Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

Man Will Walk 500 Miles To Impeach Bush and Cheney

By Julie Bolcer, The Village Voice. Posted December 29, 2007.


Pelosi needs to put impeachment back on the table.
Advertisement

John Nirenberg would walk 500 miles. And it sounds like he would walk 500 more. But unlike the persistent pop tune by The Proclaimers, he refuses to be the man who falls down at Nancy Pelosi's door.

Nirenberg, a hearty New York City native and current resident of Brattelboro, Vermont, intends to be standing when he reaches Washington, D.C. around January 10, at the conclusion of a scheduled 40-day walk that began in Boston on December 1. This fall, the 60-year-old professor of organizational behavior and Air Force veteran decided to traverse Route 1 on foot to implore House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to begin impeachment proceedings against President George Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.

"It was about a whole collection of issues around the Constitution and the behavior of this administration," explains Nirenberg, who finds that his sense of outrage and jogging background help him complete 15 miles per day. "Especially the torture issue, the spying, and an illegal war. All of this, at some point, was the straw that broke the camel's back. I decided that I needed to do something different."

In order to channel his frustration, Nirenberg founded the non-profit organization, March in My Name, where his trek can be followed on the Web site, www.marchinmyname.org. He hopes also that by collecting photos, testimonials and petition signatures, he can show Speaker Pelosi that popular support exists for her, at the very least, to allow the House Judiciary Committee to open a hearing into the behavior of the Bush administration.

Since she assumed office after the mid-term elections in 2006, Speaker Pelosi has continued to insist that the impeachment option is "off the table." Her position disappoints people like Nirenberg who had anticipated a more aggressive outcome from the Democratic majority in Congress. For example, they note with suspicion the change in House Committee Chairman John Conyers, an acknowledged proponent of executive accountability who appeared possibly bullish on impeachment in early 2006. Now in his new role, he cites a lack of votes and refers to the disruptive potential of the process.

"The Speaker is certainly aware of the frustration a lot of Americans feel about the conduct of this war," said Drew Hammill, a Pelosi spokesperson. "But she believes that impeachment would be a distraction to the priorities of this Congress." He declined to speculate whether the Speaker would meet with Nirenberg, who sent a certified letter recently to request an appointment.

Impeachment advocates, on the other hand, ask what could be more important for Congress to undertake than an investigation into the possibility that "high crimes and misdemeanors" have been committed in violation of the Constitution. They argue that uncensored abuses of executive power and subversion of the rule of law would hold dramatic consequences for the remainder of the Bush administration, and the future of the presidency.

Nearly 80 such supporters gathered at an evening rally for Nirenberg at St. Mark's Church in-the-Bowery in late December, when he arrived after beginning his day' journey in Harlem that morning.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: john nirenberg, nancy pelosi, bush, cheney, constitution, torture, spying, jogging

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
No Confidence Vote for Pelosi ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Dec 29, 2007 1:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has become painfully obvious thet Nancy Pelosi is part of the problem, not part of the solution. Her refusal to consider Impeachment constitutes a failure to protect and uphold the Constitution of the United States.

Just read Ray McGovern's column in todays Alternate about Pelosi's role in the wiretapping months before 9/11 !

""So this until-recently-unknown pre-9/11 facet of the "Terrorist Surveillance Program" was not related to Osama bin Laden or to whomever he and his associates might be speaking. It had to do with us. We know that the Democrats who were briefed on the "Terrorist Surveillance Program" include House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) ""

It is time for new leadership, in both Houses of Congress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The people not Pelosi
Posted by: WilliamF on Dec 29, 2007 4:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pelosi thinks a lot of herself. She's decided that impeachment is off the table and she has effectively joined Bush's team. Bush must love Nancy. What a job Nancy. You have other priorities when we have a criminal presidency operating under your nose?! When Bush and Cheney and the rest of the fascists in this administration have used the constitution for toilet paper?! There is no other priority than the rule of law in a democracy and you are facilitating the criminality of this presidency. When your election comes up I hope you lose by a landslide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you don't support Impeachment you're a criminal
Posted by: ErHoff on Dec 29, 2007 5:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the Democrats really fail to do is state their case to the American people. When the American people realize that not supporting impeachment of the Cheney Bush Crime Syndicate is to condone the inside job of terror known as 9-11. The Democrats have to come on with more than spine; they should come on with the ferocity of someone defending their country. Up to now, most Democrats aren’t worthy of small "d" democratic.

