Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

Airing Gonzales' Dirty Laundry

By Bill Boyarsky, Truthdig. Posted May 2, 2007.


A look at one of the real reasons eight U.S. attorneys were fired -- the Republican effort to stop voter registration campaigns in poor neighborhoods.
Advertisement

Since Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' inept stonewalling before the Senate Judiciary Committee shed no light on the firing of eight U.S. attorneys, let's dig into one of the real reasons -- the Republican effort to stop voter registration campaigns in poor neighborhoods.

The assault is an early battle of the 2008 presidential campaign. Republicans are trying to limit registration of African-Americans and Latinos in a number of states that Democrats have a chance of carrying. It's not the only reason that attorneys were fired, but it is the most reprehensible.

U.S. attorneys are political appointees. When a new president and his party take power, the old are swept out for the new. But once in office, the attorneys usually work with local law enforcement and lawyers and are not often micro-managed from Washington. There have been exceptions to this. The power of local segregationists sent Kennedy administration lawyers into action to take over some law enforcement in the South during the civil rights movement.

This operation is different. The Kennedys wanted to give African-Americans rights guaranteed by the Constitution. The Bush crowd is trying to exclude African-Americans and Latinos.

One of the fired attorneys is David Iglesias of New Mexico, who was dismissed after state Republican officials complained that he wouldn't prosecute registration fraud allegations.

(The state produced another, unrelated, example of Republicans using the Justice Department to win elections. Republican Sen. Peter Domenici complained that Iglesias was too slow in prosecuting a political corruption case that would have helped the campaign of Rep. Heather Wilson, a Republican who eventually won a tight race.)

In 2004, President Bush beat Sen. John Kerry in New Mexico by just a single percentage point, 50 percent to 49 percent. In 2008, the state's five electoral votes are within Democratic grasp. Although that's not a lot of votes, the Democrats' near success in 2004 reflects the party's hopes of big gains throughout the Southwest and Rockies next year.

Another U.S. attorney firing was linked to efforts to stop a Democratic registration drive in Washington state. Kerry carried it in 2004, but a Republican came within 129 votes of the Democratic winner in last year's election for governor. U.S. Attorney John McKay, who was appointed by Bush, was dumped by Gonzales after Republican officials complained he would not investigate supposed registration fraud.

The Republicans' main target in New Mexico, Washington and other states is a progressive grass-roots group, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, ACORN. It has chapters in more than 100 cities engaged in organizing the poor for a living wage, improved housing, jobs, healthcare, better schools and child care.

What angers the Republicans are ACORN's voter registration efforts, mostly in poor African-American and Latino neighborhoods. In the last few years, it has registered about 500,000 voters in poor communities.

ACORN members tend to be tough and focused. They organize poor families ignored by the politicians, the big contributors and the reporters and pundits who dominate today's political dialogue. While political writers report on the so-called money primary -- the contribution competition among the top contenders -- ACORN is signing up voters in neighborhoods where the major candidates and journalists seldom venture.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: attorney general, alberto gonzales, voter registration

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ohb0b, Seattle
Posted by: ohb0b on May 2, 2007 1:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill Boyarsky didn't go far enough. In Washington State, the Republican Party Secretary of State certified the election after finding no evidence of fraud.

Next, the Republican Party sued to have the election overturned. They hand-picked the venue by filing in a rural county, with a conservative judge. The judge threw their case out of court "with prejudice;" meaning they basicly had no case.

Yet the rant-wing talk show hosts have convinced the public there was massive voter fraud, despite the lack of evidence (the only ineligible voters they were able to turn out voted Republican) and the Bush administration fires the federal prosecutor for not pursuing a case that had been thrown out of state court?

We have not seen this behavior since Nixon fired the Watergate prosecutor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The AG firing scandal is small potatoes compared to the “Bogus Bush Bio Caper.”
Posted by: HughScott on May 2, 2007 3:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On February 28, 2004, the Boston Globe ran a story headlined, “Bush Bio on Web Inflates Guard Service.”

Of all places, the exaggerated (falsified) presidential history had been inadvertently posted by someone in the White House on a U.S. State Department website -- shortly after Bush's 2001 inauguration.

Brazenly, the fabricated federal document claimed Shrub had flown ANG F102s almost SIX years when the actual time was 27 months. The text contains other misrepresentations as well -- all intentional, not typos or mistaken dictation.

For example, the bogus bio asserted that George W. spent four years helping to keep two F102s on strip alert. In truth, he was only qualified for alert duty 22 months and the last 60 days were plagued by pilot problems attributed to poor airmanship, excessive drinking and a rumored fear of flying.

So why was the phony bio written in the first place? you might wonder.

