Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

The War on Drugs is Still a War on Blacks

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, New America Media. Posted June 27, 2007.


Recent surveys of drug habits among Americans found that blacks and whites use drugs at equal rates, yet blacks are more often prosecuted because the laws are biased against them.
Advertisement

The recent survey by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on the sex and drug habits of Americans is the latest to toss an ugly glare on the naked race-tainted war on drugs. The survey found that whites are much more likely to use drugs than blacks.

Other studies have found roughly equal rates of drug usage by blacks and whites. But what makes the survey more eye-catching is that it didn't solely measure generic drug use, but singled out the use of cocaine and street drugs.

The findings fly in the face of the conventional drug war wisdom that blacks use and deal street drugs while whites use trendy, recreational designer drugs, and that these presumably include powder cocaine. That again calls into question the gaping disparity in drug sentencing between whites and blacks.

More than 70 percent of those prosecuted in federal courts for drug possession and sale (mostly small amounts of crack cocaine) and given stiff mandatory sentences are blacks. Federal prosecutors and lawmakers justify the disparity with the retort that crack cocaine is dangerous and threatening, and leads to waves of gang shoot-outs, turf battles, and thousands of terrorized residents in poor black communities. In some instances, that's true, and police and prosecutors are right to hit back hard at the violence.

But the majority of those who deal and use crack cocaine aren't violent prone gang members, but poor, and increasingly female, young blacks. They clearly need help not jailing.

But it's a myth that powder cocaine is benign and has no criminal and violent taint to it. In a comprehensive survey in 2002, the Office of National Drug Control Policy, the White House's low profile task force to combat drug use, attributed shoplifting, burglary, theft, larceny, money laundering and even the transport of undocumented workers in some cities to powdered cocaine use. It also found that powder cocaine users were more likely to commit domestic violence crimes. The report also fingered powder cocaine users as prime dealers of other drugs that included heroin, meth and crack cocaine.

Even more revealing, they sold crack cocaine and heroin in inner city neighborhoods. The top-heavy drug use by young whites -- and the crime and violence that go with it -- has stirred no public outcry for mass arrests, prosecutions, and tough prison sentences for white drug dealers, many of whom deal drugs that are directly linked to serious crime and violence. Whites unlucky enough to get popped for drug possession are treated with compassion, prayer sessions, expensive psychiatric counseling, treatment and rehab programs, and drug diversion programs. And they should be. But so should those blacks and other non-whites victimized by discriminatory drug laws.

Voters and legislators in California, New York, Michigan and other states now recognize that bankrupting state budgets to lock up nonviolent drug offenders won't win the war on drugs. They have opted for drug diversion, treatment and counseling programs rather than jail as the far more effective, humane, and cost effective way to deal with drug users. This has brought some measure of sanity back to drug enforcement policy. But that doesn't sit well with the drug warriors; they have and will continue to resist any effort to get Congress to modify or scrap the blatant and deliberate racial disparity in drug sentencing laws.

In an odd way, they have to take their hard stand. The public scapegoating of blacks for America's drug problem during the past two decades has been relentless. A frank admission that the laws are biased and unfair, and have not done much to combat the drug plague, would be an admission of failure. It could ignite a real soul searching over whether all the billions of dollars that have been squandered in the failed and flawed drug war -- the lives ruined by it, and the families torn apart by the rigid and unequal enforcement of the laws -- has really accomplished anything.

This might call into question why people use and abuse drugs in the first place -- and if it is really the government's business to turn the legal screws on some drug users while turning a blind eye to others?

The greatest fallout from our failed drug policy is that it further embeds the widespread notion that the drug problem is exclusively a black problem. This makes it easy for on-the-make politicians to grab votes, garner press attention, and bloat state prison budgets to jail more black offenders, while continuing to feed the illusion that we are winning the drug war.

The CDC survey is smoking gun proof of one thing: As long as state and federal officials ruthlessly hunt for drug culprits in poor black communities, that illusion will continue to wreck lives, mostly black lives.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: blacks, war on drugs

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His new book The Latino Challenge to Black America: Towards a Conversation between African-Americans and Hispanics (Middle Passage Press and Hispanic Economics New York) in English and Spanish will be out in October.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A war on freedom and self-ownership...
Posted by: Michael Boldin on Jun 27, 2007 12:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war on drugs clearly has a massive effect on minorities and lower economic classes. But, it's premise is even more sinister in my opinion.

It's based on the idea that you do not have ownership over your own body; that you don’t have the right to decide what you’ll do with your body, with your property and with your life. The position of the drug warriors is that you should be in jail if you decide to do something with your body that they don’t approve of.

That is not freedom and that is totally repugnant to the ideals of a free society....

End the drug war now, and our streets will be safer!

Some follow up reading:

"7 Ways to Make Your Neighborhood Safer" - click here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's all about authoritarian control. Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: it never stays there Posted by: EKSwitaj
» RE: it never stays there Posted by: EagleMB
War on Drugs a war on the poor. Whether black, white, hispanic, or
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jun 27, 2007 12:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
asian. Besides the criminal variances between certain types of drugs (crack cocaine vs powder cocaine) the simply fact is that poor people are more likely to 'get caught'. This is due to:
1) cheaper drugs, like crack, have higher criminal penalties
2) cheaper drugs, like crack, need to be 'used' more frequently to maintain the 'high'
3) cheaper drugs, like meth, involve volatile compounds and a strong smell when being made. More likely to attract attention of police.
4) the rich can buy from 'high class' dealers in higher quantity usually in the privacy of their homes (or gated communities). The poor need to buy more frequently (afford less) and so more chances to get caught. Buy on 'the street' which involves more risk. Buy from 'disreputable' dealers which involve more risk and/or violence.
5) the poor need to do their drugs in their small houses, on the street, in a park, in their housing project thereby getting more chance of attention and getting caught. The rich do their 'blow' in the gated mansions, yachts, and large houses- less likely to attract attention and police
6) the rich can afford high-power, talented attorneys if they are caught. The poor get over-worked, under-paid public defender attorneys.
7) the rich can go to private rehab hospitals and, often, get away with a 'slap on the wrist' since they are 'seeking help'. The poor don't usually have that option.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» wow Posted by: brasilaron
War on drugs; total failure
Posted by: Gaubladt on Jun 27, 2007 6:18 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The billions of dollars spent on the war on drugs are not just wasted; they drive up drug profits. Therefore, they are extremely counterproductive. The drug war does not act as a deterrent to drug use. Instead, it acts as an accelerant that fuels drug use.
The solution is to set up a program where the government distributes drugs to the people who crave them. That would drive all but one of the dealers out of business. Without the economic dynamo to propagate drug use, it will eventually fade away. Effective mechanisms could be established so that people are discouraged from sharing drugs with others. After all, most drug users are initiated into that lifestyle by other people who use and love their drugs. People like to encourage others to get high with them. It’s like an underworld Amway. Other mechanisms could be established that reduce the probability of overdoses. Other mechanisms could be established that would help addicts/users break away from their habits and get clean when they decide that's what they want to do.
I believe that it is the combination of commercial forces and physical dependency that make opiates so devastating to the lives of people. The outlaw lifestyle forced on drug users is usually much more lethal that that the drug by itself.
There is also a national security issue involved here, since the groups antagonistic towards the US often use the drug trade to finance their projects (among them being possibly the nuclear sequel to 911). This fact could be used to convince right wingers to overcome their natural antagonism towards non-military government solutions to social problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» general agreement Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: War on drugs; total failure Posted by: lessbread
Say What?
Posted by: gregii on Jun 27, 2007 6:58 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Drug sellers (pushers?) deserve long jail sentences regardless of race. They disregard the disasterous consequences their enterprise wreaks on the lives of people. They seem motivated to make lots of money without working for it.

Start talking to law enforcement if you have evidence they might need.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» wrong Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: wrong Posted by: gregii
» agenda Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: agenda Posted by: Tacticsb
» i'll take it... Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Say What? Posted by: neogaia
Gee, this sounds familiar...
Posted by: SteveB on Jun 27, 2007 7:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A frank admission that the laws are biased and unfair, and have not done much to combat the drug plague, would be an admission of failure. It could ignite a real soul searching over whether all the billions of dollars that have been squandered in the failed and flawed drug war -- the lives ruined by it, and the families torn apart by the rigid and unequal enforcement of the laws -- has really accomplished anything.

Hmmm... what other war does that sound like?

And if you liked the war on drugs and the war on terror, you'll just LOVE the new war on immigrants. Just as destructive of families, just as expensive, and requiring an even greater expansion of the powers of the police state. Enjoy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Police Are Prostituting For The Attorney Pimps
Posted by: hole11 on Jun 27, 2007 8:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They tend to go after poor people and not blacks in particular. Those that take the plea deal are more likely to be black, maybe they righteously believe they will not receive a fair trial.

What about legal drugs? Is abuse of legal drugs higher among blacks that whites? Is it easier to walk down to the package store for a black or easier for a white to take that eight mile ride to the store for a six pack? Then who might get hit for the dui? The guy with the car or the guy walking down the road?

So far Hutchinson has not convinced me that there is blatant black oppression in any of his writings that I have read.

What bothers me is that there are racists people who hate/dislike blacks for their various reasons and I see or hear them instilling that hate in their children. It's disgusting to me because there are far more crooked whites in disguise as an attorney or police willing to lie or cover up evidence to get a conviction.

I would like to see blacks doing something about this oppression that not only do I experience first hand but others as well. Someone needs to start a revolution in the judicial branch the way the attorney took over in the late 1800's.

They are the one's writing the laws, becoming politicians, writing rules of the court through their corporate bar, and defining who is and who isn't a journalist through their rulebook.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» hard times Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: hard times Posted by: hole11
Why don't you let a white person complain about black issues?
Posted by: rjs on Jun 28, 2007 5:49 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reason, because it's true. Far more blacks complain about being persecuted due to race than ever before. The problem is, they don't understand that it's not about race or color, it's about what "Negro's" do in society that brings the issues they endure.

Simply put, a majority of prisons are filled with blacks or other minorities. Why? Because they commit most of the crimes. That's the facts. Period. Your article is about the same number of whites and blacks "using" drugs. Well, I don't believe it, but at any rate, rewrite your article and get some evidence together that shows whites being more apt to be on the corners of any major street in America selling crack than African Americans. Not going to happen. Just not the case.

Put a decent article together and leave the racism out of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PBS Democratic Debate
Posted by: neogaia on Jun 28, 2007 11:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today I was thrilled at the Democratic debate relating to some of the things the candidates had to say about the war on drugs.

All the candidates wanted to repeal mandatory minimum sentences which are causing disproportionate convinctions for minorities.

They all wanted to treat drug abuse as a health issue and not as much of criminal justice issue.

They all wanted to make penalties for cocaine and crack identical because currently they are more severe for crack and it has hurt minorities very much.

It has been that discrepancy that has led to much of the black white rates of incarceration differences.

I applaud the candidates positions on repealing the mandatory minimums and getting rid of the the crack & powder cocaine penalty differences.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Civil Liberties if You're Poor and Black
Posted by: BobbyGreyFriar on Jun 30, 2007 12:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my neighborhood in Brooklyn--predominantly black and very poor--undercover police (in cars without plates) can search you without probable cause; I have witnessed this personally and was sad to see it but not at all surprised. I have never seen this in a white middleclass neighborhood--I think most people like me (i.e. rich and white) would call their lawyer before submitting to this humiliation.

Since slaverly was abolished blacks have not had civil liberties. Those of us in the middle class did for a brief spell, now ending, but at least we had it. It used to be Jim Crowe and COINTELPRO, now it's the War on Drugs; next the blugeon will probably be environmental legislation.

I urge anyone who does not think this is the case to visit me here in Bushwick (near PS81) and speak to the locals.

End Times by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffery St Claire contains and invaluable section on the history of black oppression by the liberal media and respectable; "White on Black in Black and White."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MacCam
Posted by: MacCam on Jul 5, 2007 10:13 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All people need to come together. Call off the great "race" of humanity, declaring no one the winner, then let's start the party!!! DRugs can only be good when one needs them, be it for spiritual awakenings, body wellness, sexual healings, etc..

It is true, our bodies are our own "temples", and no one should have the right to tell anyone what they should ingest, or not into their own bodies; yet, for the sake of the greater society, there are certain constraints that should be practiced. Our laws say, one cannot be "...a harm to oneself, or to others..." for a good reason, therefore, current laws exist!

"Minor"ities" have gotten the raw end of the stick it to you for a while. Why, don't you remember when they barely made it on those boats from Africa not too long ago? Same goes wit them Mexicans, only, they just a skip, hop and a jail jump away! Anyway, in Shakespears "worlds a stage" production, it is only the "Major"ity players who get the best parts!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]