Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

War and Censorship at Wilton High

By Amy Goodman, King Features Syndicate. Posted June 13, 2007.


High school students in Connecticut weren't allowed to discuss the war, so they wrote a play about it. "Voices in Conflict," was quickly banned by the school, but made it to New York where it brought the audience to tears.
Advertisement

Last Sunday night, as millions of Americans tuned in to the two Tonys -- the final episode of “The Sopranos,” to see whether Tony Soprano lived or died, and the Tony Awards, celebrating the best in American theater -- actor Stanley Tucci (who played “Nigel” in “The Devil Wears Prada") was in an off-Broadway theater, the Culture Project, watching high school students perform a play about war.

The production, “Voices in Conflict,” moved the audience to tears, ending with a standing ovation for the teenage actors, still reeling from a controversy that had propelled them onto the New York stage. Their high school principal had banned the play.

Bonnie Dickinson has been teaching theater at Wilton High School in Connecticut for 13 years. She and her students developed the idea of a play about Iraq, initially inspired by the Sept. 3, 2006, death of Wilton High graduate Nicholas Madaras from an IED (improvised explosive device) blast in Baqubah, Iraq. The play uses real testimonials from soldiers, from their letters, blogs and taped interviews, and Yvonne Latty’s book “In Conflict,” with the students acting the roles. The voices of Iraqis are also included.

In mid-March, after students spent months preparing the play, the school administration canceled it. Superintendent Gary Richards wrote: “The student performers directly acting the part of the soldiers ... turns powerful material into a dramatic format that borders on being sensational and inappropriate. We would like to work with the students to complete a script that fully addresses our concerns.” (The students have modified the script; they perform Richards’ letter, its cold, condescending bureaucratese in stark relief with the play’s passionate eyewitness testimonials.)

The story struck a chord with Tucci. He was already producing a video piece about his high school alma mater, John Jay High School in Cross River, N.Y., where high school girls were suspended for performing an excerpt of Eve Ensler’s play “The Vagina Monologues.” Their crime: uttering the word “vagina” after being warned not to.

Following the performance of “Voices in Conflict,” Tucci participated in a public conversation with the student actors, noting that “Cross River and Wilton are only 15 miles apart. There’s obviously something in the water.”

After The New York Times published an article on the Wilton High censorship scandal, Ira Levin, the author of “The Stepford Wives,” wrote the paper a letter: “Wilton, Conn., where I lived in the 1960s, was the inspiration for Stepford, the fictional town I later wrote about in ‘The Stepford Wives.’ I’m not surprised ... that Wilton High School has a Stepford principal. Not all the Wilton High students have been Stepfordized. The ones who created and rehearsed the banished play ‘Voices in Conflict’ are obviously thoughtful young people with minds of their own.”

Wilton High School principal Timothy Canty was quoted in The New York Times article saying that the play might “hurt Wilton families ‘who had lost loved ones or who had individuals serving as we speak,’ and that there was not enough classroom and rehearsal time to ensure it would provide ‘a legitimate instructional experience for our students.’ ”

I asked the student actors about their opportunities to discuss the war at school. Jimmy Presson, 16 years old, said his U.S. history class has a weekly assignment to bring in a current-event news item, with one caveat: “We are not allowed to talk about the war while discussing current events.” The students said that they can discuss the war in a Middle Eastern studies class, but, they said, it is not being taught this year. “Theater Arts II was the only class in the school where students were discussing the war,” Dickinson said. Jimmy added, “We also get to speak about it with the military recruiters who are always at school.”

Following Sunday’s production, Allan Buchman, Culture Project’s artistic director, summed up, “What we saw tonight was the reason to have a theater.”