According to one case theory, in 2000, then Texas Governor Bush inflated his weekend warrior duty to make him competitive with his only viable Republican opponent, Senator John McCain, who spent five and a half years as a POW during the Vietnam War.

At the time, Bush campaign people believed his Guard records in Houston had been destroyed. That was true. However, the scoundrels didn’t know in 2000 there were duplicate documents in an Air Force depository in Colorado, which were later released to the public because of persistent Freedom of Information Act requests.

After McCain won the New Hampshire primary, he was targeted for dirty GOP campaign tricks reportedly orchestrated by Karl Rove. The scurrilous tactics worked. McCain dropped out the race and copies of the bogus bio were shredded except for the one accidentally sent to the State Department after Bush took office as a replacement for President Clinton’s history.

Republicans will argue that Bush never knew about the bogus State Department bio. However, specific details such as "two F102s on round-the-clock alert" were most likely known only by him.

Shrub also had a reputation for a fiery temper and maintaining tight management control. It is inconceivable that a member of the 2000 campaign team would risk his wrath and certain termination by publishing a false ANG record for public consumption without Governor Bush's approval.

You can bet that his innermost confidants in Austin knew about the illegal scheme, including Alberto Gonzales, Karl Rove, Dan Bartlet and Harriet Miers plus Karen Hughes, State Department propagandist and co-author of Bush's 1999 alibi autobiography, "A Charge to Keep," which claimed Shrub flew F102s in 1973 even though the Guard grounded him the year before.

Unfortunately for voters in 2004 who deserved to know about Dub-ya's phony flying history, NO other paper or media outlet in the United States carried the Boston Globe story. Why? Because the article was published on a Saturday. Back then apparently, people in the news business took weekends off instead of serving the public good.

The media’s faulure is a sore subject for me because I’m the guy who found Bush’s phony flying history, told the Globe and received credit for the scoop. To this day, I can’t help thinking if my name had been “Bob Woodward,” not only would the bogus bio have received nationwide coverage, but as a result, Al Gore would be president right now and we wouldn’t be stuck in Iraq.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption (the bogus Bush bio).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Water under the bridge, Hugh Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
Why nationwide reporting of Bush’s bogus biography would have mattered.
Posted by: HughScott on May 2, 2007 3:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 2000, besides president of the United States, then Texas Governor Bush was running for the more important position of commander-in-chief.

For the welfare of our armed forces, we the people needed to judge his fitness to serve as America's top military leader. Full disclosure of George W.’s National Guard history was and is an inalienable right paid for by U.S. soldiers, sailors and aviators who lost their lives in all past conflicts.

In the 1998 book, The Stuff of Heroes, its author, Major General William A. Cohen, USAF RES Ret., listed eight Universal Laws of Leadership. Number one was to "maintain absolute integrity."

Former Air Force Chief of Staff General Ronald R. Fogelman said in the Forward to Cohen's book that "integrity in professional relationships remained the singularly most important attribute of any leader."

Time and again, in virtually every publication written about military leadership, integrity is one of the most crucial factors to consider. Yet when reporters confronted candidate Bush about his missing Guard time, he ducked their questions and changed the subject.

Dub-ya knew his evasiveness was wrong. He was a mature adult with a history degree from Yale. But quite clearly in his selfish twisted mind, he had no choice. The 2000 election was too close to call. Disclosing his dishonorable Guard service would most certainly have caused some of the 25 million war veterans and active duty personnel to switch their support to Al Gore, who served in Vietnam and won the Bronze Star.

Despite Shrub's ability to hide his past transgressions, he still lost the popular election by 538,000 votes and only became our 43rd president after winning Florida's Electoral College with a paper-thin margin of 537 ballots. A mere 300-vote swing would have made former Army Sgt. Gore the winner.

Of the thousands of enlisted servicemen who supported Gov. Bush in the Sunshine State, how many do you suppose would have voted as Democrats after learning he had shirked his sworn military duty during the Vietnam War?

Three hundred, perhaps?

How about a slam-dunk 3,000 -- the reason Bush cheated in 2000 and did so four years later. Winning obviously meant everything to him; being an honest candidate with integrity did not.

For that reason -- exposing Devious Dub-ya to NEW AlterNet visitors daily, a patriotic duty -- I always end my comments the same way.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption (the bogus Bush bio).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vote suppression a long time GOP strategy
Posted by: robchapman on May 2, 2007 4:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vote suppression has been a long-time GOP strategy.

Their opposition to iniatives to enfranchise the poor such a motor-voter registration is well known.

The GOP have long realized that the Conservative message is by definition a minority viewpoint and only that intense polariztion of the electorate will sustain the massive turn-out of conservative voters they need to stay competitive.