As for the Chair of the Judiciary, that senile Uncle Tom, Conyers, is the last person we can have confidence in rallying the People and the House. If he can't find support he won't go forward. How about inciting support for impeachment on the grounds of murder, torture, lying to the People, lying to the Congress, committing high treason by outing Mrs. Wilson, and acting in collusion with Enron to defraud entire states? If you don't have enough to paint a picture worthy of immediate support, a picture that paints any obstruction-to-impeachment Republican or Democrat as an enemy to the People of the United States, then you don't belong working in Washington, you are a disgrace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» This is a prime example Posted by: slydad
Impeachment, Schimpeachment
Posted by: jaby on Dec 29, 2007 6:46 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless you plan on impeaching every senator, representative and, just for good measure, every jurist on the federal (including the supreme) court, impeaching Bush isn't going to do any good. He didn't do what he did by himself. He was aided and abetted not just by Republicans, but by nearly every member of our government.

The only thing impeachment would accomplish is sucking all the air out of Washington, keeping any constructive work, as minuscule as it may be, from being done. I don't really care what Pelosi's motives may or may not be, but her end conclusion is right. The impeachment of Bush serves no useful purpose and is not in the best interest of our Republic. How about taking all that energy and channeling it into registering voters for the upcoming elections? Our next president, senate, and representatives should be our focus, not the monkey in chief.

Bush & Co should be punished for their crimes, but to suggest impeachment is to detract from more important matters, like getting a sane and rational man or woman into the Oval Office next November.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Impeachment, Schimpeachment Posted by: Chromedome2000
» RE: it's true, Posted by: Pirate1
» RE: Ever heard of the rule of law? Posted by: CharliePatton
» RE: Impeachment: a MUST! Posted by: KACalder
Impeach and prosecute
Posted by: grn1 on Dec 29, 2007 8:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.bcimpeach.com If you live in Cal, you can show support here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

4000 KIA worse than sexual slander! impeach cheney halliburton
Posted by: melindyrose on Dec 29, 2007 9:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
enron government needs to be held accountable when they not only graft our money but the blood of our kids. blackwater makes more than our soldiers, and halliburtons hummers have better protection. coast guard and national guard never signed up for this detail. who cares about pelosi and conyers, this is OUR fight, we let this happen - we haven't had a fair election since President Clinton survived the war on his peepee by conglomerate whore media. shame on us, let's show the kids we can still stick up for them after "shredding" their future. remember, they are coming home, and they are bent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not that we needed another reason to impeach but...
Posted by: Lauren on Dec 29, 2007 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe their prosecution of various aspects of the drug war are impeachable offenses. The DEA for example, #1 in NORML'S list, is targeting us for religious offense. I will send a copy of the Rasta University Testimonial Oath to Conyers. I want him to know we are being targeted for our religious perspective.

2007: The Year In Review – NORML’s Top 10 Events That Shaped Marijuana Policy
December 27, 2007 - Washington, DC, USA

#1 DEA Steps Up Attacks Against California Medi-Pot Patients, Dispensaries

Federal law enforcement officials took unprecedented steps in 2007 to quash California’s medi-pot patient community. DEA officials raided a record number of dispensaries and mailed hundreds of letters to California landlords threatening them with arrest and up to 20 years imprisonment, as well as the forfeiture of their building, if they rented to medicinal cannabis clubs. Since DEA officials began mailing warning letters this summer, numerous high profile clubs across the state have ceased operations.

