Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

Remembering What Nixon Learned

By David Sirota, Creators Syndicate. Posted March 14, 2008.


Conservatives are ignoring history's teachings and resurrecting Nixon's failed strategy of going after working people.
Advertisement

A half century ago, Richard Nixon spearheaded his party's national congressional campaign in the face of a recession like we face today. Then Dwight Eisenhower's vice president, he decided the GOP would champion anti-worker laws pioneered in the segregationist south as a way to defeat Democrats. Specifically, he rolled out "right to work" ballot initiatives to weaken the labor movement. These measures ban contracts that compel employees benefiting from union representation to contribute union dues.

When the 1958 election came, Nixon's blame-workers-first initiatives bombed, and Republicans lost 48 congressional seats, handing the party "its worst year ever," as historian Rick Perlstein recounts in his brilliant new book, "Nixonland."

"Right-to-work wasn't popular with a general public that understood how a strong labor movement had rocketed millions of voters into the middle class," Perlstein writes.

Fifty years later, conservatives are ignoring history's teachings and resurrecting Nixon's failed strategy in a place that could decide a close presidential election. Here in Colorado, one of the most contested "swing" states, a group of zealots is hoping a "right to work" ballot initiative will drive up GOP turnout and help John McCain keep nine electoral votes in the Republican column.

The strategy is bold in its desperation. Right-wingers are betting that Colorado citizens will vote to cut their own pay. After all, according to the Economic Policy Institute, employees in right to work states make between 4 and 8 percent less per year than those in other states.

Already, a poll shows 56 percent of the state opposes "right to work" laws. Even one of Colorado's most influential business groups has said it has "no desire" for such irrational measures. But the right is not in a rational frame of mind.

Colorado conservatives are reeling after Republicans lost both the legislature and governor's mansion for the first time in more than four decades. The local Republican Party is so unhinged that it hired a buffoon named Dick Wadhams to save it -- the same Dick Wadhams who most recently made headlines running Sen. George "Macaca" Allen's 2006 re-election campaign into the ground, effectively ending the Virginia lawmaker's political career. Clearly, these are dire times for the right, and despair tends to deify the Nixons and the Wadhamses by embracing irrational extremism -- whether YouTube-amplified racism or worker persecution inherent in "right to work" schemes.

Adding to conservatives' troubles is Colorado's emboldened labor movement. Rather than crouching in a defensive posture, unions are preparing two initiatives that could drive up turnout for Democrats and serve as a model for other states across the nation.

One forces the right to defend criminals -- literally. The initiative would make a corporate executive personally liable under the law if he or she "engages in, authorizes, solicits, requests, commands or knowingly tolerates the business's criminal conduct."

According to union polling, 84 percent of Colorado citizens back the measure. Nonetheless, the Denver Chamber of Commerce is trying to keep the initiative off the ballot, claiming that punishing corporate criminals is "a direct assault on our business climate." Yes, conservatives say lawbreaking is not an "assault on our business climate" -- prosecuting lawbreakers is. Next thing you know these shills will argue that locking up violent criminals hurts the "business climate" because, when not killing people, murderers contribute to the local economy.

The other labor-backed initiative would require employers to have a "just cause" when laying off an employee. The unions' poll shows 70 percent of Colorado voters support the concept -- not surprising, considering many voters are probably shocked to discover that most states allow employers to terminate workers for any reason not already outlawed by existing anti-discrimination statutes. Your boss doesn't like that you root for a particular professional sports team? Unless the ballot initiative passes, you can be fired "at will" for that and more in Colorado -- and the initiative's conservative opponents will be arguing that's A-OK by them.

Perlstein notes that after his anti-labor strategy backfired in 1958, Nixon "hardly said an ill word about the labor movement in public again." He learned a lesson today's conservatives have forgotten -- namely, that the public punishes those who overtly denigrate workers. If these initiatives end up on the ballot in a state garnering so much election attention, voters will have the chance to teach the right that crucial lesson once again.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: labor, nixon, election08, colorado

