Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

Keith Ellison: First Muslim in Congress Makes His Mark

By Ali Eteraz, AlterNet. Posted December 7, 2007.


Thanks to post-9/11 hysteria, American Muslims are one of the most ostracized minority groups in the U.S.
Advertisement

Eleven months have passed since America's first Muslim congressman -- Keith Ellison, from Minnesota's fifth district -- was elected to office. In that time he has exposed bigotry in the media and Congress, and served as a bridge for American relations with the Muslim world.

Throughout his meteoric rise from an anonymous state legislator, Ellison has had unanimous support among American Muslims. Ellison is now using that goodwill to bring a minority group that has been demonized, politically apathetic and often extremely socially conservative into the American political mainstream (and without being pushy, towards the progressive wing of the Democratic Party).

Ever since Ellison's election, much of the focus has been on the venom that greeted him. He received death threats from what he calls "some crazy right-wingers," and last November, Glenn Beck, who regularly has the lowest ratings of the various CNN commentators, brought Ellison onto his show only to ask him, "Sir, prove to me that you are not working with our enemies." Soon after, Virgil Goode, a Republican congressman from Virginia, tried to turn Ellison's election into a fear-mongering campaign, telling his constituents that, unless "the Virgil Goode position on immigration" was adopted, there would be many more Muslim lawmakers.

On the heels of these two smears came an open case of Islamophobia. Supported by radio host Dennis Prager and WorldNetDaily, members of the far-right, and some conservative bloggers argued that Ellison should not be allowed to take his congressional oath for office on the Quran.

Ellison dealt with these attacks with grace and sensibility. He told Beck that he didn't need to prove his patriotic stripes to anyone. The rebuke caught Beck off guard who clarified, absurdly, that he hadn't really wanted Ellison to prove anything. Ellison told Virgil Goode that he was an African-American who could trace his familial roots to pre-revolutionary America. As far as swearing on the Quran, Ellison clarified that no representative actually swears on any religious book -- the oath is sworn upon the Constitution, and the Bible has traditionally been used only for a photo-op afterward. Then, just to remind his critics about the legacy of religious pluralism in the United States, the Quran he used in his pictures was a 1767 edition that belonged to Thomas Jefferson. Finally, after his confirmation, in a move caught on C-SPAN, Ellison offered his hand to congressman Goode.

Over the next eight months, Ellison went with Nancy Pelosi to Syria and Saudi Arabia, as well as Kuwait and Iraq. Most recently, he returned from Israel-Palestine (his second trip to the troubled area). He endorsed Barack Obama, called for withdrawal from Iraq, supported impeachment against Dick Cheney, and as a former criminal defense lawyer became the co-author of a bill that would restore habeas corpus, repeal warrantless wiretapping and shut down the prison at Guantanamo Bay. In short, Ellison had not only survived, but also arrived and, according to his field director in Minnesota, became a "rock-star" at every Democratic Party event he attended.

He has now set his eyes upon the American-Muslim community.

When it comes to political participation, American Muslims are one of the most ostracized minority groups in the United States. A large part of it has to do with the post 9/11 atmosphere, smear campaigns by pundits and the demonization of Islam upon which the war on terror and the war in Iraq have been propped. David Horowitz's Islamofascism Awareness Week is a recent example of this depressing trend.

Another part of American Muslim silence has to do with the fact that they have not always known what to stand for. On one hand, in light of their socially conservative mores -- last year's Pew Survey showed that American Muslims favor state interference in morality even more than Christian Evangelists -- they have leaned towards the Republican Party. On the other hand, in light of their liberal views on civil liberties, social justice and foreign policy, they tend to lean towards Democrats. The conundrum has caused a great deal of schizophrenic thinking in American Muslim political activism. In 2000, Muslims voted as a bloc for President Bush. In 2004, they swung to the other side, with 74 percent of their vote going towards Kerry.

Keith Ellison is out to address both of these issues -- marginalization and lack of vision -- and is doing it by educating and helping American Muslims learn to trust American political institutions.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: congress, ellison, muslim community

Ali Eteraz is an international finance and human rights lawyer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Muslim or American
Posted by: rocketman on Dec 7, 2007 5:31 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not sure what all the hysteria about Ellison was. An American born Catholic turned Muslim - very different then an Arab born Muslim with a hatred for anything American. As long as he keeps his religon out of his politics it should never be an issue.

The only problem I see with him is his support of support of Louis Farrakhan who is widely known as a "racist, homophobic, and antisemitic" . One would have to assume that Ellison holds the same views - a real problem for someone on the judiciary committee (what was Pelosi thinking)- and Ellison called the King Of Saudi Araba a "visionary leader"??? Is his Muslim faith blinding his vision????

I would be curious to see his views re 9-11

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wow Posted by: chaoslegs
Reality defies prejudice
Posted by: saltoafronteira on Dec 7, 2007 5:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Be laic once and for all. That man made is oath with his hand over your constitution, not the Bible or Quran. As written in the former, to God wich belongs to God, to Caesar witch belongs to Caesar. The simple fact of being news, or the need for religious minority representation are, in itself, a worriyng matter.
The real enemy, the real terrorist,lies in all our hearts and minds, christian, muslim, left wing, right wing, progressive or conservative altogheter, when we allow ourselves to be driven by prejudice.
Just like that CNN reporter did.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eality defies prejudice Posted by: rocketman
Minneapolis Values
Posted by: pohjoinen on Dec 7, 2007 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a 41 year white male business owner living in Keith Ellison’s district of south Minneapolis. I am an avid hunter and fisherman, have a degree in civil engineering, and am veteran of the United States Marine Corps, having served four years as an infantryman. In my professional life I have traveled extensively throughout the Middle East and Central Asia. I do not believe in organized religion, preferring a quiet spiritualism based on nature and my Finno-Ugrian ancestors.

I am proud to say I voted for Rep. Ellison, and greatly admire the leadership he has provided his district to date. Why do I support Rep. Ellison? Because he represents the values of my community. Here in Minneapolis we oppose fascism and racism, we support the green revolution, are accepting of gay marriage, and believe that a person’s religion is a personal matter that has no relevance in politics. When I read of the infantile reaction Rep. Ellison received in Washington it made me ashamed to be an American. Keep up the good work Keith!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Minneapolis Values Posted by: rocketman
» RE: Minneapolis Values Posted by: pohjoinen
» RE: Minneapolis Values Posted by: rocketman
» RE: Minneapolis Values Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Minneapolis Values Posted by: rocketman
Gotta love the phrase "state interference in morality"!
Posted by: war_on_tara on Dec 7, 2007 12:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On one hand, in light of their socially conservative mores -- last year's Pew Survey showed that American Muslims favor state interference in morality even more than Christian Evangelists -- they have leaned towards the Republican Party.

It's grimly ironic that so many Muslim groups endorsed Bush over Gore in 2000.

On the other hand, in light of their liberal views on civil liberties, social justice and foreign policy, they tend to lean towards Democrats.

Let's hope!

As Emerson put it, "a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds." Ellison's inconsistencies (if that's what they are), regarding Islam, seem to be the right ones.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» RE: What kind of judgment does he have? Posted by: cardboardurinal
Thank you Pohjoinen
Posted by: chaoslegs on Dec 7, 2007 1:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As another constituent of Rep. Ellison, I agree with your assessment of him. I am proud of my vote for him, and the grace he has shown to the intolerant folks out there.

I am also impressed with his speaking with atheists in Minnesota, while I am not part of their organization, the description fits me. He truly is a class act.

I would consider patronizing your business, I live near the Global Marketplace, as it is nice to support those with shared values.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rep. Ellison and Why Should His Religion Matter????
Posted by: Turiye on Dec 7, 2007 4:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From what I know of Rep. Ellison, he is pro-everything I am.
In so far as the Louis Farrakhan and the NOI, this was an 18 month period, only. He denounced the dogma of the NOI and blamed himself for not being as aware of the NOI, Elijah Muhammad and now Farrakhan and was involved with the NOI during the 'Million Man March.'
It is in The Bill of Rights, read it, Amendment I. Religion is of no consequence as an elected official.
Take a Qur'an, read 2. Surat Al-Baqarah V 62.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Although I no longer live in the fifth district, that is where I
Posted by: johngary66 on Dec 8, 2007 2:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
grew up. It includes the University Of Minnesota area and has always been one of the most liberal in the country. The fifth district has a long tradition of excellent Congressional representation. Kieth has, and I'm sure will continue to uphold that tradition. Go Kieth!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is no payer but Single Payer
Posted by: Casey Bowman on Dec 8, 2007 2:24 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a citizen in Congressman Ellison's district. I have lived here since 1991.

I'm a fan of your writing, and I'm glad for your advocacy of human rights.

I ask you, in strong words, "What is the difference between those politicians, such as Mr. Ellison, who would force everyone into their vision of the good, not brooking market dissent from their plans from any citizen who dare say no, and your run-of-the-mill jihadist, punishing the apostate?" I know these are outrageous words, but I have a point to make by such exaggeration. I believe one of our most important human rights is the right to say, "No," to dissent in society, including the marketplace, without government dictates.

I once was a staunch Democrat from a family of Democrats. Then I read Hayek's Road to Serfdom and started to utter a few blasphemies here and there, warning about the concentration of power and the rights-trampling passions it unleashes. I imagine my experience is not too different from liberal muslims and ex-muslims, though perhaps in degree. It's no fun.

Freedom means freedom of thought, word, AND action: economic action, entrepreneurial action.

I applaud most all of the positions of Congressman Ellison you list in your 6th paragraph (I support another candidate for President). Nonetheless, I heard the Congressman on the radio months ago discussing how much would be saved by having the federal government consolidate health services. With all due respect, this is nonsense. Hearing such economic illiteracy from a politician is like hearing about intelligent design from your doctor, disconcerting to say the least.

I would recommend looking instead at the barriers to competition that go back to legislation in the mid-1800s in the coining of doctors. Patent law deserves our attention, too, if it serves to enforce cartels. Let's focus on the essentials, people.

Moreover, and this is a problem across the entire political spectrum, Congressman Ellison does not take seriously the Constitution upon which he placed his hand. Single payer violates our rights per the Ninth Amendment, not to speak of the limits on Congressional powers granted in Article 1, Section 8.

I am particularly worried about how politicians are redefining the word "insurance", making it impossible to have a reasoned conversation, using meaningful words.

Speaking as a political exile in the wilderness, I urge Democrats to see the part they play in the expansion of illegitimate power we are witnessing by their disparagement of the Constitution and their selectivity in the rights they defend.

I pray for a reformation in the Democratic Party, infused by the "ethics of liberalism", but I'm not holding my breath. The Democratic Party still has not learned their lesson from 1994.

I am critical of any "religion" that punishes apostasy and blasphemy. So, too, am I of any "party" that does so, and thus becomes a faction, as defined by Madison in Federalist X.

I only worry about Congressman Ellison's participation in faction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]