Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

'Giuliani Time': Just When You Thought You Knew How Evil He Is

By Lisa Gray-Garcia, AlterNet. Posted December 4, 2007.


As the film "Giuliani Time" reveals, rarely has one man so successfully harnessed the hatred and ignorance of the U.S. public for poor people and people of color.
Advertisement

"Peddlers, panhandlers and prostitutes, they all need to be cleaned out [of Manhattan]." The first time I heard Rudy Giuliani speak was on a NBC nightly news broadcast. It was 1996. I was living in Oakland, Calif., at the time -- 3,000 miles away from Manhattan, where, as mayor, Giuliani was implementing his "clean-up campaign." But the sting of his speech still scared me.

It was the first time I had heard hygienic metaphors to describe poor people like me who were surviving in an underground street-based economy. Rudy Giuliani had become mayor of New York City on a campaign that constructed a new scapegoat for all of America's crime problems: "the squeegee man" (aka a person who cleans car windows at stop lights).

Giuliani was emboldened with "the broken window" philosophy, which claimed that if broken windows remain unfixed for a period of time the tendency is for vandals to break a few more windows. Eventually, they may even break into the building, and if it's unoccupied, perhaps become squatters or light fires inside.

The theory was promoted by the hyperconservative Manhattan Institute and was already litmus tested by N.Y. Police chief Bill Bratten. In his now-infamous statement, Giuliani publicly linked three street-based economies and communities with dirt or trash: They were something to be cleaned up as a means to create the perfect U.S. city.

Under his rule, ridding Manhattan of the newly designated and oxymoronic "quality of life" criminals such as panhandlers, recyclers, window washers (aka squeegee men), sex workers, hot dog peddlers and street artists was the way to have a crime-free, user-friendly, corporate dollar-fueled city.

All of these memories came to me as I watched the little-seen but important documentary Giuliani Time. The two-hour-and-20-minute feature, produced and directed by Kevin Keating, uses a series of in-depth interviews with policy makers, advocates, sociologists and urban planners to reveal how Giuliani's policies during his reign from 1994-2001 led to extreme and dangerous police empowerment and subsequent decimation of human and civil rights of poor people and communities of color. The film shows how he created a template for criminalization that would be eventually emulated and implemented by mayors across the country -- from Atlanta to San Francisco.

The movie begins with a look at Giuliani's family roots with crime and vice: His uncle Harold was a loan shark out of a bar he ran in Brooklyn and eventually did hard time in Sing Sing. It then follows Giuliani's ambitious rise from state attorney general to a mayor who appropriated as his own the "quality of life" crime campaign from then-police chief Bratton.

The film shows a somewhat dense series of interviews outlining Giuliani's draconian strategy of using New York police to attack and manipulate the short-lived mayoral run of David Dinkins. Once he achieved his position as mayor, Giuliani began an onslaught of race-based profiling and harassment of African-American communities in New York by the NYPD.

Simultaneously, he launched a campaign to cut people off welfare en masse, regardless of its impact on poor families, to have homeless people considered criminals, and to have the simple acts of sitting, standing and sleeping outdoors and surviving on a street-based economy designated as crimes.

His welfare policies succeeded in making Giuliani the mayor best known for getting 600,000 welfare recipients off welfare and into a new form of slavery, "workfare." Workfare, is the hard labor (that isn't considered real work by the welfare system and most of society for that matter) one must do to get the minimal cash aid distributed by welfare. This includes doing previously union-held jobs like crack-of-dawn street sweeping and public restroom cleaning, and other forms of menial labor, for much less than minimum wage.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: rudy giuliani, election08, poverty, new york, giuliani time, giuliani

