Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

New Study Finds Abysmally Few Minority and Women-Owned Radio Stations

By Kristal Brent Zook, Women's Media Center. Posted June 15, 2007.


Broadcast media ownership by minorities has plummeted by at least 14% since 1997.
Advertisement

In 1976, the U.S. Court of Appeals advised the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that it should begin to include race as a factor in deciding which applicants to approve licenses for broadcast media ownership. As a result of the landmark decision, which was of course fueled by the civil rights movement and public pressure, the FCC developed its groundbreaking Statement of Policy on Minority Ownership.

And during its relatively brief 20-year existence, the Minority Policy Statement (as it came to be known) actually worked. But then came the backlash.

Since the mid-1990s the small gains that were made have been consistently rolled back, and minority ownership has plummeted by at least 14% since 1997 according to the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council (MMTC) in Washington, D.C. (The FCC did not even begin to process race and gender-related ownership data until 2003 and even then its numbers were consistently erroneous and incomplete.)

In short, we are "back at square one," says Democratic FCC Commissioner Michael Copps.

Luckily, the Free Press, a Washington, DC media reform organization, has stepped up to the plate to do what the FCC will not.

In 2006 the group released "Out of the Picture," an unprecedented report on broadcast television ownership, which found that women of all races own just 5% of the 1,400 commercial broadcast television stations in America. People of color, who make up 33% of the national population (and will be more than 50% by 2050), own just 3.6%.

Now the Free Press is back with an equally scathing report on the abysmal state of radio ownership.

Its latest study, "Off the Dial (pdf)," released earlier this month, found that women and minorities own just 6 and 7.7% of all broadcast radio stations in the country respectively. This means that listeners in an average radio market have 16 white male-owned stations to choose from, but just one woman-owned and two minority owned alternatives.

"It's not about biology," warns Gloria Steinem, a founder of GreenStone Media, in reacting to the study's findings. "It's about programmers who share the experiences of their audiences. It's about ... culture, and the ethics of the whole industry."

Indeed, today's FCC places no importance whatsoever on minority or women-owned media.

After appointing (under pressure) a 29-member Advisory Committee on Diversity in 2003, volunteers worked for more than a year and a half to present 18 recommendations for promoting minority and female broadcast ownership. But in the ultimate slap in the face, the FCC did not even bother to mention the recommendations in its 2006 notice of proposed rulemaking, says David Honig, executive director of the MMTC, and one of the advisory panel members.

The FCC knows how to improve the situation. "There's no lack of suggestions," says Commissioner Copps. "It's a question of will and determination."

"Even advertisers are dissatisfied," says Steinem, noting that "women still buy 85% of goods at the point of purchase. And yet AM talk radio is so hostile and combative that it's chasing women away, and advertisers can't reach them."

Study after study has shown that minority owners report more local news, have more diverse hiring and management, and ultimately serve their communities better. The latest Free Press report confirms yet again what we already know: diversity in ownership is more likely to lead to diversity in hiring and programming.

By putting media in the hands of impersonal conglomerate owners, we no longer even have stations that are able to warn local residents about nearby emergencies, says Steinem. "Now there's just a closet with a spinning disk in it controlled by somebody thousands of miles away."

"This has to be at least the beginning of a turn upward," she adds. "We've reached the bottom."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: media ownership, minorities

Kristal Brent Zook is an award-winning journalist and author of Black Women's Lives: Stories of Power and Pain. She is currently completing a book of interviews with 10 African American owners of radio and television stations to be published by Basic Books in 2008. Dr. Zook is also an adjunct professor of journalism at Columbia University and frequent public speaker on topics of race, gender and cultural politics. She can be reached directly at kz2015@columbia.edu.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
HE WHO HAS THE MOST GOLD.......
Posted by: thetruth07 on Jun 15, 2007 8:27 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This should not be surprising in a nation where the white male social hierarchy is most dominate. The reality is everything is controlled by few most wealthy white families in this country.
That means the money, resources, media, trade, all types of industry are in the control of the white majority.
That's the reality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As a 'minority' woman who is launching a cable station
Posted by: asilsfable on Jun 15, 2007 9:11 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can 'Amen' your assertions. And it should cause more alarm than it does.

The lack of diversity is appallingly stark. I also see very few people of color behind the scenes. I hire quite a few women (mostly women, in fact, but not necessarily because they are women) and my staff consists of multi-lingual folk from all over. You can't imagine the vitriol that's been directed at me.

But that's in America. The reception I get in other countries is amazing. Again, a stark contrast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not sure what they're needed for
Posted by: Logic's Edge on Jun 16, 2007 1:24 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the mainstream media seems to be doing a good job of bashing white men without the extra help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not sure what you're needed for Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: Not sure what you're needed for Posted by: Logic's Edge
» Blacks portrayed in today's media Posted by: Pat Kittle
» RE: Well......... Posted by: ekipnrut
» Ummm...Hmm Posted by: ekipnrut
White Men Have Done/Are Doing the Bashing
Posted by: frosty86 on Jun 16, 2007 4:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This whole notion that white men are being bashed in the media is so tiresome.

These kids of comments typically refer to efforts to point out the racism and sexism of SOME white men...and this is supposedly a form of "bashing." I think the source of the problem is not understanding that both white people and men are powerful/privileged groups in this society and not understanding the dynamics of racism and sexism. One needs to understand discrimination or prejudice toward white people as occurring in a society in which white people have the power, unearned privilege, and resources and people of color do not.

Here's a good starter: a href="http://seamonkey.ed.asu.edu/~mcisaac/emc598ge/Unpacking.html">White Privilege

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Homer Simpson Posted by: suprmark
I am ashamed
Posted by: TassieDevil on Jun 16, 2007 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was listening to a talk back radio program on our (Aussie) ABC less than an hour ago. The woman presenter had a woman caller inform her she had just read a news item at the BBC about how some woman in England had ripped off a mans testicle and both women were in hysterics. The joke went on for almost three minutes. I assumed it was a funny incident, till I visited the BBC website. This is part of the transcript. You can read the full story at the BBC web news :

A woman who ripped off her ex-boyfriend's testicle with her bare hands has been sent to prison.
Amanda Monti, 24, flew into a rage when Geoffrey Jones, 37, rejected her advances at the end of a house party, Liverpool Crown Court heard.
(Jones said) "....I found I was completely naked and in excruciating pain."
Sentencing Monti, Judge Charles James said it was "a very serious injury" and that Monti was not acting in self defence.
Doctors were unable to re-attach the organ.

Even the BBC story has been handled with a twist of humour, as if it is OK and open game for women to seriously injure men. This story is bad enough, but that two women should openly carry on, on our national radio program, about such a cruel and despicable act, shows just how much work we women have got to do before we can ever fully earn the respect of the wider community. And I wonder, if this woman announcer were to loose heremployment over this incident, which I doubt, if the radical feminists wouldn't howl down the ABC as being a bastion of male dominance. We women are our own worst enemy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Read what I said carefully. Posted by: Pat Kittle
» RE: ead what I said carefully. Posted by: TassieDevil
» "We women"? Posted by: owleyes
» RE: "We women"? Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: "We women"? Posted by: TassieDevil
» RE: "We women"? Posted by: owleyes
» RE: "We women"? Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: "We women"? Posted by: owleyes
» RE: "We women"? Posted by: TassieDevil
» RE: "We women"? Posted by: owleyes
» RE: "We women"? Posted by: TassieDevil
Yo..Aussie Kim...like 'Superwoman' Huh??..WhereTF are ya' when we need you??
Posted by: ekipnrut on Jun 16, 2007 3:42 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
:O)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION = TRASH THE 1ST AMENDMENT
Posted by: Jak_dah_rippah on Jun 16, 2007 8:29 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NEVER LET IT BE SAID THAT THE LEFT RESPECTS THE 1ST AMENDMENT.

THEY WILL DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO GUT IT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» don't buy in Posted by: owleyes
Women of all hues are 51% of the listening population
Posted by: odcherenow on Jun 17, 2007 3:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This gets lost. Women are 51% of the population in whatever demographic we're using. The term "minorities and women" obscures the core issues and dilutes the pervasive and obscured impact of sexism in this country. Minority men, 16% of the population, while impacted by racism, are still are treated differently from all women, whatever their color, as males.
Do minority men have privileges women do not? Think of a good looking girl or woman walking past a construction site or through the canyons of Wall Street @ lunch hour.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Is this a real argument? Posted by: owleyes
» Agreed! Posted by: ekipnrut
» Ekipnrut Posted by: owleyes
New Study Finds Abysmally Few White Athletes In NBA
Posted by: Pat Kittle on Jun 17, 2007 2:45 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could there be a legitimate reason for that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Unmmmm..Yeah!! Posted by: ekipnrut
» RE: Unmmmm..Yeah!! Posted by: Pat Kittle
» Gee, the silence is deafening... Posted by: Pat Kittle
» Pat calling the Kittle black Posted by: asilsfable
THIS is BS
Posted by: gellero on Jun 18, 2007 7:16 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone with $$$$$$$ (or the proper backing) can buy a radio station. What does this have to do with sex or race?? And any minority or woman can start an internet radio web site on a shoestring. What a bunch of whiners you all are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: THIS is BS Posted by: dlf
» ISN'T THAT THE WAY IT WORKS? Posted by: gellero
» RE: THIS is BS Posted by: gellero
WOMEN/ENLIGHTENED OWNED/INFLUENCED RADIO STATION
Posted by: Sakanta Running Wolf on Jun 20, 2007 10:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here I am in the San Francisco BayArea. We have KSFO Hate Talk Radio with a 13 year history!!!! I tuned in Melanie Morgan and Lee Rodgers one morning. I was so shocked by what I heard (much worse than IMUS) - Inciting to Riot insanity - that I Googled KSFO Radio. I have blogged about this, and am in the process of calling their advertisers.
I will publish a list of their advertisers, and the ones that have
pulled out after learning about the Hate Talk that goes on.
YES! Let's get a radio station that broadcasts enlightened
ideas, win win ideas, conflict resolution, visionary ideas and current projects that are impacting the world to heal and unite. Sakanta Running Wolf. Global Peace Global Healing.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ISN'T THAT THE WAY IT WORKS?
Posted by: gellero on Jun 21, 2007 2:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
unless you're a 'legacy' or get affirmative action since you're a minority or woman.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No one dares answer this question (except with evasions and insults)!
Posted by: Pat Kittle on Jun 21, 2007 12:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What are you afraid of?

Just answer the question:

Do many black people (at least privately) think blacks are innately (genetically) better, say, boxers than whites?

1) Yes
2) No
3) Maybe
4) If I call you a racist I don't have to answer this question!
5) ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]