Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

Afghan Journalism Student Sentenced to Death for Reading About Women's Rights

By Kim Sengupta, The Independent UK. Posted February 1, 2008.


Six years after "liberation," civil rights are getting worse in Afghanistan.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

A young man, a student of journalism, is sentenced to death by an Islamic court for downloading a report from the internet. The sentence is then upheld by the country's rulers. This is Afghanistan -- not in Taliban times but six years after "liberation" and under the democratic rule of the West's ally, Hamid Karzai.

The fate of Sayed Pervez Kambaksh has led to domestic and international protests, and deepening concern about erosion of civil liberties in Afghanistan. He was accused of blasphemy after he downloaded a report from a Farsi website that stated that Muslim fundamentalists who claimed the Koran justified the oppression of women had misrepresented the views of the prophet Mohamed.

Kambaksh, 23, distributed the tract to fellow students and teachers at Balkh University with the aim, he said, of provoking a debate on the matter. But a complaint was made against him, and he was arrested, tried by religious judges without -- say his friends and family -- being allowed legal representation and sentenced to death.

The Independent is launching a campaign today to secure justice for Kambaksh. The United Nations, human rights groups, journalists' organizations and Western diplomats have urged Karzai's government to intervene and free him. But the Afghan Senate passed a motion yesterday confirming the death sentence.

The MP who proposed the ruling condemning Kambaksh was Sibghatullah Mojaddedi, a key ally of Karzai. The Senate also attacked the international community for putting pressure on the Afghan government and urged Karzai not to be influenced by outside non-Islamic views.

The case of Kambaksh, who also worked as a reporter for the Jahan-i-Naw (New World) newspaper, is seen in Afghanistan as yet another chapter in the escalation in the confrontation between Afghanistan and the West.

It comes in the wake of Karzai accusing the British of actually worsening the situation in Helmand province by their actions and his subsequent blocking of the appointment of Lord Ashdown as the U.N. envoy and expelling a British and an Irish diplomat.

Demonstrations, organized by clerics, against the alleged foreign interference have been held in the northern city of Mazar-i-Sharif, where Kambaksh was arrested. Aminuddin Muzafari, the first secretary of the houses of parliament, said, "People should realize that as we are representatives of an Islamic country, therefore we can never tolerate insults to reverences of Islamic religion."

At a gathering in Takhar province, Maulavi Ghulam Rabbani Rahmani, the head of the Ulema council, said, "We want the government and the courts to execute the court verdict on Kambaksh as soon as possible." In Parwan province, another senior cleric, Maulavi Muhammad Asif, said, "This decision is for disrespecting the holy Koran and the government should enforce the decision before it came under more pressure from foreigners."

U.K. officials say they are particularly concerned about such draconian action being taken against a journalist. The Foreign Office and Department for International Development has donated large sums to the training of media workers in the country. The government funds the Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR) in the Helmand capital, Lashkar Gar.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: death penalty, afghanistan, civil rights, human rights, islamic courts, malalai joya, sayed pervez kambaksh, hamid karazi

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Islam and the state will always be one
Posted by: Richard House on Feb 1, 2008 1:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush may be an idiot and have ruined our country but the concept of the clash of East and Western civilization is appropriate here, and our president “gets it”; this simplistic concept which many progressive intellectuals don’t, and when it comes to this, and I must say I am not ashamed to state the politically incorrect, that the religion of Islam continues to rear its barbaric head and will continue to do so. The mission set by the Prophet who started this religion in 610 CE still stands; global conquest, and the laws of Sharia are still central as well as the belief that any infidel who does not believe is not worthy of living on this planet, and if they are allowed to live they must pay heavy taxes for the privilege. It’s all in the Qur’an (which version your read is another issue). This is an intolerant religion no matter how you slice it. I have a few Muslim friends yet I see all Muslims as complicit in the darks aspects of their religion just as all varieties of Christians are complicit in theirs simply by association and their passiveness in standing up against fanatics who gain legitimacy and eventually the presidency. When we hear Huckabee wants to amend the Constitution to be in God’s standards if he becomes president makes my blood run cold, because here is another variant of a deadly strain of religion in the making, a way of thinking, which Islam has been ahead on for centuries. Draconian actions, secret trials, female castration, intolerance of debate that runs against the Book of Books, punishment for spilling your coffee over a sacred image, etc., would become the norm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If this is Islam...
Posted by: soulrebeljc on Feb 1, 2008 4:53 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not a moral relativist. Wrong is wrong. Perhaps not believing in God myself makes that an easier perspective to forward. If this is the kind of Islam that seeks to dominate Muslim society (as opposed to anything moderate) then it would be a worthy cause to oppose such oppression.

