Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

Arellano Deportation Highlights Economic Insecurity for Millions

By Francis Calpotura, AlterNet. Posted August 28, 2007.


Until we prioritize the economic security of working families throughout the hemisphere, we leave little choice but for millions to migrate to provide for their loved ones.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For the millions of immigrants who have left their countries due to the failed economic policies of the past twenty-five years, this week's arrest and deportation of Elvira Arellano and resulting separation from her only child is nothing new. It is only the most recent example of families being broken up by a corporate-driven globalization model that couples harmful economic policy with unjust immigration policy.

The fundamental reality of immigration is that migration is a necessity, not an option for millions around the world. Individuals weigh the severity of leaving their families behind against taking the gamble of earning a living in a richer country with more economic opportunities.

Ms. Arellano made that difficult decision to provide economic security for herself and her loved ones. But the flawed economic and immigration policies of corporate-driven globalization that forced her to look outside of Mexico to find a better living in the first place, led ultimately to her deportation.

Unfettered trade (e.g., under the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA), privatization of state-run industry and services, and the triumph of investor rights over labor rights have not only failed to reduce poverty or create economic growth, they have made conditions worse. NAFTA precipitated the loss of 1 million manufacturing jobs in the U.S. and the displacement of 3 million farmers in Mexico.

Rather than acknowledge the failures of NAFTA, the U.S., Mexico, and Canada discussed the expansion of these failed trade and economic policies this week at their Security and Prosperity Partnership summit. Their final statement called NAFTA "a tremendous mutual success" and planned to "build on NAFTA's success and reduce unnecessary trade barriers."

In reality, these policies have failed, forcing people to transfer labor and capital by migrating away from their families to work in rich countries and send money transfers, or remittances, back to their loved ones in impoverished communities around the world. The World Bank estimates these remittances are now bigger than official development assistance and foreign direct investment in impoverished countries. Inflows from Mexicans living abroad, for example, represent the country's second largest source of foreign income behind oil exports.

An immediate challenge faced by immigrant communities is the high fees incurred when sending money. Spending billions to send money back home for food, urgent medical care and education is a major economic security issue. Studies show that if money-transfer fees were cut in half, 33 million people could be lifted out of poverty in the developing world. Immigrant workers spend up to a week's wages to pay these yearly fees; for families in their home countries, the fee represents almost two month's worth of wages.

This is why immigrants have joined the Transnational Institute for Grassroots Research and Action to pressure the global money transfer giant, Western Union, to lower fees and prioritize community reinvestment in sustainable development. Such a move would make the money transfer industry more accountable to its customer base: immigrants who often work low-paying jobs with little regulation. This scenario is grounded in economic reality; wire transactions cost less than $5 to a company that charges more than $20.

Until we prioritize the economic security of families like Elvira's, we leave little choice but for millions to migrate to provide for their loved ones. As the laws in place continue to disrespect and disregard these economic realities, people like Ms. Arellano will continue to cross borders and face subsequent deportation. As Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote from Birmingham jail forty-years ago: "One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws."

If we want to move beyond such injustice as a society, we must broaden efforts that work to make migration a choice and not a necessity while holding financial institutions accountable to immigrants. Shifting focus from simply border security to economic security is the first step.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: immigration, economy, arellano

Originally from the Philippines, Francis Calpotura is the Executive Director of the Transnational Institute for Grassroots Research and Action (TIGRA), a national network of more than 100 immigrant organizations.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Let's set the record straight on immigrants contributions to US economy
Posted by: ssanabria on Aug 29, 2007 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Calpotura:

I think you describe very well the economic conditions that generate forced migration, in the countries of origin of the more than 12 million immigrants with out a recognized immigration status, living today in the U.S. However when it comes to propose solutions in your article regarding economic insecurities, you fall short by zero in a single money-transferring corporation.
Let me provide some important facts on immigrants’ contributions in the United Sates, which can provide grounds for a more comprehensive public policy solution.
"Undocumented immigrants contribute more to public coffers in taxes than they cost in social services. Moreover, undocumented immigrants contribute more the U.S. economy through their investments and consumption of goods and services; filling of million s of essential worker positions resulting in subsidiary job creation, increased productivity and lower costs of goods and programs. Eighty-five percent of eminent economist surveyed have concluded that undocumented immigrants have a positive (seventy-four percent) or neutral (eleven percent) impact on the U.S. economy." According to Francine J. Lipman. Chappman University. Only in California according to the California Immigrant Policy Center:” Immigrants pay approximately $4.5 billion in state taxes each year; their federal tax contribution is more than $30 billion annually.”
In my opinion your article portrays immigrants as helpless victims and not as hard working fighters that have had the courage to leave their communities of origin for a new land that provides the opportunities that we are denied in our own nations.
In my opinion, community based organizations need to work to have the United Sates policymakers and decision makers recognize that immigrants are making a valuable contribution to regional stability in Latin America and the Caribbean with their hard earned income. The Multilateral Investment Fund considers that:” The remittance market has changed dramatically over the past few years. Once "hidden in plain view," remittances are now widely recognized as critical to the survival of millions of individual families, and the health of many national economies throughout Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). Unlike foreign aid, migrant remittances go directly to families in places that are often difficult to reach with official development assistance. And, while international capital flows have fluctuated with market cycles, remittances have steadily increased, even during economic recession. For 2006, remittances to LAC reached US$62.3 billion (14% over 2005), making the region the largest remittance market in the world. This amount exceeded, for the fourth consecutive year, the combined flows of all net Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Official Development Assistance (ODA) to the region. [1] Given the complicated process of tracking informal flows, particularly those still carried by hand, actual flows could be at least 10% higher.” It is for the stated reasons above that your organization should be more objective and comprehensive, when it comes to propose the creation of a community reinvestment in sustainable development fund. Regarding this issue several questions arise? Is the bank industry on both sides of the border included in the call to contribute to the creation of the fund? Is the U.S. government and the international development banks call to act on this matter? In the event that the fund will be established who will appoint the board of governors on this entity? Who will decide how these monies are spent?
Mr. Calpotura I hope to hear your responses to the different addressed issues.
Sincerely,
Salvador Sanabria
ssanabria@elrescate.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Illegals Are Still Breaking The Law
Posted by: dezertlady71 dezertlady71 on Aug 30, 2007 10:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sorry, but I am a former twenty-something year resident of Arizona, my last five near a border town. I cannot feel sorry whatsoever for what negative implications these people bring to our country, let alone the state.
Gangs, Crime, filthy living conditions, overpriced utilities, housing, and gas consumption-as well as healthcare, education, need I go on?
The previous commenter states that they contribute a lot to the coffers of this country. Most illegals I knew got paid daily in cash and didn't contribute anything. They went back to Mexico for the weekends with their cashm or sent it back there.
I have also worked in the Healthcare system for the last twenty years, and I've seen how increasing costs are directly related to this crisis.
Very plain and simply I would like to know why illegals are not trying to improve their own conditions in their own country. They have no rights here, I don't care what they say. The U.S. Constitution does not include them.
Deportation and forcing them to face their own situation at home is the answer. They cannot come here and demand rights as if it were their own country. Let them do that at home.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wake up Calpotura!!
Posted by: Doubtom on Aug 30, 2007 9:16 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mexicans were crashing our borders well before the advent of "globalization" so don't use that as the prime excuse for the illegal immigration of that miserable country.
It seems to me that if conditions are so bad in their native country and they're so timid that they feel powerless to do something about it, they should seek their fortune elsewhere in the southern regions where they at least speak a common language.
It took many years to amass 12 to 20 million illegal immigrants even if they came over in droves daily!
It is no argument at all to say that they crashing our border because the jobs are drawing them here. It's pure hogwash!
What's drawing them here is the loose laws on border control. They would find it a bit more difficult to crash any of the other country's borders to the south. That's what is drawing them here, not a surplus of jobs--hell, we're losing thousands of jobs every day as the patriotic corporations send them overseas to cheaper labor. Why aren't the Mexicans chasing those jobs?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Race for Survival vs. Corporate Policies
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Aug 31, 2007 1:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read most of the responses to this hot-button issue and some are profound and thoughtful, others full of emotion and anger at our southern neighbors, but after a decade NAFTA has done little to bring prosperity to the Southern Hemisphere, chiefly Latin America and the Caribbean islands.
What we've witnessed is more mass movement across borders and the cultural baggage (and hopes and dreams) to create a meaningful life free of poverty.
Deporting Arvellano didn't address the problem and will not stop others from crossing. We cannot deport them all! We cannot lock them up, as it has been proposed. And not all of them are from Latin America.
Do you know that most immigrants arrive by plane? But we seemed to be transifixed by the melodrama along the Rio Grande and across the harsh Sonoran Desert.
Turning the southern U.S. border into a de facto DMZ won't work, either. All the high tech gadgets and gizmos and border enforcement guards brings armed confortations and vigilante justice. There have been reports of citizens in Cochise County, Arizona confronting the immigrants and shooting at them, resulting in death and injuries.
Newspapers were filled with letters from readers saying "Way to go, ICE!" as if encouraging a police state mentality. Force spooks these people in fearing for their lives.
Everyone has a stake in this push-pull struggle of immigration versus corporate need for labor. America continues to hemmorhage jobs but the blame seems to have been placed squarely on their backs. Immigrants do not write policy; merely react to it.
Our media tells them that a good life in the U.S. is possible, and what do they see? The green lawns of Tucson, a big McMansion with late-model cars in the driveway; young people wearing the latest clothes who have a full stomach and go to movies; a sprawling and sparkling college campus; an attainable education is within reach; decent health care; the lives of the rich and famous instead of the poor and the unknown; beautiful women in magazines; and JOBS!! You, too could be featured in Forbes, Seventeen or Black Enterprise. It's more than an artificial boundary separating San Ysidro from Tijuana. The reality is stark.
Agriculture requires a vast manpool of labor so we can eat and for farmers-now agribusiness-to get its crops to the stores and markets. American history has always been about labor; this land is very labor-intensive.
So if you have a college degree, would you work out in the unrelenting Fresno sun and pick raisins? I went to college with someone who did this work and told a compelling story of life in the fields. I knew I couldn't do it. Yes, he was an immigrant. But he made it through college and earned his degree.
I met a family who worked in the fields around Delano for 30-plus years in central California and through their grueling work was able to raise a family. But that came at a price; the mother has asthma and cancer from the chemicals used to spray the crops. It also stunted her growth and is on various kinds of medication. She knew Cesar Chavez during the beginning of the farm workers movement. She knew he would make a difference to alleviate their plight. She is in her late fifties but somehow keeps going.
The area around Delano is a landscape void of major hospitals and social service agencies which lie scattered hitherto among small clinics; Bakersfield, Los Angeles and Fresno could be light years away for those who fall ill in the fields.
America owes a debt to immigrants. Yes, some have broken laws and committed crimes. But we also need to examine policy. If we can find a more compassionate way to eliminate the shameless and ruthless exploitation of the land and people for the sake of profit, we could view immigration in human terms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

outrider
Posted by: outrider on Sep 13, 2007 4:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CORPORATIONS ARE NOT CITIZENS - WHY DO THEY CONTROL OUR GOVERNMENT?

Corporate America, aided and abetted by Bush’s Republican Party, is as much an enemy of the People, if not more so, than the Iraqis who are resisting their attempt to steal Iraqi’s oil and other resources. For Corporate America and Bush’s Republican Party, the promise of riches and power trumps any self-imposed accountability and responsibility so long as the rich get richer and more powerful.

Corporate America outsourced thousands of jobs creating a vacuum in this country, which would inevitably be filled by cheap immigrant labor already available for reasons hereafter stated. Corporate America had invaded and occupied the sovereign countries of Latin American, virtually and/or in fact using American military forces, countries that could not protect themselves, stealing their resources, wrecking their infrastructure, and creating wide spread unemployment and poverty among the citizens of the ravaged countries. (See “Empire's Workshop “ by Greg Gandin and “Failed Nations” by Noam Chomsky). Corporations got what they wanted - cheap and manageable labor.

The success of the Latin America conspiracies between our government officials and Corporate America is one of the reasons why we are now in Iraq.

If only our elected officials would honor their oaths to support and defend the Constitution, our government would exist for the best interests of the People. Corporations would be governed by the rule of law, rules enacted by representatives of the People and for the People, not by and for corporations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]