Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

Naomi Wolf's Guide to Restoring Liberty in America

By Naomi Wolf, Firedoglake. Posted October 26, 2007.


It's open season on all of us, and it's time to take to the streets.
Advertisement

This post, written by Naomi Wolf, originally appeared on FireDogLake

All right: Blackwater and other contractors have four BILLION dollars in US funds and, the New York Times reports today, almost no oversight in Iraq; wildfires are consuming acres of Southern California and many counties have been declared to be in a state of emergency -- and nothing at all but a whisper of popular opposition and a prayer -- nothing legal -- would prevent Bush today from declaring that the National Guard is overstretched and that it is Blackwater's torturers and murderers, recruited from Salvadoran, Ecuadoran and Nigerian paramilitaries, who will be `maintaining order' in the `public emergency' that is Southern California; and Mukasey has informed Congress that he has no idea what waterboarding is -- which professed cluelessness alone should disqualify him from service -- and that the President does not actually need to obey the law of the United States of America -- which alone should alert us that if he is confirmed the game is over. Once Congress confirms someone to decide the law of the land who holds that the President is exempt from the law of the land (which assertion was, notably, an historic tipping point when Hitler asked his Reichstag to confirm a similar position about his powers in regard to the law and the constitution) it is open season on all of us.

It is time to take to the streets.

Many of you have asked about a national strike. This is the next step in a democracy movement. We need to hold monthly strikes -- a word that is too scary for some, and we want to be inclusive, so rather we will urge people of all walks of life to participate in mass-action Constitution Days.

What will we do -- in our millions, hopefully, we will Sit Down for the Constitution in the most public space in our communities. The seated mass citizen action is more effective now than a march; less cause for confrontation, more family-friendly, you can gather more people for a longer time and it can be more of a community affirmation of American values and the Rule of Law. Daniel Ellsberg, whom I had the honor of meeting last week in Berkeley, along with his brave and beautiful wife Patricia, reminded me that it took only three days of a widely observed National Moratorium to strike a real blow to the war in the Vietnam.

We propose that local citizens organize these Constitution Days once a month, on the 6th, starting Nov. 6 (before or after you vote). We suggest that those who can refrain from going to work or to school -- use the time to be with your fellow citizens at the event or reading about democracy and sharing those ideals with your friends and neighbors. Those who can't leave work, come for lunch hour. If millions join the nation will react, and even if the first few are small, we must begin. You guys have to organize these locally -- we can't. But that is powerful. Here is how to proceed:

The Liberty Kit for Constitution Days: Assemble a Powerful `Sit Down For the Constitution' Citizen Action November 6 and Monthly Thereafter

1. Locally, a volunteer should set up a website announcing the time (start at noon, stay till five; you will have most visitors between twelve and two). The place should be the steps of the Town Hall or the most obvious civic space (in Chicago for instance everyone said Fenwick Park). Send a press kit to all local media outlets -- you can get the resources in the library or online. If you don't get coverage you can write to local advertisers of your local news and newspapers -- cc the ad department of the media outlets -- that you will stop buying their products and will urge others to do so as well unless they encourage local media to cover this local important news. Barbara Martinez who started at sitdownfortheconstitution.org provides a central space -- send an email to the site after you event so we can get an accurate nationwide count of participants.

2. Ask all to wear red, white or blue t shirts or sweaters and dark slacks. A strong visual is more likely to get wide press coverage and a good color photo on the cover of a news section of local news. It is an even better visual if you arrange people into red, white and blue sections. That will inspire wide angle shots from a higher position. Protests from progressives always seem visually disorderly -- making coverage less likely -- and a visually orderly, peaceful set of groups also makes it harder for police to crack down violently on protesters after accusing them of misconduct.

3. Have people bring uniformly sized US flags -- tell them a good local or internet source -- or buy a lot and sell them there. It reinforces that this is pure support for the American system, not partisanship. (And it is a bad media image to taser people supporting the flag.) We want to send a clear message that this is above all a patriotic, transpartisan action on behalf of our fournders' vision. People should not wave the small ones, but rather good-sized ones that will blow in the breeze (again, visuals and media attention) -- 2Å~3 at least. Signs should be in red, white and blue and uniform: `Moms for the Constitution', `Vets for the Bill of Rights' `Teachers for Liberty'; `Americans Don't Torture' `The Constitution Keeps us Safe' `Stand Up for the Founders'. Important are: `Independents for the Constitution' `Swing Voters for the Constitution' and `Republicans for the Constitution' and `No President is Above the Law'. Signs should NOT address unrelated issues -- veganism, Palestine or Israel, patriarchy -- the left tends to let a chaos of messages dilute the force and inclusiveness of one strong message. The civil rights marches were always disciplined in focusing only on civil rights, for instance.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: constitution, civil liberties

Naomi Wolf is the author of The End of America: Letter of Warning To A Young Patriot.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A call to arms!
Posted by: oregoncharles on Oct 26, 2007 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A PRACTICAL call to arms. No nitpicking about the past, folks. This is serious.