Just because acts are justified as religious and therefore 'good' doesn't mean that it is so. If 10 million people do a stupid thing, it is still a stupid thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: stupid Posted by: walldodger1969
Neo Crusades
Posted by: edraven on Feb 1, 2008 5:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forget about WMDs and other lies that set up our intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq - - it was always the lure of nation building for Bush and the neo-cons. Change these poor deluded people into Christians who will gladly allow the rich international corporations to rape them and take their oil.

Amazingly, they didn't let us walk in and take over.

Yes, Islam is crazy, it's followers are delusional, and their god allows them to kill in its name. Something like Bush's Jesus.

Religions make insane rules that people accept with no question. If there were a god, these phony man-made religions would be the first to go.

I am sickened by this news.

Ed Graham

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pay attention people.
Posted by: leland61 on Feb 1, 2008 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This one caught the headlines. But it will soon be forgotten especially by the liberals who want everyone to live in a fog of relativity like they do.

Muslims do not live in that fog, folks. This is one example. I suggest that there have been two; this young man and the man a year or so ago who was going to be executed for converting to another religion are only the tip of the iceberg in Afghanistan. I suggest that in most cases the offender is summarily murdered for offending sharia law and there are no headlines and no international protests.

The same thing is going on in Iraq. Now and then a little bubble rises to the surface of the dirty little pond and it is usually about women who are murdered because they were not dressed appropriately. There are hundreds who have been murdered. (Aside from the sectarian violence - think the Dark Ages in the West for an appropriate reference point.)

My grannie used to say, "You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear." My contention is that you cannot drag a religion from the 7th century into the 21st century by invading and occupying the country and bringing them destruction and democracy in the same purse.

We need to get out of there and let them do their thing. Maybe in another thousand or so years they'll be fit for some sort of democratic and pluralistic society. Not in my lifetime, not in yours.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» we are paying attention Posted by: aalif ba ta tha
» RE: Pay attention people. Posted by: DesertStone
And our tax dollars support this?
Posted by: georgiaorwell on Feb 1, 2008 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sentencing this journalist to death is an abomination - savage - barbaric - and so very Islamist.

The US should withdraw our military, financial, political support for this backwards sickening country or put enough pressure on these leaders to have this young man's life spared. This is a moral outrage and if we don't react, we are as guilty as their country in burying our heads in the sand. Let them deport him to a western country rather than killing him because he dared to view other perspectives.

Nothing has really changed from the Taliban controls - nothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You're so full of yourself Posted by: DesertStone
On Relativism
Posted by: Ipsi Dixit on Feb 1, 2008 8:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is articles like this that contain within them implicit racist/culturalist assumptions that are taken for granted by most people in the West.

Western commentators always seem to imply that the culture of Western Europe is the role model and that our values are paramount and universal; the cultures of other countries merely standing as a foil to our own. Even as we condemn the invasion of Afghanistan and other places, and the killing of hundreds of thousands or even millions of non-Westerners, we still seem to be saying: "Well I know that that invading your country is wrong but, look, we're still your moral betters and our way of life is still better than yours. Your culture - in whole or in part - is still fundamentally inferior to our own and it would be better for all our sakes if you were to become more like us."

