Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

America's Campaign to Smear Israel's Critics

By Salim Muwakkil, In These Times. Posted September 11, 2007.


In the U.S., scholars who contest the conventional wisdom about Israel all too often lose their reputations -- and their jobs.
Advertisement

DePaul University canceled courses taught by Norman Finkelstein, the controversial political science professor known for his forthright criticism of Israel, just a week before classes resumed in June. Finkelstein, who taught at DePaul for six years, was denied tenure at the Chicago school but permitted to teach for the one year remaining on his contract.

In late August, however, the university decided to axe him and pulled his required books from the schools' bookstore. This was a break from the academic tradition that grants a faculty member who is denied tenure one last year (the "terminal year") in the classroom. Finkelstein initially vowed to protest his suspension, but later reached an agreement (including a monetary settlement) with DePaul to end his fight. However, even as he announced the agreement, Finkelstein charged his tenure denial was due "to external pressure resulting in a national hysteria."

Finkelstein's rough treatment followed a vigorous national campaign initiated by right-wing supporters of Israel to taint his name. They attacked Finkelstein for his scholarship, which has consistently excoriated the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories and the deceitful arguments of the Jewish state's uncritical supporters. And Finkelstein is just one of many public figures currently under attack for contesting the conventional wisdom about Israel.

Harvard law professor and avid Zionist Alan Dershowitz mounted a relentless public campaign to have Finkelstein dismissed. Surely it is no coincidence that Finkelstein's recent book, Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History, is a sustained, well-researched attack on Dershowitz and his ilk for their lurid distortions of history on behalf of Israel.

DePaul's political science department and a college-wide faculty committee overwhelmingly backed Finkelstein's tenure bid. Yet that was not enough to shield him from the national campaign to punish him for his acerbic criticism of Israel. An influential dean persuaded the tenure panel to reject him for the style and tone of his scholarship rather than its content.

Finkelstein's boosters argue that right-wing supporters of Israel are persecuting him for his strident opposition to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories and for his criticism that they are unscrupulously exploiting the horror of the Holocaust to justify Israeli excesses. Finkelstein's previous book, The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering, makes the case that many Holocaust scholars use the tragedy to justify Israel's existence and continue to utilize it to extort guilt money from various sources.

Finkelstein also provokes ire from Jewish groups because he is the son of two Holocaust survivors, which gives his critiques more credence. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has repeatedly accused Finkelstein of being a Holocaust denier, a baseless charge.

The former DePaul professor's supporters claim his tenure denial is completely unjustified and that his suspension violates academic ethics. The Chicago Tribune reported that the American Association of University Professors would soon launch a protest of Finkelstein's treatment as a violation of normal academic procedure.

Finkelstein thus joins former president Jimmy Carter, NYU historian Tony Judt, Harvard University professor Stephen Walt and University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer (the latter two are co-authors of a new book, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy) whose forthright criticism of Israel have earned them accusations of anti-Semitism.

Jimmy Carter is facing a firestorm of criticism from right-wing American Jewish organizations for his book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, which mildly condemned the Jewish state's occupation policies in the Palestinian territories.

Judt, a descendant of Holocaust victims who argues that power in Israel has tragically shifted to religious fundamentalists and territorial zealots, is another victim of this pressure. The history professor, who also speaks out against American Jewish groups' attempts to stifle honest discussion on Israel's policies, has been forced to cancel many speaking engagements because of pressure from Jewish organizations.

Similar reactions have greeted Professors Walt and Mearsheimer, who have co-authored a book arguing that the American-Israel lobby has pushed policies that are not in the United States' best interests and encourage Israel to engage in self-destructive behavior. The two respected scholars have been denounced as anti-Semites by ADL Director Abraham Foxman, among others.

These scholars are victims of a national campaign to punish scholarship that challenges media-made myths about Israel. This grave threat to academic freedom should concern American progressives, who often remain eerily silent.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: academic freedom, palestine, israel

Salim Muwakkil is a senior editor of In These Times and an op-ed columnist for the Chicago Tribune. He is currently a Crime and Communities Media Fellow of the Open Society Institute, examining the impact of ex-inmates and gang leaders in leadership positions in the black community.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Smearing Israel critics...
Posted by: tooldoc60 on Sep 12, 2007 1:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
comes directly from the Right Wings' pandering to the Religious Right, who believe that Israel (Jews) are Gods chosen people. Maybe they need to re-interpret their scriptures...seem that the New Testament says something about the only way to Heaven being through Jesus Christ. Just another example of Right Wing Christian hypocrisy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Smearing Israel critics... Posted by: Ian MacLeod
Mr. Muwakkil
Posted by: Bart Thesc on Sep 12, 2007 1:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am glad to see Alternet pick up one of Mr Muwakkil's articles. I have been reading him for years and have always appreciated his writing whether I agreed with him or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Christian Zionists...
Posted by: phatkhat on Sep 12, 2007 1:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
believe, of course, that in order for the Rapture and Second Coming to occur, the Temple of Solomon must be rebuilt on the site of the Dome of the Rock mosque.

John Hagee and his followers will stop at nothing to see this accomplished, but the joke is on the Jews who suck up to him. He believes/hopes they will all be banished to hell once Jesus returns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Intolerance breeds martyrs
Posted by: carl baydala on Sep 12, 2007 8:25 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The neocons do it and so do the Christian Fundamentalists. And, now the Zionists are doing it as well. What are they doing you say? They are practicing intolerance; it is something these types of people do when they don't want their system and their power threatened. Yes, I believe it boils down to power.

America is a borderline or perhaps not so borderline state ruled by a few for the benefit of a few. I would offer the events of the past six years under the Bush Regime as evidence for my claim. I am talking about illegal wars and a whole host of government decress limiting the freedom of Americans. But, what they have done, and the people who support them have done is to practice intolerance and to remove their enemies who would dare speak out against them. The examples are numerous indeed. The neocons will call you an extremist or even a terrorist if you are against the Iraq War. Because it is their war of choice and you are either with them or against them in this endeavor. And, so it is with the Fundamentalists as well. They would think nothing of calling you pagan or an atheist, a secular humanist and the like, meaning that there is something inherently wrong with you if you deny the existence of the Christian God. Just more intolerance for the free thinking, critical person to contend with.

And, now this from the Zionists who would do anything to advance the cause of the Israeli State, even at the expense of ordinary Americans. And, yes there are those who believe that the relationship between Israel and the U.S. is not a beneficial thing for Americans. Dare to criticize the status quo and look what happens to you. And, yes the Zionists have succeeded in packaging together the aims of Israel with those of the United States foreign policy. If they hadn't succeeded this article and others would not have seen the light of day. Professor Derschowitz practices intolerance in the extreme, I believe, in his crtiicism against Professor Finklestein. His pitbull tactics have only turned Finklestein the critic into a martyr. That is the effect in my opinion of Derschowitz's intolerance.

Criticize any three of these groups if you dare. But, a word of caution: if you are not backed up by power to protect you then you must protest and speak out at your own risk. The intolerant ones are waiting in the wings for you to step out of line and would think nothing of creating a new martyr.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Intolerance breeds martyrs Posted by: joelsk44039
» RE: Intolerance breeds martyrs Posted by: taxidave
» RE: quick response mechanism Posted by: maestra
I'm Pro-Finkelstein and Pro-academic Freedom but...
Posted by: yellow on Sep 13, 2007 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is my personal view that since a number of highly respected and well established scholars, highly critical of Israel, already exist all throughout American academia, one must look elsewhere for the opprobrium heaped upon Dr. Finkelstein. Why does Finkelstein face the kind of hostility that Juan Cole, Rashid Khalidi, Joel Beinen, Stephen Shalom, Stepheen Zunes, Zachery Lockman, and Richard Falk don't deal with to nearly the same extent.

I don't think it is Finkelstein's hostility to Israel. After all, like most everyone, he supports a two state solution!! Furthermore, Israeli revisionists blew gapping holes in the traditional Zionist narrative in the late 1980s. Such well known writers as Avi Shlaim, Benny Morris, and Ilan Pappe irreversibly changed the course of Israeli historic scholarship forever and thankfully!! Rather, it is a little book Finkelstein wrote called The Holocaust Industry which earned him such hostility. In the first place the title is obnoxious and offensive to Jews and anyone with a shred of civility. I personally found it embarassing to be seen carrying a book with such a title. Every Neo-Nazi Website and publication lauds Finkelstein as a hero for finally "exposing" the Great Jewish Fraud and for vindicating their hate. Although scholars cannot be held responsible for those who would twist and abuse their work, Finkelstein dealt with the topic in a strident, nasty and irresponsible manner. There are ways to deal with the highly complex issue of Holocaust survivors, the Nazis, and the Swiss Banks. Finkelstein simply wrote a one sided narrative which gave credence to the rantings of Nazis, anti-semites and conspiricy mongers. I believe that it is this, coupled with his caustic personality, that has earned him such incredible opprobrium, and NOT his political opposition to or criticism of Israel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

POWER
Posted by: RODNOX on Sep 17, 2007 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THIS JUST SHOWS THE POWER THE TERRORIST NATION OF ISRAEL HAS OVER THE USA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]