Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

Bush's Bid for a Death Penalty Fast Track

By Andrew Gumbel, The Independent UK. Posted August 22, 2007.


A look at the White House's plans to cut death row inmates' right of appeal.
Advertisement

The Bush administration is preparing to speed up the executions of criminals who are on death row across the United States, in effect, cutting out several layers of appeals in the federal courts so that prisoners can be "fast-tracked" to their deaths.

With less than 18 months to go to secure a presidential legacy, President Bush has turned to an issue he has specialised in since approving a record number of executions while Governor of Texas.

The US Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales -- Mr Bush's top legal adviser during the spree of executions in Texas in the 1990s -- is putting finishing touches to regulations, inspired by recent anti-terrorism legislation, that would allow states to turn to the Justice Department, instead of the federal courts, as a key arbiter in deciding whether prisoners live or die.

The US is already among the top six countries worldwide in terms of the numbers of its own citizens that it puts to death. Fifty-two Americans were executed last year and thousands await their fate on death row.

In some instances, prisoners would have significantly less time to file federal appeals, and the appeals courts significantly less time to respond. On the question of whether defendants received adequate representation at trial -- a key issue in many cases, especially in southern states with no formal public defender system -- the Attorney General would be the sole decision-maker.

Since Mr Gonzales is a prosecutor, not a judge, and since he has a track record of favouring death in almost every capital case brought before him, the regulations would, in effect, remove a crucial safety net for prisoners who feel they have been wrongly convicted.

Elisabeth Semel, a death penalty specialist at the University of California law school in Berkeley, said the intention of the proposed regulation was clear: "To make it more difficult for people who have been sentenced to death in state courts, including those sentenced without adequate representation and resources, to avoid being executed."

The regulations, first made public by the Los Angeles Times, will be subject to a public comment period extending into September. They will then be enacted "as quickly as circumstances allow," according to a Justice Department spokeswoman.

The administration's enthusiasm for capital punishment runs counter to the recent trend away from the death penalty in many states. Last year saw the lowest number of capital convictions across the country -- 114 -- since the death penalty was reintroduced in the early 1970s. The development of DNA testing has raised uncomfortable questions about the safety of many capital convictions, prompting Illinois to call a halt to all its executions and triggering reviews in many other states.

Over the past two years, doubts have also arisen over the most popular method of execution -- death by lethal injection -- because medical research has suggested prisoners may die in agony. One of the cocktails of drugs typically administered, pancuronium bromide, paralyses the body, masking any pain without necessarily alleviating it.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: alberto gonzales, bush, death row, death penalty

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Maybe the Bush gang can fast track their own executions after treason
Posted by: zyxwvut on Aug 22, 2007 1:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and war crimes trials.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush is a craven killer
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Aug 22, 2007 2:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will leave the high crimes and misdemeanors issues associated with Iraq alone, except to demand the prosecution of the entirety of the Bush crowd for crimes against humanity. But what can be expected from a governor that presided over 131 executions in five years in Texas, a mind-numbing statistic unequaled anywhere. An investigation of those 131 cases revealed that one-third were defended by a lawyer that was later disbarred or severely sanctioned for misconduct. In 40 cases the lawyer put up no evidence or only one witness at the sentence hearing following trial. In 29 cases the prosecutor used the same psychiatrist whose testimony was that the defendant will likely commit a future violent act. In many instances, the shrink never examined the defendant, a practice that is condemned as unethical. In other cases, there was demonstrable evidence of perjury and judicial misconduct. Most of the 131 defendants were too poor to hire a lawyer and there was no indigent defense system in Texas. Most lawyers were appointed by the judges that presided at the trials and the majority of those had contributed to the judge's election campaingns. The State Bar of Texas appointed a committee to investigate indigent defense in the state and it reported a "national embarrassment in the area of indigent legal services." Against that background, Bush claimed everyone got a fair shot and he stood tall in defense of the executions. More compelling than that confession of craven inhumanity is the utter fact that he never reviewed one case in five years to consider commuting a death sentence. His lack of concern for others is legendary and best excemplified by this telling history: following his graduation from Yale and Harvard (MBA program), Bush sought admission to the U. of Texas, School of Law and was rejected for admission. The rejection is significant because it was accompanied by a formal letter from one of the most celebrated and distinguished law faculty professors, who declared Bush unfit for the study of law. I am not aware of a similar rejection involving any applicant anywhere else, particularly involving an applicant from a prominant political family in a state where favoritism for such types is legendary. What was clear at that time was his unfitness to study law and be bound by the proscriptions that govern professional conduct. What is now known is that he is a craven killer with no redeeming value to mankind whatsoever. It is high time that he be subjected to the criminal justice system he so ardently defends and if you think not you are sicker and more depraved than he is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush is a craven killer Posted by: MindyB
» Sources Posted by: Col. Jackleg
Even One Innocent Is Too Many
Posted by: packofwolves on Aug 22, 2007 5:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We cannot justify the execution of even one innocent person even if 10 guilty go free. The most horrible piece to the excecution game is that innocense doesn't matter, it is far less important than the process. How have we gotten to such a place where innocence is only a by-product of the process? In my mind the damn process doesn't mean diddly squat if someone is wrongly accused and/or convicted. If we put more money into rehabilitation we might not have the growing prison populations and need for bigger and more secure prisons. Rehabilitation is less expensive too in the long run. The other disturbing fact to executions is that most of the people who are on death row are individuals who are poor and could not afford to hire experienced, reputable, and competent lawyers...we are executing those who are least able to defend themselves. Our legal system is a mess and it will be entirely unjust if Bush gets away with his plans for a fast track to the death penalty. Who in the hell does this guy think he is. I think it's time he got a taste of his own medicine. People, be warned of politicians like this. IMPEACH BUSH AND HIS CRONIES. HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ATTACK ON OUR COUNTRY AND OUR CONSTITUTION.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Couldn't they find a less deadly obsession?
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on Aug 22, 2007 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Death and torture, torture and death, we make all the decisions and we like to kill people. (Oh, but we'll fight to your death our right to protect little clumps of cells that might someday become people. Once they're born, they're fair game.)

Psychologists must be having a field day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I guess...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Aug 22, 2007 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... Maybe Bush just wants more people to make fun of... since, really... who else can a total failure like him make fun of? He just needs a few Carla Faye Tuckers every once in a while to take the edge off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I agree
Posted by: vkobaya on Aug 22, 2007 6:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes indeed. Fast track executions. That will mean when George the Damned and his company of vampires are condemned, they will be executed by a bullet in the back of the head, one minute after the proclamation of guilty. Silver bullet of course. On second thought, make it between the eyes. It is crueler just as George the Damned deserves it as cruel as they come.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BUSH AND GONZALES, ANGELS OF DEATH
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 22, 2007 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's been that way since the old Texas days. The idea of having to power to take a life must be some kind of aphrodisiac for them. Nothing else accounts for it. Justice? I don't think so. Cost effective? No. It's sick twisted perversion, it brings them pleasure and it scares me half to death. Everything that drives Bush is evil and sinister. He has no redeeming qualities and no regard for human life. It defeinitely runs in the family. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Case In Point: countdown to Kenneth Foster's fate
Posted by: equidave on Aug 22, 2007 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those that might not have heard or signed the petition yet, please take just a couple minutes to review and consider signing petition and related actions in support of saving a man's life who is not even accused of having taken a life here: http://www.freekenneth.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't That Just Figure???
Posted by: Tom Degan on Aug 22, 2007 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My goodness! Just when you thought the hideous little bastard couldn't sink any lower....

What is it with this guy? Why does he get such an obvious thrill from killing people? How was he raised? What do we really know about his parents, George, Sr. and Barbara. It is now a given that the mother was (and is) a complete and utter bitch - a really mean shrew - any one who knows the family will tell you that. Is that where he gets his cruelty?

What a legacy is leaving for future generations! Is the old man tossing and turning in his bed at night with the assured realization tha his half-witted kid will be remebered as the first former president of the United States to die in federal prison? Can you even imagine the torment that the old bastard must be going through.

Calumny, thy name is Bush.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't That Just Figure??? Posted by: VZEQICVA
The Bush Legacy
Posted by: drsivana99 on Aug 22, 2007 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Leaving the world a less densely-populated place than it was when he found it.
Times like this I wish I believed in hell, so I could savor the thought of him going there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Outrage?
Posted by: Axiom69 on Aug 22, 2007 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If 10% of the inmates on death row were innocent that would mean in the next few years 5-6 innocent people would be mistakenly put to death. Yet every year tens of thousands of innocent people are killed or injured by drunk drivers. 5-6 innocent people will probably be killed or injured by a drunk driver before you finish reading this. Where is that outrage? People in this country amaze me. We protest and are outraged by the destruction of habitat belonging to some blue haired woodpecker but ignore the fact that we have homeless children in this country. We pour tens of millions into the campaign coffers of our favorite candidate but don't have time to drop some coins in the Salvation Army bucket. Why do we worry about 1 jailed journalist in China but ignore the fact that there are thousands of people being exterminated in Darfur? Where is the outrage? The outrage lies wherever the media tells us it lies. We're sheep. Being herded from one protest to the next by the elites who want us to ignore that man behind the curtain. And you all thought you were free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Outrage? Posted by: jackyD
» RE: Outrage? Posted by: Iaela
» RE: Outrage? Posted by: MindyB
When Dubya's dead
Posted by: veive on Aug 22, 2007 8:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It will be said that he lasted far too long.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: When Dubya's dead Posted by: Ellen Remore
PROCLAIM A HOLIDAY!!!!
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 22, 2007 12:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Holy Shit Man!!! I can't freaking believe it!! Of course,by all means lets high speed rail,lightspeed project this death penalty for Bush ahead!! It's not often you get a president,much less this president,to admit he's wronged the World and is willing to speed up his own death sentance.This is unbelievable!!!!
Oh crap, I was reading with the wrong bifocal. Let this idiot be allowed to kill people even faster than he already does?
Not on your life. This fools administration has broken more laws and flaunted conspiricies against humanity than any on record. They have urinated on Freedom,deficated upon Liberty
and uttered speeches of grandious oratorical flatulance.
The only death sentence that should be 'fast tracked' are for Crimes against Humanity, Treason, and not remembering what it is you do in your office.
Draft Jeffrey7 for Prez Think Outside the System

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Something I have yet to see a comment on
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Aug 22, 2007 1:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is the thought that this is another way to get rid of troublesome people for the Bush administration and the neocons in general. All they have to do is railroad someone, like they do innocent politicians or doctors who get in their way, but instead of dropping the charges later, they fast track an execution, and by the time anyone figures out that, "oops - looks like they had nothing at all to do with it", or even that maybe there was no murder atll, it's a little too late and the poor sucker has already been planted.

Jesus, what does it take to make it obvious to some people that this administration is out to destroy the Constitution, the country, and that they are totally insane??

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I will cheer on the day Bushit dies, as I did when Nixon died.
Posted by: Ellie1 on Aug 22, 2007 2:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there is anyone who deserves to be imprisoned, it is George Bushit. He is a murderer-he murdered thousands on Sept. 11 (he was warned about it in advance and did nothing), countless innocent Iraqies, and of course our own soldiers. In fact, imprisonment is too good for him. IMPEACH, IMPRISON, EXECUTE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm all for the death penalty - for corporations who kill, that is.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 22, 2007 2:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many people have been killed by the dishonest and fraudulent practices of major US corporations over the years? How many drug studies pointing to the devastating effects of various drugs have been suppressed by Big Pharma in order to gain a few more years of profits (Vioxx and Celebrex come to mind - and there are many others.)

Our legal system has granted 'corporate personhood' to corporations - and yet it also allows corporation to own other corporations (isn't that slavery, if corporations are people?) and has exempted corporations from the death penalty.

The 'death penalty' for corporations means dissolving their corporate charter and seizing their assets (the shareholders get squat).

Not in a million years would the corporate-controlled politicians in the US ever support this - but it's an idea that private citizens and grassroots groups might consider adopting. See The Death Penalty for Corporations Comes of Age for the legal background.

As far as the death penalty for real people - it's a gross travesty of justice with serious racist and classist overtones.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why would the leopard (or miserable little weasel) change its spots?
Posted by: Ellen Remore on Aug 22, 2007 2:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that this is absolutely nauseating, but certainly no surprise. This is the "compassionate conservative" who broke the record for executions in Texas, after reviewing each death warrant that passed his desk for an average of 15 minutes. (well, that's probably the outside of his attention span.) The simple fact is that like most right-wingers who habitually rush to judge those in less rarefied circumstances than themselves, this pathetic excuse for a human being has no conception of the nature of human compassion, mercy, or simple empathy. I'm sure he viewed the death row inmates in the Texas "condemn 'em and inject 'em" penal system in much the same way he now views grunts in Iraq: they are so far down the food chain that they do not register a blip on the radar screen of the little preppy consciousness he tries to subvert. Which is indicative of a complete lack of imagination. Which is one more irrefutable proof of his overwhelming stupidty. May he die deserted, destitute and desolate!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He'llnever spend one day in a jail or Prison
Posted by: Krain61 on Aug 22, 2007 2:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To start with I don't think this American Hitler will ever spend one day
in a jail let alone a prison. No one will ever file anything but talk against
him. I really don't believe there will be a election either.
I think more on the story of a so called terrorist attack or a attack on Iran
before the election and it will be postponed indefinitly.
Also with the Patriot act now in place and they fast track deaths for murder
they can now pin a murder on you or me and fast track your death and they
killed to birds with one stone.. People always think it will be the other guy
but soon we will be the other one. I also see our guns rights going very soon.
Just like the Missle Ofensive system they want near Russia. I think they will
have most American scared to such a point that they fight for what ever cause
they want them to fight for.
they exicute poor people who can't afford to buy legal help which means also
that they can't profit from them in other ways like paying taxes so they can
send us to fight another war or give bigger tax cuts away.
The only way he could be tried and convicted is if it's done after he leaves
office to make it stick. And he should be tried in a war crimes trial and in our
courts for each and evey crime he committed. Hell look at the new weapons
they invent to use for what they call crowd control. What! Are they expecting
a alot of big crowds soon?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is just the Neo-cons answer to....
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 22, 2007 3:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... prison over crowding and climbing extortionate fees being paid to private contracted corporations and the associated judicial costs...

These costs have indirect failings reflective of our modern society as a whole, and which makes me as culpable as my neighbor who is supporting these actions and I won't/cant stand by and do nothing while my rights and freedoms are being trampled in such a way.

How private enterprise got involved in the tragedy of human misery and suffering is beyond comprehension & reproach... The convicted never deserve Corporate enslavement no matter the reasons for incarceration... nor does the state have the right to end the life or empower a corporate entity to end the life of anyone anywhere because that lowers us all to the level of the original sin

This is just a sad example of how far some in society have fallen and is the responsibility of the rest of us to point out the shortcomings and enlighten those of us still living in a darkened age of responsibility and reason.

Stand up and be counted and let your neighbors know how wrong this is.
Be an example for future generations!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just think about
Posted by: willymack on Aug 22, 2007 7:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a grotesque, poisonous, degenerate, and obscene parody of a man the President of the United States is! Anyone who's troubled himself to take even a casual look at his past can see this. The fact that he STILL isn't in prison doing hard time is a grim reminder of our indifference to, and ignorance of what's right and proper. Guess what, folks? He'll continue to heap insults against the people of our country unless he's STOPPED. Now, he wants to fast-track executions, because of his sick desire to cause pain and death. Chances are he'll get away with this as he's gotten away with so many other crimes against humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mayan King George
Posted by: Doggycuny on Aug 23, 2007 9:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
King George deals in death and speeding people to their execution is another way for him to appease the demons of the underworld. Just like in Mayan times where humans were sacrificed because they believed the blood pleased the gods of the underworld, King George answers to higher masters and wishes to satisfy them. The Mayan executions were deliberately made as horrific as possible because they believed the demons fed off the victims state of terror before death. King George probably dreams of ways he can deliver death and terror to as many people as possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

but what will the democrats do?
Posted by: whealeydj on Aug 23, 2007 4:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will Democrats in the Judiciary Committee and Congress stand up to Bush on death penalty fasttrack? or will they acquiesce as they have on torture and habeas corpus and half the Bill of Rights gutted by Bush counter-terrorism measures ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some California inmates wait 20 years on death row for their appeal
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Aug 24, 2007 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some California inmates wait 20 years on death row for their mandatory appeal. LOTS!! Is the man who murdered in 1985 the same man who is put to death in 2008?

There ARE innocent men on death row. Jarvis Jay Masters is one of them. See www.freejarvis.org

While I agree that appeals need to happen must faster than 20 years (2 years should be the MAXIMUM), the DP should be abolished.

I do believe that guilty killers (first degree, malicious intent, forethought, etc...) should receive NO PAROLE, ever....and that would certainly apply to the majority of our government officials.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yup, thats the Rethugs...
Posted by: bob t on Aug 24, 2007 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and the religious right; more killing. Thats their specialty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

VIVA GEORGE BUSH
Posted by: rushbaby on Aug 24, 2007 11:05 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally someone with balls to get these bastards taken out PERMANENTLY!

Thank God for George Bush!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hey troll, Posted by: Ellie1
» RE: Hey troll, Posted by: Ian MacLeod
rita
Posted by: ressless on Aug 28, 2007 11:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this the same man that wants a constitutional amendment to preserve "Christian family values"? Who would Jesus execute?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]