Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Gonzales Tried to Get John Ashcroft to Sign on to Wiretapping Program on His Sickbed

By Faiz Shakir and Nico Pitney and Amanda Terkel and Satyam Khanna and Matt Corley, The Progress Report. Posted May 16, 2007.


A new revelation from Alberto Gonzales' former deputy reveals an attempt at an outrageous attempt to get a bedridden John Ashcroft to extend Bush's unwarranted domestic spying program
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In March 2004, President Bush's warrantless domestic spying program was temporarily suspended after then-acting Attorney General James Comey refused to sign onto an extension of the program, citing an "extensive review" by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, stating "that the program did not comply with the law." In "gripping testimony" yesterday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Comey†revealed extraordinary details about the efforts made by Alberto Gonzales and Andrew Card -- then-White House counsel and chief of staff, respectively -- to persuade John Ashcroft to overrule Comey, even as Ashcroft was debilitated in an intensive care unit with pancreatitis. The Washington Post calls Comey's "account of Bush administration lawlessness so shocking it would have been unbelievable coming from a less reputable source." Indeed, Comey's revelations confirm the worst fears about Gonzales's dangerously flawed judgment, and provide further evidence of the administration's -- including the President's -- contempt for basic legal restraints.

Race to the hospital: Describing the events as "the most difficult of my professional career," Comey explained yesterday how the ordeal began on the evening of March 10, 2004, hours before the authority for the spying program was set to expire. A top aide to Ashcroft alerted Comey that Gonzales and Card had arranged a visit with†Ashcroft, who was then hospitalized with gallstone pancreatitis. Comey "ordered his driver to rush him to George Washington University Hospital with emergency lights flashing and a siren blaring, to intercept the pair." Comey said yesterday, "I was concerned that, given how ill I knew the attorney general was, that there might be an effort to ask him to overrule me when he was in no condition to that." He described how he "literally ran up the stairs" to Ashcroft's room, and had FBI Director Robert Mueller order the agents on Ashcroft's security detail not to evict him from the room if Gonzales and Card objected to his presence.

Ashcroft, 'barely conscious,' rejects power play: Comey "arrived first in the darkened room, in time to brief Mr. Ashcroft, who he said seemed barely conscious." Minutes later, Gonzales and Card arrived, envelope in hand, and explained that they were seeking his approval to extend authority for warrantless spying.†"Attorney General Ashcroft then stunned me," Comey said yesterday. "He lifted his head off the pillow and in very strong terms expressed his view of the matter, rich in both substance and fact...and then laid his head back down on the pillow, seemed spent, and said to them, 'But that doesn't matter, because I'm not the attorney general'ˇ˝?and he pointed to me." The White House effort to overrule Comey had failed. "The two men did not acknowledge me," Comey said. "They turned and walked from the room." Comey added, "I was angry. I had just witnessed an effort to take advantage of a very sick man. ... I thought he had conducted himself in a way that demonstrated a strength I had never seen before, but still I thought it was improper."


White House Caves only after mass resignation threat: Shortly afterwards, a "very upset" Card called Comey "and demanded that I come to the White House immediately." Comey told Card that, after the conduct he had just witnessed, he would not meet with him without a witness present. Card apparently replied, "What conduct? We were just there to wish him well." Comey insisted on having then-solicitor general Ted Olson accompany him to the White House, but Card "would not allow Mr. Olson to enter his office." Comey was informed that White House officials (including Vice President Cheney and Cheney's then-general counsel David Addington) wanted to continue the program. The next morning, March 11, the program was reauthorized "without a signature from the Department of Justice attesting as to its legality." Comey had seen enough, and wrote up his resignation letter. "I couldn't stay, if the administration was going to engage in conduct that the Department of Justice had said had no legal basis. I just simply couldn't stay." Comey said yesterday that he believed both Mueller and Ashcroft were prepared to resign with him, along with all of their top aides. One day later, on March 12, facing a threat of mass resignations, the administration cracked. Bush informed Mueller that he would authorize the changes in the program sought by the Justice Department. Comey said he signed the reauthorization "two or three weeks" later. "It was unclear from his testimony what authority existed for the program while the changes were being made."

Bush and Gonzales in the spotlight: The Washington Post notes that "the bottom line" of Comey's revelations is "the administration's alarming willingness...to ignore its own lawyers." After all, the Justice Department's conclusions "are supposed to be the final word in the executive branch about what is lawful or not, and the administration has emphasized since the warrantless wiretapping story broke that it was being done under the department's supervision." The fact that Gonzales "is now in charge of the department he tried to steamroll may be most disturbing of all." Moreover, Bush's direct role in this affair remains to be fully explored. Last year, Newsweek reported that Bush dubbed Comey "with a derisive nickname, 'Cuomo,' after Mario Cuomo, the New York governor who vacillated over running for president in the 1980s"; Bush was "[m]iffed" that Comey, "a straitlaced, by-the-book former U.S. attorney from New York, was not a 'team player' on this and other issues." Comey noted yesterday that Ashcroft's wife "had banned all visitors and all phone calls" to the hospital, but that Card and Gonzales were permitted to visit Ashcroft after a direct call from the White House. "I have some recollection that the call was from the president himself," he said.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: wiretapping, gonzales, ashcroft, comey

For more, visit Talking Points Memo, and the Center for American Progress.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Does this really surprise anyone??
Posted by: Michael Boldin on May 16, 2007 9:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush and his criminal gang in D.C. have show utter disdain towards the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the rule of law since day one.

The 4th amendment is quite clear on the requirements to "search and seize" - warrants MUST be issued, and even FISA doesn't truly qualify as constitutional, no matter what the politicians or the courts have told us.

The reality is this - the bill of rights is not just some "good idea" - it's the law. It's high time for us to strongly demand that these politicians follow the law....

Some additional reading:

Contract with America: Bill of Rights
http://www.populistamerica.com/contract_with_america

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Inaccurate constitutional analysis Posted by: albrechtkrausse
One more chink in the armor
Posted by: haystack1317 on May 16, 2007 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is one more chink in the ever-weakening armor of the Bush Administration. It turns out that a few people who've been in the Administration actually display flashes of honesty from time to time. Whoever thought, for example, that Ashcroft was anything but a Bush yes-man? It doesn't excuse Ashcroft's incredible, murderous failures; it simply indicates how extremely far off the deep end Bush and his ilk have gone. For Ashcroft to be to your Left......... can you imagine?

The good thing here is that the Republicans are going to have to continue the process of distancing themselves from Bush. They know that they can't get elected in 2008 while pretending things like this are acceptable.

Also, every new bit of info that comes out about the Prosecutor scandal gets the general public closer to understanding the truth. The prosecutors were removed because they wouldn't pursue cases that made it look as if Democrats were committing voter fraud on a level that would warrant the i.d. cards and other methods of vote suppression that the GOP is counting on for 2008. The whole thing is about the vote. Any prosecutor who failed to toe the line and use backhanded techniques to suppress voting rights in 2006 sure as hell couldn't be counted on for the vast suppression of rights coming up in 2008.

I don't count on the public to get this story to the extent that it should, but every little bit helps. This is another chink in the armor. Let the Davids keep throwing stones at this ignorant, monstrous Goliath.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Gonzo will keep his job.
Posted by: TheTruthSeeker on May 16, 2007 10:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This comment is meant for NEW AlterNet visitors.

Bush will never fire AG Gonzales because he knows where bodies are buried -- metaphorically speaking, of course.

Gonzo was George W.’s guard dog when he served as the governor of Texas. The same protective role was played by Harriet Miers, Karl Rove and Dan Bartlett, all of whom worked for Shrub in Austin. They know about Dub-ya’s transgressions going back to the Vietnam War.

Another Texas loyalist is Karen Hughes, State Department propagandist and co-author of Bush’s autobiography, A Charge to Keep.

Published in 1999, the alibi autobio claimed George W. flew National Guard jets in 1973 even though he grounded himself the year before, failed to take his annual USAF flight physical and went AWOL.

Dub-ya’s dishonorable military record was reported on February 28, 2004, by the Boston Globe. Headlined, “Bush Bio on Web Inflates Guard Service,” the article described a falsified presidential biography someone in the White House advertently posted on a State Department website shortly after Shrub took office in 2001.

Brazenly, the fabricated Guard history claimed he flew ANG F102s almost SIX years when the actual time was 27 months. The text contains other misrepresentations as well -- all intentional, not typos or mistaken dictation.

For example, the bogus State Department bio asserted that George W. spent four years helping to keep two F102s on strip alert. In truth, he was only qualified for alert duty 22 months and the last 60 days were plagued by pilot problems attributed to poor airmanship, excessive drinking and a rumored fear of flying.

So why was the phony bio written? you're probably wondering.

According to one case theory, in 2000 then-Texas Governor Bush inflated his weekend warrior duty to make him competitive with his only viable Republican opponent, Senator John McCain, who spent five and a half years as a POW during the Vietnam War.

After he won the New Hampshire primary, McCain was targeted for dirty GOP campaign tricks reportedly orchestrated by Karl Rove. The immoral tactics worked. McCain dropped out the race and copies of the bogus bios were shredded except for the one accidentally sent to the State Department website manager.

Republicans will argue that Shrub never knew about the bogus State Department bio. However, specific details such as "two F102s on round-the-clock alert" were most likely known only by him.

George W. also had a reputation for a fiery temper and maintaining tight management control. It is inconceivable that a member of the 2000 campaign team would risk his wrath and certain termination by publishing a false ANG record for public consumption without Bush's approval.

Unfortunately for voters in 2004 who deserved to know about Dub-ya's bogus bio, not one U.S. paper or media outlet carried the Boston Globe story. Why? Because much to the glee of President Bush and his loyal White House guard dogs including AG Gonzales, the damning article was published on a Saturday. Apparently back then, people in the news business took weekends off instead of serving the public good.

To learn more about the cover-up of George W.’s AWOL National Guard record and Gonzo’s role, visit King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption (Bush’s bogus bio).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Also for NEW alternet visitors Posted by: anotheropinion
» YOU ARE SPAM. Posted by: anotheropinion
» Wrong Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Wrong Posted by: anotheropinion
Impeach Gonz
Posted by: dayahka on May 16, 2007 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The AG needs to be impeached and removed from office. Bush, as another writer noted, will never fire his lapdog. Wolfie needs to go, then Gonzo, then Cheney, then the State Department head, then maybe we can get rid of the chief rat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NOTICE to bloggers like Anotheropinion who think I'm spamming AlterNet.
Posted by: TheTruthSeeker on May 16, 2007 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Spamming is the abuse of electronic messaging systems to send unsolicited bulk messages.

Blog spam, or "blam" for short, is spamming on weblogs.

In 2003, this type of spam took advantage of the open nature of comments in the blogging software Movable Type by repeatedly placing comments to various blog posts that provided nothing more than a link to the spammer's commercial web site.

Similar attacks are often performed against wikis and guestbooks, both of which accept user contributions.

Finally, I have permission from AlterNet to post the NON-PROFIT King-George.biz website after each comment just as Tom Keegan does with The Rant.

Enough said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» NON-PROFIT? Right... Posted by: anotheropinion
John Ashcroft the good guy?
Posted by: lamar on May 16, 2007 11:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know that Gonzalez is a real piece of work when John Ashcroft looks like the good guy. Ashcroft never saw a civil liberty he didn't want to crush until Gonzalez came along. When Ashcroft is suspicious of police state tactics, you know you're dealing with some far, far right stuff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: John Ashcroft the good guy? Posted by: starvinmarvy
Wiretapping program = what led to Nixon impeachment
Posted by: fanny666 on May 16, 2007 3:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read Article 2 Paragraph 2 of Nixon's Letters of Impeachment.

Sound familiar?

Call your House rep, ask them to support House Resolution 333

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enough is enough, Anotheropinion. Read this comment, then tell me what my motives are.
Posted by: TheTruthSeeker on May 16, 2007 3:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In your last reply, you said EVERY comment of mine was meant to attract bloggers to King-George.biz for the "opportunity" of buying my 2004 Bushwhacking book.

You also wrote, "That book of yours is being sold for $22.99 on Amazon, and I don't recall reading about any of the proceeds going to charity."

Educating NEW AlterNet visitors about George W.'s phony National Guard history is all I care about, not making money.

As for my book, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT -- which cost me $6,000 to self publish and promote -- I barely sell enough copies through Xlibris and on Ebay to pay my monthly GoDaddy website fees. Three years later, I'm still five grand in the hole.

How much money and time have you spent trying to stop George W.'s insane war of choice? Do you speak out at community meetings like I do? Do you belong to MoveOn.org like me and stand on street corners waving an American flag to protest the Bush administration?

Probably not. So just ignore this 71-year-old Vietnam vet who loves his country and respond to other AlterNet comments, not mine. Write me off as a delusional journalist who believes Alberto Gonzales is directly connected to the Bogus Bush Bio Caper, which is just as important as the U.S. attorney firing scandal because both matters show corruption inside the White House.

One more thing. If you don't stop saying I'm spamming this blog when I'm not, I'll pick up the phone and call the AlterNet editorial staff in San Francisco and report you for harassment.

While you think about that, consider AlterNet's mission statement:

Building the progressive echo chamber: The top-down delivery model of right-wing rhetoric (e.g. "death tax," "culture of life") traces a path directly from the White House and conservative think tanks, to Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and a whole host of conservative talk shows. These messages are repeated and further reinforced on the editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal and other newspapers, creating a right wing echo chamber. AlterNet is working hard with many partners to build the progressive echo chamber that will fight back.

I'm fighting back, Anotheropinion, and you aren't. Just the opposite, you seem bent on ridiculing bloggers like me who are supporting AlterNet's patriotic progressive goals. But then, that's your right, just as it is mine to mention King-George.biz (a NON-PROFIT website with no advertising) in my posts.

Enough said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thanks for the support, felipe. Posted by: TheTruthSeeker
The "War on Terror" Smokescreen
Posted by: sofla100 on May 16, 2007 4:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is really ironic, of course, is that Clinton can be impeached for adultery, a crime against his wife; but Bush never gets impeached, reprimanded or even censored, for crimes against the United States. Consider the use of illegal wiretapping, torture, extrajudicial imprisonment (Guantanamo and secret prisons), extraordinary rendition and very dubious claims leading to war. And, the list goes on and on. Even with international policy, remember his giving the "green light" and material support for Israel's illegal invasion of Lebanon? Now Bush won't hardly even fire his cronies, look how long it took for Rumsfeld to go despite all the screw ups! So much for how long it will take to get rid of the Attorney General or anyone else in the Cabinet. But, with the Dems in power, you would think they would show some backbone. But no way! The caveat always seems to be the "war on terror." Last I remember the "terrorists" were a couple guys in Afghanistan the USA could never catch anyway. Unbelievable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HAS ANYONE ELSE HAD ENOUGH ?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 16, 2007 5:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyday another SOB surfaces, lies& forgets, but they all do 'a heck of a job'. People are dying while this 3 ring circus goes on. I used to think that impeachment was unfair to our military but maybe it's time. It would be less painful than the crap that goes on now. This slow death of our own country at home must be demoralizing. Is there a single reason why this administration should remain in office ? I don't think so. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gonzales is a SICK man; No Confidence in Bush
Posted by: dayahka on May 17, 2007 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everything we've heard so far about the illegal and immoral acts of this creep pale in significance with this new revelation. Instead of trying to vote a no-confidence in Gonzales, the Congress should vote no confidence in Bush and proceed to terminate this rotten administration...How much lower in the slime bucket can these people go?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"The Gonzales hospital room ambush" ( a new ) "What Now Cartoon"
Posted by: what now cartoons on May 20, 2007 1:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With James Comey's testimony on Tuesday we have a new revelation on how low Gonzales will go.
The March 2004 hospital room ambush by Gonzo & Andrew Card seems like a page from the Soprano's. They were trying to get Ashcroft to sign off on the NSA domestic spying program while he was medicated after surgery.
I had to devote this as this weeks installment of my political cartoon series to this topic.
It's up on my website.
www.whatnowtoons.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rebel Ruggles
Posted by: Raymond Ruggles on May 21, 2007 5:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a total disgrace this corporate-owned bunch we call a government has become. Bush and Cheney should have been impeached long ago. In fact, Bush should never have been appointed by the court. That was a massive crime in the opinion of many legal scholars and voters like myself. Gonzales, Rice. Rove. Pearle and the rest of these fascist types should be run out of town! I am sick to death of the wimpy democrats that can't even get us out of Iraq, impeach King George and Vice King Dick, or do much of anything because they are feeding at the same trough as the republicans. AIPAC, Lockheed, Haliburton and other corporate behemoths, plus the robber barons now own our nation and Democracy. Is Marshal law next?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SackofWoe0
Posted by: SackofWoe0 on Jun 1, 2007 5:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When will the committee subpoena Andrew Card, Mr. Ashcroft and Mrs. Ashcroft and clear this whole mess up once and for all, so we Americans can get on with the daily struggle of living with Bush and Cheney's war? Shame on the White House and all of its occupants.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement