Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

The FBI May Have the Inside Scoop on You

By Frances Madeson, TomPaine.com. Posted May 23, 2007.


Think surveillance is for terrorists? Think again. Under the terms of the Patriot Act, a ton of your personal and financial information may already be in the FBI's database.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Thanks to Justice Department Inspector General Glenn A. Fine's March 9 audit report detailing the FBI's handling of expanded surveillance powers granted under the USA PATRIOT Act, subsequent media reports and congressional hearings called to probe the findings, we now know that the FBI's been doing the same "heckuva job" with respect to information gathering and storage characteristic of other sectors of the Bush administration.

Though the toothpaste is out of the tube, I wonder if people generally grasp the enormity of the damage done. There is in existence an electronic database with over a half-billion records containing information collected via extrajudicial requests made in National Security Letters, the majority of which pertain to U.S. citizens. Your banking and credit activities, telephone and internet usage records, insurance policies, post office box rental, and car, boat and home ownership records could already be in the FBI's Investigative Data Warehouse. If so, no one need inform you. If the information is incorrect, there's no way to fix it. It is shared among 10,000 government employees at multiple agencies and is stored for 20 years even if you have no connection whatsoever to a crime. In fact, only 65 convictions correlated to information obtained by the FBI from over 143,000 NSL demands made from 2003 to 2005.

When the Patriot Act was reauthorized in March 2006, I asked my senators why they voted in favor of such obviously heinous legislation. Schumer's office promptly sent an auto-reply message thanking me for my inquiry. "It makes me proud to know that my constituents take an active role in our government by corresponding with me, and I look forward to responding to your concerns in greater detail." Fifteen months later, that would make two of us.

In August 2006, Sen. Clinton sent a two-page letter describing her efforts to improve the act with stronger citizen safeguards. "Ultimately, the Congress reached a bipartisan reauthorization compromise. I voted in favor of this reauthorization compromise, although I did so with some reluctance. The compromise does not address all of my concerns regarding the protection of civil liberties and the sensible allocation of homeland security funds. However, when measured against the original Patriot Act, the compromise is a positive step forward, and so I supported it." (Sigh.)

Lack of congressional oversight contributed to this horror show and without sustained citizen pressure we can only expect more of the same. Fortunately, on April 11 a letter signed by 69 courageous citizen organizations representing millions of Americans was sent to Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid providing a curative roadmap for reform. (I found the text on the downsizedc.org website, but perhaps I missed the congressional leaders' written response outlining their timeline for addressing these issues?) On April 18 the ACLU and other privacy groups met with the FBI to express the view that the self-corrective measures being proposed were insufficient to the task. They could have saved the carfare. On May 1 citizen groups were back testifying before the Senate Select Subcommittee on Intelligence, protesting administration-proposed amendments to "modernize" the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, a euphemism Orwell would have been proud to coin, in which "modernize" actually means pardon wrongdoing and gut judicial checks on more government surveillance of us.

We look to Congress hoping it will soon find remedies. While days, weeks and now months have passed since the issuance of the inspector general's audit report, how many thousands more NSLs have been delivered accompanied by their repugnant gag orders? How many additional unjustifiable intrusions into our privacy will be tolerated by our representatives in Washington? Combined with NSA illegal wiretapping, everexpanding definitions of "domestic terrorism" and initiatives to promote national identity cards, a truly horrifying and wholly un-American landscape is on the immediate horizon.

None of this is inevitable; it happens only if we let it happen. The more this administration and their would-be successors celebrate the savagery of Guantanamo and call for its expansion (Romney), sanction waterboarding (Giuliani) and lay Baghdadian waste to our desire for an enduring American democracy, the more we must and will morph from our mundane selves into mini-Jeffersons and Betsy Rosses stitching our homespun flags and stoking the fires of liberty.

Personally, I'm resolute. I'm not a child, slave or extra in their video game fantasies. I'm a grown American woman -- hale, hearty and up for this fight for my nation's soul -- and try as they will to debase that, it still means something beautiful to me.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: patriot act, war on terror, surveillance

