Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

How the Olympics Destroy Cities

By Mischa Gaus, In These Times. Posted July 11, 2007.


In Chicago, game boosters argue that Olympic construction, tourism and spillover business will bring relief to the city's long-suffering south side. Experience teaches a different lesson.
Advertisement

You could see his lip curl, the beginning of a sneer. Mayor Richard M. Daley, head of Chicago's government for 18 years, was not pleased. His parade was getting rained on.

The U.S. Olympic Committee was in town, and the March weather was not cooperating. The suits were preparing to survey Washington Park, one of the proposed sites for the 2016 Olympics, on the city's south side.

The park, closed to the public for the VIP visit, had never been cleaner. No amount of preparation, though, would keep the visitors' feet from sinking into soggy turf.

It wasn't the image Daley wanted to project to the committee to help convince them to give the 2016 Summer Olympics to Chicago, and J.R. Fleming wasn't helping. A public-housing organizer and leader in an anti-Olympic coalition, he was yelling into a megaphone three feet away from Daley, Chicago Olympics Chief Patrick Ryan and National Olympic Committee members as they sat in a city bus, waiting to embark on their visit to Washington Park.

"Is the profit that important?" he taunted. "Don't bring the Olympics to Chicago. There's too much racial tension."

Despite Fleming's warnings, on April 14 the national committee announced that Chicago had beaten out Los Angeles as its candidate to host the 2016 Summer Games. Chicago will now compete against Rio de Janeiro, Madrid, Tokyo and a handful of other cities in its quest to bring its first Olympics since 1904, when Chicago lost the games to St. Louis, which was hosting the World's Fair.

That is, unless Fleming and a growing band of doubters can convince the International Olympic Committee to take the games somewhere else. Much like the fairs of yesteryear, the Olympics has become a force unto itself, able to transform a city dramatically. The ambition to host the games fits the agenda of a city leadership enamored of gigantic, splashy projects and overweening power.

Until eight labor-backed insurgents settled last year's living-wage battle by unseating incumbents in the spring elections, the city had one gravitational pull -- City Hall's fifth floor, the mayor's office. Daley's grip on power has been so absolute he promised revenge in 1999 when five of the city's 50 aldermen voted against his pick for fire chief.

Daley's autocratic "leadership style" and the international Olympic industry match perfectly. Both prefer to make decisions behind closed doors, obscure their sordid histories, send budgets through the wash to achieve the desired result and build playgrounds for the rich.

What the Olympics hath wrought

The toll the Olympic industry takes on host cities is made worse because it's so predictable. Their destructive impact is documented in an extensive study of the seven most recent cities (Seoul, Barcelona, Atlanta, Sydney, Athens, Beijing and London) chosen to host the Summer Games. It was released in June by the Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE), based in Geneva, Switzerland.

The worst abuses COHRE documents have taken place under the most repressive regimes. Beijing will displace 1.5 million people to host the 2008 Games, as it doubles the already frenzied pace of its urban redevelopment. Often without notice, officials cut off electricity and water to convince residents to leave. If that's unsuccessful, garbage and sewage are allowed to pile up in entryways. Left without recourse, a few residents threatened suicide. Some succeed; others are arrested for creating public disturbances.

Beijing's brutality is hardly unique. COHRE details how South Korea's military dictatorship cleared out 720,000 people for the 1988 Seoul Games. Private security forces roamed the streets at night, using rape, beatings and arson to break community resistance.

But it doesn't take a one-party state to bring out the jackboots when the Olympics come to town. Atlanta gained notoriety among Olympic watchers when it declared the central business district a "sanitized corridor" and had police pre-print arrest citations, with the words "African-American," "Male," and "Homeless" already filled in. In the lead-up to the games the city arrested about 9,000 people, a "crime" that has significant implications because people with criminal records are not eligible for public housing. Some of the homeless were given one-way bus tickets out of town.

What mass-produced arrest citations and bulldozers don't accomplish the market's invisible hand usually does. Real-estate speculation and ballooning rents push out vulnerable populations with inescapable regularity. Barcelona, touted as the most successful recent games, registered a 240 percent increase in new house prices in the run-up to the Olympics.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: olympics, chicago, richard daley

Mischa Gaus is a freelance writer based in Chicago.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
RE: Chicago, Chicago, it's a hell of a town...
Posted by: Leman on Jul 13, 2007 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What are you talking about??
I don't know much about Daley Sr. but I think Daley Jr. is the best thing that ever happened to Chicago. Yes, he is an "autocrat" (yet not quite a dictator) - but how else would you run a city like this? The way Coleman Young ran Detroit? Or the way Michael White ran Cleveland?
The only negative thing I can find about him is his party affiliation. But then nobody is perfect. Even Elizabeth Dole was a Democrat at some point. Besides, for some people the party name does not really make that much of a difference. Daley could have been a Republican, just like Giuliani could have been a Democrat - without abandoning their character.
(Yes, I confess, the whole Party thing was mostly not-so-suttle flame. Perhaps it was even not in a good taste. I apologize if anybody took it too close to their liberal heart. The comment comparing Daley and Giuliani was serious, though)

One thing for sure - I would not want his job. Does anybody here think he or she could do better than Mr. Daley??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not just cities
Posted by: lb on Jul 11, 2007 6:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The bid also includes destroying a nature preserve in an adjacent county to build an equestrian center. The county board passed a resolution to proceed essentially without public discussion or involvement. Needless to say, there is significant opposition to this plan.
I understand the importance of amateur athletic competition. I think the Olympic Committee needs to find another way to promote this competition without these huge, costly events. The money would be better spent helping the participating nations develop their athletic programs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hark the Harold angel sings.
Posted by: Bart Thesc on Jul 11, 2007 6:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was a very sad Thanksgiving dinner we had in Chicago the day after Mayor Harold Washington died.

Hosting the Olympics has been a losing proposition for the citizens of the host cities for several decades. You hear a lot about ephemeral "residual" effects, which are always calculated into the costs and benefits as one of the biggest assets. I would like to see what the concrete benefits are before I would support an event that will be a net cost to most of the city's population. Good will doesn't put money into my wallet or compensate for the screaming transportation nightmares we will have to endure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't Do It!
Posted by: Gisele on Jul 11, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a British Columbian I can tell you I'm one of MANY people who is already sick of hearing the word "olympics"...and the games are still 3 years off!

The tip of the proverbial iceberg....People are losing their homes outright as a result of greedy landowners, some people are losing their livelihoods because of construction (including some business owners), others will be displaced and sent heaven only knows where, so the seedy side of life won't be seen in glorious Vancouver. And like other cities, the books are closed, the meetings are closed, and ears are closed. The only thing the government wants to hear is "yay"..."yes!"...and "we as taxpayers will be honored to pick up the short fall mr. premier."

Add to that the list of words that are now illegal to use, because they are "owned?!" by the Vancouver Olympic committee: Sea to Sky, Road to Vancouver, Road to Whistler, Gold Medal, and on the list goes...but the one that really pissed me off: "Friend"...since when can't I say that word because some jackass thinks they own it?

The olympics are no longer about athleticism, endurance and trial...they're about money. Most of which goes to line the pockets of corporations and government hacks...sad...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Olympics & conventions will attract terrorism in the future
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Jul 11, 2007 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eventually cities won't be competing to get these turkeys. The Olympics and the political parties will need to bribe cities to take them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clear as mud!
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Jul 11, 2007 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...in its quest to bring its first Olympics since 1904, when Chicago lost the games to St. Louis, which was hosting the World's Fair.

So, did Chicago ever host the olympics? The sentence is self contradictory. Altius and Fortius Forever! What the heck is Altius and Fortius anyway? The paragraph about pet service providers also left me wondering.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Clear as mud! Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
Ask Montreal
Posted by: kilgor on Jul 11, 2007 8:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Montreal Olympics ended up costing $1,000,000,000 more than expected. The taxpayers of Montreal finally finished paying off the Olympic debt a couple of years ago. To put it in perspective, it took almost 30 years to pay off the so called Olympic debt. A debt that according to the former mayor of Montreal was no more likely to happen than him giving birth to a child. Well guess what, his hnour did not get pregnant but the Montreal taxpayers sure got screwed. So, caveat emptor when bidding for the Olympic Games.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All global organisations like the Olympics, UN, WB, IMF, etc
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jul 11, 2007 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are so corrupt it is amazing. The further that power is separated from the people the more the power is aggrandised and thusly the more corrupt it becomes. Then to maintain their powerbase they need to 'control' the people, this can be, relatively, benign as in the Olympics (just ruins history, neighborhoods, culture of one city) or can cripple whole countries and continents into war and crippling debt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rotating Oylmpic sites might be long-term solution
Posted by: truthteller on Jul 11, 2007 11:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cheered when Daley's old man died in '76, because he was such a corrupt bastard. Looks like the apple didn't fall far from the tree, just another Boss.

We've got to do something about the ruinous power of developers in this country. I don't know what that something is, and until we can find a constitutional way to take the money out of politics it won't happen.

I think the long-term solution to the Olympic site issue is to rotate the Games among the best sites for them that have already built facilities in the past. This would seem to be a solution that would avoid the needless repetition of these huge and wasteful facilties that become drains on the public coffers.

I hope that the community activists in Chicago manage to shut down the Olympic effort by the developers and corrupt politicians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why one city?
Posted by: sculptor on Jul 11, 2007 12:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why can't they just have it in multiple cities? Does swimming need to be located in the same city as track and field events or gymnastics?

Have a central ceremony city with a couple of the most interesting things locally and then fly the winners there from the other venues. Sheesh use your brains people!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Purpose of sports is to stupify, not raise funds
Posted by: billwald on Jul 11, 2007 6:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Professional sports and the Olympics is the modern equivalent of the old Roman "bread and circuses." Our owners want sports to dominate the news so that the war, our loss of freedoms, and the economy doesn't. As long as the working class has cheap beer and the sports channel everything will go according to schedule.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Politics, payola, and ruthless exploitation
Posted by: willymack on Jul 11, 2007 7:08 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All in the name of the glory of sports. I wouldn't go to the olympics if I was offered a free limosine to the events, free admission to the best seat in the house, free food, free beer, and free souvineers. It's only a paper moon, hangin' over a cardboard sky.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

not to worry, America will never get the games again.
Posted by: may261989 on Jul 11, 2007 11:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
one thing everyone's missing, after the way America commercialised the Olympics in 96 solely for the benefit of the American public (for example the T.V coverage where athletes had to be interviewed by American T.V first and then the rest could pick up the scraps ) that they will never ever get another summer Olympics - not in this lifetime anyway.
It was yet again a case of America seeing itself as the centre of the universe , sorry folks it aint , and you aint getting no games either..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Only Solution to All this crap..
Posted by: millsy on Jul 14, 2007 3:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have the games permanently in one venue (perhap Athens?). No evictions, white elephants, bribery, corruption, commercial crap, no nothing.

Build some high class venues, future proof them, and you have it.

Sure a lot of people from around the world arent going to have the chance to see an Olympic Games, but to be honest, there are a lot of people who cannot anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]