Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

Los Angeles Police Are Gentrifying the City's Skid Row -- with Force

By Jessica Hoffmann, ColorLines. Posted October 20, 2007.


As the affluent take the city, poor Black residents are being pushed out with force.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For decades, a 50-block area in downtown Los Angeles known as Skid Row has been a hub for shelters and social services for homeless and extremely poor people, the majority of them Black. Now, amid rapid-fire gentrification of the downtown area, city leaders have implemented a police crackdown on Skid Row that has resulted in the harassment, arrest and displacement of thousands of poor people of color.

The LAPD's "Safer Cities Initiative," launched on Skid Row last summer, is based on the "broken windows" theory of law enforcement, which holds that small signs of "disorder" (graffiti, broken windows, people hanging out on the sidewalk) invite more serious crimes to a neighborhood and should be eliminated. Critics of the theory note its historical use to justify law-enforcement crackdowns on members of marginalized communities--especially poor people of color--who are disproportionately targeted for petty crimes. "'Broken windows' gets couched in this almost-neutral language about 'signs of disorder'," says Kristian Williams, author of a history of modern U.S. policing called Our Enemies in Blue, "but the things that get counted as 'signs of disorder' tend to be signs of poverty. What the theory is doing is reading poverty as disorder and using those 'signs of disorder' as an excuse to bring additional police attention and additional sanctioning to areas where poor people live." 
 
Since the summer of 2006, there have been more than 6,000 arrests in Skid Row, an area with a population of 10,000 to 15,000 people (about 4,000 of whom are homeless) on any given night. More than 100 new officers have been assigned to the neighborhood in the past year, so that now police officers on foot, in patrol cars, on bicycles and mounted on horses are a near-constant presence. Deborah Burton, who lives in subsidized housing in the neighborhood, said she has been stopped while simply walking down the street by police who ask, "Are you on parole or probation?"  In April, a federal district judge ruled that the LAPD has engaged in a policy of unconstitutional searches of Skid Row residents.

"We're not just talking about folks that are homeless," says Pete White, codirector of the Skid Row-based Los Angeles Community Action Network. "We're talking about any Black resident or any Black visitor in downtown Los Angeles. If they're not looking a certain way that day, they could be stopped, handcuffed and harassed."
In the face of this, many people have relocated to other neighborhoods, farther away from social services. James Hundley, who coordinates a needle-exchange program at the Skid Row site of Homeless Health Care Los Angeles, says that he has seen a decrease of about 30 percent in the number of people accessing their services since Safer Cities started. In the last year, he has also seen his site's client population go from majority Black to majority white. "The people that were accessing the services," he says, "are afraid to come in. If they come into the area, they're gonna be harassed. If they're not in the area, how can they access the services?"

Longtime residents and community organizers see what is happening on Skid Row as an extreme example of what is happening in cities across the United States: as predominantly white middle- and upper-middle-class people find urban centers increasingly desirable places to live, gentrification displaces lower-income communities of color. Policing strategies such as "broken windows" are often used to facilitate gentrification, resulting not only in displacement but increased incarceration of poor people of color. "Nationally," says White, "we need to look at these hot spots, where hard-fought civil rights are being undermined by development, and liberal politicos are turning a blind eye."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: los angeles, lapd, gentrification, skid row

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Of course
Posted by: davy on Oct 20, 2007 4:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America no longer looks after it's own, Katrina proved that so what did you expect? Kindness or greed, make your choice America, as only one of the above will work. The other, if continued, will lead to hell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» www.votenic.com Posted by: votenic
why is it...
Posted by: dannrusso on Oct 20, 2007 4:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that every time I hear about the LAPD it seems to be a paramilitary force of unheard of power and aggression instead of the "To Serve and Protect" force it claims to be?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: why is it... Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: why is it... Posted by: DaBear
» RE: why is it... Posted by: josephq
Because they have no money
Posted by: arshi on Oct 20, 2007 5:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Poor people and flourinshing poverty are evidence that the Free Market Society is benefitting the wealthy and elitists classes. Poverty is evidence that the rug War is a losing scam, that the Reagan Revolution is nothing more than a ponzi scheme.
The biggest and baddest gang in America is the wealthy and the elite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» www.votenic.com Posted by: votenic
Anti-Panhandling ordinances, 'no sleeping' laws, no 'open container' laws,
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 20, 2007 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
etc are just new attempts at the 'vagrancy' laws that were found unConstitutional. It is a way for the rich to presecute the poor and homeless. Interestingly, often 'progressives' support these laws (in the idea that no giving homeless people money will make them go to shelters and no allowing them to enjoy a beverage on the street will break their alcohol addiction). Of course, it also helps 'move them along' so those expensive lofts and condos can be built!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» www.votenic.com Posted by: votenic
The American way
Posted by: willymack on Oct 20, 2007 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is to make believe that there are no poor people in our Workers' Paradise by making them "disappear" from view, the better to pacify the genteel among us. War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The American way Posted by: Phenix
Do you like Paris?
Posted by: Phenix on Oct 20, 2007 10:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am often at odds with fellow 'progressives' because I support initiatives to remove poor residents from urban centers. I am called many things for this but I am simply a realist that wants to see the urban centers reawaken. Yes I mean that I want the city to once again be home of the middle class whether its asian, black, latino, or white.