The GOP realization that this polarization is unsustainable has lead them to augment polarization tactics with the suppression of African-American and white voters whose profile fits that of Democrats.

The Rove-Gonzales strategy of politicizing the US Attornies is merely the introduction of long time party tactics into the permanent government.

The GOP to use the powers of the governement to diminish and sabotage the electoral process for partisan advantage.

Robert Chapman
Lansing, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What are you trying to accomplish with this?
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on May 2, 2007 5:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everybody on Alternet already knows you're right - even Conservasaurus.

And if you convinced EVERYONE in the whole country including Laura and Barney, what good would it do at this point? Lying during a campaign, even about one's military service, doesn't create an impeachable offense later when the liar gets into office. You can't rerun the two elections. You're not doing anything to stop the war with this stuff. Give it a rest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ironic.... Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Ironic.... Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» Ouch! I ain't Cryofan & have blasted him too Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» OK, I'll take it to heart CatDad... Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
ACORN political organizer
Posted by: mariirwin on May 2, 2007 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article--just one correction: the folks who are hired to help register people in their community to vote are paid by the hour--NOT by the card.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ACORN political organizer Posted by: nathanhj1970
One more thing about the Bogus Bush Bio Caper.
Posted by: HughScott on May 2, 2007 5:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In November 2005, while researching the Internet for more ammunition against George W., I scooped the lazy sleepwalking media again by finding a duplicate phony bio on a website maintained by the prestigious nonpartisan organization, Federation of American Scientists (FAS).

I immediately sent FAS.org an email warning it about Dub-ya's false Guard history.

Rather than delete the bogus bio, the website manager left it intact below the following disclaimer:

"FAS NOTE: This U.S. State Department biographical account may not be entirely accurate, particularly with regard to the President's service record in the Texas Air National Guard."

I believe FAS.org took the contemptuous action because Bush is the first president in American history to dismiss science in favor of religious dogma -- as shown by his interference in the Terry Schiavo case, vetoing stem cell research legislation and pooh-poohing global warming.

To read the FAS disclaimer and entire bogus biography, click on FAS Bush Bio

ATTENTION journalists, historians and political pundits. The FAS copy is the ONLY one of Bush’s phony bio on the Web. You owe it to yourself to discover how grandiose is the fabricated, 4,000-word White House document before Karl Rove has it deleted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: hijacking threads Posted by: CatDad
Other U.S. Attorneys
Posted by: dmrohner on May 2, 2007 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It surprises us a little that Congress is focusing on the U.S. Attorneys who were fired. Many more resigned rather than be fired and were replaced by hand picked political hatchet men. For example, Jim Vines resigned in Tennessee and was replaced by Craig Morford. Doesn't anyone else note that Gore is likely to be a draft candidate in 2008? How Rove would relish a Tennessee White Water style pretext. Morford is a one trick pony - RICO - who has no ethical or moral scrupple about thumb screwing some simpleton like John Cafaro into "confessing" bribery of some higher level target, like Jim Traficant, to avoid jail time. It is a worry that so many of these men take oaths to the Constitution, yet give their allegiance to the political tool of the day - the road to tyranny is paved with such perfidy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It Doesn't Matter
Posted by: kbest on May 2, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
US Attorneys can be fired at any time for any reason. IT DOESN'T MATTER!!!!

NO SCANDAL HERE FOLKS!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It Doesn't Matter Posted by: surfreality
» RE: It Doesn't Matter Posted by: jontv
» RE: It Doesn't Matter Posted by: kbest
» RE: It Doesn't Matter Posted by: jontv
» RE: It Doesn't Matter Posted by: surfreality
» RE: It Doesn't Matter Posted by: jontv
» RE: It Doesn't Matter Posted by: surfreality
This is a direct assault on democracy itself
Posted by: UnEasyOne on May 2, 2007 8:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a coordinated attempt to illicitly establish a PRI (the party that ruled Mexico for 70 years) style one party system.

I have to confess that I used to naively think that Rove's "permanent Republican majority" referred to standard (with the usual rethug skullduggery) propaganda, gerrymandering, and vote stealing. This time they haven't missed a bet, from trumped up indictments in election season, voter expungement combined with non enforcement of the Voting Rights Act and "magic box" voting machines - and now this.

This is a "vast right wing conspiracy" without parallel. They have now stolen the presidency twice and god knows how many other elections. They intend to steal the whole damned country.

They have to be stopped in 08 - one way or another.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To Uneasyone: I don't blog at two a.m. to "make friends."
Posted by: HughScott on May 2, 2007 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Educating NEW AlterNet visitors about Shrub's phony Guard history is all I care about.

Furthermore, AG Gonzales is DIRECTLY connected to the Bogus Bush Bio Caper, which is a hell of a lot more important than the U.S. attorney scandal, which some of your AlterNet buddies think is no scandal at all.

As for my 2004 “PHONY FIGHTER PILOT” book, which cost me over $5,000 to self publish, I barely sell enough copies to pay my monthly GoDaddy website fee. Three years later, I'm still five grand in the hole.

Finally, how much money and time have you spent trying to stop George W.'s insane war of choice? Do you speak out at community meetings like I do? Do you belong to MoveOn.org like me and stand on street corners waving an American flag to protest the Bush administration?

Probably not. So just ignore this old fart who loves his country and get on whatever kind of selfish life you live, stealth Bushie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democrats need an avalanche in 2008
Posted by: Democritus on May 2, 2007 1:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The efforts by ACORN to register voters are vital to having the 2008 presidential election represent the wishes of the voters. In 2000 Bush won because there were thousands of votes uncounted in Florida--thanks to Republican Katherine Harris. In 2004 he won because Ohio apparently did not count the votes of thousands more. What this means is that, if the Democrats are going to win in 2008, they will have to counter what will probably be a reprise of the previous two presidential elections--voter intimidation and downright chicanery by Republican operatives. The only way to do this is to win big. ACORN scared Karl Rove and the Republicans, so they tried to throw a monkey wrench into its voter registration drive by having A.G. Gonzales fire U.S. attorneys who weren't aggressive enough in their efforts to restrict voter registration. Judging from the past, any states with close vote counts will probably be pushed into the red column by eager Republican drones. The only way to combat this is by having a very large voter turnout.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I think you're right, Mr. Scott! Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
Get Your Candidate to Sign On to Madame Karnak's Platform
Posted by: BlueTex on May 2, 2007 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope to get a blog and website up soon at the U4Pres site and an actual Madame Karnak site. I've also suggested to the producer of the film about Walmart (Robert Greenwald) that the Madame Karnak campaign would be an excellent way to begin addressing questions about what reforms are necessary to clean up the debris and detritus caused by the Bush treasonaries currently in office. Here's just a couple of the planks that candidates will have to walk to be MK-consistent candidates.

1. Any person running for office or currently in office must disclose any offshore, Swiss or other secret bank accounts in order to be able to run for office at all.

2. Candidates or incumbents for office must have an explanation for the source of their secret stashes that is consistent with their earnings and those of their spouses. Those that don't will have to surrender that money to the "Repair America Fund." (more on that fund later)

3. All MK candidates must support the FBI, the CIA, Interpol, the International Clearinghouse investigating such accounts. Those who locate such accounts will be given a 3 percent finder's fee for every account that they locate. If two agencies cooperate, they will split the fee. Candidates found to have not disclosed such accounts will be disqualified from running for office and lose their accounts. They can live on Social Security like everybody else.

4. Candidates must support a constitutional amendment banning campaign donations, because these only lead to corruption and our founding fathers heartily disapproved of any campaigning that did not consist of simply giving one's plans for the time in office. They would definitely be appalled by the lies, exaggeration, distortion and general merde' that is proferred as campaigning today. Karl Roves would become a thing of the past.

There is more to the platform, but that will be showing up when Madame Karnak announces. There will be no photos of MK as looks and personality are not nearly as important as ideas. I believe that Ghandi proved that. While this fact will bother the pundits who like to discuss who looks "Presidential," Madame Karnak does not subscribe to the Esquire School of Political Assessment. She believes in ideas and honesty. By the way, she is overweight, witty and thoughtful and she doesn't care who knows that. Madame Karnak will provide the very type of full disclosure that she believes other candidates should provide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about gonzalez?
Posted by: willymack on May 2, 2007 4:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What should an Attorney General be, above all? In my mind he (or she) should be, first and foremost, a brilliant lawyer, like John Edwards, for instance. What else? He (or she) should be honest and have have the best interests of our people in mind AT ALL TIMES, like John Edwards, for instance. So, what do we have for an AG? El Gusano, that's who, an obsequious, incompetent detriment to our best interests, as well as someone who condones torture, sidestepping Constitutional law, and illegally spying on our people, all on the taxpayers' dime. It's past time to dump the sorry little worm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOP=American Nazi Party; Voter shenanigans proof and mere tip of the iceberg
Posted by: xbj on May 3, 2007 8:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This goes far beyond mere party politics; this is fascism at its pure and finest, designed by oberfuhrer Karl Rove and others to insure there is only one Party in America, the War Profiteering Party, and that all "opposition" parties are castrated to the point of being merely for show, all involved serving at the pleasure of the ruling Party.

And I don't care what anyone says, that's TEXTBOOK NAZISM.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]