Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

The Paranoid Style: Xenophobic Conspiracy Theories Explored

By Heidi Beirich, Intelligence Report. Posted July 19, 2007.


The far right has always been given to the paranoia of conspiracy theories. Here's a rundown on the two that xenophobes are currently obsessed with: the 'North American Union' and the Plan de Aztlan.
Advertisement

Conspiracy theories are everywhere in America. From the assassination of President Kennedy to whether Neil Armstrong actually landed on the moon to concerns about adding fluoride to drinking water, wild-eyed and unsubstantiated theories have been part and parcel of the American political experience. Historian Richard Hofstadter, writing in a 1965 essay, famously described this phenomenon as "the paranoid style in American politics."

The paranoid style came dramatically back to public attention in the 1990s, when the then-swelling militia movement seized upon a speech by the first President Bush about a post-Cold War "new world order" to suggest that Bush really was describing a takeover of America by nefarious "one-world government" forces. So-called "Patriots" also theorized that they were being spied on by "black helicopters," that a secret weather machine in Brussels was ruining American farms, that the United Nations was planning to kill four-fifths of Americans, and so on.

Since the dawning of the contemporary anti-immigration movement around the turn of the millennium, a new set of conspiracy theories has emerged. Stoked by paranoid far-right groups like the John Birch Society, which once accused President Eisenhower of being a secret Communist, these theories revive militia fears about the United States losing its sovereignty to various foreign powers. But like the many plots alleged by militia ideologues, the allegations are fantasies.

The 'North American Union'

Since 2005, the dominant conspiracy theory animating the anti-immigration movement has been the so-called "North American Union," described as a plot to surrender American sovereignty in a planned merger with Canada and Mexico. The plotters are typically said to be various foreign leaders, President George W. Bush and his "neo-conservative" allies, and an array of leading American liberals.

If the John Birch Society (JBS) and others pushing this theory are to be believed, President Bush began ceding American sovereignty on March 23, 2005, at a meeting in Waco, Texas, with Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin and Mexican President Vicente Fox. The meeting ended with the signing of what was called the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), which set up a series of working groups to study cooperation in transportation, energy, aviation, the environment and more.

Most people familiar with the SPP understand that it is a benign and slow-moving attempt to coordinate trade and security policies in a bid to improve the lives of citizens in all three countries. But to the conspiracy theorists, it is a plot that will end with Mexico sending millions more of its citizens to the United States, international courts that overrule American justice, hate crime laws that will send anti-gay Christian preachers to prison, and more. The plotters are said to include the militia bogeyman of the Council of Foreign Relations and are supposedly directed by American University Professor Robert Pastor.

Lately, the paranoia about the SPP process has become so intense that a proposed highway linking Canada, Mexico and the United States is seen as part of evil machinations that will end with the Mexican government seizing control of the key Missouri River port in Kansas City. Other conspiracy theorists fear that a new currency, the "Amero," will displace good, old-fashioned American dollars.

The leader in "educating" the public about the North American Union (NAU) plot has been the JBS, which says "politicians and internationalists" in America are "effectively destroying the United States." In fact, the long dormant group has been reanimated by the theory, assigning writer Mary Benoit to cover it relentlessly in the JBS magazine The New American. JBS has allied itself on this issue with Howard Phillips, leader of the anti-immigrant Constitution Party, and added nativist leader Chris Simcox of the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps to its speakers bureau.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: natavist, conspiracy theories

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Alternet Is Dead
Posted by: bodo on Jul 19, 2007 12:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, at what point did Alternet become just another vestige of the propaganda apparatus?

They must be desperate to discredit the growing bipartisan movement - a movement which increasingly buys into all those nutty "conspiracy theories", as if thats all they were. Desperate to reinforce the establishment's failing false left/right paradigm.
Desperate to keep the societal consciousness subdued.

One of their articles even attempts to associate those quacky "conspiracy theories" with the far right -- nice try guys, but I'm not falling for it. People on both sides of your arbitrary paradigm are waking up in droves. I'd laugh at the attempt if there weren't people out there actually buying into the tripe you post here.

What is it exactly that is supposed to make this website an alternative as its name implies? I can get the same party line from CNN.

Its probably time to turn to an actual journalistic website.

Try globalresearch.ca
or gnn.tv
or whatreallyhappened.com
or thefilter.ca
or infowars.com

there are many many more.

The truth ain't here,
but believe me, its out there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Alternet Is Dead Posted by: rkm
» RE: Alternet Is Dead Posted by: edith
» RE: Alternet Is Dead Posted by: bodo
» RE: Alternet Is Dead Posted by: acidicjazzhead
» Get your facts straight Posted by: tulugaq
» Simple reasons Posted by: marid
» RE: The Big Picture Posted by: TarryFaster
» A pretty big disagreement Posted by: eddie torres
» Please disregard the previous comment. Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» Nice one, tc. Like it Posted by: HeroesAll
» Recall JBS and NWO Posted by: etisoppa
» RE: Alternet Is Dead Posted by: allyourbasearebelongtous
The rednecks...
Posted by: Temporary on Jul 19, 2007 1:25 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
always need someone to HATE! This gives them a change to play "big hero" to there trailer trash wife and kids. "Big whiteman" saves the worlds from the evil n***** and mexicans! They just want to feel proud of themselves!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The rednecks... Posted by: MindyB
What Really Hurts
Posted by: edith on Jul 19, 2007 3:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Free trade agreements, including the notorious NAFTA, have wrecked prospects for average Americans not privileged to attend Ivy League schools, escalated illegal immigration into the US and put the US into debt that eventually will threaten the sovereignty of the nation. The North American Union groups may have the details wrong, but tripartite North American agreements are in the interest of multinational corporations that have no national loyalty and that rely on decreasing wages and an indentured servant class(illegal immigrants.).

The snide tone of the Alternet article here simply shows that anyone including Alternet can be manipulated by Big Corporate International interests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What Really Hurts Posted by: HighburyJD
» RE: What Really Hurts Posted by: MindyB
wild-eyed and unsubstantiated theories
Posted by: DrXyzzy on Jul 19, 2007 4:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the assassination of President Kennedy ...

We got your wild-eyed theories. For a feisty speech on the subject, check out Michael Parenti's classic The JFK Assassination and the Gangster Nature of the State.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SPP is NOT benign
Posted by: Bigioni on Jul 19, 2007 4:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The NAU may be an exxageration, but the SPP is real, and it is already screwing us. Canadians were recently forced by their Federal Government to accept higher pesticide residue levels on fruit and vegetables in order to bring Canada into conformity with more lax American standards. This was a direct result of advice from the NACC - the trilateral group of business leaders created under the SPP to advise the governments of the 3 member nations. The SPP created a priviledged advisory role for big business leaders. It does not give a voice or a consultative role to anyone else. In fact, public documents show that the SPP itself was conceived of by the private sector and pushed on government. Since when did Alternet become CNN? I'm getting a little tired of you making light of conspiracy theorists instead of demonstrating a bit of curiosity about the real issues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SPP is NOT benign Posted by: eridani
sick of this
Posted by: boydranchitos on Jul 19, 2007 5:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I have been rewarded for stopping by here, generally speaking, every once and awhile, I skate in and get the sense that I'm being mugged by whores.
C'mon. Don't do the Bushevics job for them.
If I want THIS kind of pulp, I'll read the National Review.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"the key Mississippi River port in Kansas City"
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Jul 19, 2007 5:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They must be following GWB's geographical advice as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Im not sure, but...
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line on Jul 19, 2007 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am pretty sure I have read more than a few conspiracy theories right here on Alternet from the left side of the political spectrum... just sayin..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Im not sure, but... Posted by: apophenia_monkey
» Ghosts Posted by: TexasJewGirl
what is truth anyway? is it profitable?
Posted by: andy on Jul 19, 2007 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Conspiracy theories these days are a synonym for truth it seems!
People I hate corporations too, but who can argue with the neo liberal capitalist system that since the 80's has created so much wealth. I look around and everybody seems so gaddamn happy with their fancy technological gadgets and consumer culture.
Reality is defined by propaganda and very few seem to give a shit. I just sit back and hope this ignorant society gets whats coming to it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

United we Stand, Divided We FALL
Posted by: moontime on Jul 19, 2007 5:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmmm... NAU not real? I've got mail from the Canadian Embassy that suggests otherwise.
SPP Benign? Guess you didn't read their white papers. If you did, you would know that the war in Iraq (and the coming one with Iran) was planned well in advance of 9/11, they just needed a reason to go in. You would also know that the war isn't actually a mess in their eyes- it is going exactly as planned. They wrote about going into Iraq and splitting it into 3 parts, setting up permanent bases and taking over Iran & Syria for starters. They don't plan to ever withdraw the troops, and the definition of "winning" is conquering the entire middle east.
Wake up folks. Left vs. Right is a false paradigm. Both sides lie. They find the emotional issues to get you riled up and vote for them but then they advance their own agenda. Two examples would be how the "right" always promises to abolish abortion and never does, and how the "left" promised troop withdrawl and impeachment. How's that working out for ya? Nearly all the presidential contenders on both sides are globalists and will sell out this country.
Also as far as the mexicans go, learn some Spanish and go down to Texas and hear it for yourself. While you are there you can check out where they are building the Trans-Texas corridor, part of the NAFTA superhighway of the NAU. See it for yourself. Or just believe the propaganda here and go back to sleep.
And to be clear, I am NOT talking about ALL mexicans. This is not racism and I am not xenophobic. The truth is that there is a growing movement of immigrants who want to take this country over. But most of them are just good people happy for the opportunities they have found here. Like I said, learn some Spanish.
In closing, I just want to say that I used to be proud to consider myself a Liberal. Now I'm just a person who's older and wiser, sick of labels and sick of watching how politicians play Americans against each other, keep us quibbling so we ignore all their corruption. Lets start looking for what we have in common instead of finding reasons to hate each other. Don't let the politicians and pundits manipulate you. Think for yourself. United We Stand, Divided We Fall.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: United we Stand, Divided We FALL Posted by: greybeard95a
errr...Kansas City is on the Missouri River...
Posted by: sausage on Jul 19, 2007 5:56 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...last time I checked.

As for those ranting that they will never read or post on AlterNet again!!!!!!!!

Adios

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If there is one thing (besides left-wing dictators) that the editors of Alternet seem to love....
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Jul 19, 2007 5:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...its more powerful government, larger government and government that is as distant as possible from the common individual. Its no surprise that this is the second article in the last month or so that has tried to pretend that there aren't trends towards a North American Union.

Why is this particular "conspiracy theory" attacked with such vigor while other theories are so carefully cultivated?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» All too typical leftist assumption Posted by: Illiteratilumen
Conspiracy Theory a Good Thing?
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Jul 19, 2007 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The term conspiracy theory is one that seems to be often abused, not to mean a theory in which two or more persons conspire. Instead it has come to be used to refer to any theory other than the official theory i.e. the particular theory that has been approved by those in power (which, itself, may well involve two or more persons conspiring). I don't like this modern usage but I understand it; however, I prefer the use of the term hypothesis for what others might call a conspiracy theory.

Every scientific breakthrough, and every breakthrough in a criminal investigation starts with someone having an eureka moment where some innovative notion seems to explain the known facts. Often these ideas can be rejected with a little careful consideration, but sometimes they stand this initial test of logic and review of known facts. There is nothing wrong with presenting and discussing such an hypothesis even if is unproven and conflicts with what officials may say about the matter. Widespread an public discussion is a good thing that will eventually lead to improved understanding and possibly eventual consensus.

The example of Galileo comes to mind, and it is not hard to come up with other examples where an hypothesis eventually gains general acceptance. Ridicule of unconventional ideas has long been used to avoid what some call change and others call progress. In the political arena, it is a way to avoid exposure of wrong-doing and a way of preserving ignorance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Head in the Sand Dismissal
Posted by: ceti on Jul 19, 2007 7:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most people familiar with the SPP understand that it is a benign and slow-moving attempt to coordinate trade and security policies in a bid to improve the lives of citizens in all three countries.

This statement alone is a dead giveaway to the lack of seriousness this article is devoting to the issue. The SPP is being contested by some of the leading citizen action groups in Canada, who see SPP as a threat to Canadian sovereignty, and yet another step towards continental integration with the US. As such, it is a key issue for progressives in Canada. To dismiss it out of hand shows how progressives in the US are way behind in understanding current trends.

Harper, Bush, and Calderon are all ideological soul mates and will give these negotiations fresh impetus. Bush has already showed he will sell out American workers to the need of American capital, so it is understandable that opposition to even the idea of a NAU is coming from both the left and right.

Of course the patriotic right cast a conspiratorial net over the issue, as they are unable to understand the needs of imperialism and capitalism that are driving this continental integration. However, that shouldn't take away from the fact that the SPP and NAU are indeed threats just as NAFTA and the FTAA were before them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Perry and the Bilderberg Posted by: TexasJewGirl
» RE: Perry and the Bilderberg (THE PROOF) Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Here's your proof. Posted by: Prophit0
» Reality check Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: eality check Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Uhhh... not insane? Posted by: eddie torres
zoya
Posted by: delia on Jul 19, 2007 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because the US stands to gain while Canada and Mexico experience Anschluss, the protests against NAU must be a "conspiracy theory." This website is starting to really piss me off. Why don't you do some real investigative journalism on this issue before sounding off?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: zoya Posted by: ljsullivan1166@earthlink.net
not only rightwingers are concerned about the SPP
Posted by: smendler on Jul 19, 2007 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was discussion of the SPP at the recent Green Party national meeting, hardly a haven of rightwingnuts. Maybe it's kinda like the CFR - when both rightwingers and leftwingers think something doesn't smell right, maybe it really does stink.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's an ostrich Posted by: eddie torres
frank69
Posted by: frank69 on Jul 19, 2007 7:31 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's go back to those "golden days" of yesteryears..."If any more Germans come in, we'll all be speaking German," Benjamin Franklin. "Our country can accept no more immigrants; we're full," a member of the House speaking in 1790. "Irish need not apply," wants ads in leading newspapers from the 1840's into the 1870's. "We don't want those criminal Italians here," various Congress persons and newspapers. "No more Eastern Euopeans," by the same groups (1880-1910) who didn't want Italians. In 1924, the despicable immigrant quota system was voted in, as a reaction to the Doughboys bringing home Euopean wives after WWI. After WWII, the cry was, "No more DP's (Displaced Persons)." So you see, Nativist xenophobia is not new in the old USA. And lest we forget, "The only good Indian, is a dead Indian." So all of we people of Non-Native American Indian stock, should perhaps reconsider our anti-immigrant hysteria.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Finally! Posted by: TexasJewGirl
» RE: frank69 Posted by: kathat
I am insulted by this article
Posted by: zelda253 on Jul 19, 2007 7:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't believe it. You sound just like all the other half wits who run around never knowing what is going on. And the condesceding tone? How dare you. I feel like I have just been to a suburban bar-b-que of Bush lovers.
I don't think I'll bother with "ALTER net" any more. What a slap in the face.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» hey, don't take it personal Posted by: smendler
THIS WRITER NEEDS TO GET HIS "FACTS" STRAIGHT
Posted by: tooldoc60 on Jul 19, 2007 7:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article should be an embarrassment. There are too many innacuracies to mention fully, the most glaring of which are 1) Kansas City is on the Missouri River, and 2) that pissant Virgil Goode is a Virginia representative (unfortunately for those of us who live in his district. He is an extremely inbred moron). Far too many other innaccuracies too mention. No, I'm not a "conservative" trying to rain on this guy's parade, I consider myself to be very Progressive, and this author is an embarrassment.
s

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Enemies of SPLC Posted by: eddie torres
Right on - Heidi!!
Posted by: reinaldok on Jul 19, 2007 7:56 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find myself sitting at home more often. It seems whereever I go, I encounter some of the conspiracy theorists you have mentioned. All the stories are basically the same.
Last night I went to a condo meeting. Instead of talking about leaking roofs or that someone's dog is making a mess, I had to listen to the tales about muslims taking over the world. California is going to be given back to Mexico on and on. I recently returned from a hiking trip. Two others in our group were from the USA. I had to endure 8 days of listening to all the trash theories and how our Mission in Iraq is going so well and we must give George and his ilk a choice to prove that war and killing is the way to go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Canada is already being ravaged by SPP
Posted by: fma7 on Jul 19, 2007 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is really Canada that stands to lose by the SPP. OUR vast water and oil resources are currently being swindled with the USA importing all of our oil while we as Canadians buy from the Mideast. There is a gag order silencing any discussion here in Canada regarding the SPP agreement. I feel betrayed by Alternet as this is the second time I have seen this topic framed in this condesending manner attempting to discredit the research and facts highlighting the existence of the SPP.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=174

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has Alternet changed or have we changed?
Posted by: dover23 on Jul 19, 2007 8:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I confess that I used to be as far left as many of the posters here that I frequently disagree with. I have to thank media outlets such as Alternet who exposed themselves after 9/11 to be just another mouthpiece for the existing power structures; they have assisted in leading me to understand that it's not who's in power that is the problem...

it is power itself that is the problem

Alternet rarely, or never, challenges the notion of power, they in fact support it. They also use these mind games such as this piece from "Intelligence Report" to prey on their readers and discourage certain criticisms that are not approved by the established left. I imagine many Alternet readers are young and maybe a little too insecure to go against the grain; it's a confusing world out there. Everyone has some ego, nobody wants to feel stupid.

But most of us are not morons or paranoid, as Heidi is attempting to make us feel. We know the official 9/11 story is a lie. We know our government does not speak or seek the truth about those murders. We also know it's an issue you can't hide from... you had to show your cards and it turns out the established left has been bluffing all along!... (I should have picked up on this when taking part in anti-war rallies in 02 & 03)

I don't come to this site for information; there are many legit journos on the net. I come here to see the latest spin from the faux left and read the comments which usually set the record straight; it makes me optimistic knowing that many of you people are out there with only a few scattered stooges.

I was hardly aware of this NAU until, ironically, I started reading about it here. I don't feel strongly on the issue but I certainly don't feel paranoid discussing the possibilities! Thanks for links people:)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» All hail the onstitution Posted by: eddie torres
arly
Posted by: arly on Jul 19, 2007 8:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as a Canadian I find the Spp rather scary. There will be a meeting in Canada in Augustof this group. The leaders of Canada, Mexico and the U.S. will be there . A group called the Council Of Canadians had booked rooms in a hotel nearby an d the Gov. has had their reservations rescinded,no one is allowed within 25KM of the place. The few journalists they have decided to allow in have been hand picked.These meetings will involve the highest levels of government from these 3 countries and get this the CEO,s and the largest corporations,yet these will be secret meetings where deals will be made that circumvent our parliament and your congress, google Council Of Canadians or Linda Mcquaig (author of holding the bully,s coat)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bush in Ottawa Posted by: ceti
otto
Posted by: otto on Jul 19, 2007 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You probably have some valid points to make, but reading the reactions against SPP meetings as right wing reactions is way off! Up here in Canada it's the progressive groups that are afraid - especially led by Maude Barlow and The Council of Canadians. The meetings have been going on for over two years, with little media reporting, with almost all import coming from big corporate representatives. Things are happening just as NAFTA happened...secretly until they actually happen and we have to live with the results. Thinking Canadians can see it all as a way for Canada to lose all sovereignty and end up as a 51st state...using American money, of course, and forcing Canada to give up environmental, health and social standards. (also a good way for the U.S. to fight the dollar being overtaken by the Euro.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: otto Posted by: ceti
The Conspiracy Theorist Patsy
Posted by: hankedson on Jul 19, 2007 9:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Conspiracy Theorists deserve study because they present canary in the coal mine type symptomatic processing of a paranoia impacting the entire society. They exhibit a condition less noticed by the rest of us. Their theories, like dreams, are not without valid insight into a reality we all experience daily. We just haven't learned how to relate to such theories properly. Check out my article, "The Conspiracy Theorist Patsy," at http://hankedson.squarespace.com/conspiracy-theorist/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only a fool nit-picks a sensible examination of mass hysteria.
Posted by: Sojourner on Jul 19, 2007 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's called the story of "Chicken Little." "The sky is falling. The sky is falling." 'Twas ever the same.

"The end of the world is coming." "The boogieman will get you if you don't watch out." "Step on a crack and break your mother's back."

Or as the bard told us, "Ah, what fools these mortals be."

Or more recently, "There's a fool born every minute." We post on the AlterNet web site.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poor, Poor Article...
Posted by: channing on Jul 19, 2007 9:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Intelligence Report"? Oxymoron at best.

To place "conspiracy theorists", who represent small, unaligned, factions across the political spectrum as a greater threat than the GIANT role of actual "conspirators", who are well organized, funded by heavy public and private capital, and relentlessly BackDoor all of their advances, reduces this whole piece to the "slime-shot" bin with Coultergeist's.

I'm not overly concerned about NAU, compared to Mandating Public Transparency and Public Accountability for All Governments and Corporations, but the Lack of Substance in arguing for NAU, combined with a substance-less disregard that "no threat exists" (their just trying to make things easier for everybody... my a**!), while at the same time turning a blind eye to the disproportionate Real-World wealth re-distribution that has resulted from NAFTA, ironically leads me to believe there must be more to the Plan de Aztlan than I'm already aware of, just because she brought it up!

I don't care if I live in a One State or Eighty State US, and I don't care if our border is withdrawn to pre-1860 or expanded to a One World Government... Because the Only Way we're going to make Life under any of those conditions Responsive to The People is Transparency and Accountability, today, as ever.

UNLOCK THE ROOTS OF ALL CONSPIRACIES, TRUE AND UNTRUE ALIKE, DEMAND THE PEOPLE'S RIGHT TO KNOW EVERYTHING THAT PUBLIC SERVANTS AND CORPORATIONS ARE DOING WITH OUR WORLD: IT IS WE THAT GRANT THEM THIS POWER, IT IS WE WHO MUST PAY FOR THE RESULTS!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JFK MURDER: It's the non-conspiracy theorists, stupid
Posted by: DennisDalrymple on Jul 19, 2007 9:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's mad to lump the loupy Minutemen types with those that that are skeptics of the JFK Assassination and it's official investigations. The dominate theory that came out of those investigations is the biggest and nuttiest lie of all: The Single-Bullet Theory. Without it, they couldn't have concluded that Lee Oswald was the lone assassin. Trust the non-conspiracy theorists at your own peril.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is no NAU “conspiracy.” The treasonous merger is happening RIGHT NOW!
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 19, 2007 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rumors about a future North American Union gained momentum after the "New World Order" Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) organized the Independent Task Force on North America (ITFNA) in conjunction with the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and Mexican Council on Foreign Relations.

Chaired by former