Numerous 'progressives' marvel at European cities and wonder why America can not have a similar situation. The most obvious but overlooked example is that European societies took it upon themselves to move the poor out of the cities and into the suburbs. The renewal of Paris in the 16th century is the most obvious example of forced removal. The king of the time essentially demolished and then rebuilt the city. I would love to have that kind of power. Philadelphia could use a face lift.

We bemoan the fact that urban centers are deteriorating but we offer no solutions other than government assistance to those people who have watched as their neighborhoods have collapsed. In a town that is not even 10 minutes from my house the latino population has exploded and their is now the beginnings of urban renewal. The reason for this is that they work and those that do not work actually clean their streets. It is an amazing reversal of fortune for the town.

Before their arrival the county government began to start renewal projects. They were primarily cosmetic in nature with the hopes of more substantial changes in the future. The county had to put up signs saying that clean streets, trees, and flowers are in fact the first steps to renewal. In response some people decided to trash the new trash cans. The same has happened in their schools. The school brings in new books and the books are destroyed by the end of the year.

People want mass transit and they want the middle class to become involved in political movements. This can not happen if the middle class remains socially and geographically isolated from one another. Very few people know their co-workers and very few know their neighbors. In a city environment you are forced to know your neighbors. There really is no way around of getting out in the neighborhood. And while in the neighborhood or on the streets the middle class can be exposed to new ideas or even see an actual protest unfold. These things are important for political growth.

Many people want this Utopian dream where there is no winner or loser. The poor in many cases occupy valuable land that they can not utilize. I am all for them remaining if someone can show me a successful grass roots urban renewal. I'm not talking about a single street but an entire community consisting of 100,000 plus people.

What exactly is skid row doing for Los Angelos?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A boutique? Posted by: Phenix
» RE: A boutique in Posted by: ekipnrut
» RE: Do you like Paris? Posted by: cbrislain
» RE: No I do not like Paris. Posted by: Phenix
» RE: what does skid row do for Los Angeles Posted by: Camilla Cracchiolo
» RE: I've read it Posted by: Phenix
» RE: I'm impressed Posted by: Phenix
» Remove = Relocate Posted by: Phenix
» RE: emove = Relocate Posted by: Turkiye
» Wrong frame and wrong comparisons Posted by: psychochurch
Poverty-as-crime and the LAPD stormtroopers
Posted by: DaBear on Oct 20, 2007 5:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the theory is doing is reading poverty as disorder and using those 'signs of disorder' as an excuse to bring additional police attention and additional sanctioning to areas where poor people live."

I was struck by this quote as it reminds me of a local (title I) school whose faculty was reading a very popular book amongst wealthy whites (libs and thugs alike) that purports to show how poverty is essentially criminality. If a school of white teachers and administrators is reading this as a way to "understand" their non-white students and in turn criminalizing them, it's not wonder the LAPD, a gang not noted for their effective policing or adherence to civil rights, is following suit.

As to the downtown LA area, the LAPD and the "element" down there, it's very frustrating all around. Skid-Row doesn't offer much in the way of "social services" and frankly that's the biggest crime of all. Poor people need real substantive help and what's offered down there is a total shanda. Being light on the melanin, I get hit up by homeless guys all the time for money (I rarely have anything anyway). Most of the folks are pretty nice, some are half-crazy and really aggressive--shite, I'd be too if I was in their shoes. Seems to me, you just deal with it. What I strenously object to, besides the entire gentrification project going on in Little Tokyo which resulted in our dojo being moved to Chinatown (imagine a Japanese dojo in Chinatown... what a kick), is the LAPD harassment against people with more melanin than me. In the past six months I've had three incidents where friends of mine who were darker skinned were stopped as we walked together for coffee. When I as the white guy tried to intervene, I got shoved up against the wall and told to "shut my f*ckin' mouth." When I pulled out a cellphone camera to document one incident, it was slapped into the street. The LAPD officers were mostly white, but it was really shocking to receive that treatment by non-white LAPD officers. The abuse I took was nothing compared to the demoralizing and dehumanizing treatment my friends took. It's obscene. Look, these guys (LAPD) are completely out of control down there. Paramilitary doesn't even begin to describe the thuggery and level of violence these guys are eager, I mean lustfully eager, to commit against non-whites. I felt like I'm in apartheid South Africa every week when I'm down there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We allow our...
Posted by: StPeteRican on Oct 20, 2007 5:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
elected officials to spend tax dollars for police enforcement, when the money should be spent on educational and vocational enforcement. The day we put more teachers in schools than police on the streets things will begin to look up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Welcome to Amerika
Posted by: donl51 on Oct 20, 2007 10:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Home of the New World Order and the New POLICE STATE to keep us undergogs in check!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And why aren't the CA Democrats cracking down on the police?
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 20, 2007 11:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought CA especially for L.A. is Democrat and thus supposed to be in favor of helping the poor get out of their poor status. I guess the Washington Democrats have FUCKED them. The CA Democrats remind me of a great deal of the VA Democrats in their pro-DLC "centrist" sellout to the wealthy elite hacks fooling poor voters especially the blacks. Hell, the CA Democrats are probably just as bad as the Florida Democrats who in 1998 ANGERED the black community when Willie Logan was removed thereby giving Jeb Bush a guaranteed victory. If the party continues to be this dysfunctional, I wouldn't be surprised to see the GOP getting it all back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Getrification will be stop sooner than...
Posted by: compu on Oct 21, 2007 12:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ice caps expected melting in 50 yrs this past week report
put it already done in the last 2.
Soon Miami,under the same we are talking about,and many,many cities will be under water.
Perhaps the "owners"of this world will going to the Andes
and others montain ranges to kill their inhabitants,so they
and their children can live happy after.LOL.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The basic problem of overpopulation is ignored
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Oct 21, 2007 8:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
so of course it gets ugly. Yet, L.A.'s solution is a less violent version of Robert Mugabe's in Zimbabwe who simply bull-dozed the shanty towns that had surrounded the city.

Poor people exist because there are never enough social services and job opportunities to keep up with the number of children born, who then grow up to birth more children than they can support and thus need more social services which costs more and more money each coming fiscal year, until the middle and upper classes get so sick of it they just want them to disappear = gentrification.

There is a saying that "you need a licence to drive a car, but anyone can have a child", so if the poor have no other power, they can birth plenty of children no problem. But the city cares more about motor vehicles than poor people and their children, so the vicious cycle goes on and on.

But suppose every young potential parent is required by strictly enforced laws to attend family planning classes and apply for a licence BEFORE they're ALLOWED to birth a child? To protect the children themselves, deny poor people the right to get pregnant until they are earning the income necessary to support them, and require them to attend a family planning clinic for counseling.

If cities and nations value their children above their automobiles, they will take control over the circumstances of their birth - and in 20 years or so, there will be no more poor people, no growing population, no expanding economy and and no ecocidal disasters = a planet and its people returned to their natural balance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

www.votenic.com
Posted by: votenic on Oct 21, 2007 9:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WEEKLY POLL

http://www.votenic.com

Results Posted Tuesday Evening.
FREE, NON-BIASED

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: www.votenic.com Posted by: Constitutionalist75
Not much has changed since the LA Olympics
Posted by: grassyknolluk on Oct 22, 2007 6:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey if it wasn't for the LAPD, Blackwater would have got another big contract. Civic corruption at it's most blatant. I remember the LAPD of the mid 1980's... they were donning styled haircuts, had custom tailored uniforms, and acted above the law way back then. Come to think of it, they looked a lot like Erik Prince.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blame elected officials and voters not the police
Posted by: cinattra on Oct 23, 2007 4:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is just as stupid to blame a police department as it is to blame the military. Both are nothing but soldiers given marching orders. The people who make the decisions are the elected officials and the voters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]