With the evening winding down, the kids were already talking about their next performance, this one at the famed Public Theater, another prominent New York institution, which will be attended by some of the soldiers the student actors play. Jimmy said: “It means a lot that we can share their stories. We got word from India, Japan ... and even Iowa.” The audience laughed. It was getting late. As the students packed up to head home to Connecticut, they wondered if they would ever be allowed to perform the play where it all began, at Wilton High.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: wilton high school, cencorship, war

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"... dramatic format that borders on being sensational and inappropriate ..."
Posted by: SayBlade on Jun 13, 2007 7:48 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the story:

"Richards wrote: “The student performers directly acting the part of the soldiers ... turns powerful material into a dramatic format that borders on being sensational and inappropriate. We would like to work with the students to complete a script that fully addresses our concerns.” (The students have modified the script; they perform Richards’ letter, its cold, condescending bureaucratese in stark relief with the play’s passionate eyewitness testimonials.)"

Disgusting censorship. I never heard of this story until today.

So why have the media not censored reports of that young woman of whom we see so much in the news these days ... , uh what's her name again? Um, or was it a man?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I was waiting for the Fright Wing to attack the story...
Posted by: brotherjonah on Jun 14, 2007 1:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's been all damn day....

Why haven't they come to this like the diseased flies they truly are?
Maybe the rich girl going to jail for 6 weeks on a probation violation for a a felony is more star-studded and therefore better news?

She is one person who should get down on her bony knees every day and thank God Almighty that she wasn't born poor.

As for the much better story, this one, I congratulate my more radical friends (even though i never met them) for actually giving these kids a venue.

The risks they took are growing every day, the "Bong Hits For Jesus" case gives the (il)Legal System a precedent for further harassing them.

I thank them for the courage, because it's young people like that who can turn the war on it's ear.

Perhaps the next performance will get better coverage.

Thank you Ms Goodman for reporting it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

truly frightening
Posted by: Alec Freeman on Jun 14, 2007 3:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although this story ended on an uplifting note (the students performed their bold play in New York), this obscene censorship (by an educator no less!) is absolutely frightening. This highly significant trend, the fervor of which has increased in the last six years, receives little attention. It seems that the American populace and media are more concerned about jailed celebrities, talent shows, and lost humpback whales.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I agree Alec- Posted by: Ellie1
» RE: truly frightening Posted by: rinthy
You mean, we're not alone?
Posted by: mizipi on Jun 14, 2007 5:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And, I thought that only here in the Deep South the ignorant, Bible-hugging, support-the-troops crowd reigned supreme.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RUDY came from New York- Posted by: Ellie1
What's un-American?
Posted by: willymack on Jun 14, 2007 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Airing out your dirty laundry without fear of reprisal or censorship, or attempting to ban an inherent first amendment right? What kind of example is this to set for our students? Who the hell do these head-in-the-sand (or worse) "administrators" think they are? Do they think at all or just blindly follow the party line? I think Someone should carefully review the qualifications of these fools.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For the Best and the Brightest
Posted by: ccluelessfl60 on Jun 14, 2007 8:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wouldn't it be wonderful if someone taped and saved these great students efforts ,that seemed to come from honesty and compassion for their fellow man. Maybe someone can sponsor at least, a second production and let us all see their work. Post it on You Tube. The powers that be can not silence the emotions of young people as much as they try. They try to dumb down the students by forbidding discussion of important issues and low and behold they figured out a way around it. Now when I was a teenager I was not so clever nor dedicated. Isn't it a shame that so called educators would attempt to censor the best and the brightest students to their mundane level. We have hope, that now we know that the young people of this country have not been lost as this current crop of imbeciles run our schools . They not only want to leave the child behind but keep him down. More power to the youth and the people who truly support them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HOW ABOUT THE REAL REASONS??
Posted by: Naturalboy on Jun 14, 2007 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever wonder who this play would have "hurt"? If you think it's soldiers and their families, GUESS AGAIN!

One need only look to their warmongering MIC pawn, Lieberless. Why do they vote for these mass-murdering maniacs? See this article:

Excerpt:
No Farewell to Arms

To remain viable, Connecticut's defense industries must maintain a breakneck pace of evolution and innovation

Business New Haven
5/12/2003
By: Richard Rangoon

The $366 billion U.S. defense budget for 2003 calls for ample military spending in Connecticut and a new direction for the state's defense contractors.

The changing nature of geopolitical conflict and increased technological know-how are driving changes in the ways the state's No.1 industry manufactures weapons.