I've got my name (my real name) all over their lists, and so do a lot of you. It's a badge of honor, but it means we all have a personal stake in this. Let's get with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A call to arms! Posted by: oregoncharles
It's going to come down to military loyalties
Posted by: scheherezade on Oct 26, 2007 11:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ultimately, as with all coups, the end result hinges on who the military aligns with.

Historically, destructive meglomaniacs have enjoyed a short life once the military turned against them, personal guard notwithstanding.

Blackwater's undisciplined thug brigade won't last five minutes against an organized Army or Marine assault.

And Bushco's mishandling of the Iraq war, combined with the ravages wrought by privatization, would probably put the military safely in Congress' camp, if a coup attempt happens.

Army and Marine officer corps are schooled-enough in constitutional process to pose a low threat to the public. Bush's religious nuts tend to be a minority in the services, and units, that see actual combat operations.

Navy officers tend to be more opportunistic career-ladder social climbers, because they do less, operationally -- but would thus be less likely to be on the ground facing protestors.

Troops are troops, and Bill O'Reilly's 'secular-progressive' baiting, notwithstanding, it would probably take more than disgust at "San Francisco values" to make them turn weapons against the U.S. populace.

Add to that the uncentralized nature of American policing systems (despite Homeland Security's recent efforts) and you still come out with a vast, decentralized population to control.

Regardless of who started the California fires (cui bono: Blackwater? The mortgage and building industries?), a successful Buscho coup's probably going to have to go the bread and circuses route, rather than the Enabling Act route, and the U.S. economy appears to be heading in the opposite direction at this point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Darn I was hoping for something more
Posted by: mom'z the word on Oct 26, 2007 12:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, Daniel Ellsberg was a different time and place. His protest then was unique and original. It worked because it catch everyone by surprise. And we didn't have the Patriots Act then. Things have changed a lot and I am sorry to say I think it is going to take something a little different to have any sort of an impact on this situation.

First, people protesting are no real threat to anyone. As protestors we are ASKING the powers that be to change the way they are doing things. This type of protest is really coming from a powerless position and is of no consequence. We are asking the oppressors and tyrants to relinquish their power over us and to start behaving like human beings. This is just silly.

Do we expect them to act in good faith, good conscience, good sense in response to our protest? They haven't acted in good conscience from the beginning why would a protest be any different? First, Why are we ASKING people that are slowly and painfully dismembering us from our Constitution and our person to please stop. Why are we ASKING them to stop? The power is in the ability to tell them to stop.

By asking them to stop the torture and killing we are admitting to them that they still have the power. They have the power to refuse to meet our demands and this gives them more power. And of course they will refuse to meet our demands because they have no intention of doing the right thing, nor do they care that what they are doing to us as a country is wrong, illegal or immoral. Why should they? Who is going to stop them? Some protestors? I don't think so.

If you want to get these people to stop treating us like malcontents you have to talk their language. If you want to get even then get smart and get them where it counts. In their bank accounts. Money talks and sh-- walks. So instead of sitting down, stand up and boycott something that is near and dear to their hearts and will effect their bottom line. Don't buy something one day a month or two days a month or refuse to buy something until things change. This is how you get their attention. Affect the bottom line and you have them in the palm of your hand begging you to stop boycotting their power source.

I am sure their are some very knowledgeable and informed people out their that could tell you exactly what products, goods, or services that when boycotted for even a minute would send those that would benefit from our demise as a democracy into a tail spin. Where is Bush's money coming from? Or one of your representatives, or senators financial investments? If we threaten to boycott the companies that our corrupt politicians have invested in imagine how fast those companies are going to want to get rid of that politician? That politician is now a big fat liability. We boycott the goods until the president, vice president, cabinet member, chief of staff, or whoever, starts listening to us for real and in a timely manner.

And what is great about a boycott is you can do it from the comfort of your own home, anytime, anywhere and no one has to know you are doing it. You are not a target and the power to do it is all yours. They can’t throw you in jail or hose you down or read you the riot act by sitting at home refusing to buy some products. When the stocks start to drop you know you are winning.