Lisa Gray-Garcia (aka Tiny) a poverty scholar, revolutionary journalist, welfareQUEEN, daughter of Dee and mama of Tiburcio, is the founder and co-editor of POOR Magazine/PNN and the author of Criminal of Poverty: Growing Up Homeless in America, published by City Lights Foundation.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Giulinai’s so-called philosophy based on a caricature of reality
Posted by: Lector on Dec 4, 2007 12:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Giuliani may well be nominated to run by his party because, so far, despite his past there will be enough of a deluded electorate who will vote for this tyrant. Americans in the last decades seem to have consistently voted for politicians who have little interest in reforms that will benefit the majority of Americans. So it should be no surprise that Giuliani criminalizes the poor and gets away with it. In fact, in most American metropolises this is standard policy. So Giuliani is no different in this respect. The caliber of leaders we have to choose from is pathetic but what else can we expect from a political system with a society which from the very beginning had only one political party, the Property Party, which was eventually divided into the Left and the Right and as we well know now there is little difference. The issues of poverty and homelessness in this country are so easy for most politicians to marginalize in a society like ours. Promises have been made for decades to deal with poverty and they have all amounted to little. Small adjustments here and there but as we can see, the problem has become bigger and Giuliani is certainly just another politician who is part of the problem.

Pointless

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Giulinai’s so-called philosophy based on a caricature of reality
Posted by: Lector on Dec 4, 2007 12:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Giuliani may well be nominated to run by his party because, so far, despite his past there will be enough of a deluded electorate who will vote for this tyrant. Americans in the last decades seem to have consistently voted for politicians who have little interest in reforms that will benefit the majority of Americans. So it should be no surprise that Giuliani criminalizes the poor and gets away with it. In fact, in most American metropolises this is standard policy. So Giuliani is no different in this respect. The caliber of leaders we have to choose from is pathetic but what else can we expect from a political system with a society which from the very beginning had only one political party, the Property Party, which was eventually divided into the Left and the Right and as we well know now there is little difference. The issues of poverty and homelessness in this country are so easy for most politicians to marginalize in a society like ours. Promises have been made for decades to deal with poverty and they have all amounted to little. Small adjustments here and there but as we can see, the problem has become bigger and Giuliani is certainly just another politician who is part of the problem.

Pointless

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCity
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Dec 4, 2007 2:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At first, I thought I liked the newer, cleaner NYC. The punks and the mumbling street people seemed to disappear. The subways and subway stations were cleaner, and weren't as scary.

I went there a few times during the Giuliani era, but then I lost interest. The city had become so sanitized that it had become boring. It was all Starbucks and the same chains on every block. Midtown seemed to have turned into Yuppieville, and it was no longer an adventure.

I don't know what it's like now. I'm curious to hear if other people had the same experience.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: McCity Posted by: dockboy
» RE: McCity Posted by: rocketman
» RE: McCity Posted by: rogus
» RE: McCity Posted by: rclord
Newer, cleaner NYC? Where's that?
Posted by: charlief on Dec 4, 2007 4:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow the poster above really hasn't been to the NYC I know. Cleaner subways? He needed to get out of Manhattan and visit the real New York. It seems to me, the subway system is in terminal meltdown, the 'wrong kind of leaves on the track' mentality is working here and it reminds me of my time in London and the rail network's excuses for late or non-appearing trains there.

The long-suffering commuters who live in the outer boroughs are generally poorly served, the stations are in a shocking state of disrepair and few people seem to care, particularly those that run the system.

Most other New Yorkers I know like to keep a healthy distance from all things Guiliani. They know a crook and a despicable human being when they see one. He was, and still is, a morally bankrupt individual that paradoxically, the 'folks' in Iowa and other parts of the "heartland" of America seem to prefer - and they're prepared to overlook his so-called pro-choice, anti-gun stance for now. Why are these god-fearing, upright Christians prepared to overlook a mob-connected presidential candidate? Because they too are morally bankrupt. Just ask Pat Robertson.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» When Subways Melt Down Posted by: PaulK
Former welfare mom
Posted by: marykmusic on Dec 4, 2007 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I understand completely! I was a single mother of 3 young ones in Oklahoma when I was "punished" for not getting a job. We lived too far from state-paid babysitters and I didn't have a vehicle; I would gladly have worked if I could! Having my piddling welfare check cut by half meant I couldn't pay my rent AND my bills during the same month. This led to years of being in and out of homeless shelters, evictions, jobs found and lost because of transportation breakdowns. It wasn't until I returned to college that life finally got right (and now I have a big student loan debt but that's the price I had to pay.) And my children understand more than most people's kids; down to the last one now and the other two are fine upstanding hard-working citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What do ya expect from Rudy Ghouliani?
Posted by: xvictor on Dec 4, 2007 6:16 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back when he was the number 3 guy in the Justice Department, 1980 i believe, he traveled down to Haiti to ascertain stories from haitian refugees regarding political tyranny there. He said he didn't see any problems and that the refugees don't know what they're talking about. He also added that the dictatorial Duvalier government was a good role model for the United States.

Imagine that.

Indeed, he IS the "small man in search of a balcony".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Add Bill Clinton to the List
Posted by: Overburdened Planet on Dec 4, 2007 7:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Workfare:"...which has proliferated since the early 1980s, forces relief recipients to do additional work outside the home in order to remain eligible for welfare. Typically, workfare programs pay little attention to participants’ skills. But regardless of the kind of work performed, workfare is not a job. Unlike other workers, people on workfare assignments do not receive a wage in the traditional sense and, under the current welfare law, they lack rights of other American workers, such as the Earned Income Tax Credit, and credit/eligibility for Social Security and unemployment compensation."

Altering, downsizing or eliminating welfare benefits, while increasing its requirements, is tactically similar to overhaul plans for another program: Social Security. Social Security sacrifices

How can "Workfare" be legal when "compellling" Americans to work without pay for something they already paid into? What's next, telling people on Social Security they’ll have to keep working, but without pay and benefits and any other form of compensation or they will stop getting their Social Security payments?

Why pay into a system when benefits are becoming more difficult, if not impossible, to access? Programs whose benefits decrease reflect a decrease in representation, and while allegations of waste and corruption are used to justify cutting or abandoning social programs, other programs appear to be doing very well, like military spending, even though similar allegations of waste and corruption can be made for these other programs as well.

References to Clinton are mentioned in some of these links; major cuts to the SSA budget started with Clinton, and of course who can forget the Welfare Reform Act.

Social Security Administrative Troubles

Some people have waited over three years, or died waiting, for benefits hearings

So the goal is to undermine even those who have worked and paid into the system.

What was it someone once said about taxation without representation?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Add Bill Clinton to the List Posted by: marykmusic
» I Agree with you both Posted by: Overburdened Planet
Giuliani saved New York City
Posted by: reevolve on Dec 4, 2007 7:20 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I have some reservations about Giuliani, he did a fantastic job with NYC. Before he took office, living in the city was a nightmare for most people, i.e. those not part of the "street-based economy" (seriously, where do people come up with these things?). Protecting the rights of working, tax-paying, law-abiding citizens to go about their business without being subjected to crime, filth and harassment should be governmental priority number one. One could certainly argue plausibly that some of the policies were over the top, but then so was the problem at the time.

As for forcing people seeking public assistance to put in some amount of work in exchange for those benefits, that’s called “working for a living,” which in fact is not a “new form of slavery,” but a concept with fairly deep roots in both American and world history. It’s true, you can look it up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "Work for a Living" Posted by: rjgwood
» RE: "Work for a Living" Posted by: reevolve
» Ronnie Posted by: rjgwood
» "Work for a Living" Posted by: rjgwood
» RE: Giuliani saved New York City Posted by: jimmymack 2
One Hell Of A Broken Window
Posted by: QQOblivion on Dec 4, 2007 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You want a "broken windows" theory? Well, if, say, the US House refuses to initiate impeachment hearings, say, against the "broken window" of our current dictator-president's abuses of power, this may, just may, lead to the next president (especially if it is Giuliani) going absolutely nuts with the ultra-fascism. Watch as all Hell -- in the form of crack-downs against the poor and minorities, pre-emptive (nuclear) wars, and torture and other forms of sado-fascism -- breaks loose if Giuliani becomes president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One Hell Of A Broken Window Posted by: jimmymack 2
do you know he made it illegal to dance?
Posted by: schnoggi on Dec 4, 2007 8:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
everyone thinks i'm making it up, but this iron-fisted sociopath decided to exhume an old racist law and nail to the wall any club with "three or more persons moving in a rhythmic manner", and in the process choked the nightlife in Manhattan to death. You had to be there when seven city agencies swooped in to the old Cooler club, threw on the lights, and dropped 20,000 in fines in ten minutes. His style of cleanup is to wash your face with gasoline and sandpaper. the result is that many of the talented people who made the place worth knowing have fled, never to return.

