Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

Blinded By The White: OJ Simpson vs. The Jena Six

By Sally Kohn, AlterNet. Posted September 20, 2007.


Why is it that mainstream white media and white folks in general are so obsessed (once again) with OJ's guilt but paying little or no attention to the innocence of the Jena Six?
Advertisement

Why is it that mainstream white media and white folks in general are so obsessed (once again) with OJ's guilt but paying little or no attention to the innocence of the Jena Six?

Of course, we all know about OJ's recent arrest. It's been all over the news. But if you don't know about the Jena Six, you're not alone. On USAToday.com, for instance, there are four times as many recent news stories about OJ as there are about the Jena Six.

As I'm writing this, the town of Jena, Louisiana --- population 3,000 --- is having a civil rights rally today with an expected 50,000 demonstrators from across the country. But OJ Simpson is on the front page of USA Today site.

In the small town of Jena last fall, two black high school students sat in a schoolyard under a tree. The tree was known as the "white tree" because only white kids are allowed to sit under it. The day after the two black students defied this unspoken rule, nooses were hung from the tree. The school principle dismissed it as a "prank". Black students protested by sitting under the tree, in growing numbers. The District Attorney came to the school and threatened them, saying, "I can take away your lives with the stroke of a pen."

There was a series of violent incidents were white students attacked black students. The government and school administrators ignored those. But when a white student was beaten up by six black students in a schoolyard fight --- after provoking the black students with racist taunts --- the District Attorney charged the black students with attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder. They were charged in adult court. Meanwhile, the white student they beat up suffered only minor cuts and bruises. One of the black students, Mychal Bell --- age 16 --- has been in prison since December. Last month, an all-white jury decided that Bell was guilty --- not guilty of beating up a student who racially taunted him, but guilty of attempted murder.

It reminds me of the African American five-year-old in Florida earlier this year who was acting up in kindergarten so the teacher called the police and the little girl was handcuffed and arrested and taken to jail. Or countless other examples. How is it that white folks are so predisposed to presume that black folks are sinister and guilty and yet equally as quick to deny the pervasiveness of racism in every crevice of our society and rail against affirmative action and other remedies to structural injustice?

At the time of OJ Simpson's trial for allegedly murdering his ex-wife and her friend, polls showed that most white people thought Simpson was guilty while black people thought he was innocent. Another poll conducted 10 years after the Simpson verdict found the same thing.

What gives? Why in case after case do blacks and whites see things so, well, black and white? Racial profiling is a documented phenomenon; studies show that African Americans are far more likely to be arrested and convicted of crimes than whites who commit the same offenses. People of color recognize that the system is biased. Why can't whites? And why can't whites recognize their own role in perpetuating that bias --- not only directly but also indirectly by denying that that such racism even exists?


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: racism, justice, jena six

Sally Kohn is the director of the Movement Vision Project of the Center for Community Change, which is interviewing hundreds of activists across the country to determine the progressive vision for the future of the United States.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Unfortunately
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Sep 20, 2007 12:08 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
racism is a human instinct, so only extensive education will succeed in overcoming its influence. But eductaional standards are declining not advancing, so racial tensions are worsening not easing. I try my best to explain history to the people around me, and they listen or read politely, but it's obvious they don't really think about it. They just want to react emotionally and condemn each other to see where the dispute will lead them as if they really enjoy the whole thing tremendously. I'm sorry to say that also appears to be human nature. We need another eloquent leader like Dr. King, but we seem only get one per century.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Unfortunately Posted by: quitecontrary
» RE: Unfortunately Posted by: ddsharper
» RE: Unfortunately Posted by: Constitutionalist75
» RE: Unfortunately Posted by: quitecontrary
» RE: Unfortunately Posted by: wfiguy
» RE: Unfortunately Posted by: alycerocco
» RE: Unfortunately Posted by: Constitutionalist75
Yes, but...
Posted by: radioleft on Sep 20, 2007 12:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The story of racial strife in Jena, Louisiana is a sad commentary on 21st century America. Essentially, it is a story of the whites in Jena, Louisiana using the levers of government to put blacks “in their place” until the blacks decided to fight back, giving the whites in Jena further opportunity to use the government to go after the blacks.

I disagree with nothing Sally Kohn wrote in her commentary, but I am no longer willing to have my rights trampled by those who expect my support.

I’ve spent a great part of my life working for racial justice. Until 2004, I would have gone to Jena to participate in the rally in support of the Jena 6. But, no more.

As a delegate to the Senate District 23 (Texas) Democratic Convention in 2004, I served on the resolutions committee. Our district is racially diverse. The resolutions committee was comprised of 50% + 1 blacks, and the rest was white and Hispanic. We considered and passed resolutions unanimously for renewal of the Voting Rights Act, universally excellent public schools, living wage, and many others of interest and favored by black Democrats. When the resolution on same-sex marriage was introduced, the blacks on the committee block-voted against it and quoted The Bible as justification, while everyone else voted for it.

At the 2007 Dallas County Democratic Party Labor Day Picnic, I discussed this with Senator Royce West (the state senator for district 23). He is black. His response was, “That is just one issue and we probably agree on most everything else.”

But, it isn’t just one more issue anymore than it would be “just one issue” if it were about racial intermarriage, school integration, or voting rights.

Let me be clear: I don’t demand that our elected officials vote for same-sex marriage in federal or state legislative bodies if it would be politcal suicide. I don’t even expect the majority of Americans to support same-sex marriage, but I do expect that Democratic Party activists – who are well-informed and steeped in the principles of the Democratic Party – would support a basic human right such as same-sex marriage.

As a result, I will no longer decry discrimination against blacks. I will no longer work to advance equal rights for blacks. I will no longer work for the election of blacks who do not support same-sex marrige, and if this situation doesn’t change soon, I will actively work to oppose the civil rights of blacks when I have the opportunity to do so – for leverage.

I’ve always worked for the civil rights of all people without expectation of a quid pro quo, but that time has passed. My attitude is now, “I’ll scratch your back when you scrach mine.”

Geoff Staples
Democratic Precinct Chair
Pct. 1234
Dallas, Texas

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yes, but... Posted by: anonymous black writer
» RE: Yes, but... Posted by: alycerocco
» RE: Yes, but... Posted by: anonymous black writer
» RE: Yes, but... Posted by: alycerocco
The media, like most of America, is mentally ill
Posted by: ddsharper on Sep 20, 2007 1:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's going on in the media is support of the status quo. America is based on a social construct that has created mental illness in collective White America. No matter how unfair, no matter how heinous the crime, no matter what stats show about white criminals and pedophiles and murderers and serial killers and drunk drivers and corporate thieves and ponsy schemers, etc, many whites cannot see outside of a social construct of white narcissism, entitlement, racism and privilege. Blacks have been subject to this twisted nature of America for 400 years. All men are created equal, etc. Those twisted filters screen out truth. The Jena white boy got his ass beaten for hanging a noose, for calling blacks niggers, for joining in the beating of Mychal at a party, for being friends with the white boy who pulled out the shot gun on 3 of the black youths and for lying to the authorities and himself. No whites had consequences for their actions. After all, in America, they are entitled. After all, they are white. No hyphens, no explanations no limitations. The Jim Crow principles, the foundational principles are, as stated by the color-of-law DA, 'if you dispute a white man, lay a hand on a white man, continue protesting the hanging of the nooses, protesting the so-called white tree, if you negroes don't conform, I will take away your lives with a stroke of a pen. If that is not narcissism, what is? If that is not abuse of power, what is? If that DA’s attitude doesn’t exude from an assurance that this judiciary, this government, this white population, this country supports such antics, it exudes delusion.

He has stated, in every statement, every action, and every stroke of his pen, I am above the law, I am the law, the truth and the light; I am a white man with power.

That is mental illness: the over-riding of justice and reason by emotion and evil. No rule of law, just law of rule.

That is injustice and it IS supported in the social construct called America. It is a black and white issue supported by white churches, the government on all levels, the judiciary, congress, the police departments, the media, suburbia and white supremacists, admitted or not. It is America and the world looks on and hates the hypocrisy, the mental illness, the blindness and the narcissism, as do I. Heck, whites painted Jesus in the likeness of a white man, Da Vinci's nephew. They made the savior of the world a white man. They tell me that God, apparently white, loves blacks too. Jesus Christ. What is that other than mental illness? And most of the world has bought the lie so I guess it's across the board. Why then would not OJ, a symbol of white wrath, take precedence over a symbol of white evil, the Jena incident? Black Americans have no country, never have.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hello!
Posted by: alycerocco on Sep 20, 2007 5:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I consider myself to be of the human race, but will admit to being "white" for the sake of this comment. (1st generation American on Italian side of family; 2nd generation American on German side).

One of the first online articles I wrote for pay was about the Kidergarten "felon". Back around August 5th when I first read about the Jena 6 I have been busy spreading the word about the incident. I considered attending the rally for fear of low representation but opted to send money to the defense fund instead and am so happy it was well attended.

I read exactly one MSN article about OJ and was disgusted to see all those AC headlines showcased and nary a one of the new artilces written about Jena. I did force myself to read two articles, on OJ written by my black Content Producer friend to help her with pageview bonus, although I had zero interest in the case.

I was accused of making being able to make my next several articles about Jena (in a loving way) because, yes I could mention Jena in a Billy Crystal book review, thanks to Billie Holliday and "Strange Fruit" mentioned in the book.

I not only signed the 3 petitions, sent the pre-written letters electronically, I contacted Governer Blanco, most of the LA Senators and State District attorney. In addition I contacted many of the Presidential candidates, Oprah and some authors I thought would be interested in the case.

I started billing this rally as a 1960s style Civil Rights prostest in comments on You Tube videos that I thought the typical viewer would want to know about it. My local paper did not publish my letter and today is the first day they even reported on it.

I do however, agree, most white people only see "6 black thugs jump and brutally beat white boy". As for OJ, his timing could not have been worse because every forum I go on to set the ignorant straight (not that they listen) someone has to throw in OJ, Tawanda Brawley, Vick and the Duke lacrosse team.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hello! Posted by: Constitutionalist75
Just another decoy...
Posted by: chomsky on Sep 21, 2007 12:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OJ is just another decoy, like Britney and Co.
They want to keep the public away from the polical scandals, the failed illegal war in Iraq, the daily abuse of force by cops, etc...
Just a political tool to distract the public from the real issues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]