Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

My Family's Nightmare Caught on Film

By Laila Al-Arian, Huffington Post. Posted December 8, 2007.


The threat of continuous harassment and prison time hangs over one writer's family.
Advertisement

For nearly one year, my father, Sami Al-Arian, has been imprisoned on civil contempt for refusing to testify before a federal grand jury in Virginia. During plea negotiations in early 2006, federal prosecutors in Florida promised him he would not have to testify in any other cases. The moment he signed that agreement, his business with the government was supposed to have ended. He would serve the remainder of his sentence and finally be deported.

But a vindictive prosecutor from Virginia, Gordon Kromberg, resented that my father and his three co-defendants were largely acquitted by a jury following a lengthy trial in 2005. Kromberg is using every legal maneuver in his arsenal to prolong my father's imprisonment. A U.S. Attorney in Florida admitted, during a hearing regarding the plea agreement, that the boilerplate language dealing with cooperation was deleted from my father's agreement precisely because it was negotiated away. In Kromberg's world, his colleagues' words to my father, and the plea agreement both sides signed in good faith, are meaningless.

In his zeal to see my father locked away for as long as possible, Kromberg has shown an almost shameless degree of anti-Muslim animus. Perhaps it is no wonder he is the toast of neoconservative ideologues like Daniel Pipes, who hailed Kromberg's bigotry-laden rant about the "Islamization of the American justice system" as "courageous and valiant." Amnesty International has questioned Kromberg's motives, declaring that the biases he has demonstrated "raise[] further concern as to whether these proceedings are being taken to punish [Dr. Al-Arian] for his political profile rather than for legitimate purposes."

Prosecutors in Northern Virginia may soon charge my father with criminal contempt, according to a recent report in The New York Sun. This maneuver would be a shameless abuse of the criminal justice system and an abominable waste of U.S. taxpayer dollars. If prosecutors charge my father with criminal contempt, it will be obvious to everyone watching that it's nothing more than a case of sour grapes.

According to some estimates, the government has already squandered $50 million in its prosecution against my father. The trial was a resounding defeat for the government, which failed to prove its case that my father provided material support to terrorists. With the time in prison for civil contempt, my father has already served more time than he was sentenced. In February, he will have spent five years in prison. According to the plea agreement, my father was supposed to have been released from prison last April at the latest. But Kromberg and his DOJ cronies are abusing their power to lock him up indefinitely.

"From the beginning, it has been clear that this was a political prosecution and the pursuit of contempt by the rogue prosecutor in the Eastern District of Virginia have underscored this," said Linda Moreno, one of my father's trial attorneys. "As I have often said, I support my government going after terrorists and those who wish to do harm against my country. But I have never represented a terrorist, and an American jury found that Dr. Al Arian was no terrorist."

In May, at a sold-out screening in Tampa, Florida of USA vs. Al-Arian, an award-winning documentary about the trial and the toll it took on my family, I met Ron, one of the jurors who acquitted my father. "I'm sorry," Ron told me repeatedly. He said he wished he could have done more and fully acquitted my father. Two women on the jury refused to acquit my father of some charges, he explained. When asked why by other jurors, they refused to present any reasons. They disregarded the evidence in the case. Ron later elaborated at a panel discussion following the screening:

"They wouldn't tell us why they said guilty," the juror said. "They came up with really bad reasons, but most of the time it was 'I don't have to tell you. I don't even need a reason. I can just say he's guilty because I think he's guilty, and that's all'."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: discrimination, documentary, muslim

Laila Al-Arian is a freelance journalist living in New York.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Until they came for me,
Posted by: thekidde on Dec 8, 2007 9:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn't pay attention to the discrimination, criminalization, detention, torture, etc. of others - then it was too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Until they came for me, Posted by: nochicagoboys
» Precisely so. Posted by: thekidde
Unfit Empire
Posted by: zeofredo on Dec 8, 2007 11:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The absurd aims of foreign policy have finally brought the suffering and aggravation of far-off lands to our doorsteps. The ideological extension of Western supremacy through such things as the Zionist vision of manifest destiny can have only tragic consequences. This impediment is a kind of dementia for our society and it has thoroughly poisoned our systems.

Unlike the previous British Empire, which for all its flaws made some attempt to understand and administer to its colonies after a time, American statesmen have no desire to know or learn anything about distant cultures. The treatment of this Palestinian professor is damning evidence of our antipathy and hostility towards those 'outside' the compound. Our knowledge of non-Western issues and identities is strictly limited to what the market indicates, or to what we can extract from their resource lists.

It is only a matter of time before these pathological tendencies become present in our daily lives and citizens turn against each other owing to the extreme misunderstandings or resentments we harbor as a result of being so willfully ignorant. Such a limited way of experiencing reality...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why is this just being posted now?
Posted by: johnclark on Dec 8, 2007 1:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's December 8th, guys. I've been wanting to see this film and now I find out it was at the Uptown on the 5th.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

USA is the most racist, evil, violent, classist, and sexist country ever.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Dec 8, 2007 4:05 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It destroys the environment and exploits everyone. Why this "professor" wanted to move, much less stay, in the evil USA is beyond me? In fact why do so many people, especially those "of colour" or of Islamic-faith, wish to come to America--- often risking life-and-limb by sneaking across borders, climbing fences, hiding in shipping containers, falsifying documents, over-staying visas, swimming rivers, and hiking across barren deserts? It is a weird phenomena!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:Turiye Posted by: DesertStone
» RE: simplistic as usual Posted by: DesertStone
Al-Arian, victim of irrational US "War on Terror"
Posted by: Basenjis on Dec 9, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After a $50 million 11-yr. investigation of the terrorist activities of Dr. Sami Al-Arian, which proved very little, he is still behind bars for refusing to testify against former associates. During his convoluted legal entanglements, the FBI intercepted over 470,000 telephone calls on 18 tapped lines, hoping in vain to hear incriminating evidence of a terrorist plot against the USA or advanced knowledge of terrorist attacks in the Middle East.

Your tax dollars at work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Neocons want hatred and conflict
Posted by: PaulC on Dec 9, 2007 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The whole aim of the neocon agenda is to create such chaos in the world, including their own country, that civil society collapses. Only then can corporations rule with impunity on a global scale.

Grover Norquist wrote of "spearing the belly of the beast" when referring to privatizing Social Security. Neocons see governments as impinging on corporate freedom to make money no matter the consequences to the general populace or the earth itself.

The rationalization behind this attack on mankind and the earth is belief in Social Darwinism and Satanism, respectively.

With Social Darwinism the neocons believe that only the strong deserve to survive. It does not matter how brutal or corrupt the winner was - all that matters is he won so he must be genetically and ideologically superior. This is why a neocon is not bothered by genocide - if they were wiped out it was because they were weak and deserved to die. And blacks end up locked in ghetto hell, not because of racism but because they are weak and deserve what they got, and people who prey upon them are superior, and taking away their right to vote is justifiable.

With a fundamentalist Christian religion that brands all things related to this world, what normal people call "reality", as being Satanic and evil, the neocons can look on dispassionately as ancient forests are clear cut, species are wiped out, entire mountain ranges blasted to rubble for their thin seams of coal, rivers poisoned and so on. They flat out do not care. And those people screaming about it all do not matter either - they are weak and should be crushed.

So when we moved into the Middle East to take their oil the neocons were not concerned about Middle Eastern culture or religion or anything of the sort. To neocons Middle Eastern people's are subhuman scum that need to be bombed off the face of the earth. Neocon beliefs are the same culture that virtually wiped the American Indians off the face of the earth. Nothing has changed.
More primitive peoples standing in the way of the master race and their pursuit of natural resources and wealth, only back then it was called "Manifest Destiny" and today it is called "Operation Iraqi Freedom".

Similarly, Neocons view the Muslim religion as "un-Christian" and therefore Satanic. Neocons are every bit as fundamentalist as the most extreme elements of Wahhabism.

It is easy to see, then, why right wing prosecutors in the historically right wing state of Virginia would want to go after Al-Arian as if he were some sort of monster - in their eyes he is.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Twelve good men and true?!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Dec 9, 2007 11:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the article:

"They wouldn't tell us why they said guilty," the juror said. "They came up with really bad reasons, but most of the time it was 'I don't have to tell you. I don't even need a reason. I can just say he's guilty because I think he's guilty, and that's all'."

Boy! This certainly gives one a warm and fuzzy feeling about our justice system, doesn't it? God help any of us in court; criminal trials are, at best, crap shoots – and in the case of al-Arian, the dice were loaded.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WEC's count your blessings. Posted by: Ignatz deFyre
This is a poorly written article
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Dec 9, 2007 1:07 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no idea why this guy refused to testify and who he was protecting. What principle was he defending?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I looked at the hyperlinks Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: You’re illogical Posted by: DesertStone
» RE: I looked at the hyperlinks Posted by: herronsmith
Rogue State
Posted by: abbadon2007 on Dec 9, 2007 3:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Y'all realize that our country, in its foreign policy, behaves immorally and illegally. We are a rogue state, and deserve countless sanctions.

If one were to apply our own standards against us, say from the UN, we would probably also necessitate forceful regime change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Regime change begins at home. Posted by: thekidde
"Justice system"
Posted by: DesertStone on Dec 10, 2007 7:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Muslim can not receive a fair trial anywhere in this country today as made clear by jurors who cannot and will not explain why they will not acquit despite total lack of evidence. What could they possibly be motivated by hmmm? Not to mention the prosecutor, with him as a case study we could potentially make a case for outlawing a Jew from prosecuting Muslims since they are clearly so blinded by hate and wrath there is no room for reason and the rule of law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Justice system" Posted by: Nick