David Sirota is a nationally syndicated weekly newspaper columnist for Creators Syndicate. He is the author of Hostile Takeover: How Big Money and Corruption Conquered Our Government and How We Take It Back (Crown 2006). His second book, The Uprising, is due in the Spring of 2008.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The real attack
Posted by: carbon-based on Mar 14, 2008 2:54 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anti worker..how about Obama;s multi trillion $ tax increase on the working people..not the rich but those families making over $90+ thousand a year. Now if that isnt attacking the working class what is? you live in the north east $200,000 in middle class!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The real attack Posted by: chaoslegs
» RE: The real attack Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: The real attack TREASON Posted by: mkdelta69
» RE: The real attack TREASON Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: The real attack Posted by: mkdelta69
» RE: The real attack Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: The real attack Posted by: john mont
It would also be very helpful if...
Posted by: nightgaunt on Mar 14, 2008 12:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those of us earning $20,000-$30,000 as singles didn't have to pay social security because we are in dire need of all that money just to pay for the inflationary costs incrued.
I'm in Texas,one of those onerous 'Right to Work'(sic) states.(Means right to fire for any/no reason)
Cost of living has been made artificially high by the constant construction of expensive apartments but not for cheaper ones for the likes of myself. Recent offerings of an efficiency for $550 a month!
One of many problems in this sick culture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Right to Work" = No Rights
Posted by: onevoter on Mar 14, 2008 3:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I also live in Texas, a "right to work" state. Teachers in this state do not have a "union", as we do not have collective bargaining rights. Yet, there are frequent mentions in the media that "teachers' unions" stand in the way of education "reform". While we sign something called a "contract", it gives school districts every out in the book and does not even list the salary to be paid! Meanwhile, superintendents are paid and treated like CEO's. If it weren't for the efforts of our associaitions, we wouldn't even have such things as a state minimum salary schedule, a planning period, or a duty-free 30 minute lunch. Imagine what more we could have with a true "union".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ever Heard of THESE Guys?
Posted by: davidt on Mar 14, 2008 11:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After listening to carbon-based's tired old poop about Obama's tax INCREASES I wonder why some folks READ alternet.

Some background material might be amusing...

1. Two rotund little cherubs, Milton Friedman & his sock-puppet with a sneer, Grover Norquist are pushing the Neocon Agenda. Miltie's dead but his marrow is FOREVER being re-gurgitated and plopped into waiting open mouths anxious to gargle with old razor blades.

2 What these parrots squawk endlessly about is taxes, taxes, taxes, taxes. Goodness!

3. Their solution? A three-pronged attack that solves EVERY economic imbalance that could ever arise. Of course sometimes these "imbalances" take a little LONGER to rectify than is promised. But the prongs, no matter how SHARP & PAINFUL are inviolable--free markets, de-regulation and reduction of social spending.

4. This solution has been exported throughout South America--Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Peru, Paraguay, Ecuador. Guess what? During this process their economies looked just like ours does RIGHT now--inflation was skyrocketing, the rich owned everything, unemployment went ballistic, and ALL those countries went into horrendous DEBT! Oh torture becamse de rigeur so citizens had two choices--speak up & be tortured OR sit down and shut up. Bill O'Racist's mantra, I hear.

5. The same/disguised as new folks are at it again, in Iwreck and the United States of Advertising. Angel Miltie and his virulent spawn i.e. Kristol, Limbaugh, Norquist, McConnell-Chao, Cheney are busy heaving up the swill and some folks think it just tastes fine. Yum yum yum.

6. Only a pack of idiots pass 3 successive tax cuts amounting to 4 TRILLION then wage 2 wars in Afghanistan & Iraq simultaneously. Who pays for it? Why those same folks that were told--"It's YOUR money, I think you should be able to keep it". Anything ELSE that varies from that dogma is posed as a TAX INCREASE. Works every time because Americans have a short memory & DON'T bother to get involved in that smelly stale-fish game of politics--we would rather watch something more wholesome like the Steriod Circus aka World Wide Wrestling or the latest Reality Regurgitation.

7. Now we finally have seen what the Norquist/Limbaugh/Murdoch Telecommunications Complex have brought us to and we want a change. Hey, it's actually happening in OTHER countries--Venezuela, Chile, Australia, Bolivia--so why not in the MOST POWERFUL NATION IN THE FREE WORLD...PLUS GOD BLESSES US AT REGULAR INTERVALS.

Here comes Barack Obama into the picture but he doesn't quite fit the mold of previous Black politicians. He ain't Jesse Jackson, he ain't Al Sharpton he ain't Colin Powell (whew!) he ain't Condi(sweet)Rice. He is a true African-American who wants to restore fairness in our country and OMIGOSH folks are LISTENING. Well, some of us anyway.

Now, no matter what you may HEAR from the GOP Noise Machine that has found a withered old flip-flopper who ONCE had an independent streak but has NOW metamorphosed into Bush III--John McNuts to gush over, Barack Obama will not raise taxes on the middle class since there is no longer a social stratum that qualifies(!) as the middle class. The Neocons rightfully target them for elimination since when a middle class exists that means that Neocononomics has been exposed and is in its death throes.

THEY are alive & well as long as we have UNinvolved Americans who see Democracy as a Spectator Sport who swallow the tripe/propaganda that the Corporatocracy calls news.

Reading suggestion, just a suggestion mind you--The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein. Or...sign up for Greg Palast's freebie. He found out about the Rovian/Bush vote-caging scam FIRST, then Michael Moore put it in Stupid White Men. Try that one too

Stop worrying about those TAX INCREASES!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ver Heard of THESE Guys? Posted by: mkdelta69
» RE: Thank you so much.... Posted by: boydranchitos
» RE: Thank you so much.... Posted by: UnEasyOne