As the profession of journalism was invented in the West, it's non-western proponents inadvertently imbibe Western values and assumptions and not least among these is the idea that the societies the non-Western journalist is studying should correspond to our own societies in certain respects. The non-Western journalist thereby becomes an unwitting collaborator in the denigration of their own culture - a sort of 'cultural imperialist' if you will. I think this is what we are seeing here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: On Relativism Posted by: brunowe
» RE: On Relativism Posted by: morticia
» BS Alert! Posted by: Nebris
» RE: On Relativism Posted by: no1kstate
» RE: On Relativism Posted by: ankhet
» RE: On Relativism Posted by: morticia
old saying
Posted by: bitsfick on Feb 1, 2008 9:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read this somewhere, and it seems to fit, a good man will do good, an evil man will do evil, but for a good man to do evil it takes religion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now where those god-damn-motherfucking "conservatives" and faux "libertarians" on this issue of
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 1, 2008 10:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"nation building" for terrorists? You guessed it, kissing Wall Street's ASS and lying about "bringing democracy" in the Middle East. So much for promising not to waste taxpayer money for "nation building. Besides, you cannot bring democracy to another nation when none exists in this country to begin with and you most certainly cannot use war and "free" trade to do so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Relativism & Wrong Headed Multiculturism
Posted by: txbodhi on Feb 1, 2008 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is not just Western white democracy folk that criticize aspects of Islamic civilization, the Buddhist civilization has long been threatened by the violent extremism in Islam. Some of the contemplative Sufi Islamic sects were more moderate but they too are being threatened with extinction by the shallow minded Islamic fundamentalists. After engaging in Afghanistan Bush should have dealt with the genocide in pro-Al Qaeda Sudan rather than try to steal the petrol from Iraq which was governed by a secular Arab, Saddam Hussein. The immoral war on Iraq has empowered the extremists in Islam. Multiculturalism has been used as an excuse in Europe to let Islamic women and gay Islamic folk be oppressed in Europe. When a religion whether Christian or Islamic fundamentalism violates the standards of loving-kindness, compassion, proven scientific facts and the inner path to peace then it should be strongly criticized and opposed ideally through debate, economic and diplomatic means. Massively funding alternate energy would reduce the petrol funding of Saudi extremist missionary efforts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sign the petition for Sayed Pervez Kambaksh
Posted by: aalif ba ta tha on Feb 1, 2008 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
keep in mind that international pressure is what got Saudi Arabia to pardon the girl who was raped in Qatif and also saved the life of Abdul Rahman from his death sentence for converting to Christianity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So what is gained?
Posted by: wisegalah on Feb 1, 2008 5:35 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of the expenditure of lives and resources have gained precisely nothing.
It is true that there has been a brief respite for the women and girls of Afghanistan but that will only last while western forces are there to protect them from the worst excesses.
Why has this experiment in exporting democracy failed?
It was always bound to fail. What is really required is a few centuries for democratic structures to develop from an intolerrant, society in which rational debate is lost to the prejudices, ignorance and greed of the powerful and who justify their behaviour by referring to a pre-medieval mindset encapsulated in their scriptures.
Go read the Koran. Many, like Cat Stevens, have claimed to be inspired by it. Where it is not childish I find it chilling. Chilling in that it portrays a supreme being who responds vindictively to every real or imagined misdemeanour. In places he, (it is always 'he') acts as provocateur.
Does this not sound like the behaviour of a seventh century tribal leader? Does it not also sound like a twenty first century tribal leader? Initially some of the signs for Islam were good in that it released an enourmous amount fo energy which lead to flowering of islamic culture. That all fell apart when the clerics seized total control of all aspects of the belief system in the thirteenth century. Since then Islam has been a total failure in the generation of new ideas, the advancement of the rights of the individual or the development of productive economies. Only the clerics and the tribal warlords have propered.
Like the supreme being of the koran there is nothing noble, intelligent, admirable or loving about those who would condemn women to a life of abject service and misery and who condemn to death a journalist like Sayed Pervez Kambaksh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More western hypocrisy
Posted by: DesertStone on Feb 4, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author’s use of the term “civilized values” is offensive. This is typical of Europeans who through their imperialist actions throw functioning societies into chaos and war then sit back babbling and griping about “civilized values”. What do you think will happen to people after they have been ravaged for a decade by European bombs and interference? I don’t see what is particularly “civilized” about Europeans crossing continents to try and force their rule on people they have nothing to do with but rarely do you see such actions referred to as uncivilized. Now they wring their hands about what is “civilized” and what is not with breathtaking hypocrisy.
Officials wanting to carry such a sentence out are warlords. They work on their own behalf, they don’t represent ordinary people. Only warlords can reap the benefits of chaos and lawlessness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]