From the 1960s to the mid-1990s, the U.S. defense industry focused on improving existing weapons systems, rather than creating new ones. The massive buying programs of the Cold War era supported this approach, with Connecticut's defense spending peaking at $7 billion in 1989, according to Jeff Blodgett, vice president of research for the Rocky Hill-based Connecticut Economic Resource Center (CERC), a nonprofit economic development organization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LEts hear it for "education"...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jun 14, 2007 8:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.. still not teaching people how to live their lives (economics, home ec, etc...) and now not even allowing them to discuss what is going on in the world today.

Its even more just a propaganda factory than it ever was before.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TIME TO CANCEL CANTY
Posted by: Naturalboy on Jun 14, 2007 11:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cant wait to see this 'scandalous' play by these brave kids!!http://www.voicesinconflict.com/nytimes1.html

I just can't believe this guy still Canty still works as the principle of Wilton HS. The fact that these parents don't fire his ass is all-telling-- so I sent Canty a note reminding him of the widening scandal, and urging him to QUIT NOW.

If any of you taxpayers out there who pay this guy's ill-gotten salary and corrupting, unconstitutional influence wish to help him realize he's got to go, send Principle Timothy H. Canty an email directly to his office: cantyt@wilton.k12.ct.us

If the Bush administration's High Crimes are just too huge for the lilly-livered Dems to impeach, then the least we can do is cancel this hideous Canty from any sort of public service.

This is exactly the kind of 'education' Floyd and Orwell tried to warn us about, and we don't need it!

Here's what I wrote:

To: cantyt@wilton.k12.ct.us
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 1:09 PM
Subject: Mr. Canty: How about the REAL REASONS for your complicity in censorship?


Mr. Canty,
Your unwillingness to properly respond and correct the enormous and conspicuous and immensely embarrassing blunder you've made shows your true colors.
Taxpayers should not have to pay you for censorship in the name of your right-wing cronies, nor should families and children have to suffer under your cronyistic false leadership.
If you can't perform your PUBLIC duties in a way that keeps your politics out of it, then it is clearly time for you to STEP DOWN.
Advise the board of Education immediately that the 2006/2007 school year was your last in this system.
Suggest you'd be better employed at Halliburton.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's to Tucci, the student actors, the teachers, art and theater!
Posted by: texshelters on Jun 14, 2007 11:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not all is lost. The play was produced and got more national attention than if the Principal had just let it run.

He's an ass that should be fired!

Joe Tex

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a bunch of corrupt incompetents in charge of education!
Posted by: g on Jun 15, 2007 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Superintendent Gary Richards wrote: "The student performers directly acting the part of the soldiers ... turns powerful material into a dramatic format that borders on being sensational and inappropriate. We would like to work with the students to complete a script that fully addresses our concerns.”
Gee golly. Guess what, Richards: life, and especially war, have a habit of being 'dramatic,' 'sensational,' and, even more often, 'inappropriate.'
These people should be banned from working in education for life. Or at least until they give evidence that they understand what 'education' is about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I forgot
Posted by: g on Jun 15, 2007 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
KUDOS to Stanley Tucci!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hence why I hated high school
Posted by: ateo on Jun 15, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's about indoctrination and ensuring the kids are able to conform to the 8 hour work day and mindlessly bow to authority figures more than anything else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Appalling!
Posted by: The_Curmudgeon on Jun 15, 2007 10:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd read the letter in the Times but did not really grasp the full significance of the issue until reading Ms. Goodwin's column just now. As a result, I just e-mailed the following to the school's principal:

cantyt@wilton.k12.ct.us

Dear Mr. Canty,

I have just read about the creative and courageous production mounted by some of your best and brightest students, Voices in Conflict. I am delighted that these students undertook this project, but shocked and appalled that an American high school principal would censor the play and then admonish the students for trying to produce it.

Sir, life and death struggles are dramatic, and nothing is more dramatic that what is being acted out in America’s name on the sandy stage of Iraq. To tell your students that taking the actual words of soldiers fighting and dying there is “inappropriate” exemplifies the worst of public education in the United States. You should be ashamed of yourself.

I hope, at least, you are very proud of your students. They are the best and brightest this country has to offer and will, hopefully, remain creative and questioning despite the efforts of their high school to kill them of any of their curiosity and inquisitiveness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

See Voices In Conflict
Posted by: The_Curmudgeon on Jun 15, 2007 11:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to a search I ran on Google, the play is available at www.dailymotion.com/video/x28kor_voices-in-conflict-staged.

It is only a clip on Daily Motion that was taken from a local television newscast, and it includes some interviews with the director and cast members. For those of us not living in or around New York City, it's better than nothing.

So far, the clip has received 86 views; the more of us who watch it, the more support we can show the students.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Personal Anecdote
Posted by: CatDad on Jun 17, 2007 9:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was sitting in an advanced business class in my junior year at the University of Louisville circa 1984, where I was surrounded by some of the best students from the city....The professor casually mentioned "My Lai" and there was a collective blank stare from the class and the professor's jaw fell to the floor. Twelve years of schooling + three years of college and not one student had been exposed in the slightest form to this event in American history. I guess twenty five years from now the same sort of thing with occur with Abu Ghraib.

Sidenote: For some strange (and tragic) reason the vast majority of K-12 school textbooks come from Texas..that probably has a lot to do with the absence of any objective point of view.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RAPayne
Posted by: RAPayne on Jun 20, 2007 12:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How ironic that this story is sponsored in part from an ad by the US Army. (Note who paid for the BoostUP ads.) Gosh, those military recruiters get in everywhere. I thought Alternet would not fall for their seductive advertising dollars. Guess I was wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can't discuss the war???
Posted by: soulrebeljc on Jun 20, 2007 4:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a HS teacher, and I can't imagine a student raising a legitimate question about our involvement in this illegal occupation and being shut down? What are we teaching our children about participatory democracy and censorship? Unbelievable. Can this idiot super before he can do any more damage. And can Lieberman while you're at it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Disc Golfer
Posted by: disc golf on Jun 20, 2007 8:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(E-mail to Mr. Richards)

Hello Mr. Richards,

You ought to be ashamed of yourself for being so provincial and uncreative while not allowing "Voices in Conflict" to be performed in your school. (Could the fact that Conn makes so much money from the defense industry have anything to do w/this?) But at least your actions are teaching a valuable lesson on the workings of propaganda and censorship in America. What your actions have accomplished is to prove that creativity can not always be repressed! But in reality, what you've proven yourself to be in this mis-adventure, I can't print.

You should instead congratulate your bright students and allow them to have the play performed in your school. It wouldn't hurt to apologize to these students either. Your students (and fellow Americans) can't "know" that about 400,000 to 600,000 Iraqis have been killed in our illegal war, (so far), Americans can't see coffins coming back from Iraq while (meanwhile) funds for education in America are continually cut, in part to fund this horrible war. Do you think stopping this play is going to help the cause of American democracy? In what country are you living? Are not enough American liberties being abrogated every month in this country since Bush and his administration came to (or stole) power in this country?

Please do the right thing and allow these students to perform this play! Otherwise, do the honorable thing and...resign!

Tom Petrie
New York

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Applause
Posted by: alternetrose on Jun 21, 2007 1:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The students who performed this play were under the direction of a teacher - who stuck his/her neck way out. Can you imagine the side stepping and careful management this took to write, practice and then accompany the kids to perform it in New York, after being told by this teacher's boss that it was not a suitable activity? This is a fine example of a dedicated educator! And I say, Congratulations! Well done! The state of Connecticut should name him/her their Teacher of the Year! And they should also make an example of the principal for his poor leadership by dismissing him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pathetic...
Posted by: nat121874 on Jun 21, 2007 3:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If only the principal were half as concerned about the pain families feel when their children die in this unjust war. The pain is there, regardless. Maybe if we allowed these obviously bright and energetic kids to express some of the agony felt, so many would not blindly join in this unjust and unnecessary fiasco (or any that await us in the future.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]