Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

The Immigrant Graveyards of South Texas

By Mary Jo McConahay, Texas Observer. Posted June 11, 2007.


As border security tightens, South Texas has become a graveyard for the weak and unlucky immigrants making the crossing from Mexico.
Advertisement

At the Side Door Café in Falfurrias, Texas, body counts enter conversations as naturally as the price of feed, or the cost of repairing torn fences. "I removed 11 bodies last year from my ranch, 12 the year before," said prominent local landowner Presnall Cage. "I found four so far this year." Sometimes, Cage said, he has taken survivors to a hospital; mostly, however, time and the sun have done their jobs, and it is too late.

As increased U.S. border security closes certain routes, undocumented migrants continue to come but squeeze onto fewer, more dangerous and isolated pathways to America's interior. One of these is the network of trails that bypasses the last Border Patrol checkpoint traveling north on Hwy. 281, in Brooks County. That change is having a dramatic ripple effect on the county (total pop: 7,685), and on people who have lived here for generations.

For one thing, the dead are breaking the budget. County officials earmarked $16,000 in fiscal 2007 for handling deceased indigents. That category includes the remains of undocumented Mexicans and other would-be migrants found within county lines. But by May, Brooks County had already spent $34,195 on autopsies and burials, "and we're just heading into the hot months now," said County Judge Raul Ramirez. It's also rattlesnake mating season, noted the judge, who grew up on the King Ranch. It's the time when the serpents move around most, biting the unwary and those who walk in grass and sand without high boots.

"Don't get me wrong. I'm glad to do this. I'd spend $120,000 if I had to because it's the right thing to do," Ramirez said in his modest office on Allen Street in Falfurrias (population 5,020), the county seat. "But we could be helping more of our own." About a third of Brooks residents live below the poverty line; average household income is $21,000; jobs are just plain scarce.

Pictures of the dead are kept discreetly in certain places in this town, a collective album that tells an important part of what Brooks County -- which used to be better known for oil, watermelon, and a Halliburton facility -- has become in the last couple of years: a grave for the weak or unlucky. The local Minuteman-type militia, for instance, has a collection of matted 11x14's. Some are artful: a skull amid crawling vines, a kind of meditation; a young man's figure with legs softly bent, his head thrown back against a bush with the arc of a ballet dancer's neck -- only an accompanying close-up of the winsome face, mouth open and vacant eyes, speaks death. Some remains are partially clothed. There is a condition that comes with too much sun: judgment wanes, and the affected person mistakenly believes stripping will assuage the heat inside. Many fallen dead from dehydration are found with jugs of water lying nearby; the inexperienced trekker -- especially when lost -- will save water instead of sipping it periodically, until a line is crossed in the brain and the person no longer feels thirst even as he is expiring from it. Among the pictures are corpses bloated so grievously they look ready to pop. The body of one young woman is not badly swollen, lying with face and torso intact, but her legs have been gnawed down to the long bones by a feral pig.

Luis M. Lopez Moreno, Mexico's consul in McAllen, said there are other changes that may add to the death toll. Since the border has become so difficult to cross, working men who moved back and forth annually are now stuck in the north, and family members unaccustomed to the trek are "trying to reunite" by traveling to the States. Women, arguably less able to withstand the journey, sometimes caring for children, are represented more in the migrant stream. Young migrants, the majority of those who come, are likely to be better educated and more urban now, less aware of how to manage themselves under extreme conditions.

"Hank," a guide for high-end hunters who doesn't want his real name used, thinks he saves lives. Unobtrusively, he turns hunters' blinds away from nearby trails so the "illegals" don't get shot by accident. This is also an attempt "to protect the psychological state of the hunters." They may be men fearless in high finance and politics -- Washington figures including both Bush presidents have hunted here, with Air Force One parked incongruously on the county airstrip. And the gentlemen may have the confidence big wallets can bring, paying well over $1,000 a day to stalk deer, spring turkey, quail (reportedly Bush One's favorite), wild pig, and imported exotic animals, and to stay at lodges with gourmet meals, bars, and wireless. Surprised in the wild by local human traffic, however, they can quake.

"Hunters, they get scared and panic, especially if it's something like a group of 30 coming through," Hank explained. "The illegals got so bad last year we had to buy two-way radios." Hunters can use the radios to call their guides for help. Hank's job has changed in other ways, too. "Before there was downtime to be in the truck, kick back, park in a pasture, and wait for the hunters." No more. "We stay within 100 yards."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: immigration, mexico, texas, coyotes

Mary Jo McConahay is an independent journalist and contributing editor to New America Media.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sounds like this article favors stricter border enforcement
Posted by: ateo on Jun 11, 2007 12:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll be honest, I didn't read the whole thing. The impression I got, however, is that the writer is making an argument in favor of border controls because of how many illegal immigrants are dying trying to enter illegally. If they were stopped and detained they would at least be given shelter from the sun and water to rehydrate themselves.