and that jerk Bloomberg has done zero to rectify the situation; he sees fines as a way to secretly raise taxes, so any blood he can squeeze is good news to him. that hypocritical little party queen needs to come out of the closet, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who can argue ?
Posted by: 7 Levels on Dec 4, 2007 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm as liberal as they come but I had been to NY pre-Rudy and it's a much better place than it used to be. Whatever he did was measurably different than my previous visits. He may be this or that but he got the job done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who can argue ? Posted by: babs
» RE: Who can argue ? Posted by: jimmymack 2
» RE: Who can argue ? Posted by: drmflorida
To Rudy, All Arabs and Palestinians are "Terrorists"
Posted by: sofla100 on Dec 4, 2007 6:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem is that even in acknowledging Rudy's "get tough" approach cleaned up NYC crime, is that the kind of approach that will work in international foreign policy? We see Bush with his "get tough" approach and it is a complete disaster. Rudy has made no bones about going after Iran and protecting Israel at all costs. Rudy has used "terrorists" to described all Arabs and the Palestinian peoples. Rudy would mean more wars and more military spending. Fine, let him be mayor of NYC, but not President of the USA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

of city and suburbs
Posted by: eosrk on Dec 4, 2007 6:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the Cities are the new suburbs and the suburbs are the new city...catch my drift!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

...and this is why the Second Great Depression...
Posted by: eosrk on Dec 4, 2007 6:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is on its way, and it will be far worser and longer than the first.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary Stands by While Bill Bashes Poor Moms
Posted by: Lily H. on Dec 5, 2007 12:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The above posters got it right, all right.
Hillary stood by while her husband signed away
the rights and dignity of poor moms throughout
the U.S. I am a former welfare mom and write/
distribute Mother Warriors Voice, a newsjournal
from Milwaukee, WI (the state who brought you
Tommy Thompson and the birthplace of welfare
reform). One of my recent articles was in the
Spring 2007 issue, entitled Feminist Agenda:
Get A Job, where I lambaste the likes of Hillary Clinton for allowing Bill Clinton to
literally shred the lives of poor mothers and
children to smithereens. I might remind those
of you who are interested in researching Rudy's Reign of Terror in NY, that he had a right-hand
man, the head of the city's welfare dept.,
Jason Turner, a Wisconsin transplant who made
Dr. Death/Joseph Mengele look like a creampuff.
Turner was interviewed by a well-known, reputable author who was researching the effects of welfare reform on clients, and Turner shared his literal childhood dream of
making the poor work in factories assembling
toys, etc. VERY SCARY.
There was also a very publicized case of a
mother who died while working a workfare
assignment who was denied medical attention
and subsequently died of a stroke on the job.
I recommend reading Barbara Ehrenreich's book,
Nickled and Dimed AND checking out Welfare
Warriors 20-year-old newsjournal, one of the
few who still dares to print newsworthy articles about the rights and struggles of the
poor here in the U.S. and abroad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has anyone noticed that Rudy is not
Posted by: Ellie1 on Dec 15, 2007 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
popular on the east coast, where we know him the best and longest? The only jerks falling for his line are in the mid west where they only know the Bushit pushed by Fox News. To know Rudy is NOT to love him, those of us who have been acquainted with him for years know what a piece of sh-t rudy really is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]