I am looking forward to some really good boycotting ideas. The campaign slogan could be: THE BUCK STOPS HERE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: THE BUCK STOPS HERE. Posted by: Lincoln fan
US GOV DIRECTED ENERGY MIND ASSAULT VICTIMS
Posted by: etisoppa on Oct 26, 2007 2:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does this mean you are going to start investigating and protesting the US GOV. directed energy mind assault program against civilians or is this yet another diabolical hypocritical Orwellian double-talk farce put on by....! ( You don't deal with that topic , then its a farce).

Want some sites
etisoppa@yahoo.com -- picture of the system circa 2007

MIndAssault 101 sites
www.americancognitivelibertiesassoc.org
http://www.freedomfchs.com/
http://www.organizedcrimewaves.com/index.php
http://360.yahoo. com/soleilmavis

http://freedomfchs.com/index.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Petitons, boycotts, sit-ins,etc...
Posted by: Knobby on Oct 26, 2007 3:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Won't do it... Have you all forgot what they did prior to the creating and signing of the Declaration of Independence???

"In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends."

Before that was the first fighting of the Revolution on Lexington Common, 19 April 1775.

Read your history: http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/RevWar/ss/ch1.htm#colon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Petitons, boycotts, sit-ins,etc... Posted by: mom'z the word
» ONE SIZE DOES NOT FIT ALL Posted by: greenthumb
Right idea, wrong tactics
Posted by: Rune on Oct 26, 2007 4:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that it is necessary to take more direct action than the mostly ignored and creatively challenged street theater of protest marches and heckling in public meetings. I also agree with mom'z the word that effective action must have economic consequences for the parties behind the assault on civil liberties, humanity, and the natural environment. But as knobby points out, that is risky business. And in an era of intermittently lethal tasers, the Active Denial System, and the military being conditioned and pressed into domestic police duties, truly disruptive street protests will likely result in much more harm and suffering of active citizens than in necessary changes in social policy or warfare abroad.

We are nearing the final stages of a long effort to enclose the commons. If you take away public space as a place for free expression of public discontent and desires then (1) people have to pay to be heard (which excludes the rising tide of the poor) or (2) people must trespass (which makes them targets of state and private means of oppression and punishment) while (3) the corporate-state alliances use their overwhelming presence and power to dictate the terms of the public discourse, to say nothing of the details of day to day life.

I think it is silly to think that throwing more bodies at the problem, which is the essence of street protests, will work anymore. It hasn’t worked since the 1980s in any country with thriving multimedia channels for disseminating information, save for the temporary success of the WTO protest in Seattle (until they moved their parties to gated enclaves), which bought time for smaller governments to finally step up and say no to globalization schemes that continue to breach their sovereignty and increase their poverty.

Meanwhile, in the cyber age, all street protests do is waste a bunch of time and energy of well meaning people while giving the forces of fascism an opportunity to put together some reality TV clips to reinforce their message of violent opposition to public dissent. Why play into their hands?

The effective "public square" is now on the internet and the airwaves, both of which are being rapidly privatized. Those are really the most worthwhile places to wage rowdy resistance campaigns and disrupt unjust business as usual.

As in street protests patrolled by taser toting cops, the stakes are high, the risks are great. The difference is, the opportunities to make a difference and actually reclaim an effective voice and forum for the common citizen, as is necessary to any legitimate form of democracy, still exist within multimedia channels. On the other hand, people waving signs and banging pots and pans in the street are too easily reframed as irrelevant annoyances, if not completely upstaged by the dysfunctional dopeyness of any of Lindsay or Britney or whichever nonsensical character the MSM care to spotlight.

There is no point in exposing one’s self to tasers and tear gas (or much worse) any more. The conventional town square is just a place to get hurt, not to be heard far and wide. It’s on to studios and servers and switches and broadcast towers if there is to be any effective dissent and resistance to internationally institutionalized fascism. Not only are those the places where the places where ideas flow, the are the avenues through which money flows. What once made street protest potent was that they could shut down commerce while getting out a heartfelt, populist message of power. We must do that again--like never before--but we must do it in very different conditions that call for very different tactics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ight idea, wrong tactics Posted by: Lincoln fan
Wolf's Guide to Get Attention (NOT Restore "Democracy")
Posted by: stryder on Oct 26, 2007 8:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Naomi Wolf seems well-intentioned but is apparently quite naive.

Under vicious deception – democracy was all but lost in 1913 when a robber baron private bank was put in charge of the economy and therefore the nation. That would be a privately owned and rigged "Federal Reserve" bank (not federal and without a penny of reserves).

Whoever literally makes money (out of thin air in this case) makes the Fascist rules. Rules of extortion by corporate crime for illegal sham wars that dominate the west .

