Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

The Crucifixion of Michael Vick

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, AlterNet. Posted August 21, 2007.


Michael Vick was tried, convicted and sentenced in the only court that counts in the big money world of sports and celebrity-hood -- and that's the court of public opinion.
Advertisement

Soon to be former Atlanta Falcons star quarterback Michael Vick never had a chance. The instant word publicly leaked out that he'd be slapped with an indictment by the feds, he could kiss his football cleats good-bye. The indictment was just a formality. Those good government high school civics courses feed us the myth of the little Constitutional admonition: innocent until proven guilty. But Vick was tried, convicted, and sentenced in the only court that counts in the big money world of sports and celebrity-hood -- and that's the court of public opinion.

NFL commissioner Roger Goodell and Falcons owner Arthur Blank heard Senators John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) lambaste Vick in the Senate, and saw those picket signs, and heard the screams and taunts and jeers from the PETA orchestrated pack outside the Richmond, Virginia courthouse when Vick surrendered. They listened and watched as sports writers and TV commentators angrily denounced Vick. They heard sports talk jocks saber-rattle against Vick on sports shows and fans burn up Internet chat rooms screaming for his head. They watched as Nike and other firms that Vick had endorsement deals with melt away like hot butter. They watched the NAACP issue a tepid and cautious statement pleading against a rush to judgment against him and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference quickly withdraw their invitation for him to appear and be honored at their annual conference. When Vick's pals fingered him as being knee deep in the dog battering that did it. No pads, scrimmages, training camp, and definitely no games for Vick. If he hadn't had a bonafide multi-year contract with the Falcons after Goodell barred him from the Falcons' training camp he wouldn't have gotten a nickel in pay.

As far as celebrity athletes go, even the deal that federal prosecutors offered Vick is anything but generous. He won't wear an ankle bracelet, be allowed to tool around his estate under house watch, or get a walk-around-the-street probation stint. He'll do time, and, it may not be in a cushy country club fed prison. Prosecutors tipped that when they said they'd make an object lesson of him that animal abuse won't be tolerated and will be severely punished. That of course is bluster. The breeding, training, and even killing of dog gladiators won't grind to a halt, the dozens of magazines that prep the "sport" will continue to do brisk sales, and thousands will continue to toss hefty cash into the ring at the dog matches. Vick will just be a bare footnote to all of that.

However, he is an object lesson for a far different reason than what the prosecutors had in mind. More often than not, celebs and sports superstars, even black ones, get cut a lot of slack for their boorish, stupid, arrogant acts and misdeeds, and in some cases even criminal behavior. They are after all the repository of the fantasies and delusions of a public as well as advertisers, sportswriters, and TV executives that are in desperate need of vicarious escape, titillation, excitement, and profits. The sports hero fulfills all of that. He or she seduces, strokes, and comforts those fantasies. They are expected to operate above the fray of human problems, while raising society's expectation of what's good and pure. He or she is rewarded handsomely for what he or she does as a fantasy filler, not for who the often terribly flawed person they actually are. That's a false, phony, and horrible burden to dump on anyone.

Vick had the double misfortune of standing on the rarified perch of the football icon. Football more than any other sport mirrors the best and the worst in American society -- competition, greed, selfishness, and violence. Vick typified all of those qualities on and off the field. But he also typified the good side of the sport -- cooperation, organization, achievement, and heroism. That crept through in his public statement after the announcement was made of a pending plea deal. He talked about respecting the league, took responsibility for his actions, and apologized to friends and teammates.

Should we feel pity for Michael Vick? Yes and No. No: He did the crime and as the old cliché goes he should do the time. He'll still have what the average Joe and Jane that yelled their lungs off for him on the field won't have and that's memories of the adulation he received from a fawning public, sports writers, and his megabuck contract and lucrative endorsement deals. Yes: Vick is yet another reminder that sports icons are the fragile creations of an indulgent, sports-crazed, hero-worshipping, and celebrity-idolatrous public. When they take a tumble from their lofty perch, those same fans, sportswriters, and league officials that cheered and back-patted their idols turn vicious and unforgiving. They can never cobble the broken pieces of their name and reputation back together again. Vick, in the end, waved the ugly issues of wealth, race, celebrity hype, fan idolatry, and animal cruelty in the public's face. Poor Vick, poor us.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: constitutional rights, football, sports

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His new book The Latino Challenge to Black America: Towards a Conversation between African-Americans and Hispanics (Middle Passage Press and Hispanic Economics New York) in English and Spanish will be out in October.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Vick will be back
Posted by: lamar on Aug 21, 2007 1:19 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vick will go to jail, maybe "rehab" and be back in the league in 5 years. I think the guy is a scumbag, but I hope the NFL doesn't take away Vick's ability to earn a living in his profession. There are other pro athletes who have been to jail, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Vick will be back Posted by: wzeallor
» RE: Vick will be back Posted by: Conservasaurus
Rubbish!
Posted by: kevred on Aug 21, 2007 1:51 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vick is not any kind of victim. He had choices that many people will never had, and he chose wrong. More than that, he's a cruel, vicious man for the actions he's admitted to. He's not a symbol, he's not 'representative' of anything--he's a pervert and a blight on society. And that's because of his actions, not the color of his skin or his salary or profession. And he's certainly not 'fragile'--he's a long-time criminal who has yet to show any kind of compassion whatsoever for his victims, and is only coming clean now because he's backed into a corner.

This passage struck me as particularly absurd:

He also typified the good side of the sport -- cooperation, organization, achievement, and heroism. That crept through in his public statement after the announcement was made of a pending plea deal. He talked about respecting the league, took responsibility for his actions, and apologized to friends and teammates.

Heroism?! Savage animal cruelty, illegal gambling, deception, lying...what sort of warped view would see such a man as heroic?

Utter rubbish. He's only doing this now because his compatriots agreed to testify against him. He doesn't respect the league--he violated its policies for years, lied to league and team officials, and committed crimes. He's not taking responsibility for anything--he's taking advantage of a sweetheart deal that will save him some time in jail. And yes, it is a sweetheart deal--how many people who aren't wealthy and well-known would even have the luxury of taking a plea that radically reduces his charges and jail time with such a solid case against them?

As for the apology--how can anyone possibly buy such a hollow statement? Let him rot, or let him repent--but don't think for a second that anything he's saying or doing now means anything except one thing: self-preservation. If he wants us to believe anything different, he can start earning that respect the hard way, starting today. I'm not holding my breath.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ubbish! Posted by: Edison829
» RE: ubbish! Posted by: Magginkat
Aren't we all somewhat two-faced?
Posted by: cheressemm on Aug 21, 2007 3:50 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to begin by saying that I am a great animal lover, and I in no way condone what Michael Vic did or what others who participate in animal fighting do. However, I think this commentary makes some good points about how the media has thoroughly crucified this man ... yet, in the past, other NBA players have not been crucified this way for breaking the law in other ways ... they can beat/kill women and not get this kind of public outcry.
As a society, too, we are all two-faced when it comes to animal cruelty. Most of the same people who are curifying Vic for what he did to these dogs probably also eat meat and other factory-farmed produced items from regular grocery stores, and use products tested on animals ... animals in our culture suffer horrendously so we can have 100s of varities of pork products and 100s of varities of cosmetics and household items. How come we don't crucity ourselves for what we condone each and every day?
I am against all forms of animal cruelty, but we have to ask ourselves why something like this Vic case gets the attention it has gotten while other cases of extreme creulty do not ... don't pigs, known to be very intelligent and sentient beings, suffer as much for our sakes as these dogs did for the sakes of those who profit from their fights?
I think, when it comes to this, we are a nation of hypocrites ... and only those who make a concerted effort to not condone any cruel industries should be throwing stones.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A fair point , but... Posted by: may261989
» RE: A fair point , but... Posted by: cheressemm
» RE: A fair point , but... Posted by: may261989
» RE: A fair point , but... Posted by: cheressemm
He is not a hero
Posted by: may261989 on Aug 21, 2007 3:55 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sorry but while I usually love Earl's writing I can't help but think he is biased in his account of Vick.
I understand the author's point in regards to how quickly the public turn on a hero who falls foul of the law. But Earl makes it sound like Vick is the real victim here and that those evil Peta activists stepped well over the mark.
Vick is a celebrity who earns a ton of money and enjoys the social status that goes with it. Like any celebrity if he falls foul of the law his celebrity status is going to attract attention, there is no denying it.
I simply do not buy the contrition part, surely Earl is not that naive to believe that his confession was anything other than an acceptance that he would be worse off if he continued to deny the charges. Where is the heroism there? He's doing his best to save his butt and in this case it just happens to involve admitting the crime.
Well, I love animals and I think the bastard deserves everything he gets. So I hope he gets the maximum sentence and rots in hell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No Athletes Are "Heroes" Posted by: Libertine
» another good point. Posted by: may261989
» RE: Not a "hero" huh? Posted by: jimidee
» RE: Not a "hero" huh? Posted by: heid
» RE: Not a "hero" huh? Posted by: ellielouwho
» RE: Not a "hero" huh? Posted by: anonymous black writer
Wrong title.
Posted by: chutzpah on Aug 21, 2007 4:37 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The lynching of Michael Vick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wrong title...again! Posted by: jimidee
well...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Aug 21, 2007 6:45 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The instant word publicly leaked out that he'd be slapped with an indictment by the feds, he could kiss his football cleats good-bye."

Utter and complete bullshit.

Pay a bit more attention to the sports world, friend. Being a vicious criminal DOES NOT necessarily mean you can kiss your career good-bye.

Though for Vick... who just accepted a plea deal (hint hint.. millionaires don't accept plea deals if they aren't guilty and trying to avoid even worse charges), it hopefully will mean the end of his NFL career.

Trying to make Vick out as the victim in ANY way is ludicrous.

You want to defend an animal torturer... go right ahead. Its still monstrous, though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Racist NeoKlans from Georgia
Posted by: deapp on Aug 21, 2007 6:48 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It' amazing how the same red neck racists who fight to have guns to murder Bambi in the woods, who love too kiss dogs in the mouth after they finish grooming their behinds, would love to see Vick who is one of the most exciting players to play the game of football....Who has never been in jail or in front of a judge for any reason, distroyed!!!!!!!!! If there is any black players of any sports out there waiting to play ball....do not come to the racist Neo-Klan south (Atlanta, GA) to do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: acist NeoKlans from Georgia Posted by: anonymous black writer
ambiguities and ironies
Posted by: talkville on Aug 22, 2007 3:56 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"He or she is rewarded handsomely for what he or she does as a fantasy filler, not for who the often terribly flawed person they actually are. That's a false, phony, and horrible burden to dump on anyone."

This case is of a piece with the mediatized culture of judgment and punishment currently sweeping like a dense fog over our country (and diffusedly around the world). Although each case displays its particularities and nuances, it's all the same general tenor: select an Imus, a Hilton, a Lohan, a Vick and condense the utter decadence of our present times into their flesh. There's a disturbing kind of 'schadenfreude' that wafts over the airwaves day in and day out; a tinge of self-righteousness and a not un-noticeable streak of pure sadism that has slowly and persistently gained ground in these last few years. Manufacturing 'heroes' and 'role models' and 'leaders' is always subject to recalls. It's high time for each of us to take stock of ourselves and stop feeding this disturbing frenzy. Consensus can sometimes look very akin to tyranny. Or perhaps it's too late and soon we'll be burning witches again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IS THE KILLING OF EIGHT DOGS WORSE THAN KILLING A HUMAN BEING?
Posted by: thetruth07 on Aug 22, 2007 4:01 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm no fan of dog fighting, but I also think Vick was already tried and convicted in the court of public opinion. Vick is being made the poster boy for animal rights. As far as I know no one up until now has served such a severe penalty for dog fighting.
Why is it in sports these players get away with doing things to humans: abuse their wives and girlfriends, kill someone while driving drunk(Leonard Little), be accused of sexual assault of your 17yr old babysister(Mark Chmura even though he was found not guilty), and no one is up in arms.
Which brings me to something comedian Bill Mahr said about "America hates Michael Vick more than O.J. and he killed his wife!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

animal protector
Posted by: annestivacti on Aug 22, 2007 4:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a boatload of hogwash! Vick should be permanently banned from pro sports. His teammates who stated that they saw nothing wrong with dogfighting, and that people should mind their own "bidness," should be severely reprimanded by the NFL. I want to see him wearing prison orange instead of tailored suits. I want him to drink watered down soup instead of chateau brion. I want his cot to be full of roaches and lice. I want him not to have any TV or computer in his cell and to be bombarded with PETA snail mail. I want Big Bubba down the row to take a romantic interest in him. I want him to watch other inmates play football while he watches from a barred window. I want him to be wiped out financially by being fined to the hilt and the monies distributed to animal rescue and animal rights organizations. And, I want him to be unable to find any work when he gets out of prison unless it's cleaning out port-o-lets. No punishment is severe enough for this miserable excuse for a human.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: animal protector Posted by: whitechocolate
» RE: animal protector Posted by: anonymous black writer
hogwash or dogwash
Posted by: jambro on Aug 22, 2007 4:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
my dogs don't fight professionally, but however much i care for them, they are still dogs ... when americans treat other human beings in ways that they would condemn if the victims were dogs, they are hypocrits ... one & all ... hundrets of thousands of genetically bred fighting dogs can be seen in any american street ... macho image of pit bulls & the like .. why are they called pit bulls .. the brits bred them to fight & those brits are the forebearers of the WASPs that own & run this USA .... dog fighting is a cruel sport, if indeed fighting can be called a sport .. when american TV hosts gruesome human meatgrinder fights, no gloves, feet & hands & anything goes, why not dog fights? there is more dignity in a dog fight than in humans brawling bloodily for money, & being objects of wagers on blood sport -- human blood -- marquis of queensbury would be laughed or booed out of entertainment oriented blood sport in the USA today, no gloves, fictional refs & rounds ... just an audience hungering for human blood sport ... but then what about iraq & the million + iraqis slaughtered by american intervention, whether blown apart of slowly dying in a country that has become a prison for its people ..

michael vick, is no worst than george bush .... and to choose between those two "criminals" i would vote for vick to replace bush, at least vick has other talents than dog fighting or setting human beings against each other and calling it war ... who is the terrorist? perhaps all americans who support blood sport or war, each is the flip side of the same coin ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: hogwash or dogwash Posted by: rlb2005
» RE: hogwash or dogwash Posted by: annestivacti
» RE: hogwash or dogwash Posted by: brunowe
Vick was convicted the moment his buddy turned state's evidence...
Posted by: jimidee on Aug 22, 2007 5:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not in the court of public opinion. This was all done in the legal system...which worked very well so far. The sentencing phase will be the determining factor however, as if he only gets his hand smacked, there will be no deterrent to this kind of activity.

One thing that this case has brought to our attention is how widespread it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This does not excuse Vicks actions...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Aug 22, 2007 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...but the Shrub is responsible for over ~5,000 soldier deaths, 30-40,000 injured and/or maimed for life, 600,000 innocent Iraqi deaths, untold injured, the destruction of a country that had NOTHING to do with 911, the destruction of the constitution, torture, etc. etc...I could go on...all to atone the deaths of 3,600 at the towers...yet where is his "punishment?"

It is easy to see how people can rationalize Vick's "persecution." His crimes do pale by comparison.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This does not excuse Vicks actions... Posted by: bloominblacksheep
» RE: This does not excuse Vicks actions... Posted by: anonymous black writer
BS
Posted by: Lakeguy123 on Aug 22, 2007 5:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vick is not a victim in any way. He is a deeply disturbed and sick individual who gets what he deserves. I would atleast have some pity for the guy if it was just drugs or something like that. What a dumbass...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why all the fuss about "poor Vick"??
Posted by: Leman on Aug 22, 2007 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First thigs first, I need to provide you with a disclaimer: until the whole hell broke loose I had no idea who Vick was. In fact, the only football stars I know are OJ Simpson and Jack Kemp - and you can guess I did not hear these names on ESPN. I do not watch TV and the only sport I follow is the stock market.

Having said that, now you might imagine I have a different perspective on the whole issue. To me, Vick is just another idiot, who had more than enough to live on but for some strange reason decided to "supplement his income" in one of the most appalling ways. The fact that he is a football star is completely irrelevant to me. The fact that he is black is of even less of the consequence.

Here is the way I see it: the guy had a piece of bread and butter on a golden plate, but he also wanted a piece of banned salami to go with it. He could not find a better way to get it but to participate in a cruel, disgusting criminal activity. He got caught. Now, instead of his fancy snack he is going to have a stale cracker on a used paper plate. Good for everybody. Certainly, not too bad of a deal for the dogs.

So, see, Mr. Hutchinson, I don't boo him because he is a black quarterback. I boo him because he is a scumbag. I don't see how he is any better than Enron's executives. And I don't see why he would not be treated by the public the same way those pieces of crap were.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Morally Outraged, America...Please!
Posted by: klife on Aug 22, 2007 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America is a strange place. Yes, Michael Vick is wrong, and nothing will change that. But it puzzles me that we live in this Twilight Zone of a nation where Michael Vick killing dogs sparks more outcry than the US military killing thousands of innocent people? (oh I forgot - they're just towel heads) Is that sick, or no?

Is this nation - now so morally outraged over the inhumane treatment of these pit bulls ("Pit Bulls" - bred to fight - not by Michael Vick) the same nation that was never even able to pass an anti-lynching law in the senate (for over a hundred years) to stop the castrating, BURNING, mutilating and hanging of thousands of innocent black men and women? Say it isn't so.

This country - morally outraged - You're kidding, right?!!!!!

This nation, and the majority of the anti-abortion, save the animal frenzy is a vain attempt to make up for a spiritual bankruptcy that can never be made up, without admitting the depravity, inhumanity, and sadistic brutality that was (and in many cases still is) the hallmark of this nation and its people.

Do you think we should save the moral indignation. That underscores our hypocrisy. Do you think we should tone down the rhetoric, and try to show some humanity, and understanding, even if, as seems to be our pattern, we scarcely possess any? I do.
Thank you
KB

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Morally Outraged, America...Please! Posted by: anonymous black writer
» Very good point Posted by: cheressemm
What This Case Should Be About
Posted by: EKSwitaj on Aug 22, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article contributes to a spate of commentary I've seen that acts as though this case is all about Vick. It's not. It's about the innocent animals that were tortured and killed because of his actions. There are opinions on both sides of the issue that forget that, and it is unfortunate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pennagal
Posted by: pennagal on Aug 22, 2007 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that we have trial by media in this country. And it's unfortunate that we don't have impeachment by media since Congress doesn't have the courage to do what's right.

However, it's often easier to take criminals down for lower level crimes. Breeding and using dogs to fight is abhorent and I don't feel in the least sorry that Vicks had to pay through the nose for such cruelty. I do wish we were equally quick to condemn people who are guilty of the abuse of their fellow human beings.

I think the reason for the public outcry is that most of us have had a pet -- a dog or a cat who trusted us implictly and absolutely. These "lesser" beings are far superior to humans in many ways. To treat them this way for sport is simply more than most of us can stomach.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AlterNet is confused?
Posted by: mholmes102 on Aug 22, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the left hand side of the screen is an ad blasting Wendy's for using eggs that are caged. Animal cruelty. Then the article is published saying Michael Vick has been crucified, when what he did was animal cruelty!! I am an animal activist and I resent AlterNet somehow approving of Vick's behavior.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: AlterNet is confused? Posted by: DEBKAMAINE
You do the Crime, You do the Time
Posted by: SackofWoe0 on Aug 22, 2007 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is all this fuss about? He obviously has chosen wrong friends who gave him up to save their own hide and he deserves it. Now he will understand how it feels to be "caged" like he did the dogs he so delibertaley brutalized for money, what a piece of trash he is. NFL beware!!!!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pup spelled backwards is still pup. But Dog spelled backwards...Let's all think about that one!!
Posted by: yellow on Aug 22, 2007 8:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Be kind to all animals!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gailhen
Posted by: gailhen on Aug 22, 2007 9:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All I can say to Mr. Hutchinson is "Oh, puleez." The behavior of Mr. Vick was despicable. I myself am totally against human-instigated animal fighting and baiting of any kind, but if the man were going to do what he did, why didn't he just humanely and instantly kill the beasts rather than subjecting them to such torture? Defending the indefensible has become a national pastime in this country on almost any level one can think of. What a shame.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

deb
Posted by: debmcd on Aug 22, 2007 9:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sick to death of our wonderful larger than life role model athletes thinking they can just do whatever they want because they can throw or kick or pass a ball. I'm sorry that he ruined his life and career but there was plenty of evidence against him. He lied to everyone until his partners in crime caved and agreed to work with authorities. He committed disgusting crimes against vulnerable animals who had no way of knowing what was happening to them. He deserves much more than he'll ever get. Celebraties think that because they get paid or inherit a lot of money that the law doesn't apply to them. Well our prison system is full of people who committed non-violent crimes but are sitting in a cell doing years and years. Mostly because they couldn't afford some high priced attorney who will cut some great deal with prosecutors. So he gets not one iota of sympathy from me. He doesn't deserve to have kids look up to him or cheer him on. He's just another low life criminal who strangled, drowned or electrocuted dogs, just because they didn't perform well enough for him to make more money on an inhumane bloodsport.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ummm...
Posted by: The Populist on Aug 22, 2007 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Didn't he cop a plea? So wtf you racist prick....go write for the MsM!!????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh yeah, and he *IS* guilty.
Posted by: fanny666 on Aug 22, 2007 9:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vick is not a victim.

Some of these columns by EOH are seriously stretching the victimhood thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THIS is why most of the public does not trust the media!
Posted by: Voicedude on Aug 22, 2007 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SPIN - i.e., finding another way to view things that bears no resemblance to reality. The ridiculous notion that he is in any way a VICK-tim is an insult to intelligence and decency. It's the kind of 'non-accountability' that Bush's administration is famous for, so how can Alternet have righteous indignation for that, yet now try and use the same spurious storytelling to canonize this scumbag? I can hear the Right Wing howling with laughter - shaking their heads at those 'liberal nutjobs'. I'm sorry, but the damage to your credibility may be heavy on this one.

'The world was out to get him', 'he's a victim of a racist agenda', 'another example of the man trying to him down' and attitudes like this are steeped in denial and the worst possible position a responsible member of the media can possibly take. In this case, they have NOTHING to do with reality! What's next? Interviewing O.J. on how it feels to get 'railroaded'? A comparison to Ray Carruth and the way we misunderstood him?

puh - LEASE!

With all of the real injustices out there, this position is too preposturous to mention even behind closed doors, much less out in the public forum.

To even call it a 'lynching' is crock! But to call it a 'crucifixion' is downright blasphemy! You do yourself, your readers, and all bonifide victims a real dis-service with this one.

After this, I guess we can look forward to your next article: "The Softer Side Of Osama"......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» He's a victim of a racist agenda Posted by: LiberalRedneck
Odd comparisons
Posted by: bg41 on Aug 22, 2007 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish I understood the logic behind saying things like, "Don't go over board on Michael Vick - he wasn't out bombing people, he was holding dog fights," or, "There are bigger problems out there than this." Both of these claims may be true. So what? Does either of these claims change the fact that a law has been broken? And federal laws at that? While I can never understand the callousness that lurks behind those individuals who can cavalierly lead a nation into war, I am equally baffled by the indifference of so many people to nonhuman animals. Cruelty is cruelty, and whether you happen to think dogs deserve special protection under the law, it seems to me that it's the alleged crime's element of complete indifference to suffering that engenders the strong public reaction.

It's rather sad to reduce PETA and its supporters to caricatures who are somehow oppressing poor millionaire football players with their annoying messages of humane treatement to animals. (It's perhaps a more depressing sign that Peta and other animal rights/environmental groups are referred to more often in terms that categorize them as annoying little gadflies and not legitimately concerned individuals.)

While I admit I have a real affection for dogs, it's not the fact that little puppies are being hurt that contributes to whatever horror I feel at the crimes of which Vick is accused. It's the fact of the same absence of compassion or sympathy that we see in our casually warmongering leaders is also obviously present in someone who engages in this sort of activity (and seems depressingly evident in those who seek to explain away the crime by caliming they're "only dogs"), and that somehow troubles me more because it implies a more widespread lack of feeling when inflicting harm on other living things than I had imagined existed. So maybe that's part of the outcry - we've (sadly) grown accustomed to the fact that our current political leaders are, for lack of a better term, almost sociopathically indifferent to the tremendous loss of life they've perpetrated overseas - but maybe it's that much more disturbing to see how prevalent that same callousness is even outside of the political realm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is it because he is Black?
Posted by: mdwoade on Aug 22, 2007 11:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Disclaimer: We are owners of a "bait dog" that was rescued from a dogfighting ring. A bait dog is killed slowly by being ripped to shreds by fighting-dogs so that they get the taste of blood. Our dog is still traumatized even after six years.
I read the article several times, and the only reference to the fact that Vick is Black is a reference to a tepid response by the NAACP. The only reason I can see for this article is because he IS Black. If a redneck WASP player was involved in torturing and killing dogs, everybody could get behind the most vindictive punishments. Michael Vick is/was a wealthy individual who decided to involve himself with something that most people in our country, Black, White, Yellow, Hispanic and Red people, find offensive and illegal. The hidden message is that poor Michael is just another Southern Black kid ground up and spit out by the White racist establishment. I think that is hogwash. There are plenty of cases of legitimate discrimination to fight without defending a rich Black celebrity who engaged in despicable and illegal activity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vick
Posted by: mick3 on Aug 22, 2007 11:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, gee, the guy was tried and convicted, and worse, he pled guilty. Ah, the poor innocent, taking desperate measures to avoid starvation and all, only to be "crucified" for it. Another "gee" goes to the realization that the article was written by a black man. It seems that all rationality goes out the window in a hurry, any time a black man is held responsible for some outrage. Two reasons: (1) a nation-long jihad against black males by society and its law enforcement arms and (2) the black males' refusal to take responsibility for their actions or inactions. It's a double whammy that gets them nowhere except in the bind they're presently in. Just wish there weren't so many people making excuses instead of seeing a problem clearly and dealing with that problem directly as possible.

I might add that I grew up in L.A. and always said that if I were black in L.A. I would probably end up killing someone, someone with a badge. The LAPD, no different from its counterparts in other major cities, has always been outrageously sexist, racist and broadly abusive, even under a black mayor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The more one defends the defenseless..... Posted by: anonymous black writer
Cruciixtion sounds fine to me, however,
Posted by: louisa23 on Aug 22, 2007 1:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has been pointed out that there are other sports "stars" that approve of and indulge in dog fighting. I used to be a Donovan McNabb fan until he voiced support for MV. Not anymore. Read Itchmo.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

delta 15
Posted by: 15delta on Aug 22, 2007 1:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy shows his I.Q. score as a minus 50 below zero.
He makes more money than he can count and has the world
in his hands with the gifts from God and then puts his head
right up his --s, with such a dispicipul stunt of the lowest.
It shows to me that people like him that thinks he is untouchable,
and think they are the brightest in the world because he is a star
and all adore him.
My comment to him:
You’re a bigger ass-hole than Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Torturing animals is usually a misdemeanor
Posted by: dusty1215 on Aug 22, 2007 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FYI, comparing what Vick did to torturing animals is apples and oranges in the court systems. Most states view animal torture as a misdemeanor.

Yes, what he did was heinous and disgusting..but most scumbags that get nailed for straight animal torture do months not years, if anything.

I am sorry that Vick was tried in the court of public opinion..perhaps he will pay a harsher price because of his celebrity..but that won't excuse his actions or the decisions he made as an adult.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 -