Anyway, the U.S. has no borders and anyone who says otherwise isn't paying attention to the total lack of meaningful border enforcement.

Is it simply to drive down wages? Is it simply to supply cheap labor to American business? Is it a necessary precursor to unifying all of North America under one government (let so many Mexicans into the U.S. that we align ourselves culturally and get to the point where we might as well be one nation?).

Who knows, but the simple fact is the Southern border is not being enforced. Either we should build the walls and increase the size of the border patrol 10 fold or we should simply admit that we have no borders and let the immigrants come streaming in.

I don't like all of this dishonesty and lip service being paid to such an important issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Just be honest Posted by: edith
» RE: Just be human beings Posted by: sheena2u
» RE: Just be human beings Posted by: edith
» RE: Just be human beings Posted by: CUNxTime
» BIOMETRIC ID ??? Posted by: gellero
» A Simply Way.... Posted by: CatDad
» RE: A Simply Way.... Posted by: edith
Mexicans this is a sign.
Posted by: White middleclass male on Jun 11, 2007 12:57 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are not welcome in the United States. Go home and make your own country worth living in.

By the way the South West was never Aztec land anyway. It belonged to the Navajo, Apache, Comanche and various others. The only reason it was ever part of Mexico was because the white colonialist Spanish said so. Mexico had failed to secure that land from it's indigenous people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mexicans this is a sign. Posted by: sheena2u
» RE: Mexicans this is a sign. Posted by: allUneedislove
» America wanted it, took it, and paid for it Posted by: White middleclass male
» RE: America wanted it, took it, and paid for it Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» Assimilate em Posted by: edith
» Smearing again, Edith? Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: Mexicans this is a sign. Posted by: CUNxTime
Wow. Who Have We Become???
Posted by: allUneedislove on Jun 11, 2007 4:40 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we were Germany and the desperate immigrants were Jews, we would condemn the Germans' behavior. Take a look at the attitudes that prevailed against immigrants at that time in Germany, and how those attitudes gradually morphed into the nightmare of the Holocaust.

Somehow we think we are justified and immigrants are undeserving.

How did we get so righteous? Who do we think we are? We can't see ourselves clearly and neither could the German people long ago.

It's time we woke up. We are letting fear take away our humanity. Just like long ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not Nazis Posted by: edith
» RE: Not Nazis Posted by: allUneedislove
» RE: Not Nazis Posted by: edith
» RE: Not Nazis Posted by: EagleMB
» GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT Posted by: gellero
This Topic
Posted by: dlf on Jun 11, 2007 6:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
has spiralled into an either or argument. Let me ask a few questions. If as an American I made a decision to go to Iraq and fight would there be some expectation that I might die? If there are countless stories about people who attempt to cross the desert either in the back of trucks or on foot dying, shouldn't there be some expectation that it could happen to you, if you attempt the same thing? If I decided to rob a bank, without a gun, but I had a note that made some reference to my having a weapon, should I have some expectation of being killed, if I'm caught? It seems that each of these articles overlooks personal responsibility, and puts all the blame on the law itself. And with that kind of thinking we have Paris Hilton crying because she refused to obey a law. A law by the way, that is meant to save people from dying because of someone's irresponsibility. If you believe that one should be absolved from responsibility because they are poor, isn't that as bigoted as absolving someone because they are rich?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Mexican government has a great deal of blame here
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Jun 11, 2007 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mexico is not in a state of famine, nor does it have a politically repressive regime to the extent that maybe one-quarter of the countries on earth do. But the government loves getting rid of its poor people by sending them north.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sad...just sad...
Posted by: Michael Boldin on Jun 11, 2007 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That people die trying to enter a country. It's also sad to me how these people are demonized, even though every single one of us descends from immigrants as well.

It's really nothing more than a tool for the politicians to incite and divide us. The reality, though, is that immigrants, workers, and yes - more consumers - is good for our country.

Maybe that's why no politicians are talking about that - they just see voting blocks and income sources.

Some follow up reading:

"The Immigration Scam"
http://www.populistamerica.com/the_immigration_scam

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sad...just sad... Posted by: dlf
» Are you kidding? Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Sad...just sad... Posted by: EagleMB
Forget the Alamo! Give Texas Back To Mexico!
Posted by: mgloraine on Jun 11, 2007 8:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be a shame to expatriate ZZ Top & the Dixie Chicks, but think of all the innocent lives which would be spared. And we could save all that money being wasted on big fences and so on, since no one would ever try to sneak INTO Oklahoma...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Forget the Alamo! Give Texas Back To Mexico! Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» Speaking of Posturing, JaK Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
Add forensic, mortuary, burial, and law enforcement investigation costs to the
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jun 11, 2007 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
already amazingly high costs of illegal immigrants. Add to the fact that the landowners lose revenue when the police need to seal off part of their land to investigate the remains of the illegals. How many died from dehydration or, more likely, were killed from the very people (aka 'coyotes' or drug smugglers) they paid to smuggle themselves into the USA. Why progressive support this exploitation is beyond me. I can understand the big corporate bigshot's support (cheap labour, more people to buy shoddy products, exploitative usurious short-term bank loans and money transfers, destroy middle-class in the USA, etc), but why progressives, or indeed anybody with a conscious, likes to create an illegal underclass is beyond me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "Innocent Illegals"???? Posted by: aussieg1rl
Border control is a necessity
Posted by: g on Jun 11, 2007 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's easy to argue that border control is inhumane and horrible when you do not have to live near where the immigrant traffic takes place. I may be sympathetic to the plight of desperate Mexicans coming here for work, but I would not like to find 20 of them at my door asking for food, or stealing my car, or breaking into my house.
Things will never change in this country until big companies who employ illegals are held accountable. The path to legalization (or "amnesty" as some inaccurately call it) is very inconvenient for employers because once immigrants are legalized they will be able to bring lawsuits against their employer for violations. Right now, immigrants are terrified of deportation and will deal with pretty much anything, Raids throw out workers and are a hassle for employers, but as long as employers are not given some major fine they'll just pick up more illegal immigrants and start over. They are very much interested in keeping things as they are, and the idiotic crowd who froths at the mouth rejecting any immigration law is enabling them.
I do believe that immigrants who followed a legal path should be rewarded with fast processing (yeah right) and that those who did not should be penalized, but let's be realistic: if the penalties and fines are unreasonably high, things will just stay as they are right now.
To conclude this long post: this is a letter published today in Lubbock's Avalanche Journal (www.lubbockonline.com). No comments. Enjoy.

"National boundaries serve divine purpose"

God establishes national borders. Acts 17:26 (from the Jerusalem Bible) says: From one single stock He not only created the whole human race so that they could occupy the entire Earth, but He decreed how long each nation should flourish and what the boundaries of its territory should be.

This scripture teaches that God intended from eternity past to segregate the people of the world into nations with national borders. This doesn't leave room for a man-made world government that would make those boundaries meaningless. Neither would He approve of people illegally crossing a national border.

P. S. We must align ourselves with God in the protection of our borders. "
Name omitted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Minutemen and their ilk are vicious hypocrites
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 11, 2007 10:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can people whose ancestors immigrated to this country in search of freedom turn around and repress those who would wish to do the same?

These people are typically right-wing "Christian" Republicans, yet they preach a doctrine of hatred and intolerance. At the same time, they support the very same politicians who are responsible for creating economic devastation in Mexico via the loansharking programs of NAFTA, the IMF, and the World Bank.

The Minutemen get their name from the American revolutionaries who fought the British Government and the Crown Corporations that viewed American as their slave colony - but the fact is that they really should call themselves "The King's Men" or "The Tories"

According the people who run our country today, Thomas Jefferson and George Washington were 'terrorists'...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They Come At their own Risk
Posted by: Lesha on Jun 11, 2007 11:00 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These people understand the risk involved in coming to this country and because of that they deserve little sympathy (especially if they risk the lives of their own children). If their situation was like those in certain parts of Africa, Asia, and other parts of South America where starvation and poverty is high, then I could can understand. The dream these people are chasing is an illusion and they will never rise above the level of peasantry because the next wave immigrants will probably undercut the already existing ones here thus further driving down the wages in this country.

It is not the responsibility of this country to look after these people, especially if they will purposely throw themselves into the hot desert where their chance of survival is lessened. If these folks are dumb enough to travel through the hot desert knowing that they could die, then too bad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Solution?
Posted by: VisionQuest on Jun 11, 2007 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The corpses of men, women, and children who perished trying to enter the country are routinely found in Brooks County."

But unless there are no boarder controls at all, isn't it inevitable that some people will die trying to enter this country illegally by dangerous routes? Is this the result of unconscionably restrictive boarder controls or the constant flow of illegal immigration over the southern boarder?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How to kill Bush’s treasonous immigration bill – for good.
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 11, 2007 12:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1998, when George W. was running for reelection as the governor of Texas, a video was made of him waving a Mexican flag. The footage was shot in San Antonio during a Mexican Independence Day parade.

Says Shrub in the video, "About 15 years before the Civil War, much of the American West was northern Mexico. The people who lived there weren't called Latinos or Hispanics. They were Mexican citizens, until all that land became part of the United States. After that, many of them were treated as foreigners in their own land."

Taken literally, Bush essentially described the millions of Americans who now live in the Southwest U.S. as foreigners in native Mexican land.