Frances Madeson is the author of a new comic novel, "Cooperative Village," which chronicles the travails of a woman who becomes subject to the USA PATRIOT Act when her library card goes astray. More information is at the publisher’s website, www.carolmrp.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Not just in America
Posted by: Nedtheredhead on May 23, 2007 3:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What safeguards are there in place to prevent this invasion of privacy of ANY world citizen? An Australian Elizabeth Smith has been prevented from entering the US because she has the same name as another Australian, who has blogged adverse comments about America on the Net.
Who made America GOD?????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Religion Posted by: bob t
» She hates you ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Not just in America Posted by: fork
» Borders(?), you HAVE to be kidding me. Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Not just in America Posted by: greggwyck
The People's Republic of the United States
Posted by: Alec Freeman on May 23, 2007 3:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The United States is increasingly resembling China. Both countries are replete with: corrupt and dictatorial government; contempt for human rights; uninformed, shallow, selfish, racist, and avaricious populace; shameless environmental record; military and economic imperialism. Ms. Madeson's article recounts an unsurprising -- yet frightening -- reality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah...
Posted by: adp3d on May 23, 2007 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and my medical and dental records too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yeah... Posted by: greggwyck
Nothing new really....
Posted by: Neiljohn on May 23, 2007 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the pat-riot act has brought it about? well perhaps into the open.
I've been aware for sometime that the US and UK seem to be using the same monitoring systems that Hitler & Stalin would have dreamed of. So many of the laws enacted are almost word for word the same as pre WW2 germany, but with modern technology to make it happen.
Use google? So do they, google got me a 'home visit' because I'd commented on poor police driving in a news group, during that visit the inspector hinted that google actually scans for key words in searches of e-mail and google groups and forwards them to the gov't.
Yes all communication by e-mail/phone is monitored, every ISP including Universities intranets are monitored/monitoring, but the usual excuse of if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear really doesn't wash any more.
My biggest concern is that someone will breach whatever security and abuse the information, perhaps for criminal ends, perhaps political.

"The real danger is the gradual erosion of individual liberties through automation, integration, and interconnection of many small, separate record-keeping systems, each of which alone may seem innocuous, even benevolent, and wholly justifiable." -- U. S. Privacy Study Commission Source: 1977

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» we are the new rome. Posted by: greggwyck
But maybe it was good for them, honey
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on May 23, 2007 4:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None of these men and women would have voted for eavesdropping if they didn't think that at some point, in some way, it would benefit either their personal financial well-being, benefit them in a future election, or benefit them in some future showdown with their opponents. Short-sighted, selfish, cynical people to the last.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An FBI fan no longer.
Posted by: HughScott on May 23, 2007 4:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I became disenchanted with the Federal Bureau of Investigation during the Clinton administration when a local cop accompanied by an FBI field agent knocked on my front door one afternoon.

Startled by their identification, I invited the officers inside and quickly learned the Bureau was investigating one of my grown daughters, a single mom who lived with me and my wife.

The reason? My daughter, who was a Slick Willie admirer back then, before the Monica Lewinsky scandal. had sent him several emails of glowing praise. While the FBI agent admitted there was nothing wrong with her correspondence, he said the Bureau was concerned that she might be “overly enamored” with President Clinton.

Hearing that, I terminated the warrantless visit by ordering the agent off my property. Tell me I'm not in the FBI's database because of that incident and my scathing nonfiction book, George W. Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT., but so what? As I muttered about the FBI after the field agent left that day, "Phuck 'em."

To read a synopsis and sample chapter from my 2004 Bushwhacking work, visit its promotional website, PhonyFighterPilot.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: An FBI fan no longer. Posted by: greggwyck
AND...
Posted by: bob t on May 23, 2007 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the industrials, militarists, the gummint and the Republican party has easy access to all of those records. And they will use trhem to control all of us not just the 59 million voters they already control.
Corporations and the 8199 wealthy families provide the money but fundie religions in the U.S. provide the votes/voters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: AND... Posted by: greggwyck
This statement is at best, an understatement.
Posted by: WhatNow? on May 23, 2007 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"a truly horrifying and wholly un-American landscape is on the immediate horizon."

I've been bitching about the nazi actions since the 80s. Too few people were disturbed by the fascist drug war's erosion of our rights and lives during the 1980s and earlier. I'm thinking the sick oligarchs of amerika used the drug war as a litmus test. It worked so well in their favor and faced too little opposition, so why would they stop there?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How many of you have XP or Vista?
Posted by: AlienSlave on May 23, 2007 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Conect the links back together and read how you are tracked and recorded by Microsoft.

http://www.newscientisttech.com/article.ns?
id=mg19426046.400&feedId=being-human_rss20

http://www.theinquirer.net/
default.aspx?article=39662

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/
2004/jul04/07-21NCFTAPR.mspx

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6040521.html

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/
press/2005/aug05/08-26ZotobArrestPR.mspx

After all if you are innocent why should you care?
AlienSlave

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

everybody is watching you
Posted by: solrev on May 23, 2007 6:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Privacy is a thing of the past. It seems terrible when the government keeps tabs on you, but it gets easier and easier everyday and no laws are required. If you think you have any privacy, Google individual search engines, anybody can track you. I am sure the government is using their own search engines but there are plenty of public ones out there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Read Wayne Madsen Report
Posted by: gdonald on May 23, 2007 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's great to see that so many people that are commenting have it so right. Read Wayne Madsen Report. He has been reporting that the supposed theft of personal data from government, private industry, and colleges all across the country isn't theft by hackers but theft by certain government agencies in order to build their data base on we the people. The only reason this would be happening is that there must be plans to use this to eventually do what Hitler did in Germany. Will they soon be knocking on our doors or is it just paranoia? Of course just because your paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after you.

It is time to be very concerned and time to elect a whole new landscape of representatives and not from either two main parties.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

this is not news
Posted by: profmarcus on May 23, 2007 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
anyone who has been paying the slightest bit of attention came to the conclusion long ago that every, and i mean EVERY, electronic transaction that is conducted on a network outside of your personal control is being "sniffed" by extraordinarily powerful software powered by unimaginably powerful, massively parallel computer systems... the "sniffing" consists of looking for patterns, sequences of words, digital code strings, and other such pre-programmed items that, if found, would be immediately grabbed, tagged as to origin, destination, and other such elements of identification for later analysis... all forms of electronic identification for anyone who uses them, world-wide, have already been captured and are available for cross-reference as needed... this has been going on for some years and started well prior to 9/11... what's happening now is that we are slowly being fed information about it so that we will eventually accept it as just part of the way things are...

And, yes, I DO take it personally

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Keep your eye on the prize! Posted by: Darrell Kern
Bush's Stasi
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 23, 2007 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Data mining: As part of its plan to track potential terrorists, the Bush Administration is preparing to collect massive amounts of information about everyone in the United States. Specifically, the government has planned new and enormous government data mining programs to collect and analyze records of travel, bank transactions, phone calls, email, credit card purchases, and virtually anything else that leaves a trail. Using secret criteria, this data would be “mined” by computer programs to produce watch lists and profiles and to mark certain individuals as “suspicious.”

Replace "potential terrorists" with "political opponents" or "anti-war activists" and you get a better picture of what the FBI really does. Why weren't they following the Saudi hijackers around before 9/11? Well, they were busy investigating the anti-WTO protestors who were gearing up for a major protest in Washington, and the Bush White House had directed the FBI to 'back off' the Saudis and forced out chief terrorism investigator John O'Neil, who later died in the WTC (where he took the job of head of security)

The phone call records are just part of it. At this point, a special prosecutor is needed: Hold Bush Accountable: Demand a Special Prosecutor to Investigate the White House.

For all the people who are willing to "trust Big Brother" because they "have nothing to hide" (and yes, there are a lot of them in the USA!), recall these words:

"People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both" - attributed to both Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush's Stasi Posted by: aussidawg
» The FBI is just the nozzle Posted by: eddie torres
Gonzalez emails missing?
Posted by: Sushi on May 23, 2007 10:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lessee now...they can track every correspondence, all our records, that Pepto Bismol we just purchased at WalMart, what prescriptions our cat is taking, if we slid through that yellow/red light at the corner of 5th and Main, but they cannot "find" 5 million missing emails sent by Alberto Gonzalez? Methinks they are focusing on the wrong evil-doers...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Out to lunch
Posted by: willymack on May 23, 2007 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody who's given a moment's thought as to how we got into our present perilous situation can point the finger at bush, Congress, and the neothugs without the realization that we, the American people, let it all happen. It simply couldn't have happened if we were alert and had taken the time and energy to keep ourselves informed as to what was happening and what Congress was doing to fulfill their sworn responsibility to stand between us and evil. As it turns out, they were out to lunch, too. Voting more Democrats into office hasn't seemed to bring about anything positive so far. We're now faced with a difficult choice-one we shouldn't have had to make if we'd been more responsible as citizens in the first place-that is,DO SOMETHING before it's too late. Any thoughts on what that may be? War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Out to lunch Posted by: Nedtheredhead
More illegal, unconstitutional, impeachable activities from Bush.
Posted by: fanny666 on May 23, 2007 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
President Bush has acknowledged authorizing surveillance- without a court order- of communications between people abroad and people in the United States. That alone violates the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. This is a law that was written in response to Nixon's illegal domestic spying. Read Article 2, paragraph 2 of Nixon's Letters of Impeachment and see if it sounds familiar. It's more illegal spying that should get Bush impeached.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keep your eye on the prize!
Posted by: Darrell Kern on May 23, 2007 1:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The single most important thing each of us can do is to keep our eye on the prize. We have been handed a load of shit- and that is EXACTLY what it is- SHIT.

These assholes who truly think they are in charge- ARE IN CHARGE of this realm of existence which ends for each of us- with a few exceptions- about 80 years, on the average.

Why do we have to endure it? The answer is not going to be revealed to any of us in this existence- simply because we are not equipped to handle the information or rather the reasons.

There is only one fact that I do know- those warmongering fucks are NOT going to be joining us on our next journey.

If they wish to arrest me, or kill me or whatever- they have that right in this realm- but one thing is for certain- I will not convert, submit or bow down to anything or anyone- other than a truly enlightened and loving entity!

Keep my eye on the prize is the only guarantee I have that will help me distinguish the difference.

He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.

The game is over people- we now just have to wait it out and remain true to our faith. Jesus never said it would be easy- he said it would be worth it. He also said the church is within us- and not some building to show up at every sabbat.

We are all responsible for being mis-led. We have free will for a reason.

Religion and faith have been completely corrupted to divert our eyes from the prize. Don't buy into it- its a cheap special effect!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Keep your eye on the prize! Posted by: grangersmith
In the UK
Posted by: civilized european on May 23, 2007 1:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the Uk we have more surveillance cameras per head of population than any other western society. I live in a valley in North Wales ( as rural as you can get in this country ) I cannot leave this area without coming under observation from the police through the camera. Recently cameras in certain city centers have been equipped with loud speakers so as the operators can inform people of their minor infringments of the law eg leaving/dropping litter etc. With the improvement in number plate recognition and potential improvement in facial recognition software in a country as small as ours this could make real the Big Brother senario. There is now a proposition to enact a law so that public agencies social workers, charity workers, Doctors etc will have to inform the police of any person that they think may commit a violent act be that a terrorist, mentally ill person or somebody that just maybe really pissed off with life. There are regulations regarding the monitoring of telecommunications, private residences, postal services etc but these can be circumnavigated by for example getting others friendly goverments agencies do the monitoring for you passing the information on through a second hand. I am not pranoid but feel that if over the next couple of generations something is not done about the lack of inclusiveness, inequalities and serious lack of education and rational thought our societies will go down a route that no right minded individual would want.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: In the UK Posted by: albrechtkrausse
Criminals....
Posted by: Michael Boldin on May 23, 2007 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the biggest criminals in this country are the politicians. They've shown utter disdain for the constitution, but their arrogance seems to grow every year.

The 4th amendment is pretty straight-forward, and no "patriot" act can overturn it.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

It's time to demand that these people follow ALL 10 amendments in the bill of rights.

It's not just a recommendation, it's the law.

Some further reading:

"Contract with America: Bill of Rights" - click here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Criminals.... Posted by: Darrell Kern
Tick tock
Posted by: Logic's Edge on May 23, 2007 6:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One more step toward the stormtroopers kicking down doors in the dead of night.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tick tock Posted by: Dboy
walt1944
Posted by: wrogal on May 23, 2007 8:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think that its much of a secret that the government is watching us; ALL OF US! Even putting a comment on a news item is getting to be "risky business", especially on the news media sites like ABC News and especially CBS News. There are times I get warnings before posting a comment that says the comment is being viewed for "security reasons". It makes me feel as if I am in the old USSR. Freedom of speech is being lost just like all the other freedoms we had.
HEIL BUSH!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Technology that could/is be used to control individuals and crowds
Posted by: grangersmith on May 23, 2007 8:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read a study about US Electro magnetic Weapons and Human Rights. This really is disturbing, if you think the FBI spying on you through the internet, and keeping records on citizens is bad, you will be very shocked at this study. What this study talks about are electo magnetic weapons that are currntly used and being developed that are are classified as non lethal weapons. The weapons can be used to control prostesters, or targeted to an individual, this sounds so science fiction, but is used in the military in Iraq now.. It's disturbing, but something everyone should be aware of. I also want to know how they can possible monitor the large masses of people, just one or two key words...Then anyone is fair game who uses the internet, My rants and raves and fears expressed on the internet, would definately make a file for me. Yet I was raised that speaking what you feel is right and taking non violent political action is truely American. Anyway, the link to the article is:
www.projectcensored.org/
newsflash/ElectromegnaticWeapons.pdf

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not only
Posted by: talkville on May 24, 2007 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Homeland Security" demands not only the inside scoop but the outside scoop as well. With artificial memory (data-bases) forget privacy- those who want to know will know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some really important.. and great reading.
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on May 24, 2007 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pick up a copy of Derrick Jensen's Welcome to the Machine.

Its very informative, and as with most of Jensen's stuff... is a great read as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I see no problem with this
Posted by: skipp on May 25, 2007 2:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets face it, the world is full of scumbags. If you respect the laws and don't cause trouble. You should have no problem with this. I'm glad the rights are slowing being taken away from us. Hopefully soon the New World Order will take care of these people who think they have rights!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

just remember
Posted by: greggwyck on May 28, 2007 10:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if uncle sam isnt watching, just remember god is! their is only one true judge. "while gathering wood and raking leaves i became enlightened, once enlightened i was still gathering leaves and stacking wood".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement