Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

A 'Ho' By Any Other Color: The History and Economics of Black Female Sexual Exploitation

By Dr. Edward Rhymes, Black Agenda Report. Posted May 19, 2007.


While white women's sexuality is celebrated in movies and magazines, Black women acting out the same behavior are relegated to the ranks of whoredom.
Advertisement

Don Imus in his "apology" went on to say that the term "ho" didn't originate in the white community, but rather in the Black community. As the term "ho" is a variation of the word "whore" (a word not foreign to the American lexicon and indeed has been used with great frequency in the white community), that assertion does not hold water. So once again, what is endemic in American society is viewed as a specific "Black" identifier or just a "Black thing." That would be the equivalent of saying that the first person to call the television a TV undeniably invented it or the individual who first referred to the automobile as a car, now holds the patent to the creation. However, let it be understood, this truth does not excuse or exonerate sexist hip-hop from its shameful contribution to the debasement of women.

In regard to gender, there have been two, pronounced, conflicting and unjust narratives concerning female sexuality in America. Although all women who were viewed or accused as loose or promiscuous faced the ire and consternation of a (predominantly white) male-dominated society, there has always been this duplicitous racial application of the penalties incurred for committing perceived "moral" crimes against society. Historically, White women, as a category, have been portrayed as examples of self-respect, self-control, and modesty -- even sexual purity -- but Black women were often (and still are) portrayed as innately promiscuous, even predatory. I would like to focus on the various ways White female sexual promiscuity has been viewed, recognized and oft-times celebrated in today's media and in popular culture.

In her publication, "Female Chauvinist Pigs," New York magazine writer Ariel Levy argues that the recent trend for soft-porn styling in everything from music videos to popular TV is reducing female sexuality to its basest levels. In short: "A tawdry, tarty, cartoon-like version of female sexuality has become so ubiquitous, it no longer seems particular."

Kathleen Parker in her article, "Girls Gone Ridiculous," further elaborates this point: "... the message to girls the past 20 years or so has been that they can be and do anything they please. Being a stripper or a porn star is just another option among many. In some feminist circles, porn is seen as the ultimate feminist expression -- women exercising autonomy over their bodies, profiting from men's desire, rather than merely being objectified by it. Self-exploitation has become the raised middle finger of women's sexual freedom." And that "raised middle-finger" in popular culture, rap videos aside, has largely been a white one.

Society, by and large, has deracialized white female sexual explicitness while at the same time strongly accentuating what is perceived as Black female promiscuity and immodesty. That message has been communicated to us time and time again on the pages of Maxim, FHM, Playboy, Penthouse and Sports Illustrated -- and this list goes on. Although these mags have, in the past 10 years, featured more women of color, they are still (overwhelmingly) a celebration of white female sexual explicitness.

annanicole

The ultra-celebrity accorded to white female sexual explicitness burst on the scene in the person of Marilyn Monroe. Can anyone argue that Monroe was more recognized for her acting talents than for her "natural assets?" Yet, she is regarded as a legend. The celebrity that has been granted to white women such as Anna Nicole Smith, Pamela Anderson, Carmen Elecktra, Paris Hilton and a whole host of others, is also given based upon sexual assets and not upon talent. This theme is consistent in today's raunch-infested society, but the raunchiness, once again, is deracialized when the practitioners are white. WWE women's wrestling has increased in popularity in the past few years with its predominantly white roster of sex-kittens and their highly sexualized plots and subplots. Even current and former white porn stars such as Ginger Lynn, Traci Lords and Jenna Jameson are made the topics of E! Hollywood True Stories exposes, thus giving them a place of prominence and legitimacy and without ever linking their promiscuity to her whiteness. While, in contrast, one would be hard-pressed to name as many Black women (or any other women of color) -- absent of talent -- who enjoy the same level of celebrity and success.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: race, slavery, sexuality, hip hop, sexual exploitation

Dr. Edward Rhymes, author of When Racism Is Law & Prejudice Is Policy, is an internationally-recognized authority in the areas of critical race theory and Black studies. Please view his website: Rhymes Reasons. He can be reached at Edward@rhymesworld.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
'Boots n' Saddles'...da..da... daaaah.. daaah..da..da..daaaaah..da
Posted by: ekipnrut on May 19, 2007 2:01 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
daaaaaah...
Ahhhhhh..But of course..here comes the White feminist Cavalry
together with 'Fawning Festus' racist white boy (deputized) posse (Remember 'Gunsmoke'??)... Hard ridin' 'Johnette Wayne'...
making da' ghetto safe for trut', justice, and the LGBT 'darkie'
way!!!!! 'Liberals'..'progressives'.....ALL hypocritical vermin...
slither on down..the Price is ALWAYS right.......for co-opted
apologists for racist nonsense or sell out (to corporate America) MFs....... :O)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» wtf? Posted by: Ellie1
Say what?!
Posted by: JCrowe on May 19, 2007 2:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In some feminist circles, porn is seen as the ultimate feminist expression."

Not in any of the feminist circles I know about. When sex work is a real choice, when women don't go into it because they have very few economic options, then and only then will the question of whether it's "empowering" or not become askable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Say what?! Posted by: frosty86
» RE: Say what?! Posted by: goldmarx
» RE: Say what?! Posted by: frosty86
» RE: Say what?! Posted by: adventuregrrl
» RE: Say what?! Posted by: frosty86
» interesting Dworkin quote Posted by: off-the-radar 2
It's a Puritan thing
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 19, 2007 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The cartoon of the predatory black jungle seductress is a product of our repression. Uptight middle America's Puritanical mindset has been slowly killing us for centuries. But we like the sense of moral superiority that comes with that mindset, and cling to it like a security blanket.

Part of that is the myth of sugar and spice. We like to pretend that we don't like women of any color who are sassy, sexy, aggressive, full of attitude, and got big butts. And we don't like the fact that we do like them, so we blame rap culture, Janet Jackson, etc. and their historical equivalents.

The article is a bit too conspiracy, but brings up some interesting things about our culture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's a Puritan thing Posted by: frosty86
» RE: It's a Puritan thing Posted by: jimidee
» RE: It's a Puritan thing Posted by: mizani
» RE: It's a Puritan thing Posted by: talkville
» American Idol is culture Posted by: vangogh69
» Pray Tell.... Posted by: Ast77
As soon as I read this article
Posted by: rjgwood on May 19, 2007 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I knew the many of the comments on this site would try to discredit this article, likening it to a "conspiracy theory" or say that it blamed whites, without citing any evidence from the article, and without a discussion as to the meritous points the author makes.

It is so typical a reaction from many in white America: Take no responsibility for past transgressions. Paint the messenger and the victims as exploitive for bringing up the subject, and then move on, refusing "to discuss the past."

The author is not making a "conspiracy theory" argument by pointing out the FACT that 80% of hip-hop purchasers are white and that the recording/distribution industry, indeed the entire media industry, is controlled by white men. Who then is culpable for media exploitation of black sexuality in hip-hop, the author ponders, black artists who have VERY little control in the industry, or those who own the means of production/distribution, the industry, and those who push the demand, the buyers?

Further, by giving us an historical context which firmly entrenches the fact of white control and manipulation of the image of black sexuality, from the pernicious discussions of slave "breeders" to blackploitation films to hip-hop, the sad fact is that white's have continually PROFITED from the exploitation of black sexuality.

So, for someone like Imus to fraudulently claim that no on cares about hip-hop's exploitation of black female sexuality (which the author debunks with the Ludicrious example), and for America's right to then get "up in arms" about the racial double-standard they feel is given blacks to exploit black sexuality, without acknowledging that it is precisely WHITE America through CEOs of record companies to buyers of hip-hop music that are really the ones, once again, who are exploiting black sexuality is PERVERSE and disingenuousness (Imus & right wing power brokers know who controls the media) disguised as a rational reason to not fire Imus.

The author and the Imus incident brilliantly illustrate the entrenchment of white power in our society, especially the power to avoid responsibility. If one even mentions reparations for the damage inflicted by the slave trade and the ensuing years of state sponsored misery following emancipation, one is painted a cuckoo, and that discussion is never on the table. Yet it is obviously that racism is entrenched and rampant in our society and that white domination of every institution, public and private, remains and will remain because of the culpability of people who refuse to coldly examine the facts and make it right, and yes, make reparations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Culpability Posted by: Ast77
» RE: Of course not... Posted by: ekipnrut
TRASH-TRASH-TRASH
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 19, 2007 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sir, you make no point at all with your babbling. Your article serves no useful purpose. But I'll Bet you had fun writing it - at the expense of ALL women. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ...Just as expected..... Posted by: ekipnrut
» RE: TRASH-TRASH-TRASH Posted by: Ast77
for every rule its exception
Posted by: liberalibrarian on May 19, 2007 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...for every book its reader. I have found that there are several black female authors who write extremely popular pop fiction, aimed toward black women, (the authors often go by one name or initial) that are The most raunchy, explicit, and blatantly exploitive of all the books in that genre. These books go way beyond chic lit or the general romance genre. I'm curious. What is the explanation for that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: for every rule its exception Posted by: Progressive Citizen
» RE: for every rule its exception Posted by: off-the-radar 2
Don Imus' "apology"...
Posted by: H_H on May 19, 2007 7:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...was "accepted" by the Rutger's women team.

But that can't be acknowledged.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don Imus' "apology"... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Don Imus' "apology"... Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Don Imus' "apology"... Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Don Imus' "apology"... Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Don Imus' "apology"... Posted by: lessbread
History vs Today's Reality
Posted by: NoPCZone on May 19, 2007 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody with any education that tries to be honest can deny the regrettable history of racial repression and exploitation that happened in many sectors of American society until very recent times. That said, the world and times that we live in are very different and the people who allow themselves to be exploited are hardly in the same boat that the victims of Jim Crow and Pre-Civil War America.

There is also a difference between a woman being sexually expressive and aggressive because she wants to and someone who is forced to by economics. A woman can be highly sexual without being a whore, yet most people seem to either confuse one for the other or choose not to for whatever reason. Like abortion, it is a woman's choice as to how she carries herself and approaches relationships. It's nobody else's business. A man- any man- lecturing women or any woman about how they should dress, work, interact with men, date or who they should sleep with is as ludicrous as the old stereotypes.

I enjoy and am attracted to women who are sexually confident and aggressive, which is very different from being easy or a whore. A person comfortable in their own skin who dresses, conducts themselves and interacts with people on their own terms is refreshing. Women should not feel forced to act in such a way, but those who do not choose to shouldn't have to play a demure wallflower.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Is today's reality that different? Posted by: anonymous black writer
Which?
Posted by: talkville on May 19, 2007 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is woman private, or public? Is man? Madonna or the Whore? Which one? Property? Possession? Free? Production OR Re-production? Production AND Re-production? Which? Rich white? Rich black? Rich Asian? Rich Latina? Celebrity or Idol? Which? Organic or artificial? Masters or Slaves? Res Publica or Res Privata? Which?

There's a better world to build - much better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One more wrinkle?
Posted by: Sojourner on May 19, 2007 7:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, when it comes to the exploitation of women, women of color bear the heaviest burden.

But I cannot understand then the dynamics of the protectiveness of men of color by women of color. Is it that white men have so many privileges that they don't need or deserve protection?

Or is it that generalizations at the level of race don't make any sense, except for the commercialization of pop culture? And is pop culture anything more than an empty gesture?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well........well? Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: Well........well? Posted by: jimidee
patriarchal sexuality
Posted by: frosty86 on May 19, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In our society, sexuality is becoming increasingly commodified and women's bodies are more objectified and dismembered in pop culture than ever. In movies, tv and magazine advertising, music videos, and billboards just one part of women's bodies is focused on (legs, breasts, buttocks). This reproduces and reinforces an atmosphere where women are seen as things or objects rather than human beings who deserve respect and dignity.

Softcore porn has moved into the mainstream and we can see this all over the mass media. Most of the pornography that men consume on the internet and in their homes is hardcore pornography which sexualizes violence against women and reduces women to the status of "things to be fucked." Pornography in the has grown to be a $12 billion a year industry which makes it larger than the mainstream movie industry (Hollywood is $8 billion).

Everywhere women are told by the media and corporate PR strategies, that the way to liberation is through a commodified sexuality. Not only is this an outright lie, but it trivializes the idea of liberation. All too often the idea that women should be sexually expressive and open has meant that women should learn to enjoy being treated and portrayed as sex objects and women should start having casual sex. This is not the way to end sexism and patriarchal exploitation of women's bodies. I agree that women's sexuality has been repressed and shamed, but I think there is way to change this without making women into sex objects and commodifying sexuality in general.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: patriarchal sexuality Posted by: bob t
» RE: things tobe f$#"&ed? Posted by: justinmango
» RE: things tobe f$#"&ed? Posted by: frosty86
The author is right on
Posted by: Don Garb on May 19, 2007 8:09 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad I read this piece. It is well documented, delivers a powerful argument and has changed the way I look at women. Useless white whores are celebrated in our popular culture every day, while black women are already presumed to be dirty from the start. I just saw an Entertainment Tonite spot about 3 rising young porn starlets: 2 were lily white and the third had a small bit of brown Indian in her. Can you imagine 3 black porn starlets on ET with one girl having a bit of brown in her? Not likely ...

However, the black woman's stronger sexuality is not a product of systemic racism and it is not a myth. Black men have larger penises on average than men of other races. Why is that? Because black women have been more promiscuous than other women, for about the last half million years or so. Before you feminists out there start throwing fits and tantrums at me, do your homework. Every honest book on sexuality and evolution out there will tell you that as the females are more active, the males are built bigger. Works the same for gorillas and chimpanzees too. A female gorilla would rather die than be unfaithful to her alpha male, who consequently has a small penis size compared to the size of the rest of his body. A female chimpanzee on the other hand, will accept offers from just about anybody.

In my experience black women are not insatiable or slutty in any way that could be described as "dirty." They are just more pragmatic and practical. When legitimate escort agencies recruit new workers, the largest share of applicants are black women. They're not bad, they're just sensible. Imagine what white women would be like if they hadn't been messed up by the last few hundred years of Victorian, Christian and Republican sexual repression. They would be the same way that black women are now. If you shift your perspective, black women do not have a history of being immoral, rather white women have a history of being uptight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The author is right on Posted by: mobile68
» RE: The author is right on Posted by: Don Garb
» NO... Posted by: elfinito
» RE: The author is right on Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: Oh no you Di'unt!!!! Posted by: jimidee
» Am I a racist yet? Posted by: Don Garb
rap music is misanthropy
Posted by: wleming on May 19, 2007 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
rap is a daily, well financed assualt on women
of all colors.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Whore is a Whore
Posted by: TheTruthSeeker on May 19, 2007 10:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I’m a 71-year-old romantic who was raised in the Deep South and has witnessed some of the worst examples of bigotry imaginable. But because of my liberal parents’ upbringing, I was able to separate myself from the injustice and see racial discrimination as an observer, not a participant. Consequently, I view other human beings in terms of character, not color.

A whore is a whore – black, brown, white, yellow and purple.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Whore is a Whore Posted by: frosty86
» WHO'S A HO ??? Posted by: gellero
» RE: WHO'S A HO ??? Posted by: frosty86
» Oh Come now, Frosty...... Posted by: gellero
» RE: Oh Come now, Frosty...... Posted by: frosty86
» RE: WHO'S A HO ??? Posted by: mizani
Sorry, but impressions are always based on fact
Posted by: Bobsays on May 19, 2007 2:06 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you look at the high number of single black mothers, their sexual habits, and their need to work in the grubbier end of the labour market, then you can't be surprised people would think what they think.

The solution to these impressions is to change your behaviour and how you live. Such an example will over time change public perceptions. There is no better evidence that this is the case than the impression people have about asian women (hardworking, loyal, ambitious, family oriented). So it's not a white women conspiracy. In fact I have never heard a white woman spend any time talking about how she was going to run down black women. If they ever broach the issue, it is usually sweetly naive hopes for a better world. Those are the facts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wrong Impression Posted by: gellero
» God, I love these posts!!! Posted by: vangogh69
EVERY WOMAN MUST BE IN THE WORKFORCE!!
Posted by: emmanuel_goldstein_fights_fake_lefties on May 19, 2007 6:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OTHERWISE HOW IS THE "ECONOMY GOING TO GROW"? How are the rich investors and business owners going to afford their Porsches and lake Homes?

So keep pushing that feminist propaganda! Keep pushing the woman-must-work-and-must-be-integrated-into-the-workplace PROPAGANDA!

Won't someone please think of the rich???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The ho that racism created?
Posted by: Forgiven on May 19, 2007 7:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I found this article interesting in its historical references to racism and its sexual history background, I must admit that I am troubled by some of the conclusions that the writer has reached. Now granted I am not a Phd and do come with a large academic background, however I have done extensive work with poor and homeless people so I feel I have some knowledge of the situations.

That being said, the first point that troubled me was the writers initial argument concerning the way the media deals with white women’s sexuality versus black women. The writer states that celebrity has been accorded to white women based on sexuality and not talent and then goes on to complain that the same has not been given to black women, but later he discusses how black women’s sexuality was mainstreamed in the form of novelty items. You can’t have it both ways.

The next point that troubled me was the writer’s underlying justification of the hip-hop culture based on the fact that similar things are being done in the white community. While this may or may not be true, it is precisely this type of reasoning that keeps the black community ignorant and on the current road to destruction. So, it is ok for hip-hop artist to demean black women and denigrate black culture because of racism? Even for a race consultant doctor that is a reach. Whatever happened to personal responsibility? Sure there are more liquor stores that banks and yes there are drugs rampant in my neighborhood, so does that allow me a free pass to become an alcoholic and drug addict?

Though we have more Black people with money than ever before, we are worst off as a people than we have ever been in our history. Why has achievement as a people eluded us even though we have more material wealth? There is a disconnection between those that have achieved material success and the average Black person on the street.

While we spend tremendous amounts of time and energy annihilating the outsiders who dare to use the same words we use to describe ourselves and yet we do nothing against those in our community that dispense the vile vermin that poisons our minds and the minds of our children. Where are the protest marches outside of Sean Combs studio or any number of other hip-hop artists that poison the air waves with violence, sexism, and the worst attributes of our communities? We have no trouble picketing CBS over Don Imus, yet where is the outrage for those who we really should fear? Who should we be more afraid of a few washed up media personalities that most of our children have never heard of or those who invade our homes and our air waves with all manner of mental pollution?

There will be those who speak about artistic expression and the “language of the street”, but those arguments hold no weight. There is more going on in our communities than the “thug life” these so called Black artists are portraying. When has our community been about nothing, but drug dealing, dope smoking, and killing other Black men? These so called Black men are more responsible for other young Black men being killed than any racist white men. The Klan no longer have anything to do, we are finishing the job ourselves. These men who profit from the misery of their brothers and sisters are worse than any racist. At least with an outsider you can see it coming, but these people they are doing from the inside what no outsider could do. It is a known fact that what you listen to is what you become. This isn’t about some musical expression; this is about the intentional internal genocide for the sake of fortune and fame. Is everyone in the Black community selling drugs, smoking dope, and killing? When did this become our only story? This is not my story. Is it yours?

/thedisputedtruth.blogspot.com/”> The Disputed Truth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The ho that racism created? Posted by: grangersmith