With an obvious pro-Hispanic mindset like Dub-ya’s captured on videotape, what better way of defeating his treasonous immigration bill than by broadcasting the clip nationwide -- again and again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

peacefull1
Posted by: joshuawelch on Jun 11, 2007 1:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they didn't think they would find a job here, they wouldn't come. It's a simple problem. We have immigration limits for good reason. Environmental being one very important one. The top source of population growth in the U.S. is immigration. Latinos happen to also have the highest reproduction rate out of any ethnicity. Enforce the current law. Fine employers severely for hiring illegals. PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT, THE JOB MARKET, OUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS, OUR HEALTHCARE SYSTEM AND THE RULE OF LAW. STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Illegal Immigration is a Wedge Issue / Diversionary Tactic
Posted by: mgloraine on Jun 11, 2007 2:05 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a previously small issue being whipped into a nation-wide frenzy by Karl Rove and other propagandists in order to divert citizens' and Congress' attention from the continued death and war-crimes in Iraq and soon Iran.

Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan both used phony "Wars on Drugs" in much the same way, taking a non-issue and making it front-page news in order to divert attention from their own on-going criminal operations (Laos, Cambodia, Watergate, Iran-Contra, etc.).

As long as Congress is wasting its resources on bogus legislation which can't work and won't pass, they are unable to pursue impeaching and prosecuting the criminal conspiracy which is REALLY stealing this country.

Cheney and Rove never miss an opportunity to exercise a wedge issue, like racism. It's easy to play on the fear of foreigners and to encourage domestic hate groups to organize and arm themselves. The lawless vigilantes described in this piece are just the KKK in camo. The increase in dead Mexicans probably coincides with the purchase of weapons and/or night-vision equipment by the vigilantes.

The phony immigration bill should be left in the dust. It would be worth re-visiting immigration issues once Bush, Cheney, Rove, and all co-conspirators are behind bars for their felonies and awaiting their war-crimes trials. It is evident, though, that there is no possibility for meaningful or usable immigration legislation coming from BushCo or any Congressional Republican.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» 20 MILLION ILLEGALS..... Posted by: gellero
WHY THEY LEAVE MEXICO: POVERTY AND HUNGER
Posted by: sofla100 on Jun 11, 2007 5:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to the World Bank, 53% of Mexico' population of 104 million residents live in poverty, which is defined as living on less than $2 a day. Close to 24% of Mexico's population live in extreme poverty, which means they live on less than $1 a day.

The bottom 40% of Mexican households share less than 11% of the country's wealth. Millions live in extreme poverty,and children are compelled to work on the streets in order to help provide food for their families.

Unemployment in Mexico is realistically estimated near 40%, and there are no government unemployment benefits. There are also virtually no welfare benefits to provide the basics for poverty-stricken, often-starving women, children and families.

As for what America has done to help, American corporations, via NAFTA, have built factories in Mexico that employ thousands of Mexican workers. But, the wages and working conditions are so bad, many still want to flee. America sends billions to Iraq and billions to Israel, while her neighboors starve. That is why they leave Mexcio

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Neocons?? Posted by: gellero
Amazing!
Posted by: paschn on Jun 12, 2007 6:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As with the U.S. sheeple's inability to see the simplicity of curing oil whores in our government by NATIONALIZING ENERGY, you drones simply miss the boat on completely curing the illegal border crossings.
But first;
I am NOT a bigot, ( my wife of 35 years is Mexican )
I'm not anti semite, ( althought I do NOT support our sleeping with the terrorist nation of Israel )
See if you drones can grasp this;
You set up CONCRETE sentencing that is impervious to interference by Swine like Bush and other Whore-ish legislators and it will END them hiring the illegals. These terms of imprisonment are for the CORPORATE HEADS and on site lackeys that hire them.
1st offense - 3 months in a REAL prison, not "club fed"
2nd offense - 9 months " " "
3rd offense 3 years and SOLID no appeal fine of 25% of the PERSONAL fortunes of the dogs, ( this would also exclude money in trusts for their spawn or whomever ).
and the revoking of the corporations right to do business in this COUNTRY.
It's YOUR country, YOU fight and die to "defend" it from horrible threats like nations 1/50th our size. YOU tell THEM how it's gonna be....period.
Once you drones throw a few of those peckerwoods so far back into prison you need to pipe light to 'em, they'll not touch illegals with a 10-foot pole. As for the poor guys coming over that are doing nothing more than ANY OF YOU would, to support their loved ones, you give them a portion of the money you fine the dogs for, the balance goes to the unemployed drones from this country who have lost their jobs to illegals and out sourcing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Peckerwoods? N/M Posted by: edith
bogwog
Posted by: peterx on Jun 14, 2007 2:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of you Americans,in the land of the free should be ashamed in Texas.You have put your so called Constitution in the bathroom,silly cowboys.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» query Posted by: aussieg1rl