Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

Deadly Staph Infection 'Superbug' Has a Dangerous Foothold in U.S. Jails

By Silja J.A. Talvi, AlterNet. Posted December 4, 2007.


With 19,000 deaths attributed to staph infections annually, there's cause for serious alarm. So why aren't we talking about our nightmarish prison system, the biggest incubator of them all?
Advertisement

Dr. Jeff Duchin, the communicable diseases chief for Seattle/King County Department of Public Health holds his soap-lathered hands in an attention-grabbing newspaper cover photo. Above his dignified image is a highly magnified picture of fuzzy bacterium. The bacterium doesn't appear to be particularly frightening, but it is. This "superbug," known as methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), has the power to disable, disfigure and kill the people who come into contact with it.

Like so many other regional and national newspaper and magazine stories about MRSA's creeping presence in the nation, this feature in the Nov. 26, 2007, issue of the Seattle Times was chock-full of useful, preventative information. Among the key, common sense suggestions were for readers to remember that MRSA isn't limited to the transfer of blood or bodily fluids. While not airborne in the way that tuberculosis is (although MRSA has been known to be transmitted by sneezing), the bacterium spreads with tremendous ease by way of skin-to-germ contact. The article advised people to remember to wash their hands regularly; to avoid unbleached public washing facilities; not to share towels, razors, or any kind of shared drug paraphernalia; and to have the "courage" to be willing to ask medical personnel if they've washed their hands before touching you.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC has rightfully called MRSA (pronounced mer-sa) the "cockroach of bacteria." It spreads silently and stealthily, and moves quickly from one location to the next. Once it's around, it's also incredibly difficult to get rid of because this virulent mutation of staph is resistant to all but the most rare and expensive antibiotics. Sometimes, even the super drugs don't work against this superbug, resulting in some 19,000 deaths in 2005, amounting to more than one in five of the estimated 94,000 Americans walking around MRSA lurking on skin surfaces and in nasal cavities.

Media headlines have emphasized the existing or potential presence of MRSA in hospitals and schools: at least three students are known to have died from the bacteria. "[D]rug-resistant strains of the bacteria are finding new homes in the community -- particularly among kids," as a recent Time article, "Staph on the March," warned readers.

Given this level of justifiable media and public attention to the dangers of MRSA, it's remarkable to note how little attention is being paid to the kinds of facilities where the superbug thrives and spreads the fastest: poorly ventilated living and sleeping quarters; overcrowded rooms; shared mattresses, toilets and showers; and a preponderance of people who arrive with poor health, drug problems and severely compromised immune systems. Homeless shelters and emergency rooms serving indigent populations are among them, but there is no question that the biggest incubators of all are the nation's 5,000-plus prisons and jails.

"MRSA is running rampant through prisons and jails in the country," says Paul Wright, editor of Prison Legal News and co-editor of the newly published book Prison Profiteers: Who Makes Money from Mass Incarceration. "Prisons and jails have historically been the incubators of disease, and that trend continues today. A disproportionate number of people with infectious diseases, including MRSA, will cycle through jails and prisons each year."

The exact number of people entering the criminal justice system with either the regular or superbug version of staph is unknown, owing to a combination of factors. For one, not all people who harbor the bacterium present symptoms. For another, most jails and prisons do not regularly test for or report it.

It would be easy to dismiss the prevalence of MRSA in jails and prisons as something that happens to people who are so irresponsible that they don't take the time to clean themselves or their cells. But stereotypes like these don't hold true once prisoners are actually given the opportunity to explain or demonstrate what their living conditions are like. Yes, many men and women enter the criminal justice system out of unstable, impoverished environments that have already put them at risk because of behaviors attendant to high-risk lifestyles. Like most Americans, people who end up behind bars don't actually know much of anything about how MRSA is spread, what signs of infection to look for -- or even, for that matter, that the bacterium exists.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: women jails, prison system, staph infection

Silja J.A. Talvi is an investigative journalist and the author of Women Behind Bars: The Crisis of Women in the U.S. Prison System (Seal Press: 2007). Her work has already appeared in many book anthologies, including It's So You (Seal Press, 2007), Prison Nation (Routledge: 2005), Prison Profiteers (The New Press: 2008) and Body Outlaws (Seal Press: 2004). She is a senior editor at In These Times.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
If the Fascists Don't Get You...
Posted by: pcushniesr on Dec 4, 2007 4:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... then the super-staph will. I have to stop reading Alternet first thing in the morning, that's all there is to it. Where are the comics?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» try Salon.com! Posted by: war_on_tara
You can thank antibiotics for MRSA, but it's treatable. Just not by conventional medicine.
Posted by: nc green on Dec 4, 2007 4:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is attacking the wrong institution. There's a lot wrong with the prison system, but MRSA? Seems like a glancing blow.

The reason MRSA exists in the first place is the poorly considered use of antibiotics (read: conventional medicine). Remember when you took antibiotics for that "sinus infection"? Yeah, you didn't need such strong drugs for such a minor condition, and when you multiply bad prescriptions like that by literally millions a day, you get drug-resistant staph and other infections.

The bottom line is that if MRSA were really as bad as all the hype, we'd all be dead from it. It doesn't kill everyone it comes in contact with. It doesn't even infect most of the people it comes in contact with, because most of our bodies know how to deal with pathogens. Most of the "19,000 deaths a year" are immunocompromised patients. But hundreds of thousands of immunocompromised patients (read: the elderly) die every year of other causes, and many, many of those patients are simply not susceptible to MRSA. Wonder why there are 19,000 deaths a year but only three documented children's deaths? It's about the immune system, not the germ.

If you've got an infection antibiotics can't help, go see a homeopath. Get healthy. Stay away from antibiotics and steroids and chemical food.

Resist germ hysteria. Germs are everywhere. It's about your body's condition, not about germs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Worthiness, blame and illness Posted by: sweet_byrd
Broward County, FL
Posted by: war_on_tara on Dec 4, 2007 4:21 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not a place I'd expect to hear good jail news from. It's great they are setting an example on MRSA.

The trend toward privately-operated prisons is depressing, but maybe has an upside; there are probably some states where it would be easier to put pressure on a company to improve conditions than on the government.

Are most or nearly all corrections workers unionized? I hope so but don't know offhand - what a depressing place to work! - and the unions would be an obvious place to focus on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Broward County, FL Posted by: Sushi
Because it's pretty much a given?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Dec 4, 2007 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So why aren't we talking about our nightmarish prison system, the biggest incubator of them all?

This is the same thing we see in Warsaw Pact countries with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The enhanced spread of communicable diseases is--by definition--a natural outcome of housing large concentrations of primates in close proximity. Add some exclusively human (some not) conditions like suppressed immunity, low socio-economic status, needle sharing, promiscuous unprotected sex, and scientifically ignorant script-writers and the real question is why the outbreaks in prisons, nursing homes, and barracks aren't worse than they are.

The health status of people in our prisons is concerning, as it can foreshadow the health status of our populace--these people do get out of jail, and sometimes they manage to stay out, remember? The bugs, on the other hand, are never constrained by bars.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

interesting article
Posted by: kungfoofighterx on Dec 4, 2007 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Staphylococcus aureus is a commensal organism that lives in harmony with a very large number of human beings. "About 20% of the population are always colonized with S. aureus, 60% are intermittent carriers, and 20% never carry the organism" ref These critters are adapting to their new environment and are transmitted by human to human contact. No amount of clean surfaces such as sheets, flooring, or bedding can stop its movement. Humans are covered in it. I always wonder if they test the common sites on people that normally harbor staph to see if MRSA has settled in for the long haul with its less resistant siblings. I bet this type of testing would cost more than $28. However if one is exposed to HIV you will get a number of tests over a year to give you a clear slate. Maybe this is the answer for the prison system. They need to make sure people clear MRSA strain completely from the locations it normally inhabits on their bodies. It does matter if you are jail, in school, at the gym, or in your home. If MRSA lives in one's nose and doesnt go away they are going to pass it around. Again and Again and Again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: interesting article Posted by: ad132
I was wondering
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Dec 4, 2007 8:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how the exploding costs of long-term incarceration were going to be dealt with.
Now I know.

[/cynicism]

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I was wondering Posted by: jumperladd
» RE: I was wondering Posted by: ad132
Surely malnourishment is cruel and unusual punishment
Posted by: pinget on Dec 4, 2007 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A newspaper story recently made it clear that malnourishment is part of incarceration in America too. http://www.timesdaily.com/article/20071201/APA/712010704

The story is from Arkansas. My husband works in a grocery store in Alabama and sees what they buy to feed prisoners. Bologna, hot dogs - very little produce of any kind, very little unprocessed meat. Surely this is inhumane?
Combine this with the recent finding that most American prisoners have lead poisoning. How much crime is really a manifestation of a condition?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» They love their bologna Posted by: edith
» RE: They love their bologna Posted by: redroadtraveler
» RE: Surely malnourishment is cruel and unusual punishment Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
MRSA info
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Dec 4, 2007 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MRSA stands for MULTIPLE resistant staph, not methicillin resistant.

this means it is a staph infection that is resistant to most all antibiotics, not just one or two. MRSA is the result of over use of antibiotics and the natural evolution of the bacterium to develop resistance to drugs meant to kill them.

People with MRSA should be isolated because it is quite contageous. Most people with MRSA can not do anything but lie in bed. In a decent hospital, they are isolated and you can not enter their room unless you have on extreme hazardous materials protection suits. But in prisons people with MRSA are not isolated so it spreads. and spreads.

as a health reporter, I spoke with doctors about MRSA 10-15 years ago. They were petrified of it and today, it is so much more out of hand it's pitiful. Potentially, this could be a huge epidemic and if that happens, the cause will not only be over use of antibiotics, but it will be caused by poor management of large at-risk populations, exactly like what this article is saying. Prisons today are disease incubators.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: MRSA info Posted by: IvorT
Why do they forget to mention this?
Posted by: Ambrose Pare on Dec 4, 2007 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.silverlon.com/MRSA_Infections.html

They have bandages and dressing, approved by the FDA, which release Ions of Silver that quickly kill MRSA infections. Due to the nature of the antimicrobial, the bacteria do not become resistant to the Ions of silver.

They use it in burn centers all the time with fantastic results. The clinical trials show this stuff kills MRSA quickly and reliably.

They even have patented, proven techniques to use a small amount of electricity, micro-amperes, to electrocute the bacteria in the body, and it doesn't harm the human cells.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is wrong with you people?
Posted by: WitchyNy on Dec 4, 2007 10:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't you realize we need to get rid of the surplus population?

Ebenezer S.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» it would seem so Posted by: sunspot
MRSA can mean Methicillin-Resistant or Multiple-Resistant
Posted by: Overburdened Planet on Dec 4, 2007 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Methicillin-Resistant and Multiple-Resistant, pg 2, 1st para.
For all you "health reporters" out there...


MRSA Outbreak Map (last updated 3/12/07)

Can anyone provide us with a better map of the US with MRSA outbreaks?

Food-initiated outbreak of airborne MRSA in Netherlands. Several reports have been published about CA-MRSA outbreaks among sports team members, communities, prisoners, men who have sex with men, military personnel, and drug users.

Mandatory Reporting Legislation: Does your state report to the public, or only to government, or do you live in a state that has yet to take action? Legislation in Progress: details specific Legislation codes

The company I work for sent one worker for MRSA testing (they had the more mild strain) but it raised concerns, albeit for as long as most people care to remember, worry, or get on with their lives.

I'm wondering if or when government will address antibiotic misuse and the dangers of anti-bacterial products. Isn't this damage having a measurable negative financial impact yet, or are we continuing to sow our own ruin?

I've read doctors justify giving antibiotics to patients who didn't need them because they feared their patients would go to another doctor. I don't recall where I read this, but considering the potential for damage, I can't imagine why doctors don't better educate their patients, or scare them into not taking antibiotics, except when absolutely needed. Is it really all about profit? What if doctors end up in court as a result of knowingly contributing to this public safety issue?

We are being sold a great number of lies from cradle to grave, and the profits from our collective scientific ignorance are huge as industry and experts continue to peddle their wares and excuses.

Still buying anti-bacterials? Is It In You?

Anti-bacterials, removed from wastewater, remains in sludge that ends up in fertilizer, again exposing us through consumption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

priorities
Posted by: edith on Dec 4, 2007 11:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
someone sentenced to do time in jail should not suffer a "death' sentence from this virus or others(AIDS) contracted in prison. One way to free up resources to improve safety for prisoners and to contain communicable diseases there is to reduce the prison population. Non-violent prisoners need to be subject to alternatives like home detention, with appropriate monitoring. Hire more parole and probation officers if necessary, and use the latest in technology(retina, etc) to make sure "off campus" prisoners are who they say they are and are where the should be.

For a country so adept at violation of personal privacy, keeping track of non-violent defendants so as to better rehabilitate them and to keep them healthy from injury or disease contracted in jail should not be an impossible task.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Please understand the difference Posted by: nochicagoboys
Vital Oxide Kills MRSA
Posted by: greenpsi on Dec 4, 2007 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An ecological solution to kill staph bacteria is a product called Vital Oxide. See http://www.vitaloxide.com for more info.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» BLEACH Posted by: gellero
If the cons die, we die.
Posted by: PaulK on Dec 4, 2007 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only thing between the superbugs growing and mutating in prisons and us on the outside is a thirty foot wall. The wall doesn't work against bacteria. The bugs can come out on the guards' clothes and hands.

In epidemiology, as we treat the least of us, so we do to ourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not just prisons and jails . . .
Posted by: kegbot1 on Dec 4, 2007 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good story but if the problem is that the American people won't care what happens to 'bad' people, there's one other place that fits Talvi's specifications perfectly and is also a prime breeding ground for germs: US military barracks.

My post:
http://tinyurl.com/23rfv7

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

abitcrazy in Phoenix
Posted by: abitcrazy on Dec 4, 2007 3:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Private companies are even less accountable to the public. Their bottom line is not the interests of the public, or doing the right thing - particularly when it will cost them any part of their profit margin. Their interests are their stockholders, and usually profits are sucked out of the local economy that would have went toward goods, services, wages and benefits for those who work in the facility, instead are sent to the top execs in some far off city to pay for high-priced lobbyists to win more contracts for more prisoners.

We are in a shambles in this country, and headed down a dark road to slavery and the abusive system where the masses of humanity are starved, locked up, riddled with disease and poverty, and spit out to contribute to more social problems upon release.

My point: don't expect corporate America to do anything responsible if it costs them a penny. They make decisions behind closed doors, away from public scrutiny, and mostly unaccountable for their actions, as evidenced by any research on any of the private companies and the abuses they are already found guilty of committing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The war on the poor; do you think you'll win?
Posted by: GPFrank on Dec 4, 2007 8:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want to hear more from the "blogosphere" about
the estimate that 75% of the inhabitants of prisons are there for a non-violent offense
and the great majority of these are for small
amounts of "pot". I almost sense that there is some sadistic satisfaction in pushing people into the conditions described in the article, or why else has no one added to the cold science of the matter by pointing out the result of our so-called drug war. P.S. I am not a "user" and
I am a "teetotaler".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow
Posted by: Dboy on Dec 4, 2007 11:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really hope they get this problem solved before the 2008 election. Would hate to see the former Bush administration catch a nasty infection.

Dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cruel and Unusual
Posted by: herbal on Dec 5, 2007 12:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Constitutional challenge of maximum and medium security imprisonment should be a high priority for the ACLU. AIDS infection for years, given the high incidence of homosexual rape in prisons, has been tantamount to death sentences for many perpetrators of victimless drug crime. High infection rates for any fatal or serious disease, such as staph, should be cause for immediate release of prisoners who are at risk of exposure.

Why would state and county health agencies be silent about this issue? Call your local health department to ask pointed questions. Why should prison incubaton be allowed to breed and release diseases, as public policy, of hepatitis B, AIDS, Staph, consumption, etc.?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prisons Are Perfect Breeding Grounds For Diseases
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Dec 5, 2007 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Microorganisms thrive is prisons where conditons may be substandard. For example, it was reported in one of Los Angeles' jails that staph infection broke out; and if anyone has basic knowledge of this bacteria, it is a terrible thing to have.
And, if anyone has visited or spent time in an L.A. jail, they're no Holiday Inns. Let's hope the state can spend the money necessary to prevent outbreaks of any disease. Once out into the public, the sky's the limit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHY PREACH TO THE CHOIR??
Posted by: gellero on Dec 5, 2007 4:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ms. Talvi knows her subject. So why isn't she writing an educational article for trade publications for jailers and cops, which will do something positive, rather than complain that not enough is being done? She'll be paid for it. WHY???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Worthiness, blame and illness
Posted by: sweet_byrd on Dec 6, 2007 3:39 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I agree that rampant over use of antibiotics is a very bad thing, merely declaring that people should simply, "Get healthy", because "It's about the immune system, not the germ", and "It's about your body's condition, not about germs" just isn't an answer. For one thing, while it is certainly wise to keep one's body in good condition, it should not be overlooked that for the one in five Americans who have disabilities it isn't always as easy to "Get healthy" as this commenter seems to think.

But what troubles me is the implication that people who get ill have nobody but themselves to blame. If the prevailing attitude is that people should simply "Get healthy" in order to avoid being sick, if a person becomes sick, it is all too easy for others to look at the patient as the perpetrator of their own ills. After all, if they had looked after their "body's condition" in the first place, they wouldn't be ill.

I think it is more appropriate to listen to the words of another of today's Alternet articles:

"[O]ur [society has] a Judeo-Christian, moralistic approach to sickness -- the idea that your disease is somehow your punishment for sin. (New Agers say disease is caused by suppressed anger or an inability to achieve oneness with the universe, but it's the same idea.) ... the result is the same: Disease is primarily the fault of the individual.... As Max Weber pointed out in the Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, the core of the idea of Protestantism was that if you were of the elect, if you had a calling, you would work hard, you would be successful. Accumulating capital was a sign of your worth as a human being. Therefore, poverty is a sign of a lack of being a good person. A variation on this is that illness was thought of as a curse from God. So if you got sick, it was because you weren't a good enough person. The first thing people ask when they get sick is: What did I do wrong?"

I find this attitude wrong and disgusting on many, many levels -- not least because it contributes to the continuing marginalization of people with disabilities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]