Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Let's Be Kind to Christopher Hitchens ... and Stop Reading His Articles

By Chris Floyd, Atlantic Free Press. Posted June 9, 2007.


Let us exercise compassionate conservatism toward Christopher Hitchens -- by compassionately refusing to read his embarrassing outpourings, thereby conserving ourselves for more important tasks.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

You know, it has long been fashionable to criticize Christopher Hitchens for his appalling adherence to the gangsters of the Bush Regime, whom he for many years painted in the kind of bold, heroic tones we've not seen since the heyday of Socialist Realism. And while Hitchens is now trying to get back to where he once belonged to some extent -- washing his hands of a war whose failure he now blames largely on the anti-war left and instead shooting a few fish in the barrel of religious absurdities to regain his "contrarian" cred -- he has remained a much-reviled figure in quarters where once he was feted as a prince. (Indeed, no less than Gore Vidal anointed Hitchens as his successor -- but that was many years ago, and as we've seen, the indefatigable octogenarian shows no sign of needing a successor.)

But I think it's time to give over the rancor surrounding Hitchens. Let us exercise compassionate conservatism toward him -- by compassionately refusing to read his embarrassing outpourings, thereby conserving our eyesight and senses for more important tasks. I came to this conclusion after reading his piece in The Guardian in late May, a florid -- paean, I suppose he would call it -- to the literary festival in the small Welsh border village of Hay-on-Wye:

Shall I soon forget the time that the whispering limo came to pick me up, at about midnight from a dinner at the Amis/Fonseca house, and disgorged a driver who said: "It's time"? Through the flickering night we went, darting through an antique township or so, and crossing the Severn or the Bristol Channel at some point, until having been shown to a room in some stone-built hotel, I fell asleep only to wake to the sounds of bleating sheep. To this very day, I think of Hay-on-Wye as a place standing at some slight angle to the rest of the known universe: perhaps a sort of Brigadoon that isn't really there for the rest of the twelvemonth...
A "twelvemonth" is what everybody in Britain calls a "year," by the way. They talk fancy like that over here. Also, all the limousines in Britain whisper, when they don't actually purr. Just so you know. The article continues:
Led away from the tent and towards the well-stocked Green Room, I was at first astonished to find myself meeting friends I had not seen for 30 years, and then alarmed when shown to a lavatory that seemed half Lilliput and half Brobdingnag. (It turned out to be the bathroom of an infants' school, which was some balm to my already disordered senses.) As I took my leave, I was asked if I would like to come back, and replied that I would be willing to risk the trip if I could be assured that it didn't involve some kind of dream-state. Some fairy gold was then pressed into my hand, and I went back to Washington DC and the reign of the banal.
Yes, no doubt when it was all very banal back in DC when "Paul Wolfowitz and myself [needed] to go and convince the President to go to war." For what is a few hundred thousand dead innocents when one can be transported once a year to that magical Brigadoon of tiny toilets and dream states?

They tell me that all this is now available on some digital system, but I don't trust myself to check. Talking on stage with Martin Amis about his Welsh nanny? Dreamt it. Debating with Stephen Fry about faith? Come on. Discussing brain surgery with Ian McEwan, in front of a gigantic audience? What am I, some kind of name-dropper?

With heroic forbearance, we'll skip over that last remark, and move on to the amusing anecdote that closes the piece:

On the Evelyn Waugh centennial, after doing a Vile Bodies/Black Mischief/Scoop panel with Stephen Fry and Lord Deedes -- exhausting enough in itself -- I was handed a late invitation to dinner at Madresfield Court, the country house said to have inspired Waugh's Brideshead Revisited. It was made plain to me that a proper dinner jacket was a strict requirement. I murmured to [Hay director Peter Florence] that I had not a rag of formal dress to my name. With half an hour to go, he murmured in turn into a cellphone. From every quarter of the compass, there came the cummerbund, the shoes, the trousers and the rest of the kit.

Really, should we not let Hitchens wander happily in his fairy land, where whispering limos whisk him off to country houses and cummerbunds magically appear? In fact, let's encourage him to stay there -- then maybe he and his good friend Wolfie won't talk the president into any more invasions.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: christopher hitchens

Read more of Chris Floyd's work at chris-floyd.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Lay off C.H.!!
Posted by: c.e.stokes on Jun 9, 2007 3:38 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
lay off !! you know he's right, the only problem with his views, are that they involve the bushies. but, his statements on religion and, the war on terrorism are on the mark.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lay off C.H.!! Posted by: rjgwood
» RE: Lay off C.H.!! Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Lay off C.H.!! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Lay off C.H.!! Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Lay off C.H.!! Posted by: Asses of Evil
Compassionate people should consider Hitchens’ alcoholism.
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 9, 2007 3:37 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hitchens, who admits to drinking heavily, once wrote that his daily intake of booze was enough "to kill or stun the average mule." The confession shows Hitchens to be an unhappy man in conflict with himself.

Rather than simply ignore his work, compassionate people should go one step beyond the twelve he has refused to take by nor joining Alcoholics Anonymous. Encourage the miserable, mean-spirited bastard to drink himself into oblivion. He belongs on Skid Row, not Main Street.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hitch wouldn't go for AA's "Higher Power" anyway Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
You Just Never Know With Hitchens
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jun 9, 2007 4:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sometimes he's as good as it gets (as with his indictment of Henry Kissenger). Other times, you want to throw a net over him (His support of the unsupportable war in Iraq, for instance).

Say what you will about Christopher Hitchens, he's not, by any means, boring is he? Does he go out of his way to outrage? Good question! I didn't read his book on Mother Theresa but read enough about it and read enough interviews on the subject with Hithchens himself to know that of all of the targets on the planet Earth to take on, the sainted little nun from Calcutta was, at best, a curious choice.

Is he a good companion? Is this the sort of guy you'd like to go on a road trip with? On the tube (and in print) he comes off as so condesending that one would imagine that being stuck in a car with him for hours at a time would be depressing to say the least - but images can be decieving. I once worked for a nationally famous disc jockey at a radio station in Middletown, NY whose public persona was of the nicest amiable guy in the world - who turned out to be one of the most miserable bastards I've ever encountered. The prisim of video and ink is not always project the clearest picture.

That's the factinating thing about Christopher Hitchens: You just never know what the son-of-a-bitch is going to say. Neither liberal or conservative, I guess you would have to peg him as a measured thinker. But how "measured" that thinking is, is debatable, I imagine. Be that as it may, although he will quite often dissapoint, he never fails to deliver the goods.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You Just Never Know With Hitchens Posted by: Asses of Evil
geege
Posted by: geege on Jun 9, 2007 5:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one can be all things to all people. One can be right about religion and wrong about the Iraqi war. On that score, Hitchens is at least batting .500.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: geege Posted by: Veronique
» RE: geege Posted by: rbohan
observer
Posted by: robedal on Jun 9, 2007 5:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All articles by Christopher Hitchens should include the following indispensible information: was the article written before or after lunch?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: observer Posted by: Asses of Evil
dwkinney
Posted by: dwkinney on Jun 9, 2007 7:36 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hitchens drops the ball on Iraq for some incomprehensible reason but on everything else that I have had the good fortune to read, he is right on. Mother Teresa, Kissinger, god and organized religion are exposed for the garbage they are. And he does it in such a forthright, entertaining and eloquent manner.
He is quick, brilliant and hughly entertaining. It is such an added plus that he is so accurate - with the exception of his Iraq position.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dwkinney Posted by: animalleaderisgreat
A loose and drunk cannon.
Posted by: Door man on Jun 9, 2007 7:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hitchens has little left to offer but his ability to insult on any occasion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A loose and drunk cannon. Posted by: cottontail
Hitchens on religion
Posted by: g on Jun 9, 2007 7:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His rants on religion are so bad that they are an embarrassment to any serious atheist thinker. We don't need his support, thanks. Personally, I'd be thrilled if he started supporting the religious right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hitchens on religion Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Hitchens on religion Posted by: hRIOR
Why?
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jun 9, 2007 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Im no xenophobe and am not parochial, but can we load a few planes up and send all the Brits and Canucks home? The British and Canadian press should have plenty of open positions as they rarely hire Americans. Who invited all these Brits with a stick up their arse to come over here and pontificate about the state of our democracy? Who on broadcast row decided that Canadians needed to fill the ranks of our TV and radio news organizations? It obviously hasn't done us any good as the MSM has rolled over like a $10 whore for Bush and the NeoCons.

There is something wrong when Amy Goodman isn't on the airwaves and Hitchens is all over them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why? Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Why? Posted by: buxxee
» RE: Why? Posted by: Asses of Evil
Opportunistic Journalists...
Posted by: CatDad on Jun 9, 2007 9:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Journalists will often change ideology depending on which way the wing is blowing...the classic example is ex-hippie/druggie P.J. O'Rourke, who wrote for Rolling Stone and the National Lampoon in the 60s/70s...Fast forward to today and he's a 50-something "conservative" writer/humorist...laughing all the way to the bank.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My God, Hitch!
Posted by: buxxee on Jun 9, 2007 3:07 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Inherent in the freedom of speech is the freedom to listen. Why should I take your advice and forfeit half my due? The comments of brilliant, articulate and entertaining writers are always worth reading, whether you find yourself in agreement or in opposition. Those who oppose Hitch and survive are only stronger for their exertions. I for one cannot get enough of Hitch. My advice is take two aspirins for your exasperation and lie down; I'm afraid the headache will be gone all too soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My God, Hitch! Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: My God, Hitch! Posted by: Asses of Evil
Floyd is just now realizing this?
Posted by: lessbread on Jun 9, 2007 4:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As sharp as Chris Floyd is, I stopped reading Hitchens when he left the Nation back when. You're a few years late Mr. Floyd.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Floyd is just now realizing this? Posted by: SatanicJamboree
Hitchens :The 'Philip Nolan' of the Progressive Lines 'Titanic'....
Posted by: ekipnrut on Jun 9, 2007 6:32 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[From Wikipedia...The entirety of the article on Hitchens is well worth reading]:
Where he stands now
Hitchens has said he no longer feels a part of the Left. Although he does not object to being called a "former" Trotskyist, his affection for Trotsky remains strong, and he says that his political and historical view of the world is still shaped by Marxist categories. However, in 2004, Hitchens regarded himself as a 'single-issue voter,' concerning himself with what he sees as the battle between the forces of secular democracy and those of theocratic fascism.[26]
Hitchens is sometimes seen as part of the self-styled "pro-liberation left," comprising left-leaning thinkers who support the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. This informal grouping includes Nick Cohen, David Aaronovitch, Francis Wheen, Julie Burchill, and Michael Ignatieff (see Euston Manifesto).[citation needed] Neoconservatives of the last decade are hesitant to embrace Hitchens as one of their own, in part because of his harsh criticisms of Ronald Reagan.[citation needed] He similarly refuses to define himself as a member of the neocon movement.
..This racist clown is neither neocon fish nor progressive fowl and despised by both!!! As for his musings
on religion...how are we to distinguish (alcohol induced) DT hallucinations from 'pure' atheist epiphany??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some "take-down"
Posted by: Evil_Ed on Jun 11, 2007 10:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article does not address in any way Hitchens' logic, his arguments, or anything else pertinent. Some "take-down." Wow, he uses funny words and hangs out with rich people. Big whoop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» read book review posted below Posted by: fanny666
» RE: Some "take-down" Posted by: SatanicJamboree
Hitchens not right on Religion
Posted by: joel23 on Jun 11, 2007 11:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hitchens, as with many outraged atheists these days, confuses the wide variety of individual and group behaviors of human beings (which they tie to their religion, or belief system), with Religion.

Religion and belief systems are two differernt aspects of life. Religion is a manifestation in the temporal world of something which is Eternal. Many people have belief systems (which is what secular humanism and atheism are), but Religion is on the same level with Art and Science - that is it is among the highest of the varied cultural achievements of humanity.

While it is possible to find all manner of evil in the world and connect it to religious beliefs, it is also possible to do this and connect it to scientific beliefs (atom bombs, intentionally created viral weapons etc). Now obviously these latter are the product of human weakness, just as are "religious" wars.

What this means is that Science in itself, or Art in itself, or Religion in itself is not the cause of human behavior, but rather something often merely used as an excuse for someones human weaknesses. Throw out Religion from the Cultural History of the World, and most of the highest points of that History will disappear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hitchens not right on Religion Posted by: xconservative
He makes things up
Posted by: fanny666 on Jun 11, 2007 11:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a pretty brutal review, fun reading though.
On Christopher Hitchens' book about Tom Paine: "Thomas Paine’s ‘Rights of Man’: A Biography"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hitchens wishes he'd said this
Posted by: Rick01 on Jun 11, 2007 3:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I can't be sure Hitchens wishes he'd said this, I bet he does because it's one of those rare statements that crystalizes a thousand, or perhaps a million, words in those that can be said in a breath:

We are all atheists about most of the gods that society has ever believed in - some of us just go one god further
-- Richard Dawkins

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What has happened to this website?
Posted by: hellofriends on Jun 12, 2007 8:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What kind of information does this article provide? What kind of genuinely helpful discussion could this possibly engender?

Is the main critique here that Hitchens has no right to write about pleasant experiences from his personal life because Floyd disagrees with his ideas about foreign policy?

I disagree with Hitchens about THE WORLD and also about "RELIGION," but so what? Often I don't want to read rants that are filled with hatred and sarcasm because they are toxic to the soul and not constructive in any way. Hitchens is often like this, but so is this article, and it makes absolutely no sense to cite some quotations where Hitchens appears blatantly human as an attempt to convince people that he's a monster who shouldn't be permitted to participate in the discussion about how we, as people, can try and make the world as decent as possible.

As much as I'm confused by this article, I'm more bothered by the fact that Alternet decided to publish it. A high school teacher would roll her eyes at this...this massacre of logic. Since when did pointless mean-spiritedness become so fucking fashionable?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What has happened to this website? Posted by: SatanicJamboree
Hitchens had one shining moment tearing down Falwell's statue.
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on Jun 13, 2007 2:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, Hitchens had a great smackdown of Fallwell and the MSM's slavish worship & phony piety & crocodile tears for the man. Oh, the great Fallwell, he was such a hero... Hitchens told the truth, how Fallwell ripped people's money right out of their hands and polluted our democracy with erosion of church and state and his hateful nonsense about Democrat Tinky Winky's gay purse killing unborn babies.

He took it to the TV pundit show talking heads in no uncertain terms and shoved their B.S. right smack down their sorry throats.

Hitchens may be crazed but that was his one shining moment.

Who else can say they took the MSM's phony B.S. and called them on it like that?

Last time I remember, it was Howard Dean in '04 demanding his party oppose the war, that British MP who told the Republican Congress to shove it on Iraq, John Stewart taking it to Tucker Clown Carlson on Crossfired, and Stephen Colbert 'honoring' Bush at the Press dinner. Ok, so Hitchens isn't in their league or even their little league, but he had one shining moment of uncompromising truth telling, and making huckster Sean Hannitty have a rare moment stuttering and shell shocked.

This 'opinion column' doesn't do it justice, it's basically obvious fluff, and the timing is wrong so soon after Hitchens' shining moment. It should have been written long ago or later after another Hitchens blunder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Provide low-cost brand-name products. watch & handbag...
Posted by: hellofriends on Jun 14, 2007 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
exactly!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ask yourself: how trustworthy is Hitchens?
Posted by: counterpoint on Jun 14, 2007 12:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting to see this article now. I've stopped reading Hitchen's columns in Free Inquiry because I no longer trust him. Yes, he can be an entertaining writer but his forte is rethoric, not substance. I have read older pieces of his that provided real arguments (although much of the substance was stuff he had pulled together from other sources, making his books on Kissinger and Mother Theresa pretty thin). But when he switched sides his utterances were in essence nothing but regurgitations of Bush administration talking points. No independent thinking, but predigested propaganda, reissued in his own verbose style. So I stopped reading. He's proven to have extremely bad judgment, he tours with the most evil paid propagandist out there (David Horowitz of Frontline), why listen? There are serious journalists out there, but he's not one of them. A British accent alone does not suffice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement