Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

Will They Arrest Britney in Mansfield for Sagging Pants?

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, New America Media. Posted September 6, 2007.


Sagging pants are an easy and convenient symbol of the supposed dereliction and menace of young black men. The consequence of that symbol and thinking has been devastating.
Advertisement

It's a good thing that Britney was at the MTV TRL show in London a year or so ago and not in Mansfield, Louisiana when she pranced across the stage with her pants slung low around her behind. If Spears had dared to show so much belly and behind flesh in the town on September 15 she would be fined $150 or tossed in the slammer for 15 days. But we all know that the screwy, harebrained law that the fashion censors in Mansfield and a handful of other Louisiana cities passed in recent years that mandate fines, community service, and now jail time for sagging pants wearers don't really apply to the male or female Britneys of the world. They apply to young black males. The laws are much more than a terribly wrong headed effort to regulate public dress, decency, discipline or moral values. They reinforce the worst media and publicly ingrained stereotype of young black males as drug dealers, drive by shooters, gang bangers and educational cripples.

Sagging pants are an easy and convenient symbol of the supposed dereliction and menace of young blacks. The consequence of that symbol and thinking has been devastating. Despite the plummet in crime rates, racial stereotypes have deeply embedded the popular and terrifying belief that crime in America comes exclusively with a young, black male face. The result: nearly one million blacks are now warehoused in America's jails, the majority of them young blacks, and a significant number of them are there for non-violent, petty drug crimes.

Sagging pants are such a soft and juicy target for the scapegoat of young black males that even comedian Bill Cosby couldn't resist taking a swipe at it and them in his now legendary tirade a couple of years ago against low-achieving, badly behaving young blacks. He fingered sagging pants as proof to him that they had become a menace. Cosby later made a partial recant of his knock and explained that it was a call for action and not a broad brush stroke indictment of all young black males. But it was too little, too late. The sagging pants equals black male perversity notion was even more firmly imprinted in the public psyche

Though Cosby is one of the best-known blacks to fan negative racial stereotypes, he's hardly the only one. Despite much evidence to the contrary, many blacks routinely trash, demean and ridicule themselves. In fact, it was the African-American councilpersons in Shreveport, Mansfield and the other small towns that dredged up the ridiculous sagging pants laws. Some blacks in the rap and hip-hop world, of course, are deeply complicit in fanning the stereotype. The rap moguls have reaped king's ransoms peddling their music-video-cartoon version of the thug life. The rebellious young of all colors that shell out billions to enrich them are almost totally mindless of the social complexities, and the artistic and intellectual richness of the black experience. Even more tragic, some blacks further bolster the thug life stereotype by committing or winding up as victims of violence. The murders of rap icons Tupac Shakur, and Notorious BIG have been the stuff of cheap media sensationalism.

The spate of sagging pants laws does even more social damage than just reinforcing vile stereotypes and potentially swelling the jail population. It also confirms for many that the problems of poor blacks are self-made and insoluble. Many employers admit that they won't hire young blacks because they believe they are lazier, more crime prone, and educationally deficient. Many politicians, even without the excuse of ballooning state and federal budget deficits and cutbacks, mightily resist efforts to increase spending on job, health and education programs for the poor.

In Shreveport, where the sagging pants law passed by a narrow four to three vote, the opponents raised the standard arguments that the law infringes on personal and freedoms, probably violates free speech, free expression, constitutional protections, and will overburden police and the courts by forcing them to waste valuable time and resources measuring the hem line on pants when they should be about the business of dealing with serious crimes. The opponents of the law though didn't raise any protest that the law won't provide jobs, skills training, fix failing schools, and provide greater mentoring and family support programs for young black males.

The sagging pants law has been the butt (pardon the pun) of jokes, and much ribald fun-poking. But stereotypes and bad social policy are no laughing matter. The city fathers and mothers in Mansfield, and the other towns that foisted the law on their books should stop the craziness, realize that this law solves no problems, and wipe it off their books. That is before some other cities are tempted to follow their lead and make themselves look silly and pass this crazy law too. That is unless they plan to arrest Britney for her bottom dragging pants.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: sagging pants, black men, clothing, racial stereotype

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His new book The Latino Challenge to Black America: Towards a Conversation between African-Americans and Hispanics (Middle Passage Press and Hispanic Economics New York) in English and Spanish will be out in October.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The main flaw
Posted by: Alex Jung on Sep 6, 2007 12:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
with Hutchinson's point is that by railing against the blanketing effect that a racial stereotype has, he accepts that the image -- as it has been shaped by white, mainstream media -- is all bad.

I agree that the stereotype doesn't represent the breadth and diversity of black people in the U.S., but it's a mistake to think that there isn't a complexity in the flashy image we see (that, by the way, is also largely packaged by a white-controlled music industry). Tupac, for example, is an interesting example of an artist who was doing a lot more than just rap about shooting people up or banging women (although he did that too). The song, "Keep Ya Head Up" immediately comes to mind with its famous first line,

"Some say the blacker the berry, the sweeter the juice,
I say, the darker the skin, then the deeper the roots."

And to think that there isn't value in anti-assimilationist, fuck the man, images and posturing, limits what creative resistance means and denies the reality of what many black men experience in America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

66word
Posted by: cyit on Sep 6, 2007 1:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I recently observed a tall (about 6'7") twenty something young man in the grocery store. He was dressed in the urban uniform of sagging jeans, untied hi-top gym shoes, long waisted athletic shirt, and backwards cap.

He'd borrowed a store card from a young white woman and was having trouble operating the self checkout function, and holding up the line. All of us in line behind him were treated to the spectacle of his mumbling and fumbling with the credit card reader.

As an educated boomer era African American who has taught young black men and women for over 25 years, I'm pre-disposed to protect them, to even make excuses for them.

However, as I watched this MAN, I had to admit he looked like a clown. And I suspect he felt like one. He clearly was not stupid as evidenced by the clear light of intelligence in his face and eyes.

Now, here's the point. Clothes do make the man or woman. Clothes have to do with perceptions of how we see ourselves and how we perceive the world perceiving us.

I'm guessing that a twenty something man walking around dressed like a delinquent child with backwards hat, pants down around his thighs and shoes untied (all color coordinated in red and black down to his red shoe laces) can not feel too keen about himself, ... outside his hood. In fact, his ill-at-ease was apparent. And it stems from his perception of the impression he was making on those observing him.

The tragedy of the sagging pants phenomenon is what it says about what's going on the minds of significant numbers of males. In plain language it's an admission of defeat. It's a badge declaring I am a permanent member of the under class.

And the more young black men wrap themselves in this uniform the more it becomes a self fulfilling prophesy: I am a clown. I am irrelevant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 66word Posted by: bookie
» RE: 66word Posted by: MtnMig
Rebel Hall of Fame
Posted by: lamar on Sep 6, 2007 1:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I am a teenage punk or thug (aesthetic-wise), a rebel who likes to wear his pants so low that they are barely useful, and I get under the skin of the adults so much that they pass a law against what I'm doing....that has to get me into the rebel hall of fame.

I don't say this to make light of the racial issues. I just see this more as a war on youth, and by banning the practice, they are really just harassing otherwise law-abiding citizens.

Next up: Banning the wearing of baseball caps with the bill angled at more than 15 degrees from the center of the nose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ebel Hall of Fame Posted by: mobile68
Kids are kids
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Sep 6, 2007 4:01 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another colossal waste of time, energy and resources by uptight, meddling, middle-aged goody-goodies with nothing better to do.

Kids should have the opportunity to be rebellious as we all were. Seeing old pictures of ourselves with mullet haircuts, afros, cheesy mustaches, big hair, etc. is punishment enough for our youthful goofiness. Now it's the young 'uns turn. Plus, as someone once observed, they help sweep the sidewalks as they walk.

As for the racial implications, I'm too tired to argue right now. Whatever you say, Earl...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bell-bottoms, long-hair and halter tops
Posted by: mizipi on Sep 7, 2007 1:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a kid, I remember hearing many adults decry the "state of the youth" who were considered no-good hippies. Gee, we wore raggedy, frizzled blue jeans and let our hair grow long, while the gals wore those evil mini-skirts, hot-pants and halter tops. Maybe we Americans need to drop the suit-and-tie, business-wear wardrobe and dress like Jesus, just wrap a sheet around ourselves.........do we have that kind of freedom anymore?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Birthday Suit Jailbird
Posted by: John Walters on Sep 7, 2007 9:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So I guess the homeless who can’t afford new clothes or clothes in general should just accept the fate of their desperate situation and surrender themselves to their county jail whenever they find themselves without pants or a shirt. Incarceration is always one way to solve the homeless problem. The town of Mansfield should also consider making it illegal for retail shops to sell clothing that is defined as revealing. And what about women how have really long Rapunzel hair, it’s dangerous to both them and their community. The long hair gets caught causing loosing of the scalp, babies choke on it, innocent bystanders get wound up in it and have been strangled. Long hair causes serious injury and death every day and both women and men with long hair should be considered terrorists! Oh, and they should outlaw men with comb-overs, too. Just disenfranchise them. If they can’t deal with the loss of their hair they surely can’t be trusted to participate in the electoral process. I heart Mansfeild, land of the free!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Laws and more laws
Posted by: John Walters on Sep 7, 2007 9:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And people who urinate themselves...society needs to be protected from them, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Laws and more laws Posted by: donl51
Don't blame the law for black image
Posted by: MtnMig on Sep 7, 2007 10:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Louisiana’s laws are not to blame for, as Earl states, “reinforce[ing] the worst media and publicly ingrained stereotype of young black males as drug dealers, drive by shooters, gang bangers and educational cripples”. These laws are only the reaction to the successful marketing of black males as thugs.

A significant number of young black males are not jailed because they are unfairly targeted by a racist police that key in on sagging pants but because of ridiculous drug laws and because drugs are more prevalent in the black community.

Fixing the problems in the black community starts by accepting responsibility for the problems it helps to create.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On to something here....
Posted by: talkville on Sep 10, 2007 3:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The sagging pants law has been the butt (pardon the pun) of jokes, and much ribald fun-poking. But stereotypes and bad social policy are no laughing matter."

There's a rage of "appropriateness", "behavioral correctness" and "Miss Manners" oriented focus these days all over the media and cultural fields. Image has been forcefully and prominently pushed forward and substance completely ignored that the matter of stereo-type and -typing is becoming worrisome. Mr Rogers and Miss Manners have entered the court-rooms and the courts. The so-called "First Impression" rule that raises it's banner throughout the country now and then is not so innocent that it could not stand a good hard look and harder thought in reflecting about it. Although it may work as a 'rule of thumb' on some occasions, so-called 'first impressions' seldom if ever reveal anything substantial about any particular person. One has to meet them, openly, honestly and equally. It's quite easy to judge surfaces; no so much in judging humans.

No harm will come to Britney Spears; so long as the co-optation of the style and fashion is used and the "baggy pants" are found in stores at $150 or so a pair- in a vast variety of colors.

"First Impressions" are always the BEST time to consider one's OWN prejudices, and the LEAST appropriate to form opinions about another's substance and value. These days it seems the obsession with Forms and Models and Images has completely over-shadowed Reality. Hopefully, we can re-consider a few things more thoughtfully and just possibly become more human.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Themselves?
Posted by: zak822 on Sep 11, 2007 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...many blacks routinely trash, demean and ridicule themselves. "

Umm, although your photo does not do you justice, I'm guessing you're in this pot with the rest of us.

I'm not disputing your point, which I agree with. I do question the fact that you don't see yourself as part of our community. It's "ourselves" not "themselves".

Signed, a 59 year old African-American male (whose pants don't sag)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the type of black man that scares the system...
Posted by: eosrk on Sep 12, 2007 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are the ones whom don't fit their sterotype of what a black man should be.......like me, for example.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I just don't see the point
Posted by: ssdd on Sep 12, 2007 12:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in walking around looking like you've taken a dump in your pants.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Exposing your underwear
Posted by: fracuss on Sep 12, 2007 12:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the sagging pants and exposed boxer shorts, we should add short skirts, blouses showing cleavage, exposed bra straps, tattoos......what did I miss?
Fracuss

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the sagging pants "phenomena"
Posted by: tooldoc60 on Sep 12, 2007 12:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe, started in prisons, where ill fitting prison uniforms and lack of belts (prohibited) forced inmates to wear their clothing in this manner. I worked for the Missouri Dept. of Corrections for several years, before this became a popular way of dress for young men (black and white), and was given this explanation from a black inmate. If these young fools wish to display this kind of "thug" image, that is fine...but they shouldn't scream "discrimination" when they are not hired when seeking employment. My own sons went through this phase, then grew up, and became productive and decent young men. Plumbers have displayed the low slung waistline for years (unfortunately, sans boxer shorts for the most part), mechanics also, but even they usually have the sense and decency to "pull up their drawers" once they stand up straight. But I see no need for more useless legislation on the matter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

unconstitutional
Posted by: vociferouschicanery on Sep 13, 2007 10:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what is up with Louisiana continually trying to effect their dubious means with laws that fly in the face of the US Constitution? They tried to rid themselves of immigrants by passing laws against renting to anyone undocumented. Judges say"EH!!!!!" sorry, back to the drawing board.

these laws will suffer a similar fate. and rightly so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]