Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

The Right Plays to its Nativist Base

By David Neiwert, TomPaine.com. Posted October 2, 2007.


What passes for "conservatism" these days is a theater of scapegoating that fuels not just the anti-immigrant right but also the anti-gay, anti-black, anti-Muslim, anti-liberal rhetoric.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

So Republican candidates were busy finding better things to do this week than appear at a forum where they could debate minority issues. Rudy's excuse was the best: he had to go off and hobnob with Bo Derek.

Digby's right, as usual: It's not just that the no-show reveals the undercurrent of racism that runs through the conservative movement like an ancient underground sewer -- the snub also played an important role in sending a signal to the conservative base.

We've known for some time that the GOP's fake inclusiveness -- hosting black children onstage at campaign events, trotting out big-name minorities in key public positions -- isn't actual minority outreach. It's part of its strategic appeal to fence-sitting white voters as somehow racially sensitive, while continuing to empower and indulge in wink-and-nudge racial politics that sends coded messages to the more naked racists in their base. It also gives them cover even as they pursue policies that reduce civil-rights enforcement on a broad scale.

A big part of playing that game is to keep the signals going to the base. Sometimes it's plain old race- and gay-baiting, couched in ways that let them erect flimsy facades of deniability. At others, it's making subtle snubs like this week's to make sure no one's deluded into thinking that defending white privilege isn't the first and most important job on the right's agenda.

So in the meantime you get a broad range of right-wingers, from Rush Limbaugh to Glenn Beck to Bill O'Reilly,, and all points in between, finding themselves increasingly comfortable coming out and saying things that no one in their right mind would have found acceptable or reasonable as recent as a decade ago. And the troops are taking note; they're even openly frothing along with their icons at the very thought of an African American running for the presidency.

The big opening for this shift in the dialogue towards near-open acceptance of old-fashioned bigotry is the immigration debate:

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of all this is the big picture: the anti-immigrant push really represents a significant incursion of right-wing extremism into mainstream conservatism. Each is busy empowering the other, with the end result being an American right pushed even farther to the right.

The nativist right has effectively captured a significant segment of the Republican right, and it's playing out nationally in the immigration debate, most often on the local level. There was, for instance, the immigration forum held in Colorado a couple of weeks ago that was nothing more than an exercise in Latino-bashing:

Tuesday's immigration forum arranged by Weld County District Attorney Ken Buck was orchestrated to play on the worst fears of residents anxious about changes to their community.

… On the one hand, Buck has repeatedly acknowledged publicly that only a small fraction of illegal immigrants commit crimes -- beyond their unauthorized entry into this country. On the other, he attempted to whip up a crowd of 600 that gathered at an auditorium Tuesday night by flashing a slide show of photos of Hispanic men and the crimes they've committed. It was accompanied by an "ominous soundtrack," according to a Rocky Mountain News story.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: immigration, right-wingers, nativism

David Neiwert is the author of In God's Country: The Patriot Movement and the Pacific Northwest and Death on the Fourth of July: The Story of a Killing, A Trial, and Hate Crime in America. He is proprietor of the Orcinus blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Overreach
Posted by: Campbell on Oct 2, 2007 4:17 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with David Neiwert's logic is that throughout history both liberal, moderate and conservatives have practiced nativism. I think he is attempting this exaggeration to tie in illegal immigration, or the anti-immigrant deception as racism is used to blur the line between legal and illegal behavior. This along with other hate messages is common with the open border crowds that preach socialism and other anti-American practices.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Overreach Posted by: Democritus
» RE: Overreach Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Overreach Posted by: ninethreeone
» RE: Overreach Posted by: MindyB
» RE: Overreach Posted by: MindyB
» RE: Overreach Posted by: ninethreeone
Is the melting pot melting?
Posted by: rocketman on Oct 2, 2007 7:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I fail to understand why the left views illegal immigration as a right of every person who cares to cross our borders.

They may not be prone to breaking our laws, except that they are here illegally and in many respects taking jobs away from those that American’s could be doing!

In any case the article is going a bit over the top with citing isolated incidents in various parts of the country are related to "hate the latino".

Lets recognize the problem for whats happening.. Administrations have ignored this problem for years..and all of a sudden someone woke up and realized we have millions of illegals in this country..and honestly there isn’t much we can do about it - and in some parts of the country not much we want to do about it as some industries depend on it!

Neighborhoods have been transformed with legal residents paying the price.. I’m sure Pelosi doesn’t have illegals living in her neighborhood! Another mess our government has gotten us into!

We should also remember that the melting pot was created by immigrants coming into this country "LEGALLY". So it isnt melting at all, just overflowing with illegals!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Is the melting pot melting? Posted by: Democritus
» RE: Is the melting pot melting? Posted by: Joshua Holland
Yawn
Posted by: MobileSucks on Oct 3, 2007 2:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"What passes for "conservatism" these days is a theater of scapegoating that fuels not just the anti-immigrant right but also the anti-gay, anti-black, anti-Muslim, anti-liberal rhetoric."

Really?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Neiwert won't say
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Oct 4, 2007 10:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he favors illegal immigration, but his total condemnation of anyone who opposes it, makes it clear that he does. So, what is his vision of our nation's future after the borders have become meaningless - a North American Union of big corporations to dominate our lives from a to z, night and day? That is exactly what is happening under the Cheney/Bush conspiracy, but apparently Mr. Neiwert is not in the least concerned about that. Instead of seeing the corporate class deliberately inviting alien Latinos to invade and drive down the wages of legal citizens, who are of all races, he points to the inevitable friction and calls that racism, which certainly helps to insure all the low-wage labor any corporate law-breaker could ever want, and I'm sure they're grateful to Mr. Neiwert and his pseudo "Left" associates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]