A real Guide to Restore the American Republic and its democracy:

1] Nix the unconstitutional “Federal Reserve” Corp and its fellow orgs. In other words, put the power of the purse where it belongs – with the people – not Fascist monopoly oligarchs that buy off media, military and Big Oil agendas, etc.

2] Enforce laws that make corporate propaganda deception on public issues across publicly owned airwaves by monopoly media to be a felony offence.

3] Dismantle and abolish “Operation Mockingbird” (and others of its kind) with the CIA that created it. Nix the NSA along with illegal surveillance and wiretapping.

4] Establish a credible ombudsman organization whose sole purpose is to dismantle Fascist rule over America (from Washington to corporate media to “education”) and to keep it so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

show your true colours
Posted by: roberto bazal on Oct 27, 2007 1:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am looking at this from Europe. Please march and protest, if your leaders have scared you out of voicing your opinions on the streets they have effectively won. Millions of people going out in public will embolden those politicians and media voices who can make the change. Moreover it will show the world that you are not a nation of criminals. Do what Amercia does best: be bold and generous and united, move, make change. If you can beat this regime America will -once again- have changed the world for the better.
Let your cynicism and scorn go, it does not become you nor does it help. It is not too late. March, protest, boycot, strike, impeach, legislate, investigate, expose, blog, unite, do it all. No change without pressure.
It is is so European to just sit and be smart and cynical. Be proud and positive, make things move. There is no nation in the world with a bigger heart than yours. Remember how you felt after 9/11, not the outrage or the confusion and the fear you felt, but the other thing: how proud you were of the rescue workers, how you wanted to help, how you truly cared for the families of the victims. Tap into that, unite. Wake up. Find yourselves again.
Please. The rest of the world needs your help. Badly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BALDERDASH !
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Oct 28, 2007 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All this hoopla is just a tempest in an Alternet coffeepot. None of it will happen because only a very small minority of U.S. citizens care about it. All the rest of the so-called "Americans" are hiding from the real World in their favorite sit-coms and gutter-pop music shows, contentedly ignorant and completely vulnerable. So, the field of operations is wide open for Blackwater and "Will-of-Christ" terrorism to run rampant over this once independent democratic republic, using all sorts of high-tech electronic equipment. Science fiction has become reality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

abitcrazy in phoenix
Posted by: abitcrazy on Oct 28, 2007 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the comment of someone who said that these people will not give up power because they don't have to and they don't care. I have said this for quite some time. We must STOP BUYING THINGS. I buy only used whenever I can. It has two fold benefit: one, it keeps the landfills from filling up and also the monies the thrift shops make support decent causes, and two, it keeps the profits out of the capitalists wallets. Frankly, it infuriates me to see a blouce prices at $69.00 when these creeps paid 22cents a day to some child in Guatemla.
Christimas is coming. Let's send a message that America is tired, and no longer fooled about our "prosperity". Let's restore a true meaning to Christmas, and make the gifts, or buy used items that are truly unique, and focus on building family relationships during this time. Let's speak loud and clear: no spending means the economists will go nuts about the "lack of confidence" of the public's spending...yeah!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» More than a bit crazy in Phoenix Posted by: Constitutionalist75
Oh Pa-LEEEZ
Posted by: aka_bozo on Oct 28, 2007 4:20 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You “socialist movement” people are always fantasizing that the peasants will rise up and overthrow their fascist oppressors – and, of course, then begging the socialist “intellectuals” to setup an organic, sustainable, holistic, socialist paradise (and non patriarchal, of COURSE). This rarely happens. If there’s any revolting to be done, it’s usually fascist peasant, armed to the teeth, going around killing the people that their leaders encouraged them to hate. Note it’s only “encouraged”, as hate is natural in the fascist oriented humans (say about 30% of the population) and will be there regardless of what the leaders tell them.

In case you guys are totally delusional, (probably) half of the largest ethic group in this country – the white people - has been pissed out of their minds for the last 40+ years about “those people”. And, they’ve been voting fascist for the last 40+ years hoping the Republicans would help them “get even” with “those people”. And, of course, the socialist have been doing EVERYTHING they could think to help this situation along.

So, be careful what you wish for, because you might get lots of revolting peasants running around, but they’ll be rounding up you socialists (liberals, progressives, leftist, whatever you are calling yourselves). They WON’T be going after the “capitalist oppressors” as most American peasants WORSHIP their “capitalist leaders”.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh Pa-LEEEZ Posted by: donl51
» RE: Oh Pa-LEEEZ Posted by: donl51
» RE: Oh Pa-LEEEZ Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian