Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

The Last Days of American Democracy?

By James Harris and Joshua Scheer, Truthdig. Posted August 9, 2007.


Elliot Cohen, author of The Last Days of Democracy, argues that the United States is in political and cultural decline, with media and telecommunications giants engaged in "a well-organized effort to hijack America."
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

James Harris: On the phone we are talking to Elliot Cohen, the author of The Last Days of Democracy. Elliot, let's start with your theory. For the most part, you're saying that our government in the United States is coming to an end. And that we are headed toward a dictatorship, toward authoritarian rule. The idea that we will one day be like Nazi Germany was … is hard for a lot of Americans to swallow. Why do you believe it to be true?

Elliot Cohen: We are not saying things off the top of our heads; we do have the operations and secret prison camps in Europe, we torture prisoners in Abu Ghraib and Gitmo. This regarding the Geneva Conventions and the NSA spying programs warrantlessly. Bush is issuing signing statements, which is tantamount to nullifying congressional lawmaking powers. Cancellation of habeas corpus, enabling individuals as enemy combatants just by virtue of whether the president deems that hostile to U.S. interests. I mean this goes on and on for individual facts as to why one might say that America is becoming a dictatorship. And as far as the issues of the media and how the media is being controlled, I think there's many insiders who admit the same facts that I've stated, in fact, they come from such -- I mean, the issue here is not that the media is somehow an ideologue in cahoots with the government for ideological purposes. It's rather that the media is a moneymaking machine and is being controlled by the purse-strings -- through the government.

Josh Scheer: Now, aren't there good people in the media who are trying to do something? Are they wimpy? Or are they not speaking loud enough? What do you think is the cause of the problem with the media?

Cohen: Well, the cause of the problem isn't the good journalists who are in the trenches and risking their lives to get out stories. They're still there. What happens is when the news is edited, what facts that are damaging to government, the censorship kicks in. And the stories just don't get out there from the mainstream. And, so, it's not that it is a sense of wimpiness of individuals who are risking their lives. I think there needs to be a realization, however, that is it really worth risking your life when the story is going to be cut, edited, censored, in a way that the news isn't going to get out. And so it's not at the lower levels of journalists in the trenches; it's the higher levels of editorship and ownership where -- I mean there's a lot of reasons for this. First of all, when you look at the media and its interests, its bottom line is its major interests. And how does it attain its bottom line? Well, it does it through military contracts, for instance. Because these companies are not just newsrooms, they are giant conglomerates.

Take, for interest, General Electric. General Electric has interests in producing jet engines for military contracts with Lockheed Martin. And the war in Iraq is something that builds up these revenues, and when it comes to advancing the media ownership, how many cross-ownership markets and how far can you advance your national market? Well the FCC is the one that grants those wishes and … so there's lots of reasons why, not withstanding tax incentives and other little government perks, why the media would be beholden, you know, to the politicians who hold the reins of government. And when you have such an aggressive government as we do, which is ideological and has this desire to control and amass great power, then you have really a recipe for dictatorship. And that's what we have: We don't have an independent Fourth Estate doing its job. And we have problems there.

Scheer: That's what I'm talking about. When I say wimpy, I don't mean obviously the person in Iraq trying to cover for Indymedia. I'm talking about those people in power who are editors, who are publishers, who are the owners, shouldn't they have some kind of standard, because they are the Fourth Estate, speaking truth to power ... ?

Cohen: The way things are going is they're thinking as corporate executives and not journalists. They're thinking about their obligations to their shareholders; they're thinking about their bottom line. And that kind of thinking is incompatible with the Fourth Estate that's independent of government -- not when you're in business with the government. One of the major problems as far as the media is concerned is media consolidation and these large corporations that control the media being not these good journalists of the Fourth Estate, but rather simply businessmen trying to make a profit.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: civil liberties, elliot cohen, american democracy

James Harris is a radio producer and filmmaker based in San Francisco.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
BRAVO!!
Posted by: AlohaTerry on Aug 9, 2007 5:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good Article!! Especially the connection between Government and the Media....TIME TO WAKE UP!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reporters should use guerrilla tactics
Posted by: Rrrandy Wurst on Aug 9, 2007 5:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the problem is reporters being censored or having their criticisms of corporations or government edited out of their stories, then they can and should send their originals with pen-names to internet news sites.

Though I am sick of war metaphors, in these Bush/Neocon times we are suffering through a "war on truth." The First Amendment exists specifically (though not entirely) to support, for the duration of American-style democracy, a press that will fully inform its citizens about the workings of our government and those who would influence government and laws. If and when our principles and laws regarding public knowledge are being subverted, those in the public knowledge trenches---reporters---must fight back. They must get the whole truth out to the public or they are complicit.

Reporters must use the traditional guerrilla tactic of public knowledge, which used to be pamphleting, that in these times has metamorphosed into blogging.

It's not enough for reporters to say, Gee, things are tough because the editors slice and dice or even spike our stories. Give "the enemy" a dose of Tom Paine. Disguise yourselves. Fire your truth weapons from behind rocks and trees.

Give us the whole truth that Americans need and deserve. Be heroes.

---Rrrandy Wurst (wurstwisdom.com)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bobby? Posted by: Knowmad
» Muckraking opportunity Posted by: wrd
The need to arrest Bush and Cheney
Posted by: Richar on Aug 9, 2007 5:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This discussion went back to the Nazis at times, but should have gone back a century to the Prussians. Barbara Tuchman’s book, The Guns of August, included about the Prussians (page 25, Dell edition), that General Friedrich von Bernhardi’s 1911 book, Germany and the Next War, had three chapters titled: “The Right to Make War”, “The Duty to Make War”, and “World Power or Downfall”. Bernhardi was referred to as “the spokesman of militarism”.

This sounds chillingly like the attitudes of the Bush administration. The world was very afraid of the Prussians before World War I, and is now very afraid of Bush’s America. The Bush family and members and associates of the Bush and Reagan administrations have billions of dollars invested in armaments manufacture through the Carlyle Group. They profit at the enormous expense of U.S. taxpayers by generating and fighting wars. They have more military power than the next 15 countries put together and are spending more than all the rest of the world on developing new weapons, including nuclear. The world is accusing them of starting a new arms race.

Under the aforementioned administrations, America has committed all the Nazi war crimes except death camps, and has added the use of DU weapons. They are now in the process of performing the world’s greatest act of piracy. The main purpose of the four military bases, built secretly at multi-billion dollars cost, is surely to defend the Bush administration’s theft of Iraqi oil and to defend the oil fields that the Bush petro-cartel wants to develop. The only thing that could stop this would be a nuclear bomb on each from Iran. Iran has no such bombs and could not for several years, but Bush keeps talking of Iraq as a threat and, with already well nuclear armed Israel, wants to cripple Iran so it never could. Piracy has never run so rampant.

Amazingly, there is a way to stop them and, even, to give an honorable way out of Iraq. It requires the immediate arrest of Bush, Cheney and several others for war crimes. Then Nancy Pelosi automatically becomes president and, with clean hands, apologizes to the Islamic world for America’s actions under Bush, and starts making amends and withdrawing from Iraq. It could be as sudden as the fall of the Berlin Wall, and far more welcome.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» 'Drill it!' Posted by: Bobsays
Can I still travel
Posted by: reinaldok on Aug 9, 2007 8:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like so many of us I have close friends and family spread out over two continents. For obvious reasons I must use the airlines. Effective long distance rail travel has gone the way of the dodo. Buses are at best a bad joke. Since the 9-11 incidents, I have been
a consistent poster on several of the, what I like to think of as the more enlightened websites and publications. My positions have always tended to the more liberal side. I frankly wonder if I should be truly concerned that one good morning I will arrive at the airline's ticket counter and will be informed by that sweet nothing, "Sorry sir, you're on the no-fly list." With all the curtailing of freedoms that we are witnessing, I feel that this is a real possibility. For the last several years, I have asked myself, why has the legal and academic communities been so very quiet with regards to the present lack of basic freedoms? I suppose the fear of not being able to travel is one reason.
When I do take a plane, it seems that I am constantly stuck seated next to one of those and there are so very many, who continually spout the party line. "Almost 4,000 dead in Iraq, that's nothing compared to Viet-nam. We must let Bush finish his mission. Give him a chance. Do you really want a Taliban on every street corner? On and on - You have all heard the same garbage. Hasta cuando?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Can I still travel Posted by: shanaza
» RE: Can I still travel Posted by: Maryanne
Not enough
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Aug 9, 2007 9:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not enough to bemoan the fact that our news is controlled by corporations. That is only one part of the problem. Not only the media but our entire government is controlled by the corporate establishment. The Democrats as well as the Republicans are bought and paid for by big business.

Don't take my word for this. There are several sources on the internet that will tell anyone who's interested how much the pharmaceutical industry contributed to both parties, how much the "defense" industry contributed to both parties how much the banking industry contributed to both parties how much the insurnnce industry contributed to both parties and on and on.

It should be obvious to anyone who has this knowledge that our elections only decide which party carries out the corporate agenda. Where elections are meaningless Democracy is dead.

The major obstacle to Democracy in this country is that we believe that we can vote the rascals out. We can't. They weren't voted in; they bought their way in. They worked outside the electoral system and bought control of both parties. The only way that we can get them out is to work outside the electoral system and take control of both parties.

It can be done. Join The Lincoln Initiative, it's not an organization. It is a strategy to win "government of the people, by the people, and for the people".
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not enough Posted by: Lector
» RE: Lector Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Lincon Fan Posted by: Basenjis
Democracy fails when it fails to change anything
Posted by: Bobsays on Aug 10, 2007 12:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And US democracy has been a dead duck for gone 30 years now. The essentials of the US system have stayed the same, no matter what harm it does to Americans and people around the world. This insensitivity speaks of a machine, a greedy, self-serving machine that is beyond democratic control.

Once democracy fails then it becomes only about who can churn the system as fast as possible. And then you get something like China. Authoritarian, all about productivity, inhuman.

It is sad, because America has given the world so much: great music, art, ideas, technology. To witness it going down like this is heartbreaking. And scary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THANK YOU! NOW maybe people will get why NAZI means NAZI
Posted by: xbj on Aug 10, 2007 2:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only the scapegoats change; the M.O. and the greed and complete lack of all empathy that drives the psychopath perps never will.

Until society finds a way to quit procreating them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

retaining this democracy? grabbing a fistful of water . . .
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Aug 10, 2007 3:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we were warned. Franklin, Madison, Jefferson. We see what they warned against all around us. we don't admire the intellect anymore in this country (think of what we pay teachers and the drivel we ask them to teach) but corporatism (think of what the corporate overlords are 'paid' or, in reality, what is in effect, NOT paid to the worker).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It’s not our fault
Posted by: shangrilalad on Aug 10, 2007 3:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.
It’s impossible to know what any political candidate will actually do once they are elected, because campaigning is a process driven by expedience and money, honey. And the day they are elected, politicians start planning for their next campaign. So, it’s always about the money, honey.

Most Americans who’ve learned to think know it’s always about the money, but we respond to this knowledge in different ways. There are those who decide, “Okay, that’s how our system works, and I can’t change it, so it would be stupid not to take advantage of it.” Then there are those who want to change the system, for better or worse depending on your point of view. Depending on your point of view, an egalitarian society is goal worth striving for and sacrificing for, or not. I think most Americans have decided, not.

It’s not our fault, we’re born greedy and selfish.

Blame God.

See where that gets you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» i blamed god Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: when i blamed god ... Posted by: shanaza
» RE: It’s not our fault Posted by: johnthetreehugger
» RE: It’s not our fault Posted by: Basenjis
Question -- part 1
Posted by: hagwind on Aug 10, 2007 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do so many of us, right, left, and center, persist in "framing" the problem in ways that have no solution -- short of divine or other extraterrestrial intervention?

Seriously. If it's not some god, it's some damn conspiracy. Or it's genes, or human nature, or "psychopath perps." Can't do anything about that -- guess I'll go back to doing sudoku puzzles.

"Psychopath perps" we may always have with us. But who would remember the name of Herr Schickelgruber if he'd become a mediocre artist, or even an elementary school teacher? As a teacher he might have done serious damage but on a relatively small scale; he wouldn't have been responsible for the deaths of millions upon millions of people. If the only way to prevent a Hitler and a Nazi Germany is to prevent the procreation of psychopathic perps, we might as well give up now. Identifying and fixing the social conditions that tend to foster psychopathic perps -- OK, that has more potential. Even better -- much, much better -- is establishing and sustaining the institutions that keep psychopathic perps out of power, or that limit the damage they can cause if they get into power. That's what the founders of the U.S. of A. did, and you know what? It doesn't matter that they were all white guys with unenlightened attitudes on a number of very important subjects. They were visionary and they understood that people are never going to be perfect and they "framed" a government structure that (so far) has kept Napoleons and Hitlers and Stalins out of power.

Or maybe it hasn't entirely. Anyone else read Master of the Senate, the third volume in Robert Caro's awesome biography of Lyndon Johnson? From very early in his career, Johnson was the consummate manipulator. His goal was power, and it pretty much justified any means that worked. (Caro's account of Johnson's systematic persecution of Leland Olds took my breath away. Johnson was more ruthless, and much smarter, than Joe McCarthy. No contest.) Johnson did plenty of damage. What kept him from doing more damage was the structure of the U.S. government, its checks and balances. That's what the "rule of law" is about. Had LBJ been born in same place as Herr Schickelgruber -- well, suffice it to say that he wasn't, and for that I am grateful. I am also grateful to be living under the rule of law, imperfect as those laws often are. When I hear people who are so disgusted by the current situation say that we ought to blow it all up (figuratively) and start over, I think: "Be careful what you wish for. And if you get your wish, I want to be long dead by then."

*more*

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Question -- part 2 Posted by: hagwind
» RE: "They" thought they were free. Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Answer Posted by: xbj
looking forward
Posted by: Trazom on Aug 10, 2007 6:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The people made the Constitution, and they can unmake it." - Chief Justice John Marshall

It is becoming abundantly clear to me that real Constitutional reform must be enacted in the coming years. Not a wholesale rip-up and redesign, but a re-alignment and tune-up to deal with the transgressions of this present administration, and also to try and "catch up" with this new globalized, hyper-tech world we live in. However, I don't believe any of this will happen until Bush Jr. is out. I also don't see impeachment taking place - there just simply isn't the majority required in the Senate thanks to partisan politics. That's not an excuse, but a reality. He will go down as the worst president who was never impeached. Mark my words.

Of course, the odds at Constitutional reform will forever remain inexorably linked to this War on Terror, meaning that any major attack or incident, depending on its severity, has the chance of inducing a martial state (Marshall Law) and/or influencing the outcome of the next election (Pres. Guiliani). So that is the 800 lb gorilla in the room. If that does happen, we will know we are one step closer to fascism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: looking forward Posted by: hagwind
Unintelligible
Posted by: nopuppy on Aug 10, 2007 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sorry, I wanted to read this, but it doesn't make any sense at all. Was it transcribed from a tape by a machine or software program? "This regarding the Geneva Conventions and the NSA spying programs warrantlessly." Huh?? "...enabling individuals as enemy combatants just by virtue of whether the president deems that hostile to U.S. interests." What?? "Enabling"? Doesn't the speaker mean "defining"?

It's a very disturbing trend on this site that articles are not proofread, just slapped up any which way. For goodness' sake, these are incredibly important issues. Please make them legible!

Anyway, when the president has removed right of habeas corpus, the rule of law, etc., we are not "becoming" a totalitarian state; we are already there. It's just taking time for the fact to sink in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democracy has been DEAD already. There are no more last days, DUHHHHHHH !!!!!
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 10, 2007 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pretty late for such an article to show up. Right now, we need to be busy bringing it back, not counting down its "last" days ! No wonder the cons since Reagan have been BULLDOZING the LEFT to DEATH !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HOPE CRUSHING ARTICLE
Posted by: Roverton on Aug 10, 2007 8:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I choose to believe that we still have a chance to pull out of this dive. The legal system is trying to clip the crooks as they leave the building. Maybe here's some momentum coming soon.

While we're at the process of rounding up criminals, ALL he news reporters that turned on the nation should be very, very concerned for their freedom right about now. GOOD.

FOX, CNN and the rest. Pack your things and ship 'em to Paraguay. Your particular jig is up here.

Scurry, little rats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The media elite.
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 10, 2007 8:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To win wealthy Americans to his side, President Bush made tax breaks for high income citizens his first priority after taking office in 2001. Not coincidentally, mainstream media became part of part of the privileged ruling class, best described as “nonpartisan pigs at the trough.”

A close second on Bush’s 2001 to-do list was going to war against Iraq. Again, not coincidentally, the biggest blunder in U.S. foreign policy would benefit his main constituency -- rich and powerful Americans plus the media elite.

Ominously for our future, the wealthy ruling class includes EVERY candidate running for president this year except Ron Paul, my choice, and Dennis Kucinich, who don’t have a prayer of winning.

For NEW AlterNet readers who want more information about Bush’s greed-driven unpatriotic neocon background and that of his daddy, visit my nonprofit investigative website, King-George.biz.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican, John Kerry supporter in 2004 and the author of George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So if you know all that...
Posted by: colek on Aug 10, 2007 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So Alternet, if you know all so much about the true nature of the American media, how come you don't know 9/11 was an inside job? Eh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not quite the 'Last Days'
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 10, 2007 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To see the root of this issue you have to look at a pretty small item. The 1%ers that make up the top level of society. These are folks that make a million dollars a year or more. An even smaller division of that is those who make 100 million a year, with an even smaller group that takes home 500 million a year. But they all have the same idea in mind, CONTROL YOU. There is no democracy in a land that is top heavy with wealth. Such a place rewards greed,averace, and the more underhanded the deal,the more likely it will go through.
Democracy is easy to get back,simply put, the 99% of us that are the 'controled' must take the imaginary power of these folks away,via the 90% tax bracket. You'd be surprised just how fast democracy returns when the controling wealth is redistributed to the People.
Draft Jeffrey7 for Prez....it's the only vote that counts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Happened in 1933
Posted by: makeadifference on Aug 10, 2007 8:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read: "Defying Hitler", by Sabastian Haffner. After reading this book I bought four copies to distribute. It is a chilling indication of what is happening in the US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Coming Energy Scarcity
Posted by: xi_people on Aug 10, 2007 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you're not viewing the "end of democracy" through the prism of the soon-coming energy shortages, then you're completely missing the boat.

Its not about idle speculations about power-hungry politicians and corporations -- its about the fact that the elite are preparing (all over the world) to clamp down on the proles in anticipation of the riotous conditions that will exist when energy scarcity really starts to bite.

That's why there are no significant dissenting voices in government about the debacle in Iraq. No one currently in power, or vying for power, will end the "war" because it would cut the US off from having any direct control over a vital source of energy (oil).

When you hear the candidates for '08 freely talk about using nuclear weapons, its all about energy scarcity and doing whatever it takes to make sure that oil still flows to America.

Democracy (whatever that means) cannot survive when resources start running short. When people are deprived -- particularly ones as used to privilege as the average American -- they will take to the streets en mass. The preemptive clampdown that we are seeing now is anticipating this.

Remember, the elites know far more about the current state of energy reserves than the average person. The fact that the clampdown is occurring at all should tell you all you need to know about the truth of Peak Oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mick3 Posted by: hagwind
» RE: mick3 Posted by: Basenjis
» i almost envy you and your age Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: mick3 Posted by: donl51
Ron Paul has voted against any attempt to consolidate the airwaves and
Posted by: poppop_schell on Aug 11, 2007 1:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
nhas consistently voted against any attmpt to tax or control the internet.

Talk about Democracy. Look in on the Ron Paul Revolution. The grassroots are arising even with the censorship of Ron Paul by the MSM. Ron Paul dominates the internet. Join the Revolution. that is rEVOLution. Notice that LOVE is capitalized? That is NOT by accident.

ronpaul2008.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America is NOT a democracy??? It is a Constitutional Republic where
Posted by: poppop_schell on Aug 11, 2007 1:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
persons are elected to speak for the people. IF properlly used , the Constitution will protect minorities against the mob psychology of the democratic masses swayed by some demogogue who promises evreything without any cost. Oh yes, we can have evrything IF you mortage oursleves and pass the costs on to our children and grandchildren

The person running who best understands and has supopoerted the Constitution for 20 years is Ron Paul.
ronpaul2008.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The ABOVE COMMENT IS FROM AN ANTI-CHOICE TROLL
Posted by: Ellie1 on Aug 13, 2007 1:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who lurks in here all of the time. All he ever says is "Ron Paul", who wants to take away all social programs AND a woman's right to choose. He is a loathesome lying piece of scum who has nothing else to "offer". Go away, poppop, go pop yourself on your libertarian bushit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

theres more
Posted by: donl51 on Aug 14, 2007 1:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another good book to read is DARK AGES AMERICA the Final Phase Of Empire by MORRIS BERMAN,read both and more don't be too quick to give up your gun,even if you don't like 'em

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BIG brother MEDIA
Posted by: shangrilalad on Aug 15, 2007 5:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BIG brother MEDIA

Both Hugo Chavez and George Bush are pushing their countries toward dictatorship. Chavez is changing his countries laws to enable him to re-run for president indefinitely and George Bush is changing all of our laws to suit himself.

BIG brother MEDIA either hasn’t noticed, or has mistaken Bush for the Almighty, a view shared by millions of faith-based Americans. When will Americans realize that TV is the means by which a small minority rules the vast majority by deceit. The songs they sing, the stories they tell are lies dressed up as fact. Momentous events come and go so quickly TV consumers don’t bother thinking about the issues presented. Instead, they rely on BIG brother MEDIA for truth and guidance. That’s a fatal mistake for any democratic society.

Mindless acceptance of Authority of any kind, financial, medical, religious, political or, BIG brother MEDIA, is to ignore bible warnings against false prophets. False Prophets preach war, not peace. False Prophets deceive the people for selfish reasons.

.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]