Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

'Third Way' Think Tank Pushes Telecom Agenda on FISA Bill

By Matt Renner, TruthOut.org. Posted February 5, 2008.


The so-called "progressive" organization is now revealed to carry water for the corporations.
Advertisement

A think tank with close ties to the telecommunication industry has been working with a key Democrat in the Senate on a domestic surveillance bill that would provide telecommunications companies with retroactive immunity for possibly violating federal law by spying on American citizens at the behest of the Bush administration.

Third Way, a non-profit "progressive" think tank that is funded and controlled by hedge fund managers, corporate lawyers and business executives has advised Sen. Jay Rockefeller on a domestic surveillance bill that includes immunity for telecommunications companies with which Third Way board members have close ties.

Rockefeller is the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and has been the leading Democratic proponent of granting immunity to telecommunication companies that allegedly gave spy agencies access to their communication networks and databases without a warrant.

"I think we will prevail," Rockefeller told the Politico on January 23, referring to the disagreement over retroactive immunity for telecoms, "it's a pretty bad idea to appear cocky ... I'm not pessimistic."

Democrats connected to Third Way were integral in defeating a bill, supported by a majority of Senate Democrats, which might have prevented the telecoms from getting immunity.

This immunity provision is the major sticking point in the battle over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) legislation that is currently stalled in the Senate. The Bush administration has threatened to veto any FISA update that does not contain retroactive immunity. Civil libertarians and a majority of Democratic senators oppose the retroactive immunity, in part because the provision would cut off lawsuits against the telecom providers. These suits have been the most effective vehicles for uncovering the details of the Bush administration's potentially criminal surveillance activities.

"We have advised Senator Rockefeller on messaging and have talked to his staff regarding FISA," Matt Bennett, vice president of Third Way said. "We believe there should be immunity and have been cooperating with [Rockefeller's staff]."

Rockefeller's committee was tasked with drafting a FISA update bill after the House of Representatives passed a version of the legislation that intentionally did not include telecom immunity.

During the crafting of the Intelligence Committee bill, Bennett met with a frequent contact of his, Clete Johnson, Rockefeller's legislative aide for military and national security issues, to discuss the FISA legislation. At the meeting, Bennett advised Johnson on talking points to help make the case for telecom immunity.

"I told him that we thought it would be helpful for [Rockefeller] to talk about the reasons for providing immunity to the telecoms," Bennett said. "We thought it would be a bad idea to allow these companies to be held legally liable for cooperating with the government ... you want to encourage the cooperation of not just the telecom industry, but all other industries in the future."

This talking point stuck, and remains one of the main arguments made by proponents of granting retroactive immunity.

Rockefeller communication director Wendi Morigi confirmed the meeting and said members of Rockefeller's staff "meet periodically" with members of Third Way. She said Third Way "had no input in the process in drafting the [FISA] bill or anything related to it. They did not help write anything nor did anyone in Third Way meet with anyone writing the legislation."

Critics of the immunity provision argue the telecoms should have known their cooperation with the Bush administration could put them in legal jeopardy because the administration did not go through the proper channels and did not get warrants for the information they were requesting.

The Bush administration may have subverted the law by going around the established FISA court that was designed to oversee the spying activities of the executive branch in the wake of the Watergate scandal. Under the law, Telecoms that cooperate with FISA court warrants are protected from legal action.

At least one major telecom provider, Qwest Communications, refused to cooperate with the Bush administration's spy program because of legal concerns.

Third Way and Telecoms

Third Way operates behind the scenes in Washington, DC, influencing the agenda of the Democratic Party by meeting with legislative staff, conducting research and hosting policy forums. They have deep political connections within the Democratic party and are a leading voice in favor of so-called "free trade" economics.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: senate, fisa, rockerfeller, third way

Matt Renner is an assistant editor and Washington reporter for Truthout.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ex post facto, or something?
Posted by: Obijuan on Feb 5, 2008 1:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't a law such as this one called 'ex post facto' or some such thing, and actually prohibited by our constitution??

Geez, what an apparently worthless document that has turned out to be.

obi

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

EX POST FACTO
Posted by: mbruton on Feb 5, 2008 4:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those who don't know this bit of Latin this translates roughly to "retroactive". Retroactive law making is specifically prohibited by the Constitution.

Those who support this bill with the immunity provisions in place put themselves in the awkward position of possible charges of treason and face the possibility of being executed for their crimes.

Wait, I forgot, America, the land of rape and money, politicians are above the law - so never mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Corporate Police State
Posted by: ronheri on Feb 5, 2008 4:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have slipped into a facist-corporate police state here in America. The muti-national corporations and the federal government are virtually one and the same. While Congress and the MSM slept (and were actually co-conspiritors) are Constitution has been almost totally been disregarded and violated. The right to wiretap without a warrant, the government's right to open mail and e-mail. Bush's signing statement last year which says in effect, "anyone who protests the war policies can be declared a terrorists and the treasury has the right to seize their property. These are only a few of the signs of what stage we are at on this slippery slope to tyranny. How about those hundreds of FEMA prison facilities that have been built across America. All of this under the guise to make us safe from the terrorists. Hitler followed this same plan to his dictatorship. Let's see if we have an election in 08; and if we do, if any of the four top tier candidates change course. I doubt if they will; as they are also controlled by the big corpororations. Is there any hope for America? One=Ron Paul.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fascist this, fascist that Posted by: supercrisp