin facing charges of Reckless Endangerment,Dereliction of Duty, if not Treason!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Midway54
Posted by: Midway54 on May 5, 2008 5:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, and John McBush must be licking his chops to get more of these characters on the Federal courts after he is in the White House thanks to the voting Dupes' semi-hysterical response to a full dose of the ultra-right's expected propanganda campaign of imminent Islamofascist attack and red color Ridge system alerts just a few weeks before election day in November,

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What direct connection did he have to the death?
Posted by: HomerScarborough on May 5, 2008 6:06 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article says that Gus was the lawyer for the company, not responsible in any way for the actual death of the inmate. He was doing his job in the best tradition of the profession as an advocate for his client. Perhaps he had a client that deserved punishment for the acts of its agents against the lady, but in our legal system everyone, without exception, is entitled to competent legal counsel. What would you have had him do?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Consider this...
Posted by: Marlena on May 5, 2008 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prison for profit = slave labor camp
And people still think the US is not a fascist state??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We need to Know how our money is invested.
Posted by: peacekeepertwo on May 5, 2008 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The more important questions, How many of us have money invested in CCA? has the mutual fund we have invested in for our retirement, put our money in this company's Stock? Could we have a part in this? Is there A fund that will require Company's, to obey the Law, and provide a living wage for there Employees. If such a Mutual Fund does No Exist, maybe some one should start one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ostentatious name?
Posted by: mdwoade on May 5, 2008 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am confused when fair number of articles take cheap shots before talking about serious issues. No one would make fun of a person for his sexual orientation or physical disability or his race, but reporters find overweight people or people with funny names to be fair game:

"...the harmless-enough looking man possessed of a rather ostentatious name: Gustavus Adolphus Puryear IV."

Perhaps, Gus is proud of his Swedish heritage, I have no idea. Perhaps, Silja is a common name somewhere, I do not really care, it has nothing to do with how well he/she writes. I just find this type of statement about names to be objectionable and in very poor taste. The word "tacky" comes to mind. To me, cheap shots like this remind me of the way Republicans view the world.

I loved the essay and I await the second part. Just stick to the facts, OK.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» not to mention Posted by: e rice
» RE: not to mention Posted by: lenioui
What's the big deal?
Posted by: willymack on May 5, 2008 9:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How is dumbya & co. going to establish a Stalinist type dictatorship without shoving crooks, liars, and moral and social degenerates down our throats? This is hard work! Can't you see our dear leader is busy building a legacy? Stop all this annoying gossip at once; after all guvmint bidness is NONE OF OUR BUSINESS, right? Just be good boys and girls, and go back to sleep.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More Federalist Society Tory Swine..?
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on May 5, 2008 10:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I only scanned the article at this point, but I'll bet you dollars to donuts this guy is a member of the Federalist Society..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If any of you saw what Bush did as Governor of Texas
Posted by: bettyn on May 5, 2008 11:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
with the Texas prison system, you would not be surprised at his nominating of some prick like this clown for a position as a Federal court judge. More than 100 people were put to death during the time President Dingbat was in the governor's office. (Certainly some of these people were innocent, but DNA testing was not allowed).

Bush is an evil, sadistic little rich boy. I think he really enjoys and gets off on this sort of activity, not only in our prisons, but in the torture of POW's. He is truly a monster.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

if he is wearing a lapel flag pin
Posted by: jc1234 on May 5, 2008 12:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and if it isn't turned upside down symbolizing a nation in distress...he cannot be trusted

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"non-violent offender with a drug problem"
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on May 5, 2008 12:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CCA should be sued into oblivion. Missing videotape? $10 million fine. Disregard of physician's orders? $10 million fine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» By the way, EncinoM... Posted by: Quannah
Nothing ever changes
Posted by: sicntired on May 5, 2008 8:14 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was incarcerated in a federal penitentiary way back in the day and the courts were only just beginning to deal with the segregation issue.I saw some pretty badly damaged individuals that wound up in a world of hurt after extended periods in isolation.I can't imagine what it would be like in a private prison.Prisoner beatings happen all the time.In Canadian jails it's not common for inmates to be harmed or killed by guards but in those rare circumstances when they've been afforded the opportunity to take a life,they do it with delight and cold,planned violence.They always kill the person that pisses them off the most.It never has anything to do with who's strongest or the biggest threat.If this woman was withdrawing from narcotics,she would have been acting in the most bizarre manner.I thought I was able to control things with a thought at one time while coming down off a heroin addiction.The only reason I wasn't done in by guards or inmates was because it was obvious to everyone how sick I was.This woman could have been psycotic,like I was.I was placed in intensive care for three weeks and was still 1/2 nuts when I was released from hospital.This guy has no conscience.The way he handled this went way beyond just doing his job.He took a murdered woman and exonerated her killers and punished her whole family just because he could.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

tatamchwh
Posted by: tatamchwh on May 5, 2008 9:16 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is one more reason that we must have time limits on federal judgeships. Congress must act to eliminate all lifetime appointments.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

how can anyone be justified putting...
Posted by: Bearzerker on May 5, 2008 10:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...an executive officer of a company that profits in "incarceration" into a position that would and could "profit" his Company, by him making decisions that can and will incarcerate into "his" prison industrial complex?...

Isn't his being an executive [shares in the company] of CCA reason enough to preclude this person from "any form" of Prosecutor-ship and/or judgeship?
if not, why not?
wouldn't this be a conflict of interest?
and isn't their laws precluding such conflicts from ever happening?... if not, why not?


I'm sort of sick and tired of the the GRAFT that emanates from the Bush43 administration!...
it reeks of incompetence and corruption!

I sure hope the next congress/senate/executive unseals for intense investigations...
every stinking smelly act this corrupt administration has championed and pushed through...
including the creation of DHS...
the fiasco of FEMA,
9-11,
Environmental Protections,
FDA
the Timber Coalition,
Scientific manipulations for political advantage,
etc...
the list is so long I think the point is made!

Impeach?...
Its to late now, but lets prosecute this entire political machine... top to bottom...
and bankrupt the GoP so completely that their inept leadership is incapable of inflicting such damage to future generations ever again!

remember... this stinking mess started with Nixon...
Its long past its time to do a proper cleanup!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on May 6, 2008 12:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, we will


Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Escape From America??
Posted by: macdon1 on May 6, 2008 4:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never thought I would be saving up to escape from America but things are looking pretty hopeless for those of us who don't go along with the fascist government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

God Has Damned America!
Posted by: johnbradleycopeland on May 7, 2008 2:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America has become the home of the rich and wealthy who have all the power and privilege and lawyers. We torture anyone and everyone and shoot citizens 30, 40, 50 times to make sure they are dead or beat them until they can not speak. America spreads this death to other countries all over the world. Oh yes, Rev. Wright, I agree, God Damn America! This is NOT My America!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]