Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

Strategic Gains Nurture Bolder Anti-Choice Moves

By Allison Stevens, Women's eNews. Posted June 12, 2007.


Some Georgia legislators want their state constitution to recognize embryos and fetuses as persons from the moment of conception. It's a sign of a widening strategic divide within the anti-choice movement.
Advertisement

Frustrated with the slow process of gradually chipping away at abortion rights through a series of restrictions to abortion, anti - choice lawmakers in Georgia recently took a bolder move.

In March they introduced the first bill in the country to amend a state constitution to define embryos and fetuses from the moment of conception as persons entitled to a right to life.

The legislation is the latest sign of a widening strategic divide within the anti - choice movement.

In recent years, those who have pushed an incremental approach to gradually restrict access to the procedure -- but not ban it altogether -- have enjoyed the upper hand. But the "personhood amendment" signals that absolutists are readying a more direct challenge to the incrementalists in their midst.

"For too long the pro - life movement has been dominated by a strategy of 'wait;' too fearful of losing to risk winning," Richard Thompson, president of the Thomas More Law Center, a Christian legal advocacy group in Ann Arbor, Mich., said in a statement. "The adoption of this amendment will place Georgia at the forefront of the battle to restore the sanctity of innocent human life."

To be sure, gaining the support of two - thirds of the lawmakers in both chambers of the Georgia Legislature and a majority of the state's voters that is required to pass the "personhood amendment" will be an uphill battle.

Even if it were to become law, the amendment would not have any immediate effect on abortion rights in the state because it does not address criminal penalties, said Josh Brahm, a spokesperson for Georgia Right to Life in Lawrenceville, Ga. And any legislation that did include criminal penalties would be blocked because the U.S. Supreme Court -- while restricting some access in its April decision banning a specific type of abortion procedure -- has continued to uphold the basic right to abortion.

Still, Kay Scott, president of Planned Parenthood of Georgia in Atlanta, says the effort to endow embryos and fetuses with legal rights -- the so - called personhood push -- should not be discounted in her state.

If it passes, Georgia's "personhood amendment" could provide anti - choice advocates legal language that could ultimately make abortion at any gestational age tantamount to murder and could eventually lead to the outlawing of everything from contraception to stem cell research to certain kinds of fertility treatments, Scott said.

"The rest of the country took a moderate turn at the last election, but Georgia sort of went to the right," she said. "It's clear they feel like it's possible they could pass something like this in Georgia."

Tactical Steps

If such an amendment were to pass in Georgia or anywhere else it could be used as a vehicle to mount a frontal legal challenge to Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortion, Brahm said.

Proponents of the amendment base their legal claim on a passage in the majority opinion of Roe v. Wade in which Justice Harry Blackmun said the court was not in a position to answer the question of when life begins but added that if the "personhood" of embryos and fetuses were ever established, the case for abortion would collapse under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

In this view, the entire debate over abortion rights hinges on the question of personhood; if embryos and fetuses are granted that status, it would establish the legal underpinnings needed by anti - choice groups to overturn Roe v. Wade.

The Georgia amendment is the most conspicuous sign yet of the effort to recognize embryos and fetuses as persons, but the movement has seen significant under - the - radar success in recent years.

In 2002, the Bush administration issued a regulatory change to expand the State Children's Health Insurance Program to include embryos and fetuses, making them separate beneficiaries of a government program, according to NARAL Pro - Choice America, an abortion rights advocacy group in Washington, D.C.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: anti-choice, pro-choice, legislation, georgia

Allison Stevens is Washington bureau chief at Women's eNews.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The soul/spirit makes a baby as a human being.
Posted by: saywhat on Jun 14, 2007 4:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An embryo is not a person, it is an embryo. The idea of an embryo being a human being is not based upon sound study.
Does anybody care when the soul enters the body? That is when a fetus is a human being. I’d advise anyone who wishes to find out when an embryo or a fetus becomes a human being, to talk to hypnotists who have made a study of regressing people back to that stage in their lives.
With dozens of my cases and in every instance the soul, cut off from where ever it was at the time of conception, hovers around the mother until the time of birth. Then the spirit/soul unites with the body. Some feel it is when the head crowns, others at the babies first cry.
It’s a question that should be investigated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» One cannot kill a soul. Posted by: saywhat
You cannot convince these pro-life wackos with facts.
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jun 15, 2007 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Facts mean very little or nothing to them. If they were fact based, they wouldn't be so damned religious. You don't believe in abortion, fine, don't have one. No one is forcing you into a clinic. And you male pricks who want to end a woman's right to choose-if you assholes kept your pricks in your pocket, abortion would not be a necessary, would it? It is amazing to me that there are so many men who are the CAUSE and do not believe women should have any control over their own bodies. Keep your damned born again sh-t out of my bedroom and out of my body, you Christian creeps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Idiots
Posted by: BlueTigress on Jun 15, 2007 10:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the same tired shit. Make a fetus a person so abortion becomes the murder of a person.

Want to prevent abortions? TEACH CONTRACEPTION!!

People are going to fuck regardless of the outcome. I understand that contraceptives fail in a low percentage of cases, so if the woman is using a contraceptive and it fails, she should be allowed to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.

It's a form of slavery to require every woman who conceives to carry the pregnancy to term, unless she wants to.

That's part of the problem, too. These clowns want to make every fertilized ovum a person, but they don't support making help available to the woman. If these clowns supported full universal prenatal care, well-baby and child care, childbirth classes, parenting classes, daycare, and education, I might think a little differently. But they don't. Having a healthy baby is expensive. Taking care of a physically or mentally challenged child is expensive and heartbreaking.

They don't want to help where it counts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When the fetus is a dependent...
Posted by: jingles on Jun 16, 2007 4:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there will be tax credits and subsidies for the pregnant, pre-maternity/paternity pay and time off, pre-fetal insurance for all eggs and sperm, conception-day parties (for hats: broken condoms), and fertility parades. How nice. Oh oops, I forgot, pro-life has nothing to do with the Breathing, and will make sure "fetal rights" have nothing to do with anything that breathes. It was fun while it lasted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]