Click the link for 2-9, mostly pot fights cancer, but this is vital news to know:

#10 FDA Advisory Panel Says Controversial Cannabinoid Blocker Not Safe For Human Consumption

An independent FDA advisory committee determined 14-0 in June that the controversial cannabinoid receptor antagonist Rimonabant is unsafe for human consumption in the United States. Panelists reported that patients prescribed Rimonabant experienced increased incidences of depression, nausea, vomiting, and suicidal tendencies. Rimonabant is currently marketed in Europe (under the trade name Acomplia) as a dietary aid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I support this guy.
Posted by: kentigereyes@yahoo.com on Dec 29, 2007 2:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is waaaaaaaay past time for the despicably evil "w"/DICKY regime to be put out of power and into prison, a real prison, where the members of this regime will have a hard(no pun intended)time walking. Ken, from South Louisiana.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Walk With John Nirenberg
Posted by: PaulK on Dec 29, 2007 4:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I did, for most of a day!

If you can't, then bring him some coffee, tea or whatever. It's cold out there on Route 1. Yes you can be anonymous and still support him. He'll march in your name.

Rally, Philadelphia, Dec. 30, at Independence Hall. If you miss that, look where and when John starts from at marchinmyname.org, figure he walks 3 miles per hour down Route 1, and then get in your car with the extra coffee cup and look for a guy (or two or more) with a 24 inch by 15 inch yellow sign held at waist level. He's walking against the traffic, often on the sidewalk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Target all democrats
Posted by: phindrup on Dec 29, 2007 4:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just who is this Nancy Pelosi's? How is it that she gets to make such decisions?
I thought that the US had a ‘robust democracy’ — just joking, if you guys had had international observers your last couple of elections would not have passed scrutiny!

Where are all the other Democrats? They are the ones that you ought to be targeting. Organise, get the numbers, tell them impeach or lose both the White house and their next election.
Here in Australia where we just got rid of the Howard government people are saying that everything is over, ‘we are past that!’
Well you cannot get ‘past’ illegal invasions, torture, murder, incarceration without charge —
you either clean it up, that is hold the perpetrators responsible and support international law or you give up on law and order and embrace whatever it is that evolves.
Bush, Blair, Howard and their cohorts have to be brought before an International Court. The message must be that nobody is above the law. Nobody.
lettersrejected.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The corporate media controls the impeachment process, not Pelosi.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Dec 30, 2007 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What? Is that a nonsense statement? Well, let's look at the evidence. During the leadup to the Clinton impeachment, the corporate press in the U.S. headlined every word that issued from Ken Starr's lips, worked over every little detail of Monica Lewinsky's dress, and constantly kept the issue on the burner.

However, what about the Bush crimes? The outing of Valerie Plame as an undercover agent goes far beyond sex in the White House with interns on the criminality scale - as does cooking up bogus "intel" about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Then there were the firings of the U.S. Attorneys, the Cheney Energy Task Force with its maps of Iraqi oilfields, the illegal domestic spying (how many times did Bush sigh to re-authorize the program? Every 45 days or something like that?) - and that's just the partial list. The corruption in the government contracting process under Bush is huge - Karl Rove essentially told corporations that if you want contracts, you support Republican politicians - that's a massive bribery arrangement.

However, where is the corporate press on all these stories? Where are the daily headlines that were a feature of the leadup to Clinton's impeachment? Not there - and the reason they aren't there is pretty obvious: Bush supports the agenda of the owners of the corporate media, so his crimes are not discussed in the corporate media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We should all walk with him..
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Dec 30, 2007 11:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We should all walk with him to end the tyranny over our nation and the ignorance and arrogance of Nancy Pelosi..!

Impeachment is enshrined in our Constitution how dare this broad think she can just wipe it out along with the rule of law..?

How dare she..?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Trotsky
Posted by: HeKnew on Dec 30, 2007 6:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wait until they're out of power and then roll 'em up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Were not the good guys
Posted by: sp00n67 on Dec 31, 2007 3:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Almost every country in the world hates the US because of the crimminal policies of our leaders. Russia, China and many more countries are gearing up to take us down because we cannot take care of these's problem leaders who we elected bringing us down to new levels of low. Defending this country with no heart won't be done by anyone who feels the system failed them by not observing the Constitution. It was made for the protection of all, by intelligent men who knew the wealthy in power would take advantage to do as they please if they could. We stood by and allowed those elected officials who were there to serve and protect us to change the anchor that held our ship. How far from shore do we have to drift before someone notices that we can never swim back that far? We as an Empire are finished, if Howdy Dude E is still making decisions that could destroy the planet when he and anyone conected to him should be in prison. If we stand by and do nothing hopefully someone else will take care of the problem for us. The only thing wrong with that is, we will all be going down with their ship and there's only enough life rafts for them. Picture us slaves rowing below on this ship that is ready for destruction while they are manning the live rafts without us even knowing it, like they would do such a thing? Like the French said ( it's every man for themselves } good luck to all you suckers, were all screwed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Creating Emancipation - Grassroots Liberty - Slaves Anonymous
Posted by: A. Servant on Dec 31, 2007 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't wait for a "centralized solution" such as impeachment to arise. Historically, what you will receive won't be in your best interest; what happens on Capital Hill is theater for the masses like pro-wrestling. And AlterNet and the mainstream "alternative" news sources are strongly biased toward publishing articles that offer no solutions or advocate centralized solutions that can be distorted to harm all but a few at the top. Don't be a lemming that marches in line behind their predictive programming. Solutions for the common person have been and will be grassroots ones that emerge organically from you and your communities.

Fascism in America today leads to subtle yet direct effects that touch almost all persons irrespective of background. Our reality is that most of us are being kept as slaves in a matrix of control; and we are acting in ways that maintain this system of enslavement. Our voices are ignored by the powerful, and our true needs are overlooked. And as slaves, we are being dominated and imprisoned or threatened with imprisonment when we are bad producers or bad consumers. We are being sickened by limited access to uncontaminated water, nutritious foods, vital dietary supplementation, honest health information and health cures--not just treatment. And when our usefulness is over, we will be left to die or be killed. The lack of caring that we experience and too often fail to offer to others is not accidental--our indoctrination has been intentionally planned and executed by the slave masters.

If you're tired of being enslaved and seeing others threatened with more enslavement, join us in Slaves Anonymous to start making grassroots changes that will improve the security of you and your family. You and your neighbors have the autonomy, creativity, diversity, passion and transcendence to become self-owners and create the conditions necessary for emancipation of your local community from the global tyranny of slavery or serfdom or corporatism or government or fascism or empire or debt-based money or psychopathy or whatever-you-want-to-call-it. You can create ways that lead to less bondage and more humane treatment for yourselves and your neighbors.

Let's work together: You stop it in your community; I'll stop it in mine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pelosi is a symptom...
Posted by: flapdoodle on Jan 1, 2008 10:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The disease is political hubris, and it has just about succeeded in destroying anything that could be considered to be a true democracy.

Isn't a Democracy where the government follows the will of the people? If so then how is it that a twit like Pelosi gets to unilaterlly decide the question of impeachment? When did the rest of us get written out of the picrture? And why did we allow ourselves to get written out of the picture?

If we could truly realize that we HAVE (right now) the power to restore democracy we (the people) could do it. What is stopping us now is our willingness to vote for the best of the worst. The Democratic candidate may be less- even much less- than we would like, but we vote for them because it seems better than the other choice. In other words we are loyal, and that is where we abandon democracy without knowing have done so.
I say "we" because I have held my nose plenty of times and voted for a democrat I didn't like.

I know what I've said isn't the answer- it's just an idea. Somehow we have to find a way to establish our own consensus, so that we can then work in unison, and finally begin to impose the will of the people upon government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeachment should just be a start.
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jan 2, 2008 5:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IMPEACH...INDITE...IMPRISON...EXECUTE

Not usually in favor of capital punishment, but in the case of mass murderers I make an exception.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I am referring to Bush Posted by: Ellie1