Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Whistleblower Website Under Attack

By Stephen Soldz, Psyche, Science, and Society. Posted February 19, 2008.


A U.S. Court has ordered Wikileaks.org to be shut down.
wikileaks
wikileaks
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

One of the most important web sites in recent months has been Wikileaks.org. Created by several brave journalists committed to transparency, Wikileaks has published important leaked documents, such as the Rules of Engagement for Iraq (see my "The Secret Rules of Engagement in Iraq"), the 2003 and 2004 Guantanamo Camp Delta Standard Operating Procedures, and evidence of major bank fraud in Kenya that apparently affected the Kenyan elections. Wikileaks has upset the Chinese government enough that they are attempting to censor it, as is the Thai military junta.

Now censorship has extended to the United States of America, land of the First Amendment. As of Friday, February 15, those going to Wikileaks.org have gotten "Server not found" messages. Today I received a message explaining that a California court has granted an injunction written and requested by lawyers for the Cayman Island's Bank Julius Baer. It seems that the bank is trying to keep the public from accessing documents that may reveal shady dealings. Wikileaks was only given a couple of hours notice "by email" and was not even represented at the hearing where a U.S. judge took such a drastic step attempting to totally shut down an important information outlet. The result was this totally unprecedented attempt to totally wipe out the existence of Wikileaks:

"Dynadot shall immediately clear and remove all DNS hosting records for the wikileaks.org domain name and prevent the domain name from resolving to the wikileaks.org website or any other website or server other than a blank park page, until further order of this Court."
There have, of course, been previous attempts by the U.S. Government and others to block publication of particular documents, most famously in 1971 when the Nixon administration attempted to stop publication by the New York Times of excerpts from the Pentagon Papers, leaked by Daniel Ellsberg. But trying to close down an entire site in this way is truly unprecedented. Not even the Nixon administration, when they sought to block publication of the Pentagon Papers, considered closing down the New York Times in response.

If this injunction stands, it will set an incredible precedent for all of us who use the web to unveil misbehavior by the rich and powerful. Fortunately, Wikileaks is fighting this unconstitutional attack on press freedom, aided by six pro bono attorneys in San Francisco. While Wikileaks has so far not issued any particular call for support, all who value freedom should stand ready to offer whatever support they need.

Meanwhile, Wikileaks still exists. Its founders, knowing that governments and institutions will go to extreme lengths to censor the truth, have created an extensive network of cover names from which one can access their materials or continue leaking the secrets of governments and the corrupt rich and powerful. Thus, everything is available at Wikileaks.be, among other names. Let the leaks continue!

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: leaks, wikileaks.org, internet censorship

Stephen Soldz is a psychoanalyst, psychologist, public health researcher, and faculty member at the Boston Graduate School of Psychoanalysis. He maintains the Psychoanalysts for Peace and Justice web page and the Psyche, Science, and Society blog.

He is a founder of the Coalition for an Ethical Psychology, one of the organizations leading the struggle to change American Psychological Association policy on participation in abusive interrogations.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
WWW.
Posted by: QQOblivion on Feb 19, 2008 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hopefully, thanks to the international nature of the internet, an important source like Wikileaks will continue to exist, despite the government's attempts to censor it. I know, however, that the US government, borrowing from China's experiences with web censorship, is likely looking for a way to block international access to dissident websites here as well. I would hope that hackers and software-writers will continue to look for ways to by-pass government-sponsored censorship, as I have read dissident hackers are doing in China right now. Techies here in America should also look for ways to bypass and ultimately bring down the wall that would make Americans less free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Journalism and common sense
Posted by: carbon-based on Feb 19, 2008 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Making pubkic the rules of engagement for Amrican troops in Iraq???.. are they trying to get Americans killed?

transparency is good to a point.. there are some things that are NOT to be made public.. information that could hinder our efforts to fight terrorism is one and information that could endanger our troops is another..

Journalist sometimes need to use common sense and forget about the almighty dollar! I suggest those journalists walk the street with those troops who are affected by their "stories"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Journalism and common sense Posted by: carbon-based
» There is NO TRUTH, only HUMAN OPINION. Posted by: Aposterioriperception
Well what do you expect
Posted by: scootenat65 on Feb 19, 2008 11:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This ruling is not a supprise. We have all sorts of attempts to restrict freedoms since GW Cheney and the neo-con came to power. This is just another. Unfortunately we may have to start a internet underground to counter the ongoing attempts to control information.
And how is it that disclosing a bank's illegal/immoral behavior endanger our troops. Sounds like the regular neo-con rhetoric. If someone brings to light some corrupt practice by a rich/connected cororation they are disloyal and not a patriot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well what do you expect Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Well what do you expect Posted by: scryberwitch
» RE: Well what do you expect Posted by: MindyB
Fascism
Posted by: leland61 on Feb 20, 2008 3:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
marches on. Heil Bush. Heil Cheney.

The Thousand Year American Reich is underway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

would now be the time to mention
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Feb 20, 2008 3:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that the US FBI is running a massive campaign to coordinate international biometrics cataloguing?

Can you say, "Server in the Sky"?

I knew you could...


Naked Truth: Civil Rights & CNN coverage of "F.B.I. biometric database - 'Server in the Sky'"

~~~

Spread Love...
... but wear the Glove!


BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bob-o-link
Posted by: bob-o-link on Feb 20, 2008 9:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Closing down wikileaks is certainly a drastic step--but not unprecidented. The Catbird Seat website was completely shut down last year by Alberto Gonzales' United States Department of Justice (and this site had no leaked documents or military secrets)! However, like the fabled phoenix, and wikileaks, this site is rising again at http://www.kycbs.net.

Your readers comments on this censorship of the Interner in clear violation of First Amendment Rights will be most welcome.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting idea, but...
Posted by: ptisne on Feb 21, 2008 10:20 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know if anyone will read this, but thought a couple of facts about this case might be illuminating to those interested enough to browse the comments.

First, there is no government party. Generally, the First Amendment only protects against government restrictions on expression. Of course, it imposes certain limits on speech restrictions that occur in the private sector (e.g., defamation law), and that could certainly bear on this litigation. But I think it's a little disingenuous (misinformed?) to make comparisons to the Pentagon Papers case, where the President tried to prevent publication.

Second, and more importantly, this injunction was entered on stipulation of both parties. That means that the Bank and the Website decided the injunction would be a good idea and gave their proposed injunction to the Judge, who gave it an independent review to ensure good cause for the injunction and then did the parties' wishing. So, when you read "Whistleblower Website Under Attack," query who from?

Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wikileaks is still up
Posted by: zipoka on Feb 21, 2008 1:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For some reason, the original website is outside of US jurisdiction, and is still entirely three. See www.wikileaks.be

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pagarb
Posted by: pagarb on Feb 21, 2008 1:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It used to be that bank fraud and money laundering were considered crimes and that suppressing information on commission of a crime was obstruction of justice and doing these in concert by two or more people was a conspiracy..

The question then becomes is there no longer something called conspiracy and is money laundering now legal, not to mention misprison of a felony ok?.. towit, knowingly concealing proof in an open court of an illegal act?..

Hey how do I get in on this?.. there's some big advantages in it for all of us!!.. just think of all that 419 stuff.. the opportunities boggle the mind..

And oh yeah.. don't worry about suborning perjury any more.. you can just suppress the underlying act and celebrate your great genius in this brilliant performance..

Ethics??.. huh??.. whatcha talking about??.. we don't need no stinking ethics.. just get guys like this to rep you..

Welcome to the new century where up is down and wrong is right.. at this pace grab what you can and let the devil take the hindmost!!.. before it's all gone!!..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Universe said it best...
Posted by: stellans on Feb 23, 2008 9:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..."Can't stop